
Before Easter became a holy day, it was the beginning of the Resistance
In the year 112, a Roman governor in modern-day Turkey had his first encounter with members of a strange religious cult called 'Christiani.'
The governor had heard reports the cult followed an obscure criminal who had been tortured and executed by the Romans. His followers, though, believed that their leader was still somehow alive. They met in each others' homes for communal meals where, rumor had it, they practiced cannibalism by drinking the blood of their leader and held orgies.
The governor became even more puzzled when he summoned two leaders from the cult for interrogation. He wrote about the encounter.
'I believe it all the more necessary to find out the truth from two slave women, whom they call deaconesses, even by torture,' he wrote to the Roman Emperor Trajan.' I found nothing but depraved and immoderate superstition.'
He assured Trajan that he had deployed the firm hand of Rome to halt the 'contagion.' The governor, Pliny the Younger, would go on to some renown. He would write additional letters that gave historians crucial insight into the Roman Empire. And he would provide a harrowing first-person account of the volcanic eruption that buried the city of Pompeii.
But he would miss the seismic religious shift that literally stared him in the face. The obscure cult would become the dominant faith in Rome and the most widely practiced religion in the world. The cross, an instrument of torture used by the Roman government to publicly lynch political revolutionaries, would 'come to serve as the most globally recognized symbol of a god that there has ever been,' according to the scholar Tom Holland, in his book, 'Dominion: How the Christian Revolution remade the World.'
This improbable rise of Christianity is what many of the world's estimated 2 billion Christians will celebrate today. The holiest day of the Christian calendar commemorates what Christians believe is the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, symbolized by the empty tomb.
But the miracle of Easter didn't end there. What happened across Rome in the years that followed was in some ways just as astonishing. Before Christianity became a religion, it was the Resistance — a poor people's campaign that began in a Roman backwater, took on one of the most ruthless and militaristic empires in world history, and won.
How did the first Christians do it? And what can today's resistance movements facing tyrannical regimes learn from their success?
This is not a typical Easter sermon topic. The Easter miracle, though, cannot be explained exclusively through a spiritual lens. It's also a story of power — about people who seemed to have none but rose up to defeat an empire.
The first Christians faced challenges that would be familiar to anyone in authoritarian states or failing democracies today. They lived in a political system where a predatory elite amassed almost all the wealth. They faced a repressive regime that used fear to silence internal critics and enforce conformity. They faced the prospect of being arbitrarily arrested without due process and whisked off to prison or disappeared.
The early Christians faced a government that had perfected a form of proactive brutality that made political change seem impossible, says Obery M. Hendricks, a social activist and author of 'The Politics of Jesus.' When the Romans heard that a group of demonstrators had assembled near Jesus' hometown of Nazareth to protest excessive taxation, they deployed their own version of shock and awe.
'Roman legions came in and killed folks, crucifying 3,000 of them,' Hendricks says. 'These people weren't doing anything violent. They were just protesting. But the Roman empire said, no, we don't play that. They killed folks if they thought they might be a threat.'
And yet these first Christians still triumphed. The conventional Easter story says they beat the Romans because of their beliefs and courage. That is partially true. Christians preached a message of 'God is love,' which tapped into a spiritual need that Rome's pagan religions could not meet.
But they also shrewdly employed two lesser-known tactics that offer lessons for resistance movements today — whether these movements identify with the left, the right or somewhere in between.
The Romans' capacity for cruelty created an opening for dissident movements. They committed the mistake that tyrannical leaders often commit — they overreached. They were too callous to deliver tangible economic benefits to most of their citizens. The Christian movement stepped into this compassion gap and used it as a wedge to amass power.
It's hard to imagine today how awful life was for most people in ancient Rome. If you watch Hollywood's sword-and-sandal movies of the 1950s and 1960s, Rome seemed filled with clean streets and well-scrubbed citizens. But life in places where Christianity took root was miserable, according to Rodney Stark, author of 'The Rise of Christianity,' one of the most influential books about the faith's early years.
Most people in Roman cities lived in 'filth beyond our imagining,' Stark wrote. They shared smoky, dark spaces with limited water and means of sanitation. Human corpses — even infants — were abandoned in the streets. The smell of sweat, urine and feces permeated everything.
