logo
National Security Elites (Yes, That's What They Are) Say Trump Team Needs to Talk to Them

National Security Elites (Yes, That's What They Are) Say Trump Team Needs to Talk to Them

Politico17-07-2025
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks at a drone in the Pentagon courtyard this week. The Defense Department barred several of its representatives from speaking at the Aspen Security Forum this year. | Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP
Nahal Toosi is POLITICO's senior foreign affairs correspondent. She has reported on war, genocide and political chaos in a career that has taken her around the world. Her reported column, Compass, delves into the decision-making of the global national security and foreign policy establishment — and the fallout that comes from it.
ASPEN, Colorado — The national security elites gathered in this mountain retreat this week are finding themselves playing defense about their beliefs, motivations and patriotism — and whether they even deserve attention from the people in power.
It's a result of the Trump administration's 11th hour decision to pull nearly all of its speakers from the annual Aspen Security Forum, with the Pentagon alleging that the gathering 'promotes the evil of globalism.'
Many of the current and former officials I've spoken to here have wielded enough influence and dealt with enough criticism in their careers that at first, they responded to the administration's move with eye-rolls and words such as 'moronic.' Some questioned, in genuine frustration, what the administration means by 'globalism.' That America can ignore the world? Others suggested it is all a performative stunt by the administration, or at least Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, to gain favor with a MAGA base angry over issues like the Jeffrey Epstein case.
Still, attendees and organizers aren't completely dismissing the Trump attack, which could be just the first of more assaults on the event and those like it. The president has gone after a range of U.S. institutions at an impressive pace, and many are bending, not least because businesses and other factions that care what the U.S. president thinks can pull funding.
But the people here are making an argument in return: If President Donald Trump and his team are willing to snub an event like the Aspen forum, it means government officials are increasingly sealing themselves off from outside opinions. Doing so could hamper the administration's efforts to achieve its national security goals.
No matter how much the MAGA-heavy administration may dislike the Aspen conference, attendees argue, it is at least a place to stress-test ideas to make sure they're viable.
What Trump's team is doing is 'what autocrats do — they don't want to hear criticism,' one foreign lawmaker said.
'I think sometimes they are nervous about engaging in a real debate about their policies,' a former Biden administration official said. 'It's not healthy.'
On issues ranging from how Trump's tariffs will affect America's international alliances to the U.S. strategy on Taiwan, many in the national security space fear the president is not receiving the broad spectrum of advice he needs, and that increasingly neither are his underlings. It's especially foolish to reject ideas from the opposing political party, some said.
One example is Trump's refusal — until, apparently, recently — to appreciate Russian leader Vladimir Putin's unwillingness to give up his desire to subsume Ukraine.
The worries are reverberating in the top echelons of America's overseas allies. 'It's always better to engage, because real life is not binary,' a foreign minister told me.
I granted nearly everyone I spoke to anonymity so they could be candid and because many told me they feared the Trump administration would retaliate against them. Some need to engage with the administration professionally; others fear losing clients.
Aspen bills itself as America's 'premier national security and foreign policy conference,' and it increasingly is a destination for government officials from all over the world, as well as the D.C. set.
More than a dozen Trump administration members had been slated to appear on various panels; most represented the Defense Department in some capacity, including Navy Secretary John Phelan. But on Monday, the day before the four-day conference began, the Pentagon announced it was pulling all of its people. Aside from the globalism claim, the Pentagon accused the forum of showing 'disdain for our great country, and hatred for the president.'
Aspen organizers deny such allegations, noting their institution is nonpartisan, and they say their invitation to the Trump officials remains open. Trump aides might even win some converts to their America First views if they showed up, attendees and organizers hinted. The theme of the forum this year revolves around letting go of assumptions, an obvious nod to Trump's earth-shaking second term.
'A lot of what's happening in the world is making all of us who are experts in this field reassess our assumptions, and so actually engaging with people who think differently helps you do that, right?' Anja Manuel, the forum's executive director, told me.
