Minister Priyank Kharge slams Centre over denial of permission for U.S. visit
Karnataka Minister Priyank Kharge on Thursday (June 19, 2025) criticised the Centre for denying him permission to travel to the U.S. to interact with multinational companies to attract investments to the state.
According to sources, Mr. Kharge was slated to lead a delegation to Boston for Bio 2025 and San Francisco for the Design Automation Conference.
However, due to denial of permission, he was forced to cut short his ongoing trip and returned from Paris to Bengaluru on Wednesday night.
Mr. Kharge vowed to raise the matter with the Ministry of External Affairs and seek its response for denying him permission.
'It seems that somewhere Centre is trying to curtail the fame of Karnataka,' the Minister, who holds Information Technology and Biotechnology portfolio, told reporters here.
He acknowledged the union government's authority to decline permission but stressed the need for a justification for the decision.
'Rejecting my official tour is improper,' Mr. Kharge added. The minister said he would take it up with the Centre.
'We will not leave it just like that. I am going to write to the MEA seeking a valid explanation on why there was a denial of our delegation and a support from the Government of India,' Mr. Kharge said.
He also requested the Chief Minister to write to Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Mr. Kharge also said that he was visiting the U.S. not to discuss politics but to attract investments.
'People in the USA have no time to listen to our politics. We are going there to invite them to invest in Karnataka. The investment that comes to Karnataka will not only benefit the state but also the Centre,' the Minister insisted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Tharoor downplays Congress rift, says any differences can be resolved behind closed doors
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has downplayed reports of a rift within the party, saying any differences he may have with the leadership should be resolved privately. 'If there are any differences, it should be discussed behind closed doors with the people concerned, and that is where I want to leave it,' Tharoor said in an interview with NDTV. The senior leader said he had been 'loyal to the Congress for 16 years' and stressed that any disagreements were limited to 'some elements of the leadership.' He added, 'This is hardly the time to discuss such matters.' Tharoor's remarks come amid a series of controversies within the party, including his participation in the Centre's Operation Sindoor diplomatic outreach, a move that reportedly upset some in the Congress. Critics within the party accused him of endorsing the BJP's agenda, calling him a 'super spokesperson' for what they termed government publicity stunts. Adding to the friction was Tharoor's absence from the Congress campaign in the Nilambur by-election. Asked about this, Tharoor said that he wished the Congress candidate well. Earlier in the day he had said to the media that he was not invited to join the campaign, unlike previous bypolls such as Wayanad in 2024.
United News of India
2 hours ago
- United News of India
Mizoram's Kolasib district emerging as key exporter of oil palm
Aizawl, June 19 (UNI) Kolasib district is emerging as Mizoram's leading oil palm exporter, with local farmers earning over Rs 7 crore from the sale of fresh fruit bunches (FFBs) last year alone. According to Godrej Agrovet Ltd, which manages the only oil palm processing mill in Northeast India located at Bukvannei, Kolasib, the company purchased 5,335 metric tonnes of FFBs in 2024. The figure is expected to rise to around Rs 9 crore in 2025, signaling a promising future for oil palm growers in the region. The development was highlighted during a review meeting chaired by Deputy Commissioner Robert C Lalhmangaiha at the DC's Conference Hall in Kolasib. The meeting brought together officials, industry partners and farmer representatives to assess the progress and challenges in oil palm cultivation. DC Lalhmangaiha said oil palm is now a 'priority crop' under the central government policy, receiving attention from top officials in Delhi. 'The visit of central authorities to Kolasib district reflects the importance given to oil palm cultivation and to the farmers themselves,' he said, stressing the crop's potential to transform rural livelihoods. Oil palm farming was introduced in Mizoram in 2005 under a state partnership with Godrej Agrovet Ltd, targeting Kolasib and Mamit districts. As of now, Mizoram has around 26,680 hectares under oil palm cultivation, of which 6,965 hectares are in Kolasib alone, involving more than 2,100 farmers across 29 villages. Notably, Mizoram accounts for 78% of Northeast India's oil palm acreage, positioning it as a vital player in the Centre's National Mission on Edible Oils–Oil Palm (NMEO–OP). Under the scheme, the government released Rs 2.2 crore in viability gap payments for 2022–23 and Rs 76 lakh for 2023–24 to support Kolasib and Mamit farmers. At the Kolasib meeting, Lalruatkima, Senior Development Officer of Godrej Agrovet Ltd, announced plans to set up an oil palm refinery within the state this year. 'Once the refinery and packaging unit come up, Mizoram-grown oil palm will not only be exported—it will also be processed and consumed locally,' he said. He added that a 'one-stop solution' is being developed to address farmers' input and advisory needs more effectively. Despite the progress, challenges remain. Nearly half the plantations in Kolasib reportedly lack road access, which affects transportation and profit margins. Water scarcity and environmental concerns—such as soil degradation and loss of traditional farming systems—have also been cited by researchers and NGOs. The meeting acknowledged these issues and called for sustainable development practices. Officials present included representatives of the District Oil Palm Zonal Committee, the District Oil Palm Farmers' Association, District Agriculture Officer Joseph Lalnuntluanga, and executives from Godrej Agrovet Ltd. UNI ZS RN
