Han Duck-soo warns of tough response to any violence as Yoon Suk Yeol ruling nears
This comes as concerns grow over unlawful acts or violence during rallies as Yoon's impeachment ruling day approaches. Han urged people to peacefully respect the Constitutional Court's verdict as "a legal judgment made through democratic procedures," which "must becoming the starting point for our society to move beyond division and conflict."
"Anyone committing vandalism, assault or arson while resisting law enforcement authorities; or those harming public safety and destroying social order, will be arrested at the scene, and stern actions will be taken," Han said during a ministerial meeting to center on public safety issues at the Government Complex Seoul.
"As the court decision (over Yoon's impeachment) draws to a close, people express various opinions in squares and on the streets. ... I ask people to peacefully express their opinions within the boundary set by the Constitution and law."
Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon echoed Han's zero-tolerance approach to violent protesters, saying, "Any gatherings or demonstrations that threaten the safety of citizens and disrupt public order cannot be tolerated."
Oh unveiled plans to manage public safety at Seoul Metro stations near protest hubs, such as Anguk Station, City Hall Station, Gwanghwamun Station, Hangangjin Station and Yeouido Station, by deploying more workers to the scene and control room to handle high levels of pedestrian traffic.
On the day of Yoon's impeachment ruling, Seoul is also considering controlling bus routes to circumvent protest hubs and close more subway stations in addition to Anguk Station on Line No. 3, near the Constitutional Court.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
Indoor temperatures in S. Korean prison cells topped 30 C during July heat wave: disclosure
South Korea's prisons sweltered in extreme heat earlier this summer, with newly released data showing inmates were confined in cells that stayed above 30 degrees Celsius for much of July's record-breaking heatwave. Information disclosed by the Ministry of Justice, after a request from three human rights groups, revealed that from July 1 to 10, nearly all of the nation's 55 correctional facilities reported indoor temperatures above 30 degrees. At Seoul Detention Center, for example, the temperature on July 10 measured 32 degrees at 6 a.m. and rose slightly higher later in the day, even exceeding the outdoor morning temperature. The Korea Meteorological Administration confirmed that early July was the hottest on record, with national averages reaching 28.2 degrees and Seoul peaking at 37.8 degrees. Most inmates are housed in cells without air conditioning. Only medical wards are equipped with cooling units, while standard blocks rely on ceiling fans that automatically shut off every hour to prevent overheating. Crowded conditions mean body heat drives indoor temperatures even higher. The World Health Organization advises keeping daytime rooms below 32 degrees and nights below 24 degrees to reduce health risks. South Korea's own Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency recommends 26-28 degrees. Records showed at least seven inmates were treated for heat-related illnesses, including exhaustion, but some institutions declined to provide figures. No deaths were reported, yet the inconsistent disclosure was described by advocates as a significant transparency problem. Seoul Detention Center is where former President Yoon Suk Yeol is currently being held. He was returned to custody on July 10 after a court approved a detention warrant in an investigation into his Dec. 3 martial law imposition. Yoon is confined under standard intake procedures in a solitary cell that, like other ordinary blocks at the facility, has no air conditioning. Die-hard supporters of the impeached leader have called the lack of air conditioning in his cell a human rights abuse, urging the Justice Ministry to install cooling equipment. It was revealed, however, by Democratic Party lawmakers that Yoon was allowed to spend a total of 53 hours and 53 minutes between July 10-29 in air-conditioned reception areas, exclusively for himself and his guests. In 2019, the National Human Rights Commission of Korea recommended that the government establish legal standards for appropriate indoor temperatures in correctional facility cells. However, the Ministry of Justice responded that it would be difficult to set binding indoor temperature standards as the issue is linked to mid- to long-term challenges such as overcrowding and overall facility conditions. The three groups that demanded the information disclosure are Lawyers for a Democratic Society (Minbyun), the Catholic Human Rights Committee and Korean Lawyers for Public Interest and Human Rights.
