Most UK airports raise drop-off fees while many major EU hubs have no charge
Eleven out of 20 UK airports analysed by the RAC have increased so-called 'kiss and fly' charges – which are typically levied for dropping off a passenger as close to a terminal as possible – since last summer.
The nine airports which raised their fees by £1 are Belfast City, Birmingham, Bristol, Edinburgh, Gatwick, Heathrow, Liverpool John Lennon, Newcastle and Southampton.
Leeds Bradford and Glasgow both added 50p to their charges.
Cardiff, which previously had no charge, introduced a £3 fee.
Luton had no kiss and fly area last summer because of a car park fire, but now charges £5.
The RAC found there is no fee for dropping off at eight of the 10 busiest EU airports, such as Paris Charles de Gaulle, Frankfurt and Madrid airports.
RAC senior policy officer Rod Dennis said this makes increases in fees at UK airports 'all the more depressing'.
He went on: 'The sky really does seem to be the limit when it comes to the amount drivers get charged for making the briefest of stops to let friends or loved ones out to catch a flight.'
Mr Dennis said the main reason passengers get dropped off at airports is because they have bulky luggage, which means taking public transport 'can be impractical'.
He acknowledged that many UK airports offer free options for dropping passengers off in car parks which require a walk or bus ride to the terminal.
But he claimed these areas are 'often well away from the terminal' and drivers wanting to help a passenger get to the terminal will 'often end up overstaying the free period'.
Mr Dennis also expressed concern over the growing trend of airports replacing on-site payment with a barrierless system requiring payment to be made online or by phone.
'Anyone who doesn't notice the change or simply forgets to pay will inevitably be stung with a very unwelcome parking charge notice,' he added.
London City was the only UK airport analysed which allows free drop-offs outside its terminal.
Prices were frozen at Aberdeen, Belfast International, Bournemouth, East Midlands, Manchester and Stansted.
Karen Dee, chief executive of trade body AirportsUK, said: 'All airports offer a free drop-off facility. They also have a wide variety of options to suit all passengers' needs, including premium drop-off in front of the terminal building for those who wish to use that.
'Where fees are charged, this helps airports manage and reduce congestion, noise, carbon emissions and air pollution for local communities, something that they are mandated to do by the Government and local authorities.
'These charges are a part of the airport business model and help enable the provision of the widest variety of flights from the airport.'
– Here is a breakdown of charges for each airport:
£7: Bristol, Gatwick, Leeds Bradford, Southampton and Stansted.
£6: Birmingham, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Heathrow and Liverpool John Lennon.
£5.50: Aberdeen.
£5: Bournemouth, East Midlands, Luton, Manchester and Newcastle.
£4: Belfast City.
£3: Belfast International and Cardiff.
£0: London City.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Thousands of hotels in Europe to sue Booking.com over ‘abusive' practices
is facing a class-action lawsuit from more than 10,000 European hotels arguing that the accommodation mega-site used its muscle to distort the market to their detriment over a 20-year period. The Association of Hotels, Restaurants and Cafes in Europe (Hotrec), which represents the industry within the EU and is bringing the legal action, recently extended to 29 August a deadline for hotel owners to join the suit because of high demand. The lawsuit, expected to be one of the largest ever filed in the European hospitality sector, is also backed by 30 national hotel associations, including Britain's. 'Over 10,000 hotels have already joined the pan-European initiative to claim compensation for financial losses caused by use of illegal 'best price' (parity) clauses,' Hotrec said in a statement. It alleges that the 'best price' pledge on was extracted from hotels under huge pressure not to offer rooms at lower prices on other platforms, including their own websites. The hotel industry says that the Netherlands-based platform also used the clauses to prevent customers making what it called 'free-rider' bookings, which it defined as using its services to find a hotel but then booking directly with the management, cutting out 'Registration [to the legal action] continues to grow steadily, and the response so far demonstrates the hospitality industry's strong desire to stand up against unfair practices in the digital marketplace,' Hotrec said. The litigation, which experts say will be an uphill battle, seeks damages for the period from 2004 to 2024, when did away with the best price clause to comply with the EU Digital Markets Act. Hotrec said the class action, to be heard in Amsterdam, follows a European court of justice (ECJ) ruling from 2024, 'which found that parity clauses violated EU competition law'. 'European hoteliers have long suffered from unfair conditions and excessive costs. Now is the time to stand together and demand redress,' said Hotrec's president, Alexandros Vassilikos, calling out 'abusive practices in the digital market' in Europe. called Hotrec and other hotel associations' statements 'incorrect and misleading' in an emailed statement, adding that it had not received 'formal notification of a class action'. It said that the ECJ ruling did not find that 'best price' clauses were anti-competitive but 'simply stated that such clauses fall within the scope of EU competition law and that their effects must be assessed on a case-by-case basis'. The company referred to a statement about its 'commitment to fair competition', in which it argued that 'past parity clauses served to foster competitive pricing rather than restrict it'. It cited a poll in which 74% of hoteliers said made their business more profitable, with many reporting higher occupancy rates and lower customer acquisition costs. However, other industry representatives criticised the company's practices as extractive. 'As they gained control of the market, Booking was able to increase its commission rates and exert much greater pressure on hoteliers' margins,' Véronique Siegel, president of the hotels division of French hospitality sector association Umih, told public broadcaster France Inter. 'For a room that the customer pays €100 (£87) for, if you take away Booking's commission, the hotelier receives €75 at best, with which they have to pay their employees and invest.' Despite the friction, appears unavoidable for many hotels, offering an online reach and visibility hard to achieve for smaller, independent establishments. A study by Hotrec and the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland found that Booking Holding, the website's parent company, controlled 71% of the European market in 2024, compared with 68.4% in 2019. The corporation is valued at $170bn (£127bn), three times that of Volkswagen. Rupprecht Podszun, director of the institute for competition law at Düsseldorf's Heinrich Heine University, said was a classic example of how a digital platform can conquer an entire sector, creating a 'winner takes all' dynamic. He said the legal action would probably be protracted and turn on the thorny question of how damages could be measured. 'Judges will have to form an opinion and then it will go through all the appeals – everything at great expense and with all the tricks available under the law,' he told Germany's daily Süddeutsche Zeitung. 'The case is a revolt of the hotels, saying: 'You can't just do what you want with us.''
