
Before Easter became a holy day, it was the beginning of the Resistance
The governor had heard reports the cult followed an obscure criminal who had been tortured and executed by the Romans. His followers, though, believed that their leader was still somehow alive. They met in each others' homes for communal meals where, rumor had it, they practiced cannibalism by drinking the blood of their leader and held orgies.
The governor became even more puzzled when he summoned two leaders from the cult for interrogation. He wrote about the encounter.
'I believe it all the more necessary to find out the truth from two slave women, whom they call deaconesses, even by torture,' he wrote to the Roman Emperor Trajan.' I found nothing but depraved and immoderate superstition.'
He assured Trajan that he had deployed the firm hand of Rome to halt the 'contagion.' The governor, Pliny the Younger, would go on to some renown. He would write additional letters that gave historians crucial insight into the Roman Empire. And he would provide a harrowing first-person account of the volcanic eruption that buried the city of Pompeii.
But he would miss the seismic religious shift that literally stared him in the face. The obscure cult would become the dominant faith in Rome and the most widely practiced religion in the world. The cross, an instrument of torture used by the Roman government to publicly lynch political revolutionaries, would 'come to serve as the most globally recognized symbol of a god that there has ever been,' according to the scholar Tom Holland, in his book, 'Dominion: How the Christian Revolution remade the World.'
This improbable rise of Christianity is what many of the world's estimated 2 billion Christians will celebrate today. The holiest day of the Christian calendar commemorates what Christians believe is the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, symbolized by the empty tomb.
But the miracle of Easter didn't end there. What happened across Rome in the years that followed was in some ways just as astonishing. Before Christianity became a religion, it was the Resistance — a poor people's campaign that began in a Roman backwater, took on one of the most ruthless and militaristic empires in world history, and won.
How did the first Christians do it? And what can today's resistance movements facing tyrannical regimes learn from their success?
This is not a typical Easter sermon topic. The Easter miracle, though, cannot be explained exclusively through a spiritual lens. It's also a story of power — about people who seemed to have none but rose up to defeat an empire.
The first Christians faced challenges that would be familiar to anyone in authoritarian states or failing democracies today. They lived in a political system where a predatory elite amassed almost all the wealth. They faced a repressive regime that used fear to silence internal critics and enforce conformity. They faced the prospect of being arbitrarily arrested without due process and whisked off to prison or disappeared.
The early Christians faced a government that had perfected a form of proactive brutality that made political change seem impossible, says Obery M. Hendricks, a social activist and author of 'The Politics of Jesus.' When the Romans heard that a group of demonstrators had assembled near Jesus' hometown of Nazareth to protest excessive taxation, they deployed their own version of shock and awe.
'Roman legions came in and killed folks, crucifying 3,000 of them,' Hendricks says. 'These people weren't doing anything violent. They were just protesting. But the Roman empire said, no, we don't play that. They killed folks if they thought they might be a threat.'
And yet these first Christians still triumphed. The conventional Easter story says they beat the Romans because of their beliefs and courage. That is partially true. Christians preached a message of 'God is love,' which tapped into a spiritual need that Rome's pagan religions could not meet.
But they also shrewdly employed two lesser-known tactics that offer lessons for resistance movements today — whether these movements identify with the left, the right or somewhere in between.
The Romans' capacity for cruelty created an opening for dissident movements. They committed the mistake that tyrannical leaders often commit — they overreached. They were too callous to deliver tangible economic benefits to most of their citizens. The Christian movement stepped into this compassion gap and used it as a wedge to amass power.
It's hard to imagine today how awful life was for most people in ancient Rome. If you watch Hollywood's sword-and-sandal movies of the 1950s and 1960s, Rome seemed filled with clean streets and well-scrubbed citizens. But life in places where Christianity took root was miserable, according to Rodney Stark, author of 'The Rise of Christianity,' one of the most influential books about the faith's early years.
Most people in Roman cities lived in 'filth beyond our imagining,' Stark wrote. They shared smoky, dark spaces with limited water and means of sanitation. Human corpses — even infants — were abandoned in the streets. The smell of sweat, urine and feces permeated everything.
'The stench of these cities must have been overpowering for many miles — especially in warm weather — and even the richest Romans must have suffered,' writes Stark, who died in 2022. 'No wonder they were so fond of incense.'
A tiny elite controlled virtually all the wealth and political power. Most people lived one financial emergency away from irreversible doom. In rural areas, it was not uncommon for people to die of starvation from famines or a bad harvest.
