logo
Kaipara council's $52,000 Māori report slammed as 'anti-Māori'

Kaipara council's $52,000 Māori report slammed as 'anti-Māori'

RNZ Newsa day ago
Kaipara Mayor Craig Jepson.
Photo:
NZME
Kaipara District Council has spent an unplanned $52,000 producing a document which attempts to spell out what legal obligations the local authority has to Māori.
Mayor Craig Jepson claimed the document would serve as a guide for staff, councillors and the public, clarifying obligations and potentially saving the council money in the future.
But one councillor has described the paper as "actively anti-Māori" while another deemed it "bulls...."
The unbudgeted 127-page document was produced by Wellington law firm Franks Ogilvie and formally adopted in late July by a narrow 5:4 vote. Legal advice around local government law change that the firm gave to Hobson's Pledge, a group known for lobbying against co-governance, is included.
Kaipara District Council chief executive Jason Marris commissioned the report following direction from the council's remuneration and development committee, which oversees his performance and is chaired by Mayor Jepson.
Marris said he had not received committee direction on how the document should be used with staff but would now consider its implications.
Cr Eryn Wilson-Collins asked whether staff would be required to follow the Māori interaction ceilings outlined in the document, rather than anything more than that..
"There are many questions around its purpose and where it will go from here," she said.
She added that while there was currently no formal direction, she feared the document would serve as the ceiling for council dealings with Māori.
The document was developed as a single point of reference, summarising and explaining council obligations-or lack thereof-to Māori under various laws and frameworks.
These include the Treaty of Waitangi, principles of the Treaty, the Local Government Act 2022, Resource Management Act 1991, Māori Language Act 2016, New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Mayor Jepson said the document could serve councils around the country.
"There had not been a single source of information around this previously," Jepson said.
"It provides an opportunity for other councils around New Zealand to follow."
Kaipara District Council at its 2022 swearing in ceremony in Dargaville.
Photo:
Susan Botting / LDR
The Jepson-chaired remuneration and development committee's members-Deputy Mayor Jonathan Larsen and councillors Mike Howard, Gordon Lambeth and Rachael Williams-voted to adopt the document.
Cr Mike Howard said the document was worthwhile because it addressed actual legal obligations rather than misinterpretations.
However, Cr Wilson-Collins described it as "embarrassing" and said she looked forward to a new council after the upcoming elections.
She said community feedback showed concern about ratepayer money being spent on a document that was divisive and politically charged.
"There are a lot of questions that the community have raised with me around the framing of the document," she said.
Wilson-Collins said the document falsely claimed councils were not part of the Crown and therefore had no real Treaty of Waitangi duties, only those narrowly imposed by statute.
"This is false and misleading," she said.
"While councils are not the Crown in the constitutional sense, courts and the Waitangi Tribunal have repeatedly said Crown obligations can extend to councils where powers or functions are delegated."
Te Moananui o Kaipara Māori ward councillor Pera Paniora said the report was "bullsh*t" and an echo chamber of the political positions of some councillors.
She said committee members Jepson, Larsen, Howard, Lambeth and Williams, who had worked on its genesis, should have paid for it themselves.
Eryn Wilson-Collins.
Photo:
Susan Botting / LDR
Several councillors opposing the adoption attempted to pause the meeting vote to allow time for an information briefing, in line with normal council process.
Cr Mark Vincent questioned the motives of those pushing for adoption at the meeting without that step.
"We need to give it proper consideration," Cr Vincent said.
Deputy Mayor Larsen said a briefing could happen, after the document had been adopted.
Cr Wilson-Collins said the document undermined the Treaty of Waitangi as a constitutional document, treating it more like a political courtesy.
She said the document denied councils had Treaty obligations, claimed Māori had no right to consultation or outcomes, and framed participation as a burden.
"This is disrespectful to local mana whenua," she said.
"It said mana whenua mandates had no statutory basis."
Cr Wilson-Collins said this was a complete dismissal of local hapū and iwi rights, with existing obligations spun as optional.
She said the document repeatedly reinforced the idea that council's obligation was to general community democracy, as if that were incompatible with upholding Māori rights.
It referred to the Waitangi Tribunal as non-binding and nearly irrelevant to council operations.
Cr Wilson-Collins said the report was politically biased and echoed rhetoric from NZ First, ACT, and anti-co-governance narratives.
"I'm ashamed and embarrassed that would be the case," she said.
The council's law firm Simpson Grierson peer-reviewed the document.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nationwide pro-Palestinian protests call on government to sanction Israel
Nationwide pro-Palestinian protests call on government to sanction Israel