Even after the, umm, military withdrawal, the forum could still point to two Trump officials on its agenda: Tom Barrack, the U.S. ambassador to Turkey who also is dealing with the Syria file; and Adam Boehler, the special envoy tasked with retrieving American hostages held abroad. But then Barrack pulled out, officially due to a need to respond to new violence in Syria. If Boehler shows up, I guess we should be relieved that there's still bipartisan agreement the U.S. should try to save its hostages.
The executive branch presence here is smaller than the norm across past administrations, including during Trump's first term. The secretary of State and the national security adviser tend to show up to Aspen. Not this time, and it's the same guy.
The forum in this Colorado ski town is designed to allow for an exchange of views in a relaxing setting. Many of the conversations happen off-stage, and the leafy, mountainous views are indeed calming.
The security forum, whose events are live-streamed, is also held right before a meeting of the Aspen Strategy Group where more unfiltered debate can happen. The latter is a private gathering, but it includes people from both political parties, including some Republicans who served in Trump's first term and who for the most part today are not seen as MAGA-worthy. Organizers told me they invited a slew of Trump administration officials to attend the strategy group as well as the forum, but for now, no current administration officials are expected to show up to the strategy group either.
Are the public forum and the private strategy group gatherings of elites? Well … yes. Do they skew more left than right? Yes, especially in the Trump era. Something about all that probably frustrates the populist strain that animates much of Trump's MAGA movement.
But it's getting harder in an increasingly polarized country to stage any events where top players in the national security field can exchange ideas across ideological lines, particularly in private settings where participants don't have to worry about nasty headlines about their proposals.
If Republicans, under pressure from Trump, decide they shouldn't show up to forums such as Aspen, 'where is the place where smart liberals and conservatives can have a debate?' the former Biden administration official asked.
Early in the first Trump administration, the Aspen forum drew several top officials, including then-CIA chief (and later Secretary of State) Mike Pompeo. As the years went by, the forum struggled to bring in Trump types, especially as the president's America First MAGA base grew more empowered over the traditional denizens. Pompeo, for instance, was staunchly loyal to Trump but is now viewed with suspicion by the MAGA faction. Republicans still involved in Aspen events, including those who worked for Trump in his first term, tend to be more the George W. Bush-era types who believe the U.S. should not retreat from the world.
Aspen organizers told me they tried hard to get as much Trump representation as they could this year. And while most of the Trump military types who'd signed up were likely to be cautious (those in uniform in particular almost never say anything startling), they would nonetheless have offered a window into the administration's thinking, the topic that most interests many in the audience here. The Aspen forum also tends to draw many tech, cyber and other business leaders whose views the Trump administration might find helpful.
Besides, had Hegseth's 'warfighters' been allowed to attend, they would have found that the Aspen forum is not exactly the Colosseum of such confabs. Its moderators press panelists, but they rarely go for the kill. I once published a piece suggesting some spicier questions for Aspen's moderators.
It's still something of a mystery exactly who in the administration decided to pull the plug on its Aspen line-up. I asked the White House, the Pentagon and the State Department that question. The only real answer I received was from a White House official, granted anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, who said, 'We did not direct anyone to pull their speakers.'
As conference attendees munched on paella and other treats this week, some wondered if the Pentagon, knowing the Trump team lacks a formal national security strategy, was worried that one of its representatives might say something that could irk the president.
Others theorized that the Trump administration is trying to send a warning to all such conferences in an effort to reshape their programs more in the MAGA mold. When I asked Aspen organizers if they would change their program in response to a potential such demand, they declined to answer.
Either way, the Trump administration's voice is nearly silent at a major gathering of national security thinkers, some of whom might even be useful allies on some issues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Park fires back explicit-laden message to DHS after department uses show to recruit ICE agents
South Park fires back explicit-laden message to DHS after department uses show to recruit ICE agents

