NASCAR Insider Fights For Michigan Track As Denny Hamlin's Praise Revealed
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
NASCAR driver Denny Hamlin brought home the win at the FireKeepers Casino 400, a race that featured a ton of action and brought praise to the Michigan International Speedway.
At the veteran age of 44, Hamlin drove his No. 11 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota into first place.
It was his 57th win in NASCAR and the third of the season for the experienced driver.
Denny Hamlin, driver of the #11 Yahoo! Toyota, celebrates after winning the NASCAR Cup Series FireKeepers Casino 400 at Michigan International Speedway on June 08, 2025 in Brooklyn, Michigan
Denny Hamlin, driver of the #11 Yahoo! Toyota, celebrates after winning the NASCAR Cup Series FireKeepers Casino 400 at Michigan International Speedway on June 08, 2025 in Brooklyn, Michigan
Photo byThe second half of the race became all about managing fuel. The top runners struggled on fuel, dropping pace lap after lap as they tried to save all over the track.
The fuel concerns allowed middle-of-the-pack runners like Hamlin to make up some serious ground and push for the win.
The racing was incredibly dramatic and aided by the fuel usage, leading to several over-takes and on-track battles during the last 30 or so laps.
Jeff Gluck, co-host of The Teardown podcast and writer for The Athletic, pointed out that it was the latest generation of cars that led to the incredible racing.
"Denny Hamlin said afterwards that this is maybe NASCAR's most underrated track now. It's perfect for the [Next Gen] car," Gluck said on the podcast.
"It's wide. It gives drivers lots of options. It's high-speed handling matters. It was a great crowd today.
"It was the first time that these fans hadn't been rained on in a few years here.
"It was a great day. It was really fun, a great weekend and nice positive way to end this little stretch of the season before we head to Mexico City."
Hamlin managed to keep his focus despite having a baby on the way. He previously claimed that he would skip a race to witness the birth of his third child.
He went as far as to say he would leave the race anyway up until Lap 50 if the call came of his wife going into labor.
It never came during the race in Michigan, and now he adds another win to his illustrious career.
NASCAR Cup Series FireKeepers Casino 400 Results
1. Denny Hamlin, No. 11 Toyota
2. Chris Buescher, No. 17 Ford
3. Ty Gibbs, No. 54 Toyota
4. Bubba Wallace, No. 23 Toyota
5. Kyle Larson, No. 5 Chevrolet
6. Ross Chastain, No. 1 Chevrolet
7. Zane Smith, No. 38 Ford
8. Kyle Busch, No. 8 Chevrolet
9. Ryan Preece, No. 60 Ford
10. Brad Keselowski, No. 6 Ford
11. Erik Jones, No. 43 Toyota
12. Josh Berry, No. 21 Ford
13. Tyler Reddick, No. 45 Toyota
14. Daniel Suarez, No. 99 Chevrolet
15. Chase Elliott, No. 9 Chevrolet
16. Christopher Bell, No. 20 Toyota
17. AJ Allmendinger, No. 16 Chevrolet
18. Shane van Gisbergen, No. 88 Chevrolet
19. Austin Dillon, No. 3 Chevrolet
20. Ricky Stenhouse Jr., No. 47 Chevrolet
21. Justin Haley, No. 7 Chevrolet
22. Joey Logano, No. 22 Ford
23. Chase Briscoe, No. 19 Toyota
24. Ty Dillon, No. 10 Chevrolet
25. Riley Herbst, No. 35 Toyota
26. Cody Ware, No. 51 Ford
27. Noah Gragson, No. 4 Ford
28. William Byron, No. 24 Chevrolet
29. Carson Hocevar, No. 77 Chevrolet
30. Michael McDowell, No. 71 Chevrolet
31. Austin Cindric, No. 2 Ford
32. Ryan Blaney, No. 12 Ford
33. Todd Gilliland, No. 34 Ford
34. John H Nemechek, No. 42 Toyota
35. Cole Custer, No. 41 Ford
36. Alex Bowman, No. 48 Chevrolet
For more NASCAR news, head on over to Newsweek Sports.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmunds
2 hours ago
- Edmunds
Tested: 2025 Kia EV6 GT-Line Is Almost a Hot Hatch
The elephant in the room, however, is the EV6's weight. At our test track, it weighed a substantial 4,746 pounds. Still, that didn't stop it from posting some impressive numbers. It dealt with the run to 60 mph in 4.9 seconds, shaving 0.1 second off Kia's advertised time. For context, the Civic Type R needed 5.5 seconds, while the GR Corolla took a pedestrian 5.9 seconds. Only the Golf R and its 4.5-second run manage to outsprint the GT-Line. When its front splitter was still attached, the Kia retained its lead through the quarter mile. During our testing, it managed a 13.5-second time at 99.3 mph, a run that still enables it to best its Honda and Toyota rivals while falling just short of the rapid Volkswagen. Hot hatch thrills? Not so much. While the Kia's added heft doesn't hamper its straight-line acceleration performance, it turned out to be a different story as we moved on to other tests. When it came time to stop from 60 mph, the EV6 managed a disappointing distance of 123 feet. For context, that's just 4 feet shy of a Chevy Tahoe RST. Stack it up against those aforementioned hot hatches, and every single one bests the GT-Line's stopping distance by over 10 feet. As such, you'll carry more speed off the line, but you'll also have to get on the brakes far sooner.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
I spent 3000 miles in an Explorer – is it really a true Ford?