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Nationwide pro-Palestinian protests call on government to sanction Israel

Photo: RNZ / Mary Argue Protesters across the country are calling on the government to place sanctions on Israel for its war in Gaza. This week the government announced it is considering whether to join other countries like France, Canada and Australia in recognising Palestinian statehood at a UN leader's meeting next month. But critics say the move is long overdue. Protesters have taken to the streets in about 20 cities and towns, waving flags, holding vigils, and banging pots and pans to represent what a United Nations-backed food security agency has called "the worst case scenario of famine". Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Rights Aotearoa: Minister's Ban On Te Reo Māori In Year-1 Readers Breaches New Zealand's Human Rights Obligations
Rights Aotearoa: Minister's Ban On Te Reo Māori In Year-1 Readers Breaches New Zealand's Human Rights Obligations

Scoop

time6 hours ago

  • Scoop

Rights Aotearoa: Minister's Ban On Te Reo Māori In Year-1 Readers Breaches New Zealand's Human Rights Obligations

Rights Aotearoa condemns the Education Minister Erica Stanford's decision to exclude Māori words from new Ready to Read Phonics Plus books for five-year-olds (except for character names). This directive, confirmed in Ministry documents and ministerial comments, represents a retrogressive step that undermines children's cultural rights and New Zealand's international and domestic legal commitments. On a prima facie view, the policy conflicts with at least five UN instruments New Zealand has ratified. First, ICCPR Article 27 protects linguistic minorities' right to use their own language and, per the Human Rights Committee's General Comment No. 23, requires positive measures by the State to safeguard that right. A blanket removal of te reo Māori from foundational readers sits squarely at odds with that obligation. Second, ICESCR Articles 13 and 15, read with the Committee's General Comment No. 21, require States to make cultural life accessible and to refrain from measures that restrict participation—especially for minorities and indigenous peoples. Stripping Māori vocabulary from early-years materials narrows access to culture in the very context where language attitudes are formed. Third, the Convention on the Rights of the Child obliges that education foster respect for a child's own cultural identity, language, and values (Article 29(1)(c)) and protects indigenous and minority children's right to use their language (Article 30). The directive is difficult to reconcile with those aims. Fourth, CERD (and General Recommendation No. 23) calls for active measures to preserve and promote indigenous languages. A rule that singles out Māori words for exclusion from standard resources risks indirect discrimination and runs counter to that guidance. Fifth, the UNESCO Convention against Discrimination in Education prohibits distinctions based on language that impair equality of treatment in education and recognises minorities' right to use and teach their own language. Domestically, the directive cuts against NZBORA s 20 (rights of linguistic minorities) and the Māori Language Act 2016, which affirms te reo Māori as a taonga and an official language and requires a Crown strategy (Maihi Karauna) to revitalise and normalise its use across public life. Schools are also required to give effect to Te Tiriti o Waitangi under the Education and Training Act 2020. Paul Thistoll, Chief Executive of Rights Aotearoa, said: 'Language visibility in a child's first readers is not a matter of taste; it is a matter of rights. Removing te reo Māori from Year-1 books is a legally retrogressive measure that marginalises indigenous language in mainstream schooling and undermines New Zealand's binding commitments at home and abroad. The minister is engaging in cultural suppression.' Rights Aotearoa calls for the following immediate actions: 1. Rescind the directive and confirm that Māori words will continue to appear in all new early-literacy readers as appropriate to context and pedagogy; 2. Release the relevant Ministry papers in full and consult with Māori education stakeholders, literacy experts, and the Māori Language Commission; 3. Align early-literacy resources with obligations under ICCPR, ICESCR, CRC, CERD, the UNESCO Convention against Discrimination in Education, NZBORA, the Māori Language Act, and the Education and Training Act.

Dr Robert Patman on Israel and Palestine
Dr Robert Patman on Israel and Palestine

RNZ News

time7 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Dr Robert Patman on Israel and Palestine

A series of rallies and vigils are being held around the country today in a 'national day of action' planned by Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa. It comes in a week where Israel launched attacks on Gaza City and killed five Al-Jazeera journalists in a targeted strike. Green co-leader Chloe Swarbrick was suspended from parliament after saying MPs could "grow a spine" and support her bill which would impose sanctions on Israel. While Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had 'lost the plot' after launching a take-over of Gaza City. Otago University Professor of International Relations, Dr Robert Patman speaks to Mihingarangi Forbes. Palestinians queue to fill up on drinking water in the sweltering heat in the Mawasi area of Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip on 12 August, 2025. Photo: AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store