'The stench of these cities must have been overpowering for many miles — especially in warm weather — and even the richest Romans must have suffered,' writes Stark, who died in 2022. 'No wonder they were so fond of incense.'
A tiny elite controlled virtually all the wealth and political power. Most people lived one financial emergency away from irreversible doom. In rural areas, it was not uncommon for people to die of starvation from famines or a bad harvest.
There was no Medicaid in ancient Rome. The average life expectancy was about 35 years, due to high rates of infant mortality. Many of those that lived suffered chronic health conditions, including 'swollen eyes, skin rashes and lost limbs,' Stark recounts.
The first Christians offered what was arguably Rome's first social safety net. When epidemics swept through the cities and many leaders and wealthy citizens fled to the countryside, they stayed behind to nurse the ill and the dying. In time, Christians would establish orphanages, hospitals and food-delivery systems.
The Roman world was full of stories of pagan gods rising from the dead, but the compassion Christians displayed was new.
'There was nothing like a welfare state in Rome,' Andrew Crislip, a historian and an authority on early Christianity, tells CNN. 'Even doctors in time of plagues would get out of town. One of the principles of ancient medicine was if a patient appears to be hopeless, do not treat (them). Christians did not have such compunction. They were willing to treat the hopeless.'
These early Christians also offered a different economic model. They collected money for the poor and eventually established poorhouses. And in the New Testament's Book of Acts, which recounts the rise of the church, they redistributed their wealth.
'All the believers were one in heart and mind,' says Acts 4:32. 'No one claimed that any of their possessions was their own, but they shared everything they had.'
These Christians followed the adage, 'First bread, then religion.' Their willingness to meet the physical and economic needs of the people gave them credibility.
Scot McKnight, a biblical scholar and host of the podcast 'Kingdom Roots,' says the first Christians formed 'a socio-economic community of justice,' inspired by Jesus. His first public sermon in the Gospel of Luke was about economic justice, or 'good news to the poor.' Jesus routinely criticized wealthy people who were indifferent to the poor. He stood in the tradition of Jewish prophets who condemned greed and evoked the concept of 'Jubilee,' a tradition from Leviticus 25 in which kings freed slaves and forgave debts to prevent perpetual cycles of poverty and promote social justice.
McKnight sees echoes of the first church's message in a modern-day socialist: Bernie Sanders, the independent senator from Vermont who has been drawing huge crowds across the US on his current 'Fighting Oligarchy' tour. Sanders has long condemned the gap between the haves and have-nots in America, and political analysts say his message resonates now because he's tapped into mounting anger over wealth disparities.
'Bernie's quest for justice is an inherently Biblical view,' says McKnight, author of 'The Jesus Creed.' 'The prophets of Israel — Jesus, the early church in Jerusalem, even (the apostle) Paul — all believed in economic justice.'
Hollywood movies propagated another myth about early Christians: that relentless persecution by Rome fanned their growth. In this telling, the blood of Christian martyrs facing lions rather than renouncing their faith eventually transformed the Roman empire.
There's no doubt that Roman persecution was a factor in the growth of the church. But historians say Rome's violent persecution of Christians was sporadic, and the number of martyrs has been exaggerated.
There was another factor that helped Christianity spread. Its leaders disarmed one of the major weapons tyrants use to crush resistance movements.
Repressive regimes don't just instill fear in people — they also breed indifference. People check out of civic involvement. They stop following the news or politics. They don't talk about their beliefs with family or friends because they're afraid of informers or because they don't believe it will make a difference.
This is the atmosphere that Vladimir Putin has instilled in Russia through the manipulation of information via state-controlled media. People don't know what to believe, so they don't believe in anything.
But support from friends and family can offer an antidote to fear and apathy — for early Christians, and for others throughout history.
This is what James Zwerg, a civil rights activist, discovered when he was attacked by a White mob in 1961 at an Alabama bus station. The photograph of a bloodied Zwerg, standing next to the late John Lewis, the congressman and legendary activist, became a rallying cry for the civil rights movement. Zwerg says he couldn't have endured the beating without the friendships he developed with people like Lewis.
