House prosecutor chosen to read articles of impeachment in VP Sara trial
The House prosecution panel has already selected which one of them will read the Articles of Impeachment against Vice President Sara Duterte before the Senate next week, but declined to name the prosecutor for now.
'While I did not personally have the chance to speak with any of the senator-judges, I understand based on the agreement between the House of Representatives and the Senate that one prosecutor will be asked to read the seven Articles of Impeachment during the June 2 session of the Senate,' impeachment prosecutor and Iloilo 3rd District Representative Lorenz Defensor told reporters in an online interview.
Defensor said it is not required for all 11 House impeachment prosecutors to be present at the Senate during the reading.
'I did not receive any instruction that all prosecutors are required to attend the June 2 session. But only one prosecutor will be required to read the seven articles of impeachment,' he said.
The House impeachment prosecution panel had met earlier this week, the last big group meeting before their appearance at the Senate, although Defensor said smaller groups may meet again this week.
He also said the 19th Congress may be ending soon but it is only their legislative duty that will be ending and not their duty relative to the impeachment.
Defensor was reacting to Senator-elect Vicente "Tito" Sotto III's statement that whatever was discussed in the 19th Congress cannot be carried over to the 20th Congress.
'Tandaan natin na kapag nagtapos ang 19th Congress, ang nagtatapos lang, ang aming legislative power. Hindi natatapos ang isang impeachment proceeding na nakahain na sa Senado,' Defensor said.
(Let us remember that when the 19th Congress ends, what only ends is our legislative power. An impeachment proceeding before the Senate will not be ended by that.)
He compared the impeachment case to a regular case filed in court.
'Once a case is filed with the trial court, the judge may retire, the judge may get promoted, but the case stays on with the trial court. Hindi nadi-dismiss ang kaso just because napalitan ang mga judges [The case is not dismissed just because the judges are replaced],' he added.
When asked if the issue may be brought before the Supreme Court, Defensor replied, 'As far as we are concerned, since the impeachment is a purely political question, the Supreme Court should not interfere with the impeachment process.'
But, he added, 'We will respect whatever decision the Senate will have on this and how they will act on it, as well as the Supreme Court on how they will decide on the pending petitions.'
There are two petitions before the Supreme Court: one filed by a lawyer asking the SC to compel the Senate to proceed with the trial and another filed by Vice President Sara Duterte asking the SC to block the impeachment, saying it violates the one-year ban rule.
'We also have to understand that the impeachment is the highest form of national inquest in our country. Hindi dapat pigilan ito [It must not be stopped] because the impeachment is intended to protect the people, to protect the government, from a high public official who is sitting in office and should be removed if necessary if she committed a violation of the Constitution,' Defensor stressed.
When asked if a senator can choose not to take their oath as an impeachment court judge, Defensor replied, 'If you are a sitting senator and an impeachment proceeding is pending before the Senate, you have to do your constitutional duty to take your oath and act as senator-judge. Just like the prosecutors, we did not request to be prosecutors, we did not intend to be prosecutors. But we were elected by 215 members of Congress. And it is incumbent upon us to do our Constitutional duty to prosecute this impeachment complaint.'