To mark the launch of the Ford Explorer, Lexie Alford became the first person to circumnavigate the globe in an EV. The 18,600-mile, 27-country journey traversed territory as diverse as the Australian outback, the mountains of Bhutan and the Atacama desert. Impressive stuff, but of more relevance to me – and you, I would expect – is how the Explorer will tackle slightly more real-world adventures, such as the traffic-clogged streets of Twickenham, the bumpy moorland roads of Somerset and the relentless roundabouts of Milton Keynes. Now, I doubt I'll get close to Alford's epic quest in terms of accumulated mileage over the coming months, but I will be tackling those more real-world environments – and with enough time behind the wheel hopefully to gain an understanding of what remains a very curious machine. A controversial one, too. This is, as you may recall, the Ford that isn't entirely a Ford: it's built on the Volkswagen Group's MEB electric car platform, as part of a broad deal between the two firms that has helped the Blue Oval expand its EV line-up beyond the larger Mustang Mach-E. That said, Ford says that while it has taken a VW Group platform, it has developed its own vehicle with its own character. It's also the Explorer that isn't really an Explorer: the name comes from a long-running US market SUV, although one that is both larger and very much not electrically powered. To British buyers not versed in Ford's US lineup, that's possibly more confusing than controversial: certainly Ford attracted less opprobrium for using the name than if they had, say, wheeled out an electric SUV-coupé and called it a Capri. Imagine! Perhaps most contentiously, of course, is that this Explorer is the car that killed the Ford Fiesta: Ford had to convert its Cologne plant, where the Fiesta was built, for EV production. That was a much-questioned decision when announced in 2023, never mind the recent challenges in the EV market. It's not really fair to judge the Explorer by what it is, isn't or represents, though: the role here is to leave all of that to one side and evaluate how good the Explorer is as a car. And the good news is that there's a lot of promise here. For starters, for a boxy SUV the Explorer is really quite well resolved, with some neat design touches. It has already attracted an admiring comment from one of my neighbours, a non-car person who thinks it looks 'really nice'. We're off to a good start, then. It's also deceptive: that boxy styling makes it look bigger in photos than it really is. Anyone who read about the MEB platform and expected the Explorer to be a VW ID 4 with a different badge – an ID Ford, perhaps? – may be surprised to learn it's quite a bit shorter. Inside, the Explorer is notably different from most VW Group models. A few parts will be familiar (we'll get to those in a future report), but the large, vertically mounted 14.6in touchscreen is pure Ford, and it runs Ford's own infotainment system. It can also be angled up and down depending on preference, in doing so giving access to a semi-secret storage cubby. The Explorer is offered with single- and dual-motor layouts, and with two battery sizes. Because I value range above pace, I've chosen the Extended Range Premium RWD, which features a single 282bhp motor and a 77kWh (usable capacity) battery. The official range is 354 miles, with efficiency rated at 3.4mpkWh. As with other MEB cars, it can charge at speeds of up to 135kW, which is decent enough, but plenty of rivals are now faster. If you want an Explorer that charges more quickly, you'll need the dual-motor AWD Extended Range version. Our Premium-spec car is really well equipped, as you would hope for £49,975: outside, there are stylised 20in wheels, matrix LED lights and a large panoramic roof; inside, there are niceties such as heated seats covered with Sensico trim (it's an alternative to leather), a wireless phone charger, a rear camera and a 10-speaker Bang & Olufsen sound system. We've plumped for a few extras such as Rapid Red paint, which costs £800 (white is the only no-cost option). After that we added the £1300 Driver Assistance pack for a head-up display and a 360deg reversing camera, plus the £1050 heat pump, because frankly this is 2025 and every EV should come with one. That brings the total to a not insignificant £53,125. A cheaper Explorer with a smaller battery is on the way, just so you know. When our road testers put an Explorer Premium RWD through the mill last year, they determined Ford had succeeded in injecting some personality into the handling but fallen short of producing a car that matches up to some of Ford's nest. Certainly, on first impressions, the Explorer is proving very pleasant to drive, but while it's not anodyne, like some electric SUVs, there's little I'd call especially memorable. But it's early days, so there's plenty of time to find roads on which I can try to discover some dynamism. Still, I'm looking forward to doing that, and to finding out how well the Explorer fulfils the