'Each of us was stronger because of those we were with,' Zwerg recounted in 'Children of the Movement,' my book about the children of prominent figures of the civil rights era. 'If I was beaten, I knew I wasn't alone. I could endure more because I knew everybody there was giving me their strength. Even as someone else was being beaten, I would give them strength.'
It may be hard to believe today, but Christianity was once considered a form of social deviancy. Many Romans thought Christians were ridiculous or dangerous. A major reason why the faith ultimately triumphed in Rome is that many people were motivated by the same sentiments that ultimately power resistance movements everywhere: personal loyalty to friends and family.
Many people didn't join the movement because of its doctrinal appeal alone. They joined because their family or friends reached out to them. Stark writes that for many early Christians, joining the faith was 'not about seeking or embracing a theology; it was about bringing one's religious behavior into alignment with that one one's friends and family members.'
The first Christians also offered believers an array of personal relationships that were previously unseen in their world. Rome was a society divided by entrenched ethnic, racial and class divisions. But early Christians largely erased these hierarchies. Greeks, Jews, Romans — rich and poor — all worshipped together in homes and built close relationships with one another. They accepted women as leaders and — shockingly at the time — treated slaves as human beings of inherent worth.
Slaves were so despised in the ancient world that 'Roman men no more hesitated to use slaves and prostitutes to relieve themselves of their sexual needs than they did to use the side of a road as a toilet,' Holland, the historian, writes in 'Dominion.'
'In Latin, the same word, meio, meant both ejaculate and urinate,' Holland writes.
Unlike today, when some activists reject allies who don't fit all their ideological requirements, early Christians practiced coalition building. They appealed to as many people as they could.
'Christians spread because believed their religion was universal,' says Crislip, the historian who teaches at Virginia Commonwealth University. 'Most other religions did not want to proselytize. They didn't attempt to covert other people to their way of life. Christians from the beginning said this is a religion that is radically inclusive — a way of life for everyone.'
After years of employing these strategies, the Christians' movement grew so popular and entrenched in Rome that political leaders discovered they couldn't get rid of it. It became a force for social stability, not dissent. A pivotal moment came when the emperor Constantine legalized Christianity and used the might of the Roman empire to give it institutional support. He became the first Roman emperor to convert to Christianity.
Something was lost, though, when the Christian resistance triumphed.
Scholars say the church won, in part, because its leaders eventually softened their message of resistance. Salvation became solely about the afterlife instead of deliverance from oppressive conditions on earth.
Crislip says the church eventually promoted 'more quietism and compliance' in Rome. In time, the church itself became oppressive, giving us the Inquisition and leaders who sanctioned slavery.
And yet for millions, the miracle of Easter continues to inspire. For many, it means that 'The Caesars among us don't get the final word,' Andrew Thayer, an episcopal priest, wrote in a recent essay.
History didn't record the names of the two young women who were interrogated by Pliny the Younger. Most historians assume they were executed because they would not recant. But their courage lives on. We still talk about them today. They embodied one of the most overlooked elements of the Easter story:
The Easter miracle isn't confined to an empty tomb. In some ways, the greatest miracle is what started the day after.