There was no Medicaid in ancient Rome. The average life expectancy was about 35 years, due to high rates of infant mortality. Many of those that lived suffered chronic health conditions, including 'swollen eyes, skin rashes and lost limbs,' Stark recounts.
The first Christians offered what was arguably Rome's first social safety net. When epidemics swept through the cities and many leaders and wealthy citizens fled to the countryside, they stayed behind to nurse the ill and the dying. In time, Christians would establish orphanages, hospitals and food-delivery systems.
The Roman world was full of stories of pagan gods rising from the dead, but the compassion Christians displayed was new.
'There was nothing like a welfare state in Rome,' Andrew Crislip, a historian and an authority on early Christianity, tells CNN. 'Even doctors in time of plagues would get out of town. One of the principles of ancient medicine was if a patient appears to be hopeless, do not treat (them). Christians did not have such compunction. They were willing to treat the hopeless.'
These early Christians also offered a different economic model. They collected money for the poor and eventually established poorhouses. And in the New Testament's Book of Acts, which recounts the rise of the church, they redistributed their wealth.
'All the believers were one in heart and mind,' says Acts 4:32. 'No one claimed that any of their possessions was their own, but they shared everything they had.'
These Christians followed the adage, 'First bread, then religion.' Their willingness to meet the physical and economic needs of the people gave them credibility.
Scot McKnight, a biblical scholar and host of the podcast 'Kingdom Roots,' says the first Christians formed 'a socio-economic community of justice,' inspired by Jesus. His first public sermon in the Gospel of Luke was about economic justice, or 'good news to the poor.' Jesus routinely criticized wealthy people who were indifferent to the poor. He stood in the tradition of Jewish prophets who condemned greed and evoked the concept of 'Jubilee,' a tradition from Leviticus 25 in which kings freed slaves and forgave debts to prevent perpetual cycles of poverty and promote social justice.
McKnight sees echoes of the first church's message in a modern-day socialist: Bernie Sanders, the independent senator from Vermont who has been drawing huge crowds across the US on his current 'Fighting Oligarchy' tour. Sanders has long condemned the gap between the haves and have-nots in America, and political analysts say his message resonates now because he's tapped into mounting anger over wealth disparities.
'Bernie's quest for justice is an inherently Biblical view,' says McKnight, author of 'The Jesus Creed.' 'The prophets of Israel — Jesus, the early church in Jerusalem, even (the apostle) Paul — all believed in economic justice.'
Hollywood movies propagated another myth about early Christians: that relentless persecution by Rome fanned their growth. In this telling, the blood of Christian martyrs facing lions rather than renouncing their faith eventually transformed the Roman empire.
There's no doubt that Roman persecution was a factor in the growth of the church. But historians say Rome's violent persecution of Christians was sporadic, and the number of martyrs has been exaggerated.
There was another factor that helped Christianity spread. Its leaders disarmed one of the major weapons tyrants use to crush resistance movements.
Repressive regimes don't just instill fear in people — they also breed indifference. People check out of civic involvement. They stop following the news or politics. They don't talk about their beliefs with family or friends because they're afraid of informers or because they don't believe it will make a difference.
This is the atmosphere that Vladimir Putin has instilled in Russia through the manipulation of information via state-controlled media. People don't know what to believe, so they don't believe in anything.
But support from friends and family can offer an antidote to fear and apathy — for early Christians, and for others throughout history.
This is what James Zwerg, a civil rights activist, discovered when he was attacked by a White mob in 1961 at an Alabama bus station. The photograph of a bloodied Zwerg, standing next to the late John Lewis, the congressman and legendary activist, became a rallying cry for the civil rights movement. Zwerg says he couldn't have endured the beating without the friendships he developed with people like Lewis.
'Each of us was stronger because of those we were with,' Zwerg recounted in 'Children of the Movement,' my book about the children of prominent figures of the civil rights era. 'If I was beaten, I knew I wasn't alone. I could endure more because I knew everybody there was giving me their strength. Even as someone else was being beaten, I would give them strength.'
It may be hard to believe today, but Christianity was once considered a form of social deviancy. Many Romans thought Christians were ridiculous or dangerous. A major reason why the faith ultimately triumphed in Rome is that many people were motivated by the same sentiments that ultimately power resistance movements everywhere: personal loyalty to friends and family.
Many people didn't join the movement because of its doctrinal appeal alone. They joined because their family or friends reached out to them. Stark writes that for many early Christians, joining the faith was 'not about seeking or embracing a theology; it was about bringing one's religious behavior into alignment with that one one's friends and family members.'