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Why a Calcutta court ordered the Centre to release MGNREGA funds
After nearly three years of political standoff and administrative impasse, the Calcutta High Court on June 18 directed that the 100-day rural employment guarantee scheme (MGNREGA) be resumed in West Bengal from August 1. The verdict comes as a significant breakthrough in a long-running dispute between the Centre and the state, marked by allegations of corruption, political bias and denial of rights to millions of rural conflict began in the wake of corruption allegations in the implementation of MGNREGA in Bengal, prompting the Narendra Modi government to halt all funding to the state under the scheme. Since then, not a single rupee has been released, effectively suspending the programme and impacting the livelihoods of lakhs of rural families dependent on it. While the Centre justified its actions citing misuse of funds, the state government led by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, and even political rivals like the Left, have accused the Union government of engaging in selective non-cooperation and politically motivated high court's intervention may mark a turning point. During the hearing on June 18, Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam offered a stern yet nuanced observation: 'From the beginning, I've said one thing— out of 10 apples, a few may be rotten, but the rest are still fresh.' Acknowledging the past issues but refusing to let them justify continued inaction, he added, 'What has happened is in the past. But the scheme has remained shut for nearly three years. Now it must be restarted. The Centre cannot indefinitely suspend this programme.' He further instructed that the possibility of resuming the scheme from July or August be seriously judgment also clarified that while the Centre has the authority to impose supervisory mechanisms to curb corruption—including conditions or monitoring arrangements—it cannot use such powers to indefinitely stall an entire welfare programme that affects millions. This assertion directly challenges the Union government's prolonged withholding of funds, despite similar corruption charges having emerged in several other states, including in the Hindi belt and even in Gujarat, without those states facing such drastic punitive Reacting strongly to the court's ruling, CM Mamata launched a fierce critique of the Centre's stance. Addressing the media from Nabanna—the state secretariat—she said, 'We will review the petition, but first, they must release the money. It's been four years. Not a single rupee has been given. This is the people's money.' She accused the Centre of inflicting deliberate harm on Bengal's rural poor and declared that the state government had to pay the pending wages of workers from its own funds in the absence of central support. Since 2022, the state government has paid Rs 16,637.03 crore as wages from its own coffers, besides clearing pending wages of Rs 3,732 crore under demanded reimbursement of these expenditures, stating, 'From the day the scheme was stopped, the Centre must calculate and pay the dues. Why was our money diverted to other states? That is a crime.' She also referred to the state's 'Karmashree' initiative, launched to provide employment using state funds as a substitute for its submission to the court, the Union government maintained that it had no intent to punish genuine workers, but raised the issue of verification—questioning who would confirm whether work was indeed carried out. It also insisted that the funds allegedly misused by the state be returned and called for the appointment of a central nodal officer to oversee the programme's implementation in the this argument appeared unconvincing to many observers and legal analysts. The primary question raised was: if the Centre was serious about ensuring oversight and integrity, why did it take nearly three years to propose such mechanisms? Moreover, who bears responsibility for the economic hardship endured by the rural poor during this extended suspension?The state, for its part, argued that no nodal officer was needed, as the entire scheme was administered through centralised digital portals, making discrepancies immediately visible and rectifiable. While this stance underscores the growing role of technology in welfare governance, it does not fully absolve the state government of blame. Repeated allegations of corruption in Bengal's MGNREGA implementation have surfaced over the years, and critics argue the state failed to act with adequate urgency to stem malpractices before the situation escalated into a full-blown intergovernmental despite these mutual shortcomings, the court's directive is being viewed by many as a positive development—a long-awaited reprieve for lakhs of marginalised workers and families in West Bengal's villages. The court has reasserted a crucial democratic principle: even amid allegations and administrative friction, the rights of the people to livelihood and public welfare cannot be indefinitely held its heart, the impasse over MGNREGA funding is not merely a matter of financial disbursement or administrative oversight—it is a microcosm of the increasingly fraught relationship between the Centre and opposition-ruled states. It reflects how welfare, accountability and political rivalry intersect in contemporary India, and how institutional checks—such as the judiciary—remain vital in upholding constitutional guarantees when executive action fails to do August approaches, much will depend on how both governments respond—not only in terms of implementing the court's order, but also in restoring the dignity and stability of a social security scheme that was never meant to be a political to India Today Magazine