New York Post

time4 minutes ago

  • New York Post

South Park fires back explicit-laden message to DHS after department uses show to recruit ICE agents

South Park continued its war of words with the Trump administration on Tuesday. The official X account for the long-running adult cartoon show shared a vulgar message to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security after it used a screenshot of South Park's depiction of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to encourage recruitment through 'Wait, so we ARE relevant? #eatabagofd—-,' the account replied in a repost. DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin responded to South Park's post in a statement shared with Fox News Digital. 'We want to thank South Park for drawing attention to ICE law enforcement recruitment: We are calling on patriotic Americans to help us remove murderers, gang members, pedophiles, and other violent criminals from our country. Benefits available to new ICE recruits include an up to $50,000 signing bonus, student loan forgiveness, and retirement benefits. Apply today at she said. 3 The South Park social media page fired back at DHS. X / @SouthPark South Park's post appeared to be a direct reference to a comment from White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers about the show's relevance following a controversial depiction of President Donald Trump in its season premiere on July 23. 'This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention,' Rogers said at the time. 'President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country's history – and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak.' He also trashed liberals who love the show's attacks on Trump, adding, 'The Left's hypocrisy truly has no end – for years they have come after South Park for what they labeled as 'offense' content, but suddenly they are praising the show. Just like the creators of South Park, the Left has no authentic or original content, which is why their popularity continues to hit record lows.' 3 South Park has been at war with the Trump administration since its controversial season premiere last month. ©Comedy Central/Courtesy Everett Collection The show's season 27 premiere last month took aim at Trump, depicting him as having a sexual relationship with the devil and mocking the size of his genitalia. The episode also accused Trump of covering up details of the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking case. At one point during the premiere, Satan mentioned he heard that the president was on the Epstein list. 'The Epstein list? Are we still talking about that?,' Trump responded. 3 South Park's season premiere also accused Trump covering up details in the Epstein case. South Park Studios 'Well, are you on the list or not? It's weird that whenever it comes up, you just tell everyone to relax,' Satan continued. Trump replied, 'I'm not telling everyone to relax! Relax, guy!' South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone reached a $1.5 billion streaming deal with Paramount. They took shots at Paramount in early July after its season premiere was delayed by two weeks. Reps for South Park did not immediately reply to Fox News Digital's request for comment.

Minors account for half of DC's carjacking arrests since 2023 — including pint-sized perps as young as 12: police data
Minors account for half of DC's carjacking arrests since 2023 — including pint-sized perps as young as 12: police data

New York Post

time4 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Minors account for half of DC's carjacking arrests since 2023 — including pint-sized perps as young as 12: police data