role of a daily companion. Enough to inspire me to circumnavigate the globe in one? I'm not so sure about that, but let's see. Even if my upcoming adventures aren't as ambitious or spectacular as Alford's, getting to know this Explorer promises to be an interesting quest. Second report It's the key fob that threw me, simply because it was so incongruous. The Ford Explorer has a very pleasant, stylish key fob, but it's a Volkswagen Group key fob. That makes sense on one level: it's no secret that the Explorer is built on the German giant's MEB platform, so there will be many shared parts. But I was still surprised that it extended as far as the casing for the remote locking system. So I decided to see how many VW parts I could find in my Ford. The first few are pretty obvious: the stubby drive mode selector behind the steering wheel, the digital instrument cluster and the head-up display. They even run the same so ware. The indicator stalks are VW parts too, as are the light-switch panel and the window and locking controls on the driver's door. Also, while the steering wheel has a Blue Oval in the middle, the controls on it are the much-moaned-about haptic 'buttons' from early MEB cars (which the VW Group is in the process of phasing out). You get the idea. But before you think this is a rant about platform sharing, here's my point: I don't think it matters. Certainly, I reckon that many car buyers won't notice or care. And here's why: the VW Group's key fob, indicator stalks, drive mode selector and digital instrument cluster are all perfectly good. Why would Ford spend money on engineering its own casings just so they look different? Instead, Ford has clearly focused its investment on areas where it feels it can add value and buyers will appreciate it: the massive touchscreen is a Ford unit and runs Ford so ware. And Ford engineers spent time working on the Explorer's suspension and ride, which does feel sharper than most other MEB-based cars. Frankly, I would rather Ford's engineers spend their time making a car ride and handle better than ensuring it has an on-brand key fob. And that does seem to have been the case so far. I suspect relatively few people would realise the key fob is a VW Group design. And it is a perfectly good key fob, probably sleeker and shinier than recent Ford ones. Even if it will keep on confusing me when I pick it up. Third report Car designers are very clever people, and as cars have swelled in recent years, they've become increasingly adept at hiding their dimensions. The best example of recent years is probably the Hyundai Ioniq 5, which in pictures looks like a Lancia Delta-esque hatchback but is actually a pretty hefty SUV. The Renault 5 is another car that has surprised me with its footprint when I've seen it in the metal: it's still a relatively small car, but those sharp lines and retro creases have you thinking compact hot hatch. And the new Ford Explorer is yet another that can trick you into misjudging its size based on images – although, unusually, in this case it's because it's actually smaller than it looks. The Explorer's distinctively boxy SUV styling gives it real presence, making it feel like it's a bigger, chunkier car. It was only when I opened the boot and was mildly surprised at how relatively small it was (445 litres) that I realised how compact the car really is. It's not just me: when chatting about the Explorer to my colleague Steve Cropley before he borrowed it for a tour of Ford UK sites (Autocar, 30 April), he said: 'It's a slightly big beast, isn't it?' He was quite surprised (as I had been) when he learned that, at 4468mm, the Explorer is about the same length as the Ford Focus. Now, clearly the Explorer is an SUV, so it's a bigger, chunkier car than the Focus, but it's significantly shorter than the Kuga, which is Ford's Focus-equivalent SUV. I really got a sense of its size on a recent trip to a garden centre, when I spied an opportunity to squeeze the Explorer into a parking spot between a Fiesta and an older Focus. This unlikely family gathering was quite telling, highlighting that if you look beyond that bluff, beefy front end, the Explorer is actually relatively compact. Which, for someone who much prefers smaller cars, is a very good thing. Among the reasons why people buy big SUVs seem to be perceptions of safety and security and a love of a commanding, high-riding seating position. Well, the Explorer feels securely stout and has a nice high-set driving seat, yet it's also well-sized for Britain's narrow roads. As Cropley found on his recent tour, there's actually a pleasing dynamism to the Explorer's ride and handling, and while it's not as well resolved as a Fiesta or Focus, there is some real engagement to it. And because it isn't an oversized SUV, you can actually enjoy that without fear of kerbing a wheel or threatening oncoming traffic. In my experience, it isn't that compromised inside, either. I mentioned that I was surprised by how small the boot was, but I should stress that this