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Birmingham Airport delays continue after emergency landing closure
Passengers continue to face hours of delays following the closure of Birmingham Airport's runway, after a plane was forced to make an emergency runway was shut on Wednesday afternoon when the small aircraft returned to the airport after it's landing gear failed on a flight to remained closed for more than six hours while staff worked to remove the plane, with thousands of airline passengers stranded or runway reopened after 19:30 BST, when the plane was moved. The first flight departed shortly after, having originally been scheduled to leave at 14:10. Is Birmingham Airport open and are there delays? In a notice on its website, Birmingham Airport said it was now "operating to its normal schedule" but warned that passengers might face some residual online departures list on Thursday morning showed several flights leaving later than 05:55 BST Lufthansa flight to Frankfurt, for example, departed at 09:57, while the 06:30 TUI service to Kefalonia was estimated to take off at about 12: flights have experienced shorter delays, ranging from about 35 minutes to a couple of hours. What happened and was anyone injured? According to aircraft charter and management company, Woodgate Aviation, one of its Beechcraft fixed-wing planes developed landing gear problems on its journey to Belfast after taking off from Birmingham at 13: aircraft returned to Birmingham, landing at 13:58."The aircraft returned to Birmingham and made an emergency landing and the main undercarriage collapsed on touch down," the company confirmed two crew members and one passenger were on board but were not Midlands Police, West Midlands Fire Service and Birmingham Airport Police were among the agencies at the scene. Birmingham Airport said its teams worked as quickly as possible to move the aircraft in line with "strict protocols".A spokesperson said the protocols had to be followed to "ensure a safe reopening of the runway following a prolonged closure".Woodgate said it would co-operate fully with the Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB), which confirmed it was looking into the AAIB statement said a multi-disciplinary team of inspectors was deployed to the site. How did the incident affect passengers? With the closure lasting for more than six hours, many passengers suffered significant delays or saw their flights diverted to other least 10 flights due to depart from the airport were cancelled, while others were delayed by more than five which were due to land at Birmingham were diverted to other passengers told the BBC that their flights were cancelled "moments before boarding" on Wednesday Airport said it understood the frustration and apologised for the disruption. Faye, who was travelling with her partner and four children, said they found out about the incident on had been due to fly to Antalya in Turkey with Jet2 at 14:55. While waiting at the airport, the family was given £10 per person by the airline for food and subsequently received a text message saying the holiday had been cancelled and there would be a full refund in four to five and her family were waiting to collect their baggage, along with about 400 other people, her children "sobbing and crying"."We are stuck here waiting for our baggage and it's boiling hot... and now our kids aren't going to have a holiday," she said at the time. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Sky News
30 minutes ago
- Sky News
Aberdeen to introduce 7% 'tourist tax' on visitors
Councillors have given the green light for the introduction of a 7% visitor levy for Aberdeen. The "tourist tax" will not come into force until at least April 2027, but it is expected to generate millions of pounds a year that will be reinvested back into the city. The charge for overnight stays will apply to paid accommodation, including hotels, B&Bs, hostels, guest houses, camping sites, caravan parks, and vessels that are permanently or predominantly situated in one place. Cruise ships and motor homes will be exempt from the levy, as well as those in receipt of disability payments. A report to Aberdeen City Council's finance and resources committee said that with the average hotel room costing about £70, the levy would cost an extra £4.90 per night. On that basis, the new charge could generate up to £6.8m a year. Funds raised will be put towards projects that help enhance leisure and business tourism in the city. The committee approved the levy on Wednesday. It will bring Aberdeen in line with other visitor hot spots, including Venice, Barcelona, Amsterdam and New York. Councillor Alex McLellan, committee convener, said: "The income generated from the visitor levy, paid by those visiting the city, will provide a huge boost to our local economy and allow us to invest in bringing major events and conferences here on a more regular basis. "Across Europe we are paying similar amounts to stay per night subsidising their thriving economies, and we should do the same to ensure we can compete in terms of attracting both business and leisure tourism to Aberdeen." The levy comes after Holyrood last year passed legislation giving councils across Scotland the ability to introduce such a charge. Both Edinburgh and Glasgow have approved a 5% levy on overnight stays in hotels, short-term lets and B&Bs. Edinburgh's tourist tax will come into force from 24 July 2026, while Glasgow's will follow on 25 January 2027. Stephen Gow, chair of VisitAberdeenshire, said: "A well-managed scheme that supports the aims of the region's destination strategy will drive continued growth of Aberdeen's visitor economy. "Aberdeen welcomed 2.2 million overnight visits in 2024, contributing to an economic impact from tourism of over £500m. "The headroom for growth in the leisure and conference sectors will be fulfilled through effective investment in promotion, events, and development of the tourism sector."