John Blake is a CNN senior writer and author of the award-winning memoir, 'More Than I Imagined: What a Black Man Discovered About the White Mother He Never Knew.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
27 minutes ago
- Axios
MAGA feasts on red meat as Trump escalates L.A. showdown
President Trump's MAGA allies are framing the Los Angeles protests as a once-in-a-generation opportunity to rewrite the rules of engagement with "the Resistance" — starting with the use of military force. Why it matters: As National Guardsmen and Marines descend on L.A., the loudest voices in the MAGA media ecosystem are urging Trump to make an example out of anyone who stands in the way of mass deportations. With protests spreading to other cities, the list of demands is growing: Deploy the military. Arrest Democrats. Expel not just undocumented immigrants, but even legal residents who oppose the crackdown. For Trump, who said Monday that California Gov. Gavin Newsom should be arrested, the vocal support of the GOP base will only fuel his maximalist instincts. Driving the news: MAGA activists were calling as early as Friday for Trump to deploy active-duty military personnel to L.A., where federal immigration officers were encountering resistance to their deportation raids. Now, many are clamoring for Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act to authorize the troops to participate in law enforcement activities and immigration raids — a step he hasn't yet taken. "The only way to win here is to double and triple down. The media and left-wing apparatus and Deep State that run this country want us to blink, want us to back down," Steve Bannon said on his "War Room" podcast. Zoom in: MAGA views itself as fighting for nothing short of the survival of Western civilization, and images of protesters waving Mexican and Palestinian flags have exacerbated fears that the right is losing its country. Pro-Trump activists Charlie Kirk, Jack Posobiec and Matt Walsh all called, in unison, for a ban on "third world immigration, legal or illegal" — pointing to images from LA as evidence of civilizational decay. Other prominent MAGA accounts have called for shooting looters and deporting immigrant members of Congress who have criticized the administration's protest response. The intrigue: MAGA's army of online sleuths is working diligently to identify violent protesters in videos and flag them to the FBI, whose top two leaders hail from the same ecosystem of pro-Trump activism. What they're saying: "Almost exactly ten years ago to now, everything that we've been fighting for — every single battle — has all led to this," Posobiec said on his show Tuesday, recalling the moment Trump announced his presidential campaign in June 2015. "We have come too far and been through too much," Posobiec continued as he urged Americans to support their local ICE raids. "I don't care if it's Newsom, Pelosi, Harris, any of them: You know what, you might be on the next plane too."
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Funeral row causes chaos for mourners of Zambia's ex-president
Arranging a funeral can be testing at the best of times - let alone for a former head of state. Amid that intense, initial stage of grief, loved ones must juggle cost, the wishes of the deceased and numerous other factors in order to throw a fitting send-off. Add the clashing desires of a national government and its political opponents into the mix, and things become doubly complicated. Edgar Lungu, who led Zambia from 2015 to 2021, died last Thursday. His death at the age of 68 has shocked Zambians - and there is genuine sense of grief with all radio stations playing gospel music for the man who had remained influential in Zambian politics despite being barred from contesting last year's election. Zambia is officially a Christian country - and most people take their religion and periods of mourning seriously. But a standoff between his family, the government and Lungu's political party, the Patriotic Front (PF), has left mourners confused about how exactly the former president should be honoured. The government announced there would be a state funeral and declared that the official venue for mourning would be a lodge it owns in the capital, Lusaka, but the PF dismissed this plan, directing mourners to its headquarters instead. As for Lungu's family, they have said they are not opposed to a state funeral, but have insisted on choosing who will preside over it, family lawyer Makebi Zulu has told the BBC. Then there is the official book of condolence, in which mourners can pay tributes to Lungu. The government has set up an official book - at the lodge - but the PF has urged people to sign theirs instead - at their headquarters. The government wanted to repatriate his body from South Africa last week - Lungu died there after receiving treatment for an undisclosed illness. However, the PF and Lungu's family intervened, wanting to organise the safe passage of the ex-leader themselves. "The state was saying, 'We are giving him full military honours, therefore we're taking over from here' - as if to say that 'you have no say over what happens,'" Mr Zulu said. Plans for returning Lungu's remains are still unclear, though the family are now engaging with the government on this issue. There has also been confusion over the "official" mourning period when all forms of entertainment like big football matches and concerts are stopped. The government declared a seven-day national mourning period starting last Saturday, even though the PF announced one days earlier. This chaos is, in short, a continuation of the tumultuous relationship between