More than half of the carjackers arrested in Washington, DC over the last two years were minors, the majority of whom were just 15 and 16 years old, according to a shocking review of police data in the nation's capital — which has come under the spotlight after President Trump's latest threat of a federal takeover. Since August 2023, DC police have collared 333 carjacking suspects and 56% of those busts were of kids under 18, figures from Metropolitan Police Department show. And 60% of the juveniles arrested for stealing cars were 15 or 16 — but ages ranged from 17 to as young as 12, according to police records. Advertisement 6 Former Department of Government Efficiency staffer Edward Coristine was beaten by a gang of 10 youths during an attempted carjacking in Washington, DC. Truth Social/@realDonaldTrump The disturbing statistics emerged as Trump has called on DC to start charging 14 year old's as adults to wrangle what he described as the 'totally out of control' crime in the city. Over the past two years, DC saw a total of 1,046 carjackings — vehicle thefts where the owner was present. And 72% of those crimes involved a gun. Advertisement Meanwhile, motor vehicle thefts — where the owner is not necessarily present — remained constant over the last two years — with 2,847 reported since Aug. 6 2024 and 2,844 during the same period the year before. In the latest would-be carjacking to rock DC, former Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer Edward Coristine, 19, was badly beaten by a gang of 10 youths on Sunday morning. Two 15-year-olds — a male and a female — have since been arrested in the attack on Coristine, which occurred as he thwarted a carjacking attempt. 6 President Trump has threatened a federal takeover of DC over crime. Trump Truth Social Advertisement Trump cited the assault on Crostine in his Tuesday threat to bring the District of Columbia under federal control. 'Crime in Washington, D.C., is totally out of control. Local 'youths' and gang members, some only 14, 15, and 16-year-olds, are randomly attacking, mugging, maiming, and shooting innocent Citizens, at the same time knowing that they will be almost immediately released,' the president fumed on Truth Social. 'They are not afraid of Law Enforcement because they know nothing ever happens to them, but it's going to happen now!' he wrote. 'The law in D.C. must be changed to prosecute these 'minors' as adults, and lock them up for a long time, starting at age 14.' Trump added that if DC leaders didn't clean up the streets, he would have no choice but to 'take federal control of the City.' Advertisement 6 An Uber eats driver was killed in a carjacking from two tween girls in 2021. DC's left-leaning Attorney General Brian Schwalb has been famously relaxed about pursuing punishments for juvenile offenders — notably telling Fox 5 'kids are kids' in 2023 while explaining why he didn't believe in charging youths as adults. 'When you're talking about teenagers particular — their brains are developing, their minds are developing, and they're biologically prone to make mistakes,' Schwalb said at the time, explaining he believed in providing 'a chance of rehabilitation and going on to live lives of success and independence.' But some legal experts — echoing Trump's assessment of the situation — think Schwalb's stance might be exactly what is fueling DC's pint-sized perps. 'It's led to perverse incentives,' Heritage Foundation senior legal fellow and former Florida Assistant US Attorney Zack Smith told The Post. 6 Surveillance footage of the suspects who carjacked an FBI agent in 2023 in DC. Metropolitan Police Department 'Gangs are going out and recruiting very young juveniles to commit very violent crimes — things like shootings, carjackings, drug dealing, you name it — because they know under the D.C. attorney general's policy that even if these juveniles are caught for committing these crimes, they're likely only to receive a slap on the wrist,' he said. 'They may serve some period of time in a juvenile detention facility,' Smith added. 'The DC attorney general has essentially said that he is never, never going to prosecute a juvenile as an adult. No matter how old the juvenile is, no matter severe the crime that the juvenile offender may have committed.' Advertisement DC's youth crime has forced crackdowns from city leaders, with Mayor Muriel Bowser imposing a district-wide 11 p.m. curfew for everyone younger than 18 through the end of August. 6 Police responding to Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar getting carjacked in 2023. Fox News 6 A man pointing a gun out of a car window during an attempted carjacking that spanned from DC to Maryland in 2023. FOX 5 Washington DC Some neighborhoods even have 7 p.m. curfews for minors. Advertisement And in 2021, a special task force was assigned to address carjackings. The district has been wrestling with its crime in recent months and years. A 21-year-old congressional intern was killed by a stray bullet in July, and last year former Trump administration official Mike Gill was killed in a carjacking. Advertisement Then in 2023, Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar was carjacked at gunpoint outside his apartment while a month later an FBI agent was also carjacked. And the year before Schwalb took office, a 66-year-old Uber driver was killed when two teen girls — 13 and 15 — used a stun gun to carjack him. Both girls pleaded guilty to murder, but were only sent to juvenile facilities until they turned 21.

ACA premiums set to spike
ACA premiums set to spike

The Hill

time4 minutes ago

  • The Hill

ACA premiums set to spike

The proposed rates are preliminary and could change before being finalized in late summer. The analysis includes proposed rate changes from 312 insurers in all 50 states and DC. It's the largest rate change insurers have requested since 2018, the last time that policy uncertainty contributed to sharp premium increases. On average, ACA marketplace insurers are raising premiums by about 20 percent in 2026, KFF found. Insurers said they wanted higher premiums to cover rising health care costs, like hospitalizations and physician care, as well as prescription drug costs. Tariffs on imported goods could play a role in rising medical costs, but insurers said there was a lot of uncertainty around implementation, and not many insurers were citing tariffs as a reason for higher rates. But they are adding in higher increases due to changes being made by the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress. For instance, the majority of insurers said they are taking into account the potential expiration of enhanced premium tax credits. Those subsidies, put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, are set to expire at the end of the year, and there are few signs that Republicans are interested in tackling the issue at all. If Congress takes no action, premiums for subsidized enrollees are projected to increase by over 75 percent starting in January 2026, according to KFF. But some states are pushing back. Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (R) on Wednesday called on the state's insurance commissioner to disapprove the proposed increases from Centene and Blue Cross Blue Shield. The companies filed increases of up to 54 percent and 25.5 percent, respectively, she said. 'Arkansas' Insurance Commissioner is required to disapprove of proposed rate increases if they are excessive or discriminatory, and these are both,' Huckabee Sanders said in a statement. 'I'm calling on my Commissioner to follow the law, reject these insane rate increases, and protect Arkansans.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store