The first Christians also offered believers an array of personal relationships that were previously unseen in their world. Rome was a society divided by entrenched ethnic, racial and class divisions. But early Christians largely erased these hierarchies. Greeks, Jews, Romans — rich and poor — all worshipped together in homes and built close relationships with one another. They accepted women as leaders and — shockingly at the time — treated slaves as human beings of inherent worth.
Slaves were so despised in the ancient world that 'Roman men no more hesitated to use slaves and prostitutes to relieve themselves of their sexual needs than they did to use the side of a road as a toilet,' Holland, the historian, writes in 'Dominion.'
'In Latin, the same word, meio, meant both ejaculate and urinate,' Holland writes.
Unlike today, when some activists reject allies who don't fit all their ideological requirements, early Christians practiced coalition building. They appealed to as many people as they could.
'Christians spread because believed their religion was universal,' says Crislip, the historian who teaches at Virginia Commonwealth University. 'Most other religions did not want to proselytize. They didn't attempt to covert other people to their way of life. Christians from the beginning said this is a religion that is radically inclusive — a way of life for everyone.'
After years of employing these strategies, the Christians' movement grew so popular and entrenched in Rome that political leaders discovered they couldn't get rid of it. It became a force for social stability, not dissent. A pivotal moment came when the emperor Constantine legalized Christianity and used the might of the Roman empire to give it institutional support. He became the first Roman emperor to convert to Christianity.
Something was lost, though, when the Christian resistance triumphed.
Scholars say the church won, in part, because its leaders eventually softened their message of resistance. Salvation became solely about the afterlife instead of deliverance from oppressive conditions on earth.
Crislip says the church eventually promoted 'more quietism and compliance' in Rome. In time, the church itself became oppressive, giving us the Inquisition and leaders who sanctioned slavery.
And yet for millions, the miracle of Easter continues to inspire. For many, it means that 'The Caesars among us don't get the final word,' Andrew Thayer, an episcopal priest, wrote in a recent essay.
History didn't record the names of the two young women who were interrogated by Pliny the Younger. Most historians assume they were executed because they would not recant. But their courage lives on. We still talk about them today. They embodied one of the most overlooked elements of the Easter story:
The Easter miracle isn't confined to an empty tomb. In some ways, the greatest miracle is what started the day after.
John Blake is a CNN senior writer and author of the award-winning memoir, 'More Than I Imagined: What a Black Man Discovered About the White Mother He Never Knew.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
41 minutes ago
- New York Times
Hong Kong Officials Harden Their Stance on ‘Soft Resistance'
The Hong Kong authorities have a new favorite buzzword: 'soft resistance.' The phrase, which is used to describe anything seen as covertly subversive or insidiously defiant against the government, is showing up in news reports, speeches by top officials, and warnings from government departments. Officials and propaganda organs have warned of the threat of possible 'soft resistance' in a book fair, music lyrics, a U.S. holiday celebration and environmental groups. The term and its widespread official use reflect the political climate of a city that has been transformed since Beijing imposed a national security law in 2020, after quashing mass pro-democracy demonstrations in 2019. Protests disappeared, and the political opposition was largely dismantled by the yearslong crackdown that followed. Now, with such 'hard resistance' held at bay, the authorities appear to be targeting what they see as the next threat: subtler, inconspicuous expressions of discontent. Officials have warned that Hong Kong continues to be threatened by foreign forces, led by the United States, that seek to destabilize Hong Kong in order to block China's rise. To the authorities, 'soft resistance' is nothing short of a national security threat, and at least a dozen senior officials have used the term in recent weeks. Warning signs include messaging that is deemed to be critical of the government or sympathetic to the opposition or to protesters, whom the authorities have described as rioters or terrorists. 