Lungu and his successor, President Hakainde Hichilema. The pair are long-time rivals - in 2017, when Lungu was president, he had Hichilema locked up for over 100 days on treason charges after Hichilema's motorcade allegedly refused to give way for him. It took the intervention of the Commonwealth for Hichilema to be released. Four years later, and after five attempts at the presidency, Hichilema defeated Lungu. Now, the PF and the Lungu family's lawyer are accusing Hichilema's government of being partly responsible for the former president's death. Lungu returned to frontline politics in 2023, frequently accusing Hichilema's government of victimising him and other PF members. Now, after Lungu's death, his party allege that Lungu was banned from leaving the country for years and that if he had been allowed to travel to seek medical treatment sooner, he might still be alive. The government has vehemently denied any responsibility for Lungu's death, with spokesperson Cornelius Mweetwa insisting that the ex-president was never prohibited from travelling. Mr Mweetwa told the BBC that the PF was trying to use Lungu's death as a "springboard" for a "political comeback". It is not the first time conflict has broken out following a Zambian leader's death. In 2021, the family of Kenneth Kaunda, the country's first post-independence president, said he wanted to be laid to rest next to his wife and not at the site designated by the government. Despite this, the government went ahead and buried Kaunda at Embassy Memorial Park in Lusaka. "The High Court ruled that national interest takes precedence over individual or family preferences because there is a designated burial place for former presidents, and there is a designated set of protocol to handle those proceedings that are conducted by the state, not a political party," Mr Mweetwa said. This argument - about the state's rights to a dead president's body - has played out numerous times across Africa. In 2019, Robert Mugabe died almost two years after being unseated as Zimbabwe's president by his former right-hand man, Emmerson Mnangagwa. Mugabe's family refused to allow him to be buried at the national Heroes' Acre, arguing that he had been betrayed by his former colleagues. After a bitter feud, the man who had led Zimbabwe to independence was laid to rest after his state funeral in his home village. But a legal row rumbles on over his burial site, with some still wanting him to be interred at Heroes' Acre, where a mausoleum has now been completed for him. And loved ones rarely won such disputes. The relatives of Angola's José Eduardo dos Santos and various Ghanaian presidents have clashed with the government over post-death arrangements, but all eventually had to yield to the state. In Lungu's case, the government has the constitution - the supreme law of the land - behind it, but the PF has significant clout as the former leader's long-time political home. In an attempt to break the standoff, the government has sent envoys to South Africa to negotiate with Lungu's family, where a private memorial service was held at Pretoria's Sacred Heart Cathedral on Tuesday - organised by the PF. This was attended by his widow and daughter and where it was announced to the congregation that the former president's body would not be flown home on Wednesday as had been expected. So for those in Zambia, there is still no clear direction on how to send off the nation's sixth president. 'My son is a drug addict, please help' - the actor breaking a Zambian taboo An ancient writing system confounding myths about Africa Zambia president orders ministers to stop sleeping in cabinet Go to for more news from the African continent. Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica Africa Daily Focus on Africa


Hamilton Spectator
10 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Southern Baptists overwhelmingly call for a ban on same-sex marriage
DALLAS (AP) — Southern Baptists overwhelmingly endorsed a ban on same-sex marriage — including a call for a reversal of the U.S. Supreme Court's 10-year-old precedent legalizing it nationwide. They also called for legislators to curtail sports betting and to support policies that promote childbearing. The votes came at the gathering of more than 10,000 church representatives at the annual meeting of the nation's largest Protestant denomination. The wide-ranging resolution doesn't use the word 'ban,' but it left no room for legal same-sex marriage in calling for the 'overturning of laws and court rulings, including Obergefell v. Hodges, that defy God's design for marriage and family.' Further, the resolution affirmatively calls 'for laws that affirm marriage between one man and one women.' A reversal of the Supreme Court's 2015 Obergefell decision wouldn't in and of itself amount to a nationwide ban. At the time of that ruling, 36 states had already legalized same-sex marriage, and support remains strong in many areas. However, if the convention got its wish, not only would Obergefell be overturned, but so would every law and court ruling that affirmed same-sex marriage. There was no debate on the marriage resolution. That in itself is not surprising in the solidly conservative denomination, which has long defined marriage as between one man and one woman. However, it marks an especially assertive step in its call for the reversal of a decade-old Supreme Court ruling, as well as any other legal pillars to same-sex marriage in law and court precedent. Gender identity, fertility and other issues The marriage issue was incorporated into a much larger resolution on marriage and family — one that calls for civil law