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Unification Church campaigned for Yoon Suk Yeol in 2022 presidential election: report
The Unification Church is being suspected of illegally campaigning for Yoon Suk Yeol during the 2022 presidential election, a local media outlet reported Wednesday. The accusations come amid the government's ongoing probe against the former president's wife and the controversial religious sect's alleged lobbying. According to CBS No Cut News, branches of the Unification Church gathered their followers on March 3, 2022 — a day before the prevoting for the presidential election that Yoon won — and instructed them to vote for Yoon, then candidate of the conservative People Power Party. The meeting supposedly carried messages that were against the Democratic Party of Korea, and messages that the next president should be one who could "hear the words of the heavens." Han Hak-ja — the incumbent leader of the group and wife of the founding leader Moon Sun-myung — reportedly addressed high-ranking church officials in a Seoul hotel on March 2, 2022. In her speech, she was critical of then-incumbent President Moon Jae-in and claimed "the will of the heavens should be upheld in the presidential election." It was reported last week that the special counsel team investigating former lady Kim Keon Hee found evidence suggesting that the Unification Church funneled substantial amounts of cash to its branches to support Yoon's party ahead of the 2022 election. If the allegations are confirmed, the church would have violated the Public Official Election Act, which states in Article 85 that no one should use their position in a religious group to have members engage in an election campaign. The church's official position is that it has not illegally sponsored a "certain individual," although it did not elaborate. The Unification Church is also accused of gifting luxury bags and a necklace to Yoon's wife.
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Trump administration revokes security clearances of 37 current and former government officials
The Trump administration said Tuesday that it was revoking the security clearances of 37 current and former national security officials in the latest act of retribution targeting public servants from the federal government's intelligence community. A memo from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard accuses the singled-out individuals of having engaged in the 'politicization or weaponization of intelligence' to advance personal or partisan goals, failing to safeguard classified information, failing to 'adhere to professional analytic tradecraft standards" and other unspecified 'detrimental" conduct. The memo did not offer evidence to back up the accusations. Many of the officials who were targeted left the government years ago after serving in both senior national security positions and lower-profile roles far from the public eye. Some worked on matters that have long infuriated Trump, like the intelligence community assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election on his behalf. And several signaled their concerns about Trump by signing a critical letter in 2019 that was highlighted on social media last month by right-wing provocateur and close Trump ally Laura Loomer. The action is part of a broader Trump administration campaign to wield the levers of government against perceived adversaries, and it reflects the president's continued distrust of career intelligence officials he has long seen as working against his interests. The revocation of clearances has emerged as a go-to tactic for the administration, a strategy that critics say risks chilling dissenting voices from a national security community accustomed to drawing on a range of viewpoints before formulating an assessment. 'These are unlawful and unconstitutional decisions that deviate from well-settled, decadesold laws and policies that sought to protect against just this type of action,' Mark Zaid, a national security lawyer whose own clearance was revoked by the Trump administration, said in a statement. He called it hypocritical for the administration to 'claim these individuals politicized or weaponized intelligence.' Gabbard on Tuesday defended the move, which she said had been directed by Trump. 'Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right," she wrote on X. "Those in the Intelligence Community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold.' The security clearance suspension comes amid a broader effort by Gabbard and other Trump administration officials to revisit the intelligence community's assessment on Russian election interference, including by declassifying a series of yearsold documents meant to cast doubt on the legitimacy of its findings. Multiple government investigations have reached the same conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election in sweeping fashion, including through a hack-and-leak operation of Democratic emails and a social media campaign aimed at sowing discord and swaying public opinion. But Trump has long resisted the assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin interfered in his favor, and his Justice Department has authorized a grand jury investigation that could bring fresh scrutiny to Obama-era officials. Security clearances are important not only for current government workers but also former ones whose private-sector jobs require them to retain access to sensitive information. Stripping clearances from such employees could make it hard for them to do their jobs. On his first day of office, Trump said he would revoke the security clearances of the more than four dozen former intelligence officials who signed a 2020 letter saying that the Hunter Biden laptop saga bore the hallmarks of a 'Russian information operation.' He's also revoked the clearances of former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris, and he attempted to do the same for lawyers at a spate of prominent law firms but was rebuffed by federal judges. Some of those who were targeted in the latest action were part of Biden's national security team. Many only learned of the Gabbard action from news reports Tuesday, said two former government officials who were on the list. Both spoke on the condition of anonymity as they ponder whether to take legal action. (AP)