is all relative – and probably not helped that my previous car was a Skoda Superb Estate, a car with a boot so large it probably has its own microclimate. I've rarely struggled to get everything I needed into the back of the Explorer, and because it's quite a deep boot, it's easy to stack items if needed. In fact, my only gripe with the boot – and this is true of a lot of EVs – is that the compartment for storing the charging cable neatly is under the floor. Which is fine unless you're trying to plug in your car when you've got a bootful of stuff. The Explorer's rear seats don't seem that compromised either, and there's plenty of space up front. Clearly, some families will need a bigger vehicle, but the Explorer seems to offer plenty of car for most. And while it's not exactly a conventional hatchback, it does that within a comparatively compact footprint while giving the impression that it's more 'SUV' than it really is. That seems like a good combination to me. Fourth report The Ford's touchscreen is a talking point, and one that's been commented on by all my friends and family who have had the privilege of being offered a ride. And that's no surprise: the 14.6in vertical screen dominates the dash. It's got a neat party trick, too: you can slide it up, both to set it at an angle of your choosing and to access a sort of secret storage cubby. I tend to have it down: it makes the screen easier to reach and means I can better see the B&O soundbar. My ears aren't attuned enough to know if having the soundbar blocked by a bit of the touchscreen affects the audio quality, but that's my excuse and I'm sticking to it. Touchscreens in cars remain a contentious issue, but there are now too many controls and functions not to use them, so the focus is on ensuring they're implemented as well as possible. That includes placement: should a screen be portrait or landscape? (We're excluding Mini's round screens, those crazy oddballs.) Initially, I was part of Team Landscape, because they look better and more natural on horizontally aligned car dashboards – and it matches the way my TV sits. But the more I experience vertically mounted screens the more I'm convinced. Last year I ran a Honda e:Ny1 that had a supersize portrait screen, and I really warmed to it (the screen, that is; the rest of the car was 'meh'). The Explorer confirms my feelings. They may sit oddly on the dash, but vertical screens just work better in a car. The top is near your eyeline, and it's much easier to glance down at a vertical screen than one that's landscape. Easier to reach, too: I have had to reach across big horizontal screens to access functions in the far corner, which isn't ideal when driving. The Explorer's Sync infotainment system divides the screen into a number of sections, including some fixed elements that remain in place. They're still not as easy to locate as physical buttons, but you do develop the muscle memory that makes it easier to reach them. The top includes key driving and car control functions, including the drive mode selector – which is useful, because I always need to access it when I get in so I can select Eco. The HVAC controls are all at the bottom of the screen and well placed to access at a glance. That leaves the middle for key functions such as the sat-nav, entertainment and other bits. It's also where Apple CarPlay appears – although somewhat to the chagrin of my phone, because the Explorer's wireless charger refuses to fill my iPhone's battery as fast as wireless CarPlay drains it. Both Google Maps and Ford's own sat-nav work well in portrait mode, giving a better view of what's ahead than a landscape screen. It's much easier to scroll through a list of podcasts or songs, too. Ford clearly thinks the landscape screen is a selling point: it's one aspect of the VW-platformed Explorer that was kept in-house. I'm minded to agree. I'm fast becoming a member of the Portrait Society. Final report The estimable Steve Cropley has already explained things better than I ever could. When I took delivery of this Ford Explorer, the question set for me to answer concerned whether an EV with Volkswagen underpinnings could really be a true Ford. I had several months to consider. Then Steve borrowed the Explorer for a Ford-themed UK road trip (30 April) and pretty much nailed my brief in two days. As he put it, Ford took a VW platform, built a sensible, honest family car and added just enough handling pep to evoke the brand's turn-of-the-century glory days and make the Explorer feel distinct from its German cousins and worthy of bearing the Blue Oval. Well, I agree with Steve on all counts. Early in my days with the Explorer, I found myself counting the VW parts – which include plenty of the switchgear and even the key fob. But beyond those bits, it looks and feels like a Ford. And you know what? VW switchgear is pretty good, generally (particularly since Ford hasn't ported over the controversial infotainment sliders). Some of the switchgear in Rachel Burgess's opulent Bentley