Regarding President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr.'s pronouncements against the impeachment, Defensor said, 'The President should not be involved in the impeachment. And I'm glad to hear that the President as the head of the Executive Department will not interfere with the impeachment process. As the President is the most powerful man in the country, he will exert undue influence on the Senator judges and we want the Senator judges to act independently, free from any influence from the executive department.' — BM, GMA Integrated News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
24 minutes ago
- GMA Network
Escudero: Sara Duterte impeachment trial up to 20th Congress
Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero said Monday that senators in the 20th Congress will get the final say on whether or not the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte will push through. The 20th Congress will open on July 28, on the day of the fourth State of the Nation Address (SONA) of President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. With only six plenary sessions remaining before the 19th Congress adjourns on June 13, Escudero said the next Congress will be the one to handle the trial proper, if pursued, once it convenes a day after SONA or on July 29. He explained that regardless of the decision of the 19th Congress regarding impeachment matters, it cannot bind the subsequent Congress. Meaning, the 20th Congress needs to decide again if it will reconvene as an impeachment court and proceed with the trial 'either by an affirmative vote or by their silence and acquiescence.' 'Pwedeng pagbotohan 'yun ng plenaryo ng 19th Congress pero anuman ang desisyon namin, hindi pwede i-bind 'yung 20th Congress. So pwedeng magkaroon ng ibang pananaw 'yung 20th Congress. Halimbawa, pwedeng sabihin ng 19th Congress, tatawid 'yan pero ang pasya ng 20th Congress, hindi tatawid 'yan at idi-dismiss nila, so depende,' the Senate President said. (The 19th Congress can vote on it, but regardless of our decision, the 20th Congress cannot be bound. So the 20th Congress can have a different decision. For example, the 19th Congress can say that the impeachment trial will proceed, but the 20th Congress can say otherwise, so it depends.) 'Sa dulo, you have to understand in Congress, plenary is supreme. It's not the decision or the voice of one member even if he or she is the Senate President or an officer of the Senate or the House. Desisyon palagi ng plenaryo ang mangingibabaw sa anumang usapin,' he added. (In the end, you have to understand that in Congress, plenary is supreme. It's not the decision or the voice of one member even if he or she is the Senate President or an officer of the Senate or the House. The decision of the plenary will always prevail no matter what.) Five senators in the 20th Congress were endorsed by PDP-Laban, chaired by Sara's father former president Rodrigo Duterte, during the 2025 midterm elections: Ronald 'Bato' Dela Rosa, Bong Go, Rodante Marcoleta, Imee Marcos, and Camille Villar. They will join Senator Robin Padilla, who sits as the party's president. Other senators in the next Congress are either independent or are allied with other political parties. Escudero urged incoming senator-judges, regardless of who they are affiliated with, to remain impartial regarding the impeachment. 'Desisyon at pasya nila 'yon hindi para sa akin na husgahan 'yon. Pero nakalagay sa aming rules hangga't maaari ay maging impartial sana ang bawat senator-judge hangga't hindi pa naririnig 'yung kaso mismo. Maging ganun pa man ang pag-inhibit ay voluntary decision sa parte ng sinumang hukom. Hindi ito pinagbobotohan ng mga miyembro ng hukom mismo,' he said. (They have their own decision and it's not for me to judge. But it is stated in our rules that every senator-judge should be impartial as much as possible until the case has been heard. Even so, inhibition is a voluntary decision on the part of any judge. It is not voted upon by the members of the senator-judges themselves.) Asked if the impeachment trial will proceed as scheduled on July 30, Escudero said that it should "in the ordinary course of events," unless the senators decide otherwise. Based on the proposed schedule, the oath-taking of newly elected senator-judges before the Senate, sitting as an impeachment court, will take place on July 29 at 9 a.m., followed by a plenary session in the afternoon. The trial proper will then begin on July 30 from 9 a.m. until 2:00 pm. Last week, Escudero announced that the reading of impeachment raps against Duterte would be moved from June 2 to June 11, as the Congress needs to prioritize the passage of the items in the administration's legislative agenda before the 19th Congress adjourned sine die on June 14. House Speaker Martin Romualdez agree that convening the impeachment court for the trial of the Vice President is up to the Senate 'The Senate President's letter to me is pretty straightforward. Kaya 'yung impeachment complaint ay nasa Senado na. So we leave it to their sound discretion as to how they want to proceed and conduct [the impeachment trial],' Romualdez told reporters. "The Senate President outlined the priority measures that they would like to prioritize