'Soft resistance is real and lurks in various places,' John Lee, the city's leader, warned in June. He cited the threat of unspecified forces that 'don't want our country to prosper and become stronger,' saying that such actors had planted agents in Hong Kong to undermine stability. Mr. Lee pointed to what he described as an attempt to turn public opinion in the city against organ donations, after Hong Kong and mainland China started exploring establishing a system for doing so across their border. In 2024, after thousands of people appeared to withdraw from the organ donation system, two people in Hong Kong were sentenced to prison, accused of using fake registrations and cancellations to create the illusion that there was widespread opposition to the system. The term 'soft resistance' is being used so widely that Hong Kong's justice secretary, Paul Lam, felt the need to explain it officially for the first time, in late June. He told local media that it referred to using false or misleading information to incite the public, or to cause people to have a 'wrong understanding' of the government. But he also said that the term was hard to define, and that 'soft resistance' was not necessarily illegal. The phrase was first coined by Beijing's representative to Hong Kong in 2021. It was revived by another high-ranking Beijing official in June, at a celebration of the fifth anniversary of the imposition of the national security law. As part of the term's current resurgence, a major Hong Kong broadcaster aired a series of episodes that repeatedly warned against 'soft resistance,' pointing to perceived threats like a children's book that portrayed the police as wolves. The education secretary said that public schools had been warned against letting teachers and students participate in a U.S. Consulate Independence Day event, over concerns about 'soft resistance.' But even some within the pro-Beijing establishment are expressing concern that the government's campaign risks stifling expression and hurting the economy. Ronny Tong, a prominent legal figure and member of the Executive Council, a top advisory cabinet, said in an interview that the government's response to the U.S. Consulate event appeared to be 'overdoing it a little bit.' He said that even the word 'resistance' was excessive when applied to a minority of people who were unhappy with the government, whom he said should be dealt with using 'soft measures, not strong words.' Prominent business figures with ties to the government say that the repeated emphasis on perceived security threats is undercutting more urgent efforts to attract foreign investment and preserve the city's image as a global hub. 'We, Hong Kong's pro-establishment, must clearly understand what the top priority is — national security or the economy, that's in itself contradictory,' David Tai Chong Lie-A-Cheong, a Hong Kong businessman and a member of an advisory body to Beijing, said in an interview. 'When officials are constantly saying that Hong Kong is not safe, would you invest here?' asked Mr. Lie-A-Cheong, a former chairman of the Hong Kong France Business Partnership, a semiofficial group that promoted trade with France. He said that foreign business groups were having a hard time understanding the direction of Hong Kong's policies. Mr. Lie-A-Cheong described the situation in Hong Kong as 'heart-wrenching' and said: 'As a pro-establishment member for decades, I feel we have failed our jobs.' To businessmen like Lew Mon-hung, who was also in the same advisory body to Beijing, the government should prioritize economic development and improving people's livelihoods. He said that people had complained to him about financial difficulties, as the city's property, retail and service sectors have suffered in recent years. Instead, 'they are focusing on opposing so-called 'soft resistance',' Mr. Lew said. The approach was fueling concerns among Hong Kongers about the future of 'One Country, Two Systems,' he said, citing a policy meant to protect the city's autonomy under Chinese rule, including the freedoms of speech, press and publication. 'Everyone is asking whether they're trying to bring a Cultural Revolution approach to Hong Kong,' he added, referring to a movement in the 1960s and '70s to purge elements deemed disloyal to Communist Party orthodoxy. (Mr. Lew said he himself had fled China during that period by swimming across to Hong Kong, which was then a British colony.) That sense of ideological zeal appeared to be mirrored in Beijing-controlled media in Hong Kong, which have lauded crackdowns on what they portrayed as hidden threats. In July, the Wen Wei Po newspaper published a front-page article that said an independent book fair was 'full of 'soft-resistance' intentions,' pointing to 'anti-China and destabilizing Hong Kong' books at the event. Some even see environmental activism as a potential hotbed of political opposition. The city's development secretary, speaking to the Wen Wei Po in June, said that some criticism of government's moves to dismantle environmental protections, in an effort to reclaim land around the city's iconic Victoria Harbour, could be regarded as 'soft resistance.' She accused one organization, which she did not name, of 'deliberate provocations.' Not long after, a 30-year-old group dedicated to protecting the harbor disbanded.


