Ordinary Zambians lose out twice: to global looting and local corruption
Your editorial (The Guardian view on Zambia's Trumpian predicament: US aid cuts are dwarfed by a far bigger heist, 10 January) highlights research by Prof Andrew Fischer, and the exploitation of Zambia's commodity resources via illicit financial schemes. Many Zambians have raised the issue of this looting for years, but have met coordinated resistance. Consequently, Zambia's treasury loses billions of dollars in revenue. These losses are driven by well-known multinationals working in concert with certain insiders close to the Zambian state.
Your editorial also says: 'The US decision to cut $50m a year in aid to Zambia … is dreadful, and the reason given, corruption, rings hollow.' Alas, I disagree and wish to place this in context.
The aid cut followed large-scale theft of US-donated medical supplies by individuals connected to and within the Zambian state. Even before Donald Trump assumed office, Michael Gonzales, the US ambassador, confronted Zambian authorities about this. US officials engaged in 33 meetings with senior members of the Zambian government and officers from the Zambia police service and other law enforcement agencies. US officials urged the Zambians to take action to ensure medicines reached the country's poorest citizens. The president's inner circle ignored the warnings, ultimately leading to the aid cut. The Zambian government's reaction was to dismiss these legitimate concerns, saying diplomats should stay out of Zambia's internal affairs.
This response is inadequate, as the issues go beyond mere bureaucratic inefficiency and touch on profound state corruption.
The government's refusal to confront this reality is disappointing and has led to more suffering, where ordinary people who benefited from this aid will be most affected.Emmanuel MwambaZambia's high commissioner to South Africa (2015-19)
As a Zambian and UK citizen, I am both enraged and heartbroken by Prof Andrew Fischer's research exposing the systematic plunder of my country's wealth. While Donald Trump cuts our aid, citing 'corruption', the real thieves operate with complete impunity under the guise of legitimate business.
The figures are devastating: $5bn extracted in 2021 alone. This isn't corruption in the traditional sense, it's legalised theft orchestrated by multinational corporations that exploit our resources while leaving us in poverty. How can we be called corrupt when the very system designed to 'help' us facilitates our exploitation?
I think of my fellow Zambians struggling to access basic healthcare, education and clean water while billions flow to Swiss bank accounts. We sit on some of the world's most valuable mineral deposits, yet we're drowning in debt. This isn't coincidence – it's by design.
Foreign direct investment is often foreign direct extraction in disguise. Companies like Glencore and First Quantum Minerals have treated Zambia like a cash machine, using complex financial structures to strip our wealth while paying minimal taxes. When confronted, they simply leave or settle for pennies in the pound.
This global economic architecture, which enables legal plunder, must be challenged. African countries need new models of resource governance that prioritise our people over foreign shareholders. We need transparency requirements exposing these shadowy financial flows, progressive taxation capturing fair value from our resources, and regional cooperation preventing companies from playing us against each other.
The west's moralising about corruption while facilitating this systematic theft is breathtaking hypocrisy. Until the international community addresses the structural violence of this extractive system, their aid will remain what it truly is – a drop in the ocean compared with the torrent of wealth flowing out of Africa.Fiona MulaishoLondon
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki: Three decades, one leader - how independence hopes were dashed
Once hailed as part of a new generation of reformist African leaders, Eritrea's president, who recently marked 32 years in power, has long defied Afwerki now spends much of his time at his rural residence on a dusty hillside some 20km (12 miles) from the capital, the cabinet not having met since 2018, all power flows through him, and like a potentate he receives a string of local officials and foreign dignitaries at his is also a magnet for ordinary Eritreans hoping in vain that Isaias might help them with their 79-year-old has never faced an election in his three decades in power and there is little sign of that changing any time things looked very different in the was 45 when, as a rebel leader, his Eritrean People's Liberation Front (EPLF) defeated Ethiopia in 1991. Those who fought in the war are remembered each year on Martyrs' Day, 20 June. Tall and charismatic, he inspired hope both at home and 1993, following formal independence, Isaias appeared on the international stage as head of state for the first was in Cairo, where he attended a continental leaders' summit, that he lambasted the older generation of African leaders "who wanted to stay in power for decades".He vowed that Eritrea would never repeat the same old failed approach and promised a democratic order that would underpin the social and economic development of his people. His stance won him plaudits from Eritreans and diplomats alike. Riding the euphoria of the early years of independence and enjoying a glowing international reception, Isaias sought closer relations with the 1995, after inviting the Eritrean leader to the Oval Office, US President Bill Clinton expressed appreciation for the country's strong start on the road to had just begun drafting a new constitution expected to establish the rule of law and a democratic was supposed to be a "transitional president" until a constitutional government was elected. The new constitution was ratified by a constituent assembly in May just as Eritreans and the world were expecting national elections in 1998, war broke out between Eritrea and neighbouring Ethiopia over a disputed was accused of using the war as a justification to postpone the elections had promised a multiparty democratic system and his resolve was tested after a peace agreement was reached in of his cabinet ministers, including former close friends and comrades-in-arms, began to call for an open letter issued in March 2001, a group of senior government officials, who later became known as the G-15, accused the president of abusing his powers and becoming increasingly autocratic. They called for the implementation of the constitution and national elections. Starting from the mid 1990s, Eritreans had tasted some freedom, with emerging newspapers carrying critical voices — including from within the ruling party, that had been renamed the People's Front for Democracy and Justice (PFDJ).The transitional national assembly had decided when elections would take place, an electoral commission was being formed and proposed political party laws were under country seemed to be on a slow path towards this fragile opening abruptly closed in September 2001, while the world's attention was focussed on the 9/11 attacks in the a single morning, the authorities shut down all independent newspapers, effectively silencing critical voices. Many editors and journalists were detained and never seen the government arrested 11 of the G-15, including three former foreign ministers, a chief of staff of the armed forces and several members of the national assembly. They have not been seen or heard from hopes of many Eritreans were Isaias had already moved away from introducing democratic changes. "I had never had any intention of participating in political parties," he said in April 2001. "I don't have any intention of participating in a political party now, and I won't have any intention of participating in a political party in the future."He also described the democratic process as a "mess", saying that the PFDJ was "not a party. It is a nation". For many, it became clear the president would not allow democratic reforms to take hold. The silencing of critics and the failure to hold elections, earned him and his country pariah his supporters say he was unfairly targeted by Western nations and praise him as a symbol of national liberation. In 2002, he unofficially dissolved the transitional assembly that was meant to hold him accountable and in effect did the same with the cabinet in aging ministers with no real authority now lead weak government agencies, and several ministries - including defence - remain without wonder why the independence hero took such a repressive Adem, a former regional governor and senior ambassador, says Isaias never believed in democracy and has always been obsessed with power. He led the EPLF with an iron fist even before independence, according to Mr Abdella, who now lives in exile in London."He systematically weakened and removed leaders with public legitimacy and struggle credentials who could challenge his authority."To some surprise, in May 2014, Isaias announced plans for a new constitution, later saying that the constitution ratified in 1997 was "dead". But no progress has been made since proposal to write a new constitution may have been triggered by an attempted coup by senior military officers in drove tanks into the capital and seized control of national TV and radio stations for several the attempt was failing, they tried to broadcast a call to implement the 1997 constitution and release political prisoners. But security forces pulled the plug officials - including the mines minister, a governor, diplomats and a general - were detained. The leader of the coup killed himself to avoid Shiker, a former diplomat, left his post in Nigeria and sought asylum in the UK. His boss, Ambassador Ali Omeru, a veteran of the independence war, was later detained and remains unaccounted that lock people up "like Isaias Afwerki's do not allow genuine political and social institutions or the rule of law", says Mr Zeraslasie, now a PhD candidate at the UK's Leeds University."The indefinite suspension of Eritrea's constitution and the collapsing of government institutions into the office of the president must be understood in this context."Isolated internationally, Isaias withdrew from the global stage. He stopped attending summits such as the UN General Assembly and African Union meetings. The country's economy has "struggled", according to the World Bank's assessment last year."Economic activity is constrained by underdeveloped infrastructure, limited competition due to state dominance, and strict import controls," the authors said, adding that the financial sector remained "weak".Isaias himself acknowledged problems in an interview with state TV in December last year."A subsistence economy will lead us nowhere. Currently, we are not in a better position than many other African countries in this regard," he also refuses humanitarian aid, citing fears of dependency that would undermine his principle of "self-reliance".For many Eritreans, especially young people trapped in indefinite national service, which the authorities justify because of a series of conflicts and tense relations with its neighbours, daily life is a nightmare. Under a repressive regime, they face a future with little hope or freedom. Disillusioned by the lack of political progress and exhausted by forced conscription and state violence, many risk their lives to escape in search of the past two decades, hundreds of thousands have fled, crossing deserts and seas to find safe haven. Eritreans are currently the third most common nationality to be granted refugee status in the his independence day speech last month, Isaias gave no hint of any of the changes many Eritreans hope to see. There was no mention of a constitution, national elections or the release of political prisoners. At the same time there was no concrete plan to turn round the country's moribund criticism at home, President Isaias retains support among parts of the population, particularly within the military, ruling party networks and those who view him as a symbol of national independence and resistance against foreign president also has strong backing among some in the diaspora, who believe Western powers are conspiring to undermine Eritrea's hard-won frustration grew in Eritrea, Isaias retreated from Asmara in 2014 to his home that overlooks the Adi Hallo dam whose construction he closely Isaias nears 80, many fear what could happen apparent attempt to groom his eldest son to succeed him was reportedly blocked at a 2018 cabinet meeting, since when no further meetings have been there is no obvious succession plan or a credible opposition in the country who could replace the current regime, leaving many to find it hard to imagine a future without Isaias."The president's office is what's holding the country from collapse," warns Mr this year's Easter holiday, Isaias was seen kissing a cross during a church mass in Asmara. Some believe he is seeking spiritual redemption, others hope he may release political now, however, Isaias remains firmly in control, while Eritreans continue their long and anxious wait for change. You may also be interested in: Why Eritreans are at war with each other around the worldEritrea viewpoint: I fought for independence but I'm still waiting for freedomReporting on Africa's most secretive stateEritrea President Isaias Afwerki 'both charismatic and brutal''I haven't seen my parents for 17 years' Go to for more news from the African us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
Ordinary Zambians lose out twice: to global looting and local corruption
Your editorial (The Guardian view on Zambia's Trumpian predicament: US aid cuts are dwarfed by a far bigger heist, 10 January) highlights research by Prof Andrew Fischer, and the exploitation of Zambia's commodity resources via illicit financial schemes. Many Zambians have raised the issue of this looting for years, but have met coordinated resistance. Consequently, Zambia's treasury loses billions of dollars in revenue. These losses are driven by well-known multinationals working in concert with certain insiders close to the Zambian state. Your editorial also says: 'The US decision to cut $50m a year in aid to Zambia … is dreadful, and the reason given, corruption, rings hollow.' Alas, I disagree and wish to place this in context. The aid cut followed large-scale theft of US-donated medical supplies by individuals connected to and within the Zambian state. Even before Donald Trump assumed office, Michael Gonzales, the US ambassador, confronted Zambian authorities about this. US officials engaged in 33 meetings with senior members of the Zambian government and officers from the Zambia police service and other law enforcement agencies. US officials urged the Zambians to take action to ensure medicines reached the country's poorest citizens. The president's inner circle ignored the warnings, ultimately leading to the aid cut. The Zambian government's reaction was to dismiss these legitimate concerns, saying diplomats should stay out of Zambia's internal affairs. This response is inadequate, as the issues go beyond mere bureaucratic inefficiency and touch on profound state corruption. The government's refusal to confront this reality is disappointing and has led to more suffering, where ordinary people who benefited from this aid will be most MwambaZambia's high commissioner to South Africa (2015-19) As a Zambian and UK citizen, I am both enraged and heartbroken by Prof Andrew Fischer's research exposing the systematic plunder of my country's wealth. While Donald Trump cuts our aid, citing 'corruption', the real thieves operate with complete impunity under the guise of legitimate business. The figures are devastating: $5bn extracted in 2021 alone. This isn't corruption in the traditional sense, it's legalised theft orchestrated by multinational corporations that exploit our resources while leaving us in poverty. How can we be called corrupt when the very system designed to 'help' us facilitates our exploitation? I think of my fellow Zambians struggling to access basic healthcare, education and clean water while billions flow to Swiss bank accounts. We sit on some of the world's most valuable mineral deposits, yet we're drowning in debt. This isn't coincidence – it's by design. Foreign direct investment is often foreign direct extraction in disguise. Companies like Glencore and First Quantum Minerals have treated Zambia like a cash machine, using complex financial structures to strip our wealth while paying minimal taxes. When confronted, they simply leave or settle for pennies in the pound. This global economic architecture, which enables legal plunder, must be challenged. African countries need new models of resource governance that prioritise our people over foreign shareholders. We need transparency requirements exposing these shadowy financial flows, progressive taxation capturing fair value from our resources, and regional cooperation preventing companies from playing us against each other. The west's moralising about corruption while facilitating this systematic theft is breathtaking hypocrisy. Until the international community addresses the structural violence of this extractive system, their aid will remain what it truly is – a drop in the ocean compared with the torrent of wealth flowing out of MulaishoLondon
Reuters
11 hours ago
- Reuters
Kenya parliament passes proposed 2025 finance law
NAIROBI, June 19 (Reuters) - Kenya's parliament on Thursday voted to approve this year's proposed finance law, denying the revenue authority's request to get unrestricted access to taxpayers' data on account of privacy concerns and constitutional safeguards. The government is under pressure to avoid a repeat of last year's unrest after protests against proposed tax hikes led to over 60 deaths and forced President William Ruto to abandon plans to raise 346 billion shillings in taxes. Lawmakers voted by acclamation to approve this year's law, clearing the way for President Ruto to sign and approve it. Kenya's parliamentary finance committee rejected on Monday a proposal that would have granted the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) the access to the data. The provision included in this year's finance bill had drawn a public backlash over alleged privacy violations. The committee said existing laws allowed KRA to access financial data with a court warrant, rendering the proposal unnecessary. Finance Minister John Mbadi last week presented to parliament a 4.29 trillion-shilling ($33 billion) budget for the 2025/26 (July-June) fiscal year. This year's finance law aims to raise an extra 30 billion shillings ($233 million), mainly through boosting tax compliance. ($1 = 129.0000 Kenyan shillings)