first, so we have to respect the decision of the Senate President,' he added. Duterte was impeached by the House of Representatives on February 5, with over 200 congressmen endorsing the complaint against her. She was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes mainly over alleged misuse of around P612.5 million worth of confidential funds and threatening to kill President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr., his wife Liza and the President's cousin and Speaker Romualdez. The Vice President, for her part, said she is looking forward to her impeachment trial in the upcoming 20th Congress because she 'wants a bloodbath." She clarified over the weekend that she meant her own blood, even likening the impeachment trial to a crucifixion. —with a report from Llanesca Panti/AOL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
3 hours ago
- GMA Network
Escudero: Marcos didn't order postponement of reading of impeachment raps vs VP Sara
President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. was not behind the delay of the presentation of the Articles of Impeachment by the House prosecution panel against Vice President Sara Duterte before the Senate, Senate President Francis 'Chiz' Escudero said Monday. At a press conference, Escudero explained that the decision came after the Legislative-Executive Development Council (LEDAC) meeting on Thursday, May 29, upon consultation with some senators. 'No, it did not,' the Senate President said when asked if the suspension was a directive from Marcos. 'I was not even able to tell Martin, the Speaker, about that. He found out through the letter that I sent him,' he added. Escudero also said the delay has nothing to do with his bid to continue his Senate leadership in the 20th Congress. 'I don't see the connection whatsoever. No…It has nothing to do, especially given the fact that the 20th Congress will have a totally different composition,' he said. Last week, Escudero announced that the reading of impeachment raps against Duterte would be moved from June 2 to June 11, as the Congress needs to prioritize the passage of the items in the administration's legislative agenda before the 19th Congress adjourned sine die on June 14. He said that the Senate's convening as an impeachment court may proceed also on June 11. 'June 11, ipe-present ng Kamara ang Articles of Impeachment—paguusapan, pagde-debatihan, at kung wala ay ire-refer 'yan sa committee of rules na magsisilbing senyal at hudyat para i-create ang impeachment court sa [June] 11 din,' he said. (On June 11, the House will present the Articles of Impeachment—we'll discuss it, debate about it, and after that, it will be referred to the committee of rules that will serve as a sign and signal to create the impeachment court on June 11 as well.) 'Susumpa kami, iko-convene ang impeachment court, mag-aapprove ng rules, at magi-issue ng summons. Doon magwawakas ang procedure na gagawin sa ilalim ng 19th Congress sa June 11,' he added. (We will take an oath and the impeachment court will be convened. The rules will be approved, and summons will be issued. That's when the procedure under the 19th Congress will end, on June 11.) With the postponement, Escudero explained that nobody loses nor benefit because even if the Senate convenes now as impeachment court, they still can't hold the trial in the 19th Congress due to limited time and therefore needs to be passed to the next Congress. Duterte was impeached by the House of Representatives on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint against her. She was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. — RSJ, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
5 hours ago
- GMA Network
NCAP will remain amid postponement of EDSA rebuild —DOTr
The No Contact Apprehension Policy (NCAP) will remain amid the postponement of the EDSA rehabilitation, Transportation Secretary Vince Dizon said Monday. 'I think so, I think so. I think NCAP will stay because NCAP is not just about EDSA. It's about enforcing— a more efficient way of enforcing our traffic rules,' Dizon said in a press briefing. Over the weekend, President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. announced the postponement of the rehabilitation, which was supposed to begin on June 13. Marcos said the project needs to be studied for one month to know if there are new technologies that can be used to hasten the rehabilitation of the 23.8-kilometer road. 'I want to do this faster, 'yun ang sinabi po ng pangulo. Gusto niyang mas mabilis. Ang sabi nga niya kung kayang anim na buwan lang,' Dizon said. (The president said he wants to do this faster. He even said, if it can be done in just six months.) The Department of Transportation previously said heavy traffic is expected once the EDSA rehabilitation begins. It was expected to last until 2027. 'I think this shows the President's resolve in not only rebuilding EDSA but in making sure that the inconvenience to the motoring public and to the commuters is minimized using the most advanced technology that is out there,' Dizon added. NCAP was resumed after the Supreme Court partially lifted the temporary restraining order against the policy, allowing only the MMDA to implement it. —AOL, GMA Integrated News