Boston Globe
9 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Oklahoma will test some incoming teachers with ‘America-first' exam
Advertisement 'We're not bringing in woke indoctrinators into the classroom,' Walters told The Washington Post on Monday, adding, 'It's a very America-first approach.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Walters has courted controversy for previous efforts to shape Oklahoma's schools, including distributing Bibles in classrooms and backing a proposal to teach high-schoolers that there were 'discrepancies' in the 2020 election. He supported the unsuccessful effort to create the nation's first public religious charter school in Oklahoma that culminated in a deadlocked Supreme Court ruling in May. Walters told the education board that its members will not have a chance to review the test for teacher candidates before it is implemented. Chris Van Denhende, a board member, asked Walters in July to ensure the policy 'passes legal muster.' Advertisement 'It sounds like we're on the edge,' Van Denhende said. The requirement went into effect over the summer, Walters said, but the test is being finalized. Applicants from New York and California receive a notice that they will not be accepted until they complete the exam, once it is ready. Walters said he hoped the exam would be released 'soon.' The Oklahoma State Department of Education shared five sample questions from the multiple-choice test Monday, covering topics such as the Constitution and the makeup of Congress. Oklahoma already requires new teachers to take a US citizenship test, which covers civics topics, to complete their certification. Walters said the test for California and New York teachers would also focus on 'the biological differences between the two genders.' Some sample questions from the exam: 1. What are the first three words of the Constitution? A. In God We Trust B. Life, Liberty, Happiness C. The United States D. We the People 2. Why is freedom of religion important to America's identity? A. It makes Christianity the national religion B. It bans all forms of public worship C. It limits religious teaching in public life D. It protects religious choice from government control 3. What are the two parts of the U.S. Congress? A. House of Lords and Commons B. Courts and Senate C. Executive and Legislative D. Senate and House of Representatives 4. How many U.S. Senators are there? A. 435 B. 110 C. 50 D. 100 5. Why do some states have more Representatives than others? A. They cover a larger geographic area B. They have held statehood for a longer period C. The number is determined by military presence Advertisement D. Representation is determined by population size - Oklahoma State Department of Education Applicants will have to answer all 50 questions correctly to qualify. Walters said the test is 'common sense' and 'straightforward.' While the requirement is aimed at teaching applicants from California and New York, Walters said he would consider expanding the test to applicants from other blue states. Cari Elledge, president of the Oklahoma Education Association, which represents the state's school employees, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. She told USA Today that the move is a 'political stunt to grab attention,' adding that inserting politics into the state's teacher screenings could harm morale and turn away good educators. The union told its members in a July letter that Walters 'has no legal authority to vet certified teachers based on political ideology' because state law requires Oklahoma to recognize out-of-state teaching credentials, USA Today reported. Walters said he is prepared for the teacher test to face legal challenges. The move deepens PragerU's influence in state education. The nonprofit, which produces videos promoting conservative views of history, race, sex, and gender, has secured partnerships with at least five states to allow their content to be optional teaching material in public schools.


UPI
11 hours ago
- UPI
Oklahoma ads 'America first' teacher test for some new applicants
The U.S. Department of Education Headquarters is seen in Washington, D.C. The Oklahoma superintendent of education has created a test for teachers from New York and California applying to teach in his state. File Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo Aug. 19 (UPI) -- Oklahoma plans to screen teachers from New York and California applying to work in the state with a new test to determine their views on a range of topics regarding their political ideology. Teachers from the two Democratic-leaning states will be required to provide approved answers to 50 multiple-choice questions on topics such as the the U.S. government, gender, religion and gender to teach in the state. Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters, who announced the test requirement said New York and California have teaching standards that are "antithetical" to Oklahoma's. Teachers from New York or California who want jobs in Oklahoma will now have to take a special test to prove that they are not "woke indoctrinators." "We're not bringing in woke indoctrinators into the classroom," Walters told The Washington Post on Monday. "It's a very America-first approach." Walters told the education board that its members won't get to review the test for teacher candidates before it is implemented. Board member Chris Van Denhende asked Walters in July to ensure the policy "passes legal muster." "It sounds like we're on the edge," Van Denhende said. PragerU, a conservative non-profit, not a university, helped develop the multiple-choice test. Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, told USA Today the test is going to be a "huge turnoff" for teachers. "Ryan Walters appears to be trying out for MAGA-in-chief, not educator-in-chief, because everything that he's doing is about the culture wars, not about the reading, writing and arithmetic," Weingarten said. "If he wants to be MAGA-in-chief then go be MAGA in chief. But let someone else be educator-in-chief and focus on other things people deserve, which is reading, literacy, and wraparound services -- and actual teachers who want to be in Oklahoma." Teachers' unions say it could make the state's teacher shortage worse because it would discourage applicants. And, Oklahoma's public education system for K-12 students ranks last, according to a study by WalletHub. In October 2024, Walters put out a call to purchase 55,000 Bibles, but they had to be leather-bound and have the U.S. founding documents in them, like the Trump Bible. He forced high-school teachers to teach students that there were "discrepancies" in the 2020 election. He also supported the unsuccessful effort to create the country's first public religious charter school in Oklahoma, but it caused a deadlocked Supreme Court ruling in May. "You're not gonna lie to kids about the influences Christianity had on American history," he told the New York Post on Friday, adding, "We want you to teach history appropriately." He also told the Post that the test is meant to ensure no one teaches "radical woke gender theory that goes against biology and science."