logo
U.S. envoy praises Lebanon's reply on disarming Hezbollah

U.S. envoy praises Lebanon's reply on disarming Hezbollah

UPI5 days ago
U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and Special Envoy to Syria Thomas Barrack speaks during a news conference after a meeting with the Lebanese president at the presidential palace in Baabda, east of Beirut, Lebanon, on Monday. Barrack is on an official visit to Lebanon to meet with Lebanese leaders. Photo by Lebanese Presidency Press Office/EPA
BEIRUT, Lebanon, July 7 (UPI) -- U.S. special envoy Thomas Barrack said Monday he was "unbelievably satisfied" with Lebanon's response to Washington's proposals to disarm Hezbollah, saying Israel seeks peace with its neighbor and Hezbollah needs to see that there is a path forward for them.
Barrack, however, warned that war-ravaged Lebanon risks being left behind if it fails to seize the current opportunities with the region changing at high speed.
The envoy, who was speaking after a meeting with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun shortly after his arrival in Beirut, praised the Lebanese officials for presenting "a thoughtful and considered" seven-page response to his June 19 roadmap.
His initial proposals include a phased approach to disarm Hezbollah and other militant groups, the implementation of necessary reforms to unlock funds for reconstruction and help solve its acute financial crisis as well as the need to improve ties with neighboring Syria.
According to a statement released by the Presidential Palace, Barrack was handed over Lebanon's reply with "ideas for a comprehensive solution."
"We are creating a go-forward plan. To create that, we need dialogue. What the government gave us was something spectacular," Barrack said. "We are both committed to get to the details and get a resolution. So, I am very, very hopeful."
He said the mechanism set up to monitor the Nov. 27 cease-fire accord that ended 14 months of a devastating Israel-Hezbollah war "wasn't sufficient" and "had no ability to correct a default," referring to the mistrust between Israel and Hezbollah.
Israel has continued striking southern Lebanon and other areas of the country since the cease-fire accord, which was brokered by the United States and France, went into effect Feb. 18. It has also refused to fully withdraw and retained five strategic positions inside south Lebanon to force the full disarmament of Hezbollah.
More than 200 Lebanese civilians and Hezbollah field commanders were killed in the ongoing strikes, which Israel claims to target suspected Hezbollah positions and foil the group's attempts to reorganize its ranks and rearm in violations of the cease-fire accord. Lebanon and Hezbollah on their part recorded more than 3,700 Israeli violations.
In line with the cease-fire agreement, the Lebanese Army has taken control of most of Hezbollah's positions and military facilities, pushing the militant group away from the border with Israel and preventing it from having a military presence south of the Litani River. The Army could not complete its deployment because of Israel's continued occupation of the five points inside south Lebanon.
Prime Minister Nawaf Salam explained after a meeting with the U.S. envoy that Barrack "wouldn't have come with new ideas" if the mechanism to monitor the ceasefire succeeded in ending the ongoing hostilities.
"These are ideas for implementing the cessation of hostilities arrangements ... based on the principle of parallel and reciprocal steps -- not that Israel withdraws first and then we start talking about the issue of exclusive arms control, or that if there is no exclusivity of arms, Israel doesn't withdraw," Salam said.
"That's not how this process works. There are interlinked steps that unfold over time."
He said Lebanon's demands include the necessity of a full Israeli withdrawal from all Lebanese territory, a comprehensive and complete cessation of hostile activities, the immediate start of reconstruction efforts and the release of the remaining Lebanese prisoners held by Israel.
"The exclusivity of weapons must be in the hands of the Lebanese state, and it alone must reclaim the decision over war and peace," Salam said. "This authority must lie solely with the Lebanese state, without any partnership with any other party."
On Sunday, Hezbollah leader Sheikh Naim Qassem said his group, which has repeatedly refused to lay down arms, was ready for both choices: peace and building Lebanon, but also for defending it and confronting Israel until it ends its air strikes and pulls out from south Lebanon.
The U.S. envoy said there is "an opportunity in the air," calling on Lebanon not to miss it as the region is changing and "everything is moving at warp speed."
Barrack said that he believes Israel wants peace, not war, with Lebanon while Hezbollah needs to see that "there is a future for them ... that there is an intersection of peace and prosperity for them."
"It has been a nightmare on both sides, for both countries and everybody is tired of it," he said. "I think both countries are trying to give the same thing: the notion of a stand down agreement of the cessation of hostilities and a road to peace... but everybody will have to give up something."
Barrack said while Syria "went from absolute chaos to hope of the world standing behind it" and started a dialogue with Israel, Lebanon "can't be left behind."
He warned Lebanon that the region "the region is moving at mach speed," and will be "left behind sadly" if it refuses to change.
But if it does change, Barrack said Washington will support it, adding that U.S. President Donald Trump "for some reason, believes that Lebanon still is the key to the region and can be the Pearl of the Mediterranean."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gaza ceasefire talks on verge of collapse, Palestinian officials say
Gaza ceasefire talks on verge of collapse, Palestinian officials say

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Gaza ceasefire talks on verge of collapse, Palestinian officials say

Negotiations between Israel and Hamas in Qatar on a new Gaza ceasefire and hostage release deal are on the brink of collapse, according to Palestinian officials familiar with the details of the discussions. One senior official told the BBC that Israel had "bought time" during Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to Washington this week and deliberately stalled the process by sending a delegation to Doha with no real authority to make decisions on key points of contention. They include the withdrawal of Israeli troops and humanitarian aid distribution. Before he left the US on Thursday, Netanyahu had maintained a positive tone, saying he hoped to complete an agreement "in a few days". He said the proposed deal would see Hamas release half of the 20 living hostages it is still holding and just over half of the 30 dead hostages during a truce lasting 60 days. 'They were just kids': Mother mourns sons killed in Israeli strike while waiting for aid Outrage builds over plan to force all Gazans to southern city Gaza's largest functioning hospital facing disaster, medics warn, as Israel widens offensive Since last Sunday, Israeli and Hamas negotiators have attended eight rounds of indirect "proximity" talks in separate buildings in Doha. They have been facilitated by Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdul Rahman Al Thani and senior Egyptian intelligence officials, and attended by US envoy Brett McGurk. The mediators have relayed dozens of verbal and written messages between the Hamas delegation and the Israeli delegation, which has included military, security and political officials. But on Friday night, Palestinian officials familiar with the negotiations told the BBC they were on the verge of collapse, with the two sides deeply divided on several contentious issues. They said the most recent discussions had focused on two of those issues: the mechanism for delivering humanitarian aid in Gaza and the extent of the Israeli military withdrawal. Hamas has insisted that humanitarian assistance must enter Gaza and be distributed via United Nations agencies and international relief organisations. Israel, on the other hand, is pushing for aid distribution via the controversial Israeli- and US-backed mechanism run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). According to mediators involved in the process, there has been some limited progress on bridging the divide over this issue. However, no formal agreement has been reached. The second major sticking point is over the extent of the Israeli withdrawal. During the fifth round of talks, Israeli negotiators reportedly handed mediators a written message stating that Israel would maintain a limited "buffer zone" inside Gaza that was between 1km and 1.5km (0.6-0.9 miles) deep. Hamas, according to a Palestinian official who attended at least two of the rounds of talks, viewed this proposal as a possible starting point for compromise. However, when Hamas requested and received a map outlining Israel's proposed withdrawal zones, the document contradicted the earlier message, showing far deeper military positions. The map was said to indicate buffer zones that were up to 3km (1.8 miles) deep in certain areas and confirmed a continued Israeli presence in vast swathes of territory. They covered all of the southern city of Rafah, 85% of the village of Khuzaa east of Khan Younis, substantial parts of the northern towns of Beit Lahia and Beit Hanoun, and eastern neighbourhoods of Gaza City, such as Tuffah, Shejaiya and Zeitoun. Hamas officials saw the map as a bad-faith manoeuvre by Israel, further eroding trust between the sides. Palestinian officials accused the Israeli delegation of deliberately stalling to create a positive diplomatic backdrop for the Israeli prime minister's recent visit to Washington. "They were never serious about these talks," one senior Palestinian negotiator told the BBC. "They used these rounds to buy time and project a false image of progress." The official also claimed that Israel was pursuing a long-term strategy of forced displacement under the guise of humanitarian planning. He alleged that Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz's plan to move Palestinians to a "humanitarian city" in Rafah was part of a broader effort to permanently relocate them. "The goal of concentrating civilians near the Egyptian border is to pave the way for their expulsion either across the Rafah crossing into Egypt or out through the sea," the official said. On Monday, Katz briefed Israeli reporters that he had instructed the military to prepare a plan for a new camp in Rafah that would initially house about 600,000 Palestinians - and eventually the whole 2.1 million population. According to the plan, the Palestinians would be security screened by Israeli forces before being allowed in and not permitted to leave. Critics, both domestically and internationally, have condemned the proposal, with human rights groups, academics and lawyers calling it a blueprint for a "concentration camp". With the talks at a critical juncture, the Palestinian side is calling on the US to intervene more forcefully and pressure Israel to make meaningful concessions. Without such intervention, mediators warn, the Doha negotiations could collapse entirely. That is a scenario that would further complicate regional efforts to reach a durable ceasefire and avert a broader humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. Diplomats in Doha say there is still a narrow window for compromise, but that the situation remains fragile. "This process is hanging by a thread," one regional official said. "Unless something changes dramatically and quickly, we may be heading towards a breakdown." The Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage. At least 57,823 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry.

Can an ‘ethical' spyware maker justify providing its tech to ICE?
Can an ‘ethical' spyware maker justify providing its tech to ICE?

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Can an ‘ethical' spyware maker justify providing its tech to ICE?

Paragon, an Israeli spyware company that claims to operate as an 'ethical' surveillance vendor, faced scrutiny when earlier this year Italy was caught using Paragon's tools to spy on the phones of two journalists. Paragon responded by cutting Italy off from its surveillance products, becoming the first spyware company to ever publicly name one of its customers after the misuse of its products. Now, Paragon might face a new ethical dilemma: whether or not it will allow ICE agents to use its spyware. A $2 million one-year contract that Paragon signed in September 2024 with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) remains under review and has not yet taken effect, and Paragon has so far not supplied ICE's Homeland Security Investigations with its spyware tools, the company told TechCrunch. Since taking office in January, the Trump administration has authorized ICE to carry out large-scale immigration raids across the U.S., leading to the detention of thousands of migrants — and numerous U.S. citizens — in part thanks to data stored in federal databases and using technology provided by govtech giant Palantir. Considering ICE is poised to get a significantly larger budget following the passing of Trump's flagship Big Beautiful Bill Act into law, spyware could serve as a powerful surveillance tool in the Trump administration's immigration enforcement operations. With two months left before the contract expires, Paragon may never supply its spyware to ICE. But until the contract runs out on September 29, the U.S. government could approve it at any moment, forcing Paragon to make a decision about the use of its tools on U.S. soil. Right now, the company doesn't want to talk about this dilemma at all. When asked by TechCrunch, Paragon would not say what it plans to do if the contract passes review, or clarify what will happen with its relationship with ICE if the contract goes forward. Do you have more information about Paragon? From a non-work device, you can contact Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai securely on Signal at +1 917 257 1382, or via Telegram and Keybase @lorenzofb, or email. You also can contact TechCrunch via SecureDrop. Paragon's contract with ICE has been on pause since the paperwork was signed. Homeland Security issued a near-immediate stop-work order with the goal of reviewing whether the contract complied with a Biden-era executive order. The order restricts U.S. government agencies from using commercial spyware that could (or has been) abused by foreign governments to violate human rights, or to target Americans abroad. At the time, a Biden administration official told Wired that the U.S. government had 'immediately engaged' top leadership at Homeland Security, which houses ICE, to determine if the contract met the requirements of the executive order. Nine months on, Paragon's contract with ICE remains in limbo, and officials in the Trump White House did not have an update on its status. Trump administration spokesperson Abigail Jackson referred TechCrunch's questions to Homeland Security, and would not comment, when asked, about the Trump administration's position on the Biden-era spyware executive order, which remains in effect. A spokesperson for Homeland Security and ICE did not provide comment when contacted by TechCrunch. Spyware companies have historically been reticent to name their customers in any context, often for fear of reputational damage or risking lucrative government contracts. After WhatsApp revealed earlier this year that around 90 of its users, including journalists and human rights dissidents, had been targeted with Paragon's spyware, the company sought to distance itself from the hacks. Paragon's executive chairman John Fleming told TechCrunch then that it only sells to 'a select group of global democracies — principally, the United States and its allies.' In other words, Paragon wanted the world to know that it would sell to responsible government customers, and its response to the Italy scandal appears to reinforce the company's position. But in calling itself an ethical spyware vendor, Paragon has put the onus on itself to judge who it deals with. In doing so, the company has also opened the door for others to scrutinize its government customers and their ethics — whether they are the Italian government or ICE. As governments and their leaders change over time, Paragon may face the choice of having to re-evaluate who it works with. 'Given this administration's record of attacks on human rights and civil society organizations, we hope that Paragon would reconsider the agreement,' said Michael De Dora, the U.S. advocacy manager at Access Now, a nonprofit that has worked to expose spyware abuses. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

US aware of reported death of American after beating by Israeli settlers
US aware of reported death of American after beating by Israeli settlers

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

US aware of reported death of American after beating by Israeli settlers

By Kanishka Singh and Menna AlaaElDin WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. State Department said on Friday it was aware of the reported death of a U.S. citizen in the Israeli-occupied West Bank after reports emerged of Israeli settlers fatally beating a Palestinian American. Palestinian news agency WAFA, citing the local health ministry, said Saif al-Din Kamel Abdul Karim Musallat, aged in his 20s, died after he was beaten by Israeli settlers on Friday evening in an attack that also injured many people in a town north of Ramallah. Relatives of Musallat, who was from Tampa, Florida, were also quoted by the Washington Post as saying he was beaten to death by Israeli settlers. "We are aware of reports of the death of a U.S. citizen in the West Bank," a State Department spokesperson said, adding the department had no further comment "out of respect for the privacy of the family and loved ones" of the reported victim. The Israeli military said Israel was probing the incident in the town of Sinjil. It said rocks were hurled at Israelis near Sinjil and that "a violent confrontation developed in the area". Israel has expanded and consolidated settlements in the West Bank as part of the steady integration of these territories into the state of Israel in breach of international law, the U.N. human rights office said in March. Settler violence in the West Bank, including incursions into occupied territory and raids, has intensified since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in late 2023. Israel's military offensive has killed over 57,000 Palestinians in Gaza, according to Gaza's health ministry, and led to accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice and of war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Israel denies the accusations and says it is fighting in self-defense after the October 2023 Hamas attack that killed 1,200 people, according to Israeli tallies. Israeli killings of U.S. citizens in the West Bank in recent years include those of Palestinian American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, Palestinian American teenager Omar Mohammad Rabea and Turkish American activist Aysenur Ezgi Eygi. The United Nations' highest court said last year Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories and settlements there were illegal and should be withdrawn as soon as possible.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store