Jane Street likely to argue retail demand drove its India trades, Bloomberg News reports
In an interim order on July 3, the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred the company from trading securities in the Indian market, citing that some of its trading strategies were manipulative and led to losses for retail investors.
The Indian market regulator alleged that Jane Street and its related entities manipulated the Bank Nifty index by purchasing large quantities of constituent stocks in the cash and futures markets to artificially support the index in morning trade, while simultaneously building short positions in index options.
However, SEBI lifted the trading restrictions on Jane Street last week after the firm deposited $567 million in escrow. Jane Street said on Monday that it has sought an extension to respond to the interim order.
Jane Street is expected to argue it was eager to facilitate options bets from the country's retail investors, knowing it would be largely unhedged, Bloomberg News reported.
The firm is likely to argue that it hedged less aggressively in India compared with other markets and deliberately spread its hedging activity over several hours on January 17, 2024 - its most profitable day during the roughly two-year period under regulatory scrutiny - to reduce market impact, the report said.
Reuters could not immediately verify the report, while Jane Street did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
UBS profit beats expectations as CEO Ermotti holds stance on capital
ZURICH, July 30 (Reuters) - UBS's (UBSG.S), opens new tab second-quarter profit more than doubled from a year earlier, beating expectations on a surge in trading activity even as regulatory uncertainty continued to preoccupy the bank. Net profit came in at $2.4 billion, beating a company-provided estimate of $2.045 billion as the bank joined rivals in benefiting from higher trading amid market turmoil. Switzerland's largest bank remains committed to remunerating its shareholders, CEO Sergio Ermotti said, renewing his criticism of Swiss government proposals to increase the amount of capital it would have to hold by $24 billion, which analysts have said could hamper its ability to reward investors. Reuters reported on Tuesday that UBS had stepped up contingency planning, including considering moving its headquarters. Ermotti said however the bank was focused on staying in Switzerland. At the same time, "shrinking is not an option", he told reporters, adding that UBS retained its global ambitions, including in the U.S. "We are not going to front-run any new capital regime, that's clear," he added. Theories that UBS could easily absorb or mitigate proposed capital increases did not reflect reality, he said on an analysts' call, with any mitigation strategies coming "at a significant cost". Deliberations in the Swiss parliament over capital requirements could take years. The government is concerned about the potential for crises, given that UBS is the country's sole global bank, with a balance sheet about double the size of the economy. For Deutsche Bank analysts, "while Swiss regulation remains a known headwind by now", the results were a "good reminder of the strength of the business model and the fast and relatively smooth integration of Credit Suisse". Shares in UBS trimmed early gains to trade 0.8% higher. UBS was upbeat about its outlook, saying it saw a high level of readiness among investors and companies to deploy capital as "conviction" around the global economy strengthens. Revenues for global markets surged 25%, beating analysts' expectations, during a quarter when trading cues were focused on U.S. tariff policies. Transaction-based income for its global wealth management division rose 12%, slightly below forecasts. UBS expects trading and transactional activity to normalise in the quarter ahead, but said it was too early to say when deals in the pipeline would be executed. Other major banks such as Bank of America (BAC.N), opens new tab, JPMorgan Chase (JPM.N), opens new tab, Citigroup (C.N), opens new tab and Morgan Stanley (MS.N), opens new tab also beat estimates in the second quarter as traders cashed in on volatile markets. Some of the earnings beat can be attributed to a $427 million release of provisions related to the resolution of a Credit Suisse litigation issue, as well as a net income tax benefit of $209 million. Integration of Credit Suisse remained on track, UBS said, with one-third of client accounts booked in Switzerland migrated. Market volatility in spring also meant some UBS clients booked losses after they were sold complex foreign-exchange derivatives that wiped out much of their investments. The bank has been in talks to compensate clients, Reuters reported in May. Ermotti said on Wednesday that fewer than 200 clients were affected and that some UBS advisors "did not adhere to the rules that we have in place", without elaborating. He declined to disclose the amount the bank has set aside for compensation, but said the cost for UBS was "not material".
Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
India regulator seeks trading data from exchanges in wider Jane Street probe, sources say
MUMBAI, July 30 (Reuters) - India's markets regulator has asked stock exchanges to share detailed data of trading by U.S. brokerage Jane Street across all indexes from January 2023 to May 2025, two sources with direct knowledge of the matter told Reuters, formally widening its probe into alleged market manipulation. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) had on July 4 barred Jane Street from trading in Indian markets, alleging the firm manipulated stock indexes through its derivatives positions. Jane Street has since deposited $567 million in an escrow account, representing what SEBI termed "unlawful gains," in a bid to resume trading while reserving its legal rights. The firm has denied the allegations and called the trades basic arbitrage. The regulator's latest request, sent to exchanges on July 11, seeks mark-to-market profits, long and short positions of Jane Street group entities, and data for all expiry days of derivatives contracts, the sources said, declining to be named as the discussions are private. BSE - formerly the Bombay Stock Exchange - has been asked to share data related to its indexes of top 30 stocks and banking stocks, while National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) has been asked for information on indexes tracking the top 50 stocks and financial services firms, they added. A BSE spokesperson declined to comment. SEBI, NSE, and Jane Street did not immediately respond to Reuters' queries. "More data is being analysed as part of a planned widening of investigations," one of the sources said, adding that six entities under the banner are being examined currently. The letter followed a July 10 meeting where SEBI asked exchanges to look for trading patterns similar to those flagged in its interim order, the second source said. In that order, SEBI had focused on Jane Street's trades in NSE's banking index. The order said the firm had bought large quantities of stock in constituents of the Bank Nifty (.NSEBANK), opens new tab index, in both the cash and futures markets, during morning trade to artificially support the index, while simultaneously building large short positions in index options. The firm later reversed the trades to profit from the options, it added.
Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
India-US trade talks go off rails on row over farm markets
NEW DELHI, July 30 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the United States would impose a 25% tariff on Indian goods starting August 1, citing New Delhi's high tariffs and strict non-monetary trade barriers. Following are the key issues that appear to have derailed the trade talks between the U.S., the world's largest economy, and India, its fifth largest: India has resisted U.S. demands to open its agricultural and dairy markets, saying such moves would hurt millions of poor farmers. New Delhi has historically excluded agriculture from free trade pacts to protect domestic livelihoods. Tariff cuts on corn, soybean, wheat and ethanol remain off the table, with Indian officials citing risks from subsidised U.S. farm products. Domestic automakers, pharma firms and small industries have also lobbied for only a gradual opening, fearing disruption from U.S. imports. According to a White House fact sheet, India imposes an average MFN (Most Favoured Nation) tariff of 39% on imported farm goods, compared to 5% in the U.S., with some duties as high as 50%. Trump's administration has repeatedly flagged these tariffs as a key obstacle to deeper trade ties with India. Washington is pushing for better access to India's markets for agriculture, ethanol, dairy, alcoholic beverages, autos, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices. It also wants India to reduce non-tariff barriers, and reform rules on patents, digital trade, and data flows. Despite offering limited tariff cuts and boosting imports of U.S. energy and defence goods, India says it is still awaiting clear proposals from Washington. Officials cite Trump's unpredictable trade moves as a concern. Indian exporters remain uneasy over rising U.S. levies on imports: a 10% base tariff, up to 50% on steel and aluminium, 25% on autos, and now 25% across a broader range of goods. Trump's repeated assertions that he helped broker a ceasefire between India and Pakistan earlier this year have raised concerns in New Delhi. Indian officials view the remarks as a strategic tilt toward Pakistan, complicating broader bilateral relations. Indian officials were initially confident of a deal, expecting the U.S. to favour deeper trade with one of its biggest commercial partners. Modi and Trump had aimed to sign a first-phase pact by autumn 2025, targeting bilateral trade of $500 billion by 2030, up from $191 billion in 2024. Despite the tariff setback, India hopes its exports – including pharmaceuticals, electronics, engineering goods and garments – could remain competitive, especially with tariff advantages over China. Indian goods exports to the U.S. rose to $87 billion in 2024, with gems and jewellery ($8.5 billion), pharma ($8 billion) and petrochemicals ($4 billion) leading the list. Services exports, mainly IT and professional services, were worth $33 billion. The United States is India's third-largest investor, with $68 billion in cumulative FDI since 2002. U.S. manufacturing exports to India, valued at nearly $42 billion in 2024, face high tariffs, ranging from 7% on wood products and machinery to as much as 15% to 20% on footwear and transport equipment, and nearly 68% on food.