to be based on what the convention says is the divinely created order as stated in the Bible. The resolution says legislators have a duty to 'pass laws that reflect the truth of creation and natural law — about marriage, sex, human life, and family' and to oppose laws contradicting 'what God has made plain through nature and Scripture.' The same resolution calls for recognizing 'the biological reality of male and female' and opposes 'any law or policy that compels people to speak falsehoods about sex and gender.' It urges Christians to 'embrace marriage and childbearing' and to see children 'as blessings rather than burdens.' But it also frames that issue as one of public policy. It calls for 'for renewed moral clarity in public discourse regarding the crisis of declining fertility and for policies that support the bearing and raising of children within intact, married families.' It laments that modern culture is 'pursuing willful childlessness which contributes to a declining fertility rate,' echoing a growing subject of discourse on the religious and political right. The pornography resolution, which had no debate, calls such material destructive, addictive and exploitive and says governments have the power to ban it. The sports betting resolution draws on Southern Baptists' historic opposition to gambling. It called sports betting 'harmful and predatory.' One pastor urged an amendment to distinguish between low-stakes, recreational gambling and predatory, addictive gambling activities. But his proposed amendment failed. Whistleblower's death casts pall on Dallas meeting The two-day annual meeting began Tuesday morning with praise sessions and optimistic reports about growing numbers of baptisms. But casting a pall over the gathering is the recent death of one of the most high-profile whistleblowers in the Southern Baptists' scandal of sexual abuse. Jennifer Lyell, a onetime denominational publishing executive who went public in 2019 with allegations that she had been sexually abused by a seminary professor while a student, died Saturday at 47. She 'suffered catastrophic strokes,' a friend and fellow advocate, Rachael Denhollander , posted Sunday on X. Friends reported that the backlash Lyell received after going public with her report took a devastating toll on her. Several abuse survivors and advocates for reform, who previously had a prominent presence in recent SBC meetings, are skipping this year's gathering, citing lack of progress by the convention. Two people sought to fill that void, standing vigil outside of the meeting at the Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center Dallas as attendees walked by. The pair held up signs with photos of Lyell and of Gareld Duane Rollins, who died earlier this spring and who was among those who accused longtime SBC power broker Paul Pressler of sexual abuse. 'It's not a healthy thing for them (survivors) to be here,' said Johnna Harris, host of a podcast on abuse in evangelical ministries. 'I felt like it was important for someone to show up. I want people to know there are people who care.' Past attempts at reforms in the SBC The SBC Executive Committee, in a 2022 apology, acknowledged 'its failure to adequately listen, protect, and care for Jennifer Lyell when she came forward to share her story.' It also acknowledged the denomination's official news agency had not accurately reported the situation as 'sexual abuse by a trusted minister in a position of power at a Southern Baptist seminary.' SBC officials issued statements this week lamenting Lyell's death, but her fellow advocates have denounced what they say is a failure to implement reforms. The SBC's 2022 meeting voted overwhelmingly to create a way to track pastors and other church workers credibly accused of sex abuse. That came shortly after the release of a blockbuster report by an outside consultant, which said Southern Baptist leaders mishandled abuse cases and stonewalled victims for years. But the denomination's Executive Committee president, Jeff Iorg, said earlier this year that creating a database is not a focus and that the committee instead plans to refer churches to existing databases of sex offenders and focus on education about abuse prevention. The committee administers the denomination's day-to-day business. Advocates for reform don't see those approaches as adequate. It is the latest instance of 'officials trailing out hollow words, impotent task forces and phony dog-and-pony shows of reform,' abuse survivor and longtime advocate Christa Brown wrote on Baptist News Global , which is not SBC-affiliated. In a related action, the Executive Committee will also be seeking $3 million in convention funding for ongoing legal expenses related to abuse cases. What else is on the agenda? As of late Tuesday afternoon, attendance was at 10,541 church representatives (known as messengers). That is less than a quarter of the total that thronged the SBC's annual meeting 40 years ago this month in a Dallas showdown that marked the height of battles over control of the convention, ultimately won by the more conservative-fundamentalist side led by Pressler and his allies. Messengers will also debate whether to institute a constitutional ban on churches with women pastors and to abolish its public-policy arm, the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission — which is staunchly conservative, but according to critics, not enough so. Brent Leatherwood, president of the ERLC, said Tuesday he would address the 'turbulence' during his scheduled remarks Wednesday but was confident in the messengers' support. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .