logo
China Reveals Details of Dual Aircraft Carrier Operations in West Pacific

China Reveals Details of Dual Aircraft Carrier Operations in West Pacific

Miami Herald01-07-2025
The Chinese navy said on Monday that its two aircraft carriers repeatedly encountered foreign warships and aircraft while operating simultaneously in the broader western Pacific.
Both CNS Liaoning and CNS Shandong maintained "high vigilance and responsiveness" to combat scenarios, handling the situation "professionally and soundly," China's navy said.
Newsweek has contacted the Chinese Defense Ministry for further comment by email.
The Liaoning and the Shandong were deployed for about two weeks in June on the eastern side of a U.S. defensive line known as the first island chain-comprising Japan, Taiwan and the Philippines in the western Pacific.
Japan, a U.S. treaty ally, closely monitored the dual Chinese aircraft carrier deployment-the second such operation since October in the South China Sea-during which one of its patrol aircraft was intercepted by missile-armed fighter jets launched from the Shandong.
Both the Liaoning and the Shandong have completed "far-sea combat-oriented training" and returned to their respective home ports of Qingdao and Sanya, according to China's navy.
Regarding the "coordinated and systematic" training, both Chinese aircraft carriers conducted a series of drills-including reconnaissance and early warning, counterstrikes, maritime assaults, air defense and aircraft flight operations-under "combat conditions."
Official footage shows fighter jets conducting takeoffs and landings aboard the Liaoning and the Shandong, both day and night, while the aircraft carriers receive supplies.
Without naming specific countries, the Chinese navy accused foreign warships and aircraft of conducting "up-close reconnaissance maneuvers, tracking, and surveillance" against its aircraft carrier groups, prompting the deployment of carrier-based aircraft.
It remains unclear whether any country besides Japan has surveilled the Chinese naval groups. The U.S. Navy dispatched a destroyer to monitor the Liaoning at close range in April 2021. An official photo showed U.S. naval officers "casually" observing the Chinese aircraft carrier.
The dual aircraft carrier training enhanced the Chinese military's ability to safeguard the East Asian power's sovereignty, security and development interests, according to the Chinese navy, which added that the drills were part of a "routine arrangement" under its annual plan.
Meanwhile, China's Defense Ministry announced that the Shandong and three other warships were scheduled to make a port call in Hong Kong-a special administrative region of China-on Thursday for a five-day visit to promote the country's military development.
The Chinese navy said in a post on X, formerly Twitter, on Monday: "During the mission, the two [aircraft carrier] groups, in coordination with relevant arms of the service, conducted joint drills on maritime strikes, air and missile defense, anti-submarine warfare, and integrated long-range support, and thus significantly enhanced real combat capabilities."
Alex Luck, a naval analyst in Australia, wrote on X on Monday: "'Far sea' in [People's Liberation Army]/Chinese terminology usually refers to blue water operations. As opposed to 'near seas,' traditionally associated with coastal aka green water ops."
It remains to be seen whether the Chinese navy-which possesses the world's largest fleet of warships by hull count-will conduct dual aircraft carrier operations regularly in the future.
Related Articles
Exclusive - India Hopes for Imminent US Trade Deal, Minister Tells NewsweekUS Citizen Charged in North Korean IT Employment SchemeUS Military Issues Update on China's Rocket Force ThreatChina Reveals Fighter Jets Expelled Foreign Military Aircraft
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California Proposes Major Drinking Water Change: What to Know
California Proposes Major Drinking Water Change: What to Know

Newsweek

timea few seconds ago

  • Newsweek

California Proposes Major Drinking Water Change: What to Know

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A bill introduced in California by state senators Anna Caballero and Alexandra Macedo, a Democrat and Republican, respectively, would give water agencies immunity from civil lawsuits regarding chromium-6 contamination in their supply if they are actively working on plans to address the issue. Caballero argued California Senate Bill 466 is needed so water agencies can concentrate on removing the potentially cancer-causing contaminant from their supply, rather than spending their limited resources on legal cases. Newsweek contacted state Senators Caballero and Macedo for comment on Thursday via telephone and voicemail message outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters Chromium-6 is a known carcinogen, meaning it can cause cancer in humans when inhaled or ingested in certain amounts. During the 1990s, a case against Pacific Gas and Electric over contamination of its water in Hinkley, California, with chromium-6 resulted in a $333 million settlement and formed the basis of the 2000 movie Erin Brockovich. According to the Los Banos Enterprise, a newspaper serving the town of 50,000 in central California, water testing has uncovered chromium-6 levels in the settlement above the legal California limit of 10 parts per billion. What To Know Senate Bill 466 would protect water suppliers from civil lawsuits over chromium-6 in California, provided they are either implementing a state-approved compliance plan to reduce chromium-6 levels from their water or are waiting to see if a proposed plan is approved. However, the powers of state regulators are not impacted. The legislation has been endorsed by the City of Los Banos and passed by the California Senate, and is currently making its way through the California State Assembly. Stock photograph showing water running from a tap. Stock photograph showing water running from a tap. show999/GETTY According to the Los Banos Enterprise, city officials estimate reducing chromium-6 levels in water supplied to the town to the state-regulated level will cost around $65 million, around half its annual budget. Los Banos is expected to submit a compliance plan later in 2025 to the State Water Resources Control Board. If Senate Bill 466 is passed, this would protect water suppliers to the city from civil lawsuits while they work to reduce chromium-6 levels. In 2019, the Environmental Working Group concluded that chromium-6 is in the drinking water consumed by more than 200 million Americans. What People Are Saying Addressing The Fresno Bee, state Senator Caballero said: "The goal of SB 466 is not to block accountability, but to make sure resources go toward fixing the problem — not fighting premature lawsuits while a water system is actively working under state oversight to meet the standard. "This bill strikes the balance between protecting public health and giving water providers the time and tools they need to deliver safe water without diverting funds to litigation when they are already doing everything required by the state to comply." Speaking to non-profit news website CalMatters, Los Banos Mayor Michael Amabile said: "I really don't want to go down as the mayor that quadruples water rates, so I need the help from the state." In a report, California state Senate Judiciary Committee staff wrote: "Immunity from liability tends to strip incentives to act with reasonable care by taking away the consequence of having to pay for any damages caused by doing otherwise." In an opinion piece for the publication The Fresno Bee writer Tad Weber said: "A water department as large as Los Banos cannot be brought into legal jeopardy over an inability to pay for a new treatment system that must go online in mere years. Cleaning out chromium-6 will take some time — and money. "Caballero's bill seeks to be a buffer while still ensuring the state does not lose any enforcement capability. As strange as it is for a senior Democrat in the Legislature to argue for protecting water agencies with contaminated supplies, in this case it makes sense." What Happens Next The California State Assembly is expected to vote on Senate Bill 466 in August.

TikTok will go dark in US if China doesn't OK sale before Trump's deadline: Lutnik
TikTok will go dark in US if China doesn't OK sale before Trump's deadline: Lutnik

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

TikTok will go dark in US if China doesn't OK sale before Trump's deadline: Lutnik

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Thursday that TikTok will have to stop operating in the United States if China does not approve a deal for the sale of the Chinese-owned short video app that is used by some 170 million Americans. Lutnick, speaking on CNBC, also said the US must control the algorithm that makes the social media platform work. Last month, President Trump extended by 90 days to Sept. 17, a deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the US assets of TikTok. Trump's action took place despite a 2024 law that mandated a sale or shutdown by Jan. 19 of this year if there had not been significant progress. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick warned TikTok will go dark in the US if China doesn't approve a sale to American investors. REUTERS 'China can have a little piece or ByteDance, the current owner, can keep a little piece. But basically, Americans will have control. Americans will own the technology, and Americans will control the algorithm,' Lutnick said. 'If that deal gets approved, by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark, and those decisions are coming very soon.' TikTok did not immediately comment. A deal had been in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors. This stalled after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese goods. Trump has three times granted reprieves from federal enforcement of the law that mandated the sale or shutdown of TikTok that was supposed to take effect in January. A deal had been in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors. REUTERS Attorney General Pam Bondi sent letters to Apple, Google and other companies that provide services or host the TikTok app that were made public this month. The letters said the Justice Department was irrevocably relinquishing any claims against the companies for potential violations of the law, citing Trump's determination that an abrupt shutdown would interfere with his overseeing national security and foreign affairs. Some Democratic lawmakers argue Trump has no legal authority to extend the deadline and suggest the deal under consideration would not meet legal requirements.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store