Bentayga long-termer is recognisable from elsewhere in the VW Group, and if it's good enough for Bentley, then it's fine for Ford. And, really, why change stuff just for the sake of it? And while the Explorer doesn't quite have the pep of a Fiesta or a Focus, it certainly holds its own with any of Ford's petrol SUVs. So, basically, Steve was right. Case closed, then. Actually, hang on, because there's still a separate yet related question to answer: what's the Explorer like to live with? After all, even if it looks like a Ford, feels like a Ford and, er, quacks like a Ford, that doesn't matter if it can't deliver on the brief of an electric family crossover. Well, generally, I liked it. It's the sort of car that takes a bit of time to warm to but reveals plenty of strengths over an extended period. The styling featured plenty of SUV cues but had enough edge that it looks better in the metal than in photos. It's well sized too: despite that boxy exterior, it was pleasingly compact and proved very easy to place on the road. It had strong all-round visibility as well. Typically for a Ford, the interior was pleasant and comfortable enough but definitely majored on practicality rather than premium sheen. Nothing wrong with that, though. One bit of VW switchgear that did annoy was the window control panel on the driver's door, which featured tactile 'buttons' and made me press a toggle to operate the front or rear windows. As previously reported, the big, portrait-oriented touchscreen is a bit in your face at first but generally works quite well, and once I had learned where the key controls were, I didn't rue the relative lack of physical buttons. My Explorer was in my ideal electric SUV spec: a single motor paired with the biggest (77kWh) battery possible. I struggle to see why you would need the extra performance of the dual-motor version, because this car had more than enough accelerative juice to keep pace in traffic and cruised happily at motorway speeds. Much of my running was spent either pootling around town or on trips up and down the motorway, which is always a good test of range. Officially, it's 354 miles, but when I filled the battery, the most I ever saw on the range indicator was 302 miles – and I managed to cover only 270 miles before I needed to plug in again. Still, that's not a disgraceful range for an electric SUV, and while I generally was achieving around 3.5mpkWh, on his outing Steve returned just above 4mpkWh. He isn't just annoyingly efficient when it comes to turns of phrase, then. The caveat to the range is that it was definitely very temperature-dependent. When the Explorer arrived in far colder weather, the indicated range when the battery was full was closer to 250 miles. That's a disappointing variance, especially because the heat pump fitted to my test car was a £1050 option. Still, it was relative: last year I ran a pumpless Honda e:Ny1 and its range suffered so much from colder conditions that I was deterred from putting the heater on. The other four-figure option fitted to my Explorer was the £1300 Driver Assistance Pack, which added a head-up display, lane change assistance, parking assistance and a 360deg parking camera. Even if the Explorer is quite easy to place, due to its compact size, it's probably worth the outlay for that camera, which was generally excellent and made reversing a cinch. But adding options adds cost, and that's where my Explorer gives pause for thought. With a price of £53,125 as tested, it's quite pricey compared with rivals. In fact, it costs more than the Volkswagen ID 4, which has essentially the same running gear but is bigger. You can understand why, since VW is clearly making profit from selling its hardware and Ford then needs its own markup to compensate. That makes the Explorer slightly harder to recommend. It might come down to what deals you can nd. But there's enough character and Ford-infused charm here to make up for that extra outlay if you really want an EV bearing a Blue Oval. A proper Ford, then, and a good family crossover. Ford Explorer specification Prices: List price new £49,975 List price now £49,975 Price as tested £52,125 Options: Driver Assistance Pack £1300, heat pump £1050, Rapid Red paint £800 Fuel consumption and range: Claimed range 354 miles Battery size 82/77kWh (total/usable) Test average 3.4mpkWh Test best 4.2mpkWh Test worst 2.8mpkWh Real-world range 262 miles Tech highlights: 0-62mph 6.4sec Top speed 112mph Engine Permanent magent synchronous motor Max power 282bhp Max torque 254lb ft Transmission 1-spd reduction gear, RWD Boot capacity 470 litres Wheels 8.0Jx20in (f), 9.0x20in (r) Tyres 235/50 R20 H XL (f), 235/45 R20 H XL (r), Continental EcoContact 6 Kerb weight 2102kg Service and running costs: Contract hire rate £420 CO2 0g/km Service costs None Other costs None Fuel costs £277.20 Running costs inc fuel £277.20 Cost per mile 9 pence Faults None]]>
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Does This Make Slate's Electric Truck Dead on Arrival?
Key Points Slate Auto captured customer interest with its $20,000 electric truck. The automaker was one of many competitors to raise prices recently. Ford's upcoming $30,000 electric truck should draw some attention. 10 stocks we like better than Ford Motor Company › At a time when the global automotive industry is contemplating how to deal with highly advanced and highly affordable Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) slowly spanning more of the globe, Slate Auto has been slowly growing in Detroit. The young automaker -- just founded in 2022 -- seemingly came out of nowhere to take hold of the market's intrigue, especially with the backing of Amazon's Jeff Bezos, with its mid-$20,000 priced electric truck. But with a couple of new developments, is it dead on arrival? Bad timing It sure seems like a rough time to launch an EV start-up company, with the Trump administration's steadfast desire to roll back EV incentives and even remove penalties for companies not meeting emissions standards. On the flip side, you could argue that it's a great time for Slate Auto to launch, as it tackles the industry's primary hurdle: Affordability. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You The Insurance Savings You Expect Great Rates and Award-Winning Service As previously mentioned, Slate Auto became the latest company to raise the price of its vehicles before even delivering its first. One of the big selling points of the Slate truck was that you could configure a vehicle for under $20,000, including incentives and tax credits. However, with the EV tax credit going away, and the increased cost from tariffs on imported parts, the cost is now in the mid-$20,000s. "People are looking at Slate because it's a throwback, with roll-up windows and no radio," said Sam Fiorani, vice president of global vehicle forecasting at AutoForecast Solutions, according to Automotive News. The company hopes buyers "will pay a little more for a better wrap, accessory panels, or anything that adds profit." It's an impressive feat to produce a truck at such a price tag, much less an electric truck. Slate Auto deserves its applause, but in losing the EV tax credit and raising its price tag, it's now going to compete with a selection of combustion engine vehicles and hybrids at or around $30,000 with far more technology and equipment packed in. One big-time example If you're wondering what some of the competition could look like, take a quick glance at what Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F) has been up to recently. The company developed a small "skunkworks" team based in California that was dedicated to making a universal low-cost EV platform. Ford is certainly hyping what's to come, calling Monday's announcement and unveiling a "Model T moment." Ford's first vehicle to launch on the new EV platform will be a midsize electric truck, closer to the size of the Maverick than the Ranger, due in 2027. It will be the first of potentially eight EV models to launch on the platform, and -- most importantly -- Ford says the $30,000 four-door electric truck will be profitable. The company also made massive adjustments to its production process and changed its assembly line to be an "assembly tree," where three sub-assembly lines will run simultaneously before combining the parts at the end. It's a process that, along with other optimizations, should enable the plant to assemble the new EV platform 15% faster than current vehicles. It reduces parts by 20% versus a typical vehicle, with 25% and 40% fewer fasteners and workstations in the plant. This is important to generate profits from such a low-priced vehicle. Dead on arrival? Slate Auto and its vehicle are an intriguing development within the EV industry. Its bare-bones approach was refreshing, and there's little doubt it'll find a target consumer, although it's possible that it'll be more niche than mainstream. Slate said it has over 100,000 reservations in the U.S., but as reservations are secured with only a $50 refundable deposit, there's a good chance only a small percentage will be converted into orders. Not only is Ford soon to release a highly competitive electric truck in 2027, both Rivian Automotive and Lucid Group are launching electric crossovers next year at prices between $45,000 and $50,000, tens of thousands of dollars lower than their original models. So, is Slate's truck dead on arrival? Without Slate being able to hold its core marketing selling point of a sub-$20,000 electric truck, the young EV maker might find it really difficult to gain traction in the increasingly competitive and more affordable EV market. It's not dead on arrival, but there are serious reasons for concern. Do the experts think Ford Motor Company is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did Ford Motor Company make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,071% vs. just 185% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 886.18%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Daniel Miller has positions in Ford Motor Company. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Does This Make Slate's Electric Truck Dead on Arrival? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
