Joint Statement from the International Partners Group on the United States (US) Withdrawal from the Just Energy Transition Partnership in South Africa
The partnership, originally announced at COP 26, aims to support South Africa to move away from coal and to accelerate its transition to a low emission, climate resilient economy.
The US contribution to South Africa's Just Energy Transition (JET), as set out in the JET Investment Plan, was $56m in grant funds and $1bn in commercial debt/equity from the US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC).
While the withdrawal of the US is regrettable, the International Partners Group (IPG) remains fully committed to supporting South Africa to deliver its just energy transition. The level of investment made to date and remaining pledges demonstrate this. Over $2.5bn of the IPG pledge has been spent to date. The total pledged funding to support South Africa's just energy transition also remains higher than the original pledge due to increases in pledges from both the IPG and other development partners who are not part of the IPG. Some partners are exploring possibilities for supporting work previously being carried out by the US.
We look forward to continuing to work with the government of South Africa and other stakeholders to allocate existing funding in support of a just energy transition that will benefit all South Africans. The political, technical and financial support from the IPG remains strong and steadfast.
On behalf of the International Partners Group – United Kingdom, Germany, France, the European Union, Denmark and the Netherlands.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of United Kingdom Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
22-05-2025
- Middle East Eye
Why claims of 'white genocide' in South Africa are cruelly ironic
It was an afternoon of several cruel ironies. With the genocide in Gaza reaching barely fathomable levels of brutality over the past several days, including a UN warning about the imminent deaths of up to 14,000 infants, US President Donald Trump accused South Africa of conducting a 'white genocide'. Trump, not known for his deference, flat out asked South African President Cyril Ramaphosa to explain the killings of white farmers in the country. Ramaphosa could do little more than push back gently and offer a nervous smile as he tried to extricate himself from the televised ambush. But Trump persisted, apparently seeking confrontation or capitulation. Trump said white South Africans were 'fleeing because of the violence and racist laws', pointing to images that showed 'genocide' was taking place. Trump asked his aides to lower the lights, and proceeded to screen a video of South African opposition party leader Julius Malema demanding land expropriation at a session in parliament. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In another video, Malema is seen leading a chant of 'Kill the Boer', referring to white farmers, a slogan that harkens back to the days when it was used to mobilise against apartheid rule. The next video, Trump said, showed 'burial sites' of 'over 1,000' white farmers in South Africa. Beyond fear-mongering For the record, not only is there no white genocide taking place in South Africa, but white South Africans own more land; have access to better schooling, healthcare and employment opportunities; and enjoy a better overall standard of living than Black South Africans. White South Africans, who make up around seven percent of the population, own 72 percent of the country's farmland, compared with four percent for Black Africans, who comprise 81 percent of the population. The burial sites Trump mentioned were actually white crosses used during a protest in 2020 to represent farmers allegedly killed. Why so many white South Africans are reluctant to support Palestine Read More » Throughout the public interrogation, Ramaphosa, though visibly perplexed, maintained his composure, and resisted the urge to self-immolate, as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenksy had done during a previous ambush by Trump and Vice President JD Vance in February. It seems Ramaphosa came prepared, given that both Trump and his close associate, Elon Musk, had been circling South Africa for several months. For Musk, who refuses to comply with South African laws mandating that at least 30 percent of a company's ownership or economic involvement must include Black South Africans, the launch of Starlink in the country remains in purgatory. The effort to shame South Africa, as emphasised by the arrival of 54 white 'refugees' in the US earlier this month, was more than just fear-mongering. Even prior to Trump's return to the White House, the Biden administration had made its displeasure known over Pretoria's decision to take Israel to the International Court of Justice on the charge of genocide. Israel, too, has used its lobbyists in an attempt to dent South Africa's reputation in Washington. And what better obfuscation could there be than Washington accusing South Africa itself of conducting a genocide? Win-win scenario Earlier this year, the South African government passed a land expropriation law in an effort to reduce unequal distribution of land among the country's people. Amid accusations that this could result in private land being seized without payment, Ramaphosa's office issued a statement describing it not as a 'confiscation' scheme, but rather as 'a constitutionally mandated legal process that ensures public access to land in an equitable and just manner as guided by the Constitution'. Shortly after the expropriation law passed in January, Zsa-Zsa Temmers Boggenpoel, a law professor at Stellenbosch University, noted in a column: 'I am not convinced that the act, in its current form, is the silver bullet to effect large-scale land reform - at least not the type of radical land reform that South Africa urgently needs.' While the law would have a 'severe impact' on property rights, she added, there would be only 'very limited cases' where landowners would not be compensated. The 'white genocide' claim tapped into his Maga support base, reinforcing white supremacist beliefs Though no land has been taken by the state without compensation, Trump's administration in February froze aid to South Africa over claims of 'unjust racial discrimination'. Trump had initially waded into this topic in August 2018, when he announced that Mike Pompeo, then the US secretary of state, had been told to look into 'land and farm seizures' and 'large scale killings of white farmers' in South Africa. These comments were surely influenced by a slew of right-wing American news programmes spotlighting unsubstantiated claims about an epidemic of white farmers being killed in South Africa - even as a Washington Post analysis of crime stats in the country found that farmers were 'far less likely to be the targets of violent crime than the general population'. For Trump, though, it was a win-win scenario. The 'white genocide' claim tapped into his Maga support base, reinforcing white supremacist beliefs about a community supposedly under siege. The Southern Poverty Law Center described Trump's 2018 move as troubling 'because it signifies the mainstreaming of white nationalist narratives about 'white genocide', of which South Africa's farm murders are an essential component'. Other groups concerned about the rise of white supremacy in the US during Trump's first term also weighed in. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) rejected as 'false' the notion of a 'white genocide' in South Africa, noting in a statement: 'Some white farmers are actually killed each year in South Africa - as are many black farmers and many other South Africans, largely because South Africa is a country with generally high rates of violent crime … For decades, white supremacists globally were cheerleaders for the institutionalized white supremacy of apartheid in South Africa. They have reacted bitterly to the end of the racist policy, and to the progress South Africans have made in pursuit of racial equality and reconciliation.' Notably, the pro-Israel ADL has not issued a statement condemning the latest claims of 'white genocide'. Trump's obfuscation of the actual genocide in Gaza serves its interests. Painful irony Ramaphosa is not guiltless in all of this. The South African president is forever linked with the massacre of 34 Black miners in the small mining town of Marikana in 2012. Ramaphosa, who was not president at the time, was cleared of any wrongdoing by a commission of inquiry. But for many, his role as a director and shareholder at the Lonmin platinum mine, where police shot dead the Black workers at the behest of white capital, is difficult to reconcile. During Ramaphosa's visit to the White House on Wednesday, a reporter asked Trump what it would take for him to change his mind on the 'white genocide' issue. The new fascism: Israel is the template for Trump and Europe's war on freedom Read More » 'It will take President Trump listening to the voices of South Africans, some of whom are his good friends,' Ramaphosa said. That Ramaphosa is seen to have emerged from this interaction with his reputation intact - perhaps even enhanced - after deftly sidestepping accusations that he is overseeing a 'white genocide', while he runs a country where life remains inordinately difficult for Black people as part of the lasting legacy of colonialism and white supremacist rule, is not just irony; it is a cautionary tale. Last year, the unemployment rate among Black South Africans was around 38 percent, compared with eight percent for white South Africans. In a story that involves high levels of inequality, high crime rates, and a systemic lack of opportunities for the majority, it is still white fears - those that once justified apartheid - that the Black South African president must palliate. That he knew, too, that even three decades after apartheid ended, two white South African golfers and a billionaire businessman were his best chance to assuage a US president's 'concerns' over a non-existent 'white genocide' - all to facilitate the sale of critical minerals - is surely the most painful irony of them all. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Middle East Eye
21-05-2025
- Middle East Eye
South African president escapes a Zelensky moment at the White House
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa's first visit to the White House under this Trump administration on Wednesday was, as he insisted, meant to "reset" relations between the two countries. And it certainly began with friendly overtones, before devolving into disagreement over what US President Donald Trump has termed as the "genocide" of white South Africans. Earlier this month, dozens of them were granted refugee status in the US and flown there on the dime of the American taxpayer. At times, the meeting became so tense that Ramaphosa could have ended up with a fate similar to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, whose now infamous White House visit in March turned into an ambush by Vice President JD Vance, and a shouting match, before he was escorted out without even being served any lunch. World leaders have since been keen on being prepared for all outcomes in an Oval Office meeting that is largely televised and turned into an impromptu and sometimes chaotic press conference. For Ramaphosa, trade was at the top of the agenda. Like most nations now facing US tariffs, Pretoria is seeking a new trade deal with Washington, given that it is the top African exporter to the US. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Trump made it clear to reporters that it was Ramaphosa who called him and asked for the visit. The US is South Africa's second-largest trading partner after China. Ramaphosa's delegation to the White House meeting included not just cabinet members, but a trade unionist and two of the most famous South African golfers, all in a bid to both appeal to the US president - a lover and purveyor of golf courses - while also making the point that it is Black Africans that are most negatively impacted by the remnants of Apartheid-era laws. Things appeared to be going smoothly until a reporter asked why the US is accepting Afrikaners as refugees while it turns away Afghans and Venezuelans. 'White genocide' ambush At least 59 white South Africans have been granted refugee status in the US, with 70,000 others having expressed interest in the process, according to The South African Chamber of Commerce in the USA. For the Trump administration, the issue stems from a land reform measure that Ramaphosa signed into law earlier this year, in a bid, he said, to remedy the lingering effects of Apartheid. It allows the government to expropriate privately held land without compensation when it is deemed in the public interest. On Wednesday, Trump said 'white South Africans are fleeing because of the violence and racist laws", and that he had images of the attacks that proved "genocide" was taking place. He then proceeded to hold up those images for the press assembled in the room. While Ramaphosa himself acknowledged the high rate of crime in his country, there is no known evidence of a genocide of white South Africans taking place. Ramaphosa - likely having learned from watching Zelensky and other leaders in that very spot - did not interrupt Trump to argue the point, but waited for him to finish before saying, "People who do get killed, unfortunately, through criminal activity, are not only white people. The majority of them are Black people." Trump browbeating Zelensky offers rare window into how US wields power Read More » When a South African reporter then asked Trump what it would take for him to acknowledge that there is no white genocide, Trump hesitated for a moment before Ramaphosa jumped in and said, "It will take President Trump listening to the voices of South Africans, some of whom are his good friends," and he pointed to the two white pro golfers he brought with him, Ernie Els and Retief Goosen. Instead of ending it there to move on to the private portion of the meeting, Trump pushed back, and in a surprise move, asked for the lights to be turned down so Ramaphosa could watch a video that allegedly proves white farmers are being systematically killed. That video, shared by the White House on X, was a compilation of clips of firebrand Black South African communist party leader Julius Malema calling for "killing" whites as part of the "revolution" that must happen in the country. Additional video was also shown, which Trump said was land filled with graves of white South Africans. For more than four awkward minutes, Ramaphosa hardly looked at the screen, choosing to look around the room and at the floor as Trump watched the video intently. When it was finished, Ramaphosa asked where those gravesites were located. 'I'd like to know where that is, because this I've never seen.' Vance chimed in: 'So you denounce that type of language in the video?' 'Oh yes, we've always done so,' Ramaphosa said. 'We are completely opposed to that.' The Gaza ICJ case Washington's problem with Pretoria goes much further than its close relationship with China and crimes against whites. In December 2023, South Africa brought a genocide case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against Israel for its war on Gaza, which had been going on for two months at the time, and was indicative of a process of ethnic cleansing, human rights groups had said. US grants dozens of white South Africans refugee status Read More » The US fiercely opposed the case under the Biden administration, and maintained that policy under Trump, even expelling South Africa's ambassador to the US, Ebrahim Rasool, back in March. Israel has been heavily lobbying US lawmakers to push South Africa to drop its case entirely. Israeli diplomats were also instructed to reach out to South African diplomats in the US and tell them their country would "pay a heavy price" if it did not change its policy towards Israel. On Wednesday, a reporter asked Trump if he expected South Africa to drop its ICJ case, but there was surprisingly no definitive answer. "I don't expect anything to be honest... I don't know. The case is a lot of anger there, tremendous anger," he said. "We'll see what the ruling says." Ramaphosa himself has long been vocal in his support for the Palestinian cause, and has also opted to strengthen relations with the global south as part of the BRICS group - a kind of antithesis to the G7. In Trump's executive order that granted refugee status to white South Africans, he also accused South Africa of 'reinvigorating its relations with Iran to develop commercial, military, and nuclear arrangements'.
Zawya
21-05-2025
- Zawya
South Africa: SAWEA NQF Level 3, wind turbine operator skills programme key to address unemployment
The South African Wind Energy Association's (SAWEA) NQF Level 3 Wind Turbine Operator Skills Programme has been approved by the Quality Council for Trades and Occupations (QCTO). The wind energy sector reflects on the critical role skills development plays in building a sustainable green economy and tackling the country's biggest challenge - unemployment says Morongoa Ramaboa, chief communications officer at the South African Wind Energy Association (SAWEA) (Image supplied) According to the Just Energy Transition Skilling for Employment Programme (JET SEP), the wind industry could generate between 22,300 and 35,700 jobs by 2030, particularly in construction and end-of-life phases. Additionally, the Integrated Resource Plans (IRP2023 and IRP2024) project the deployment of 69GW to 76GW of wind energy capacity by 2050, potentially supporting up to 340,000 jobs. This massive potential highlights the urgency of developing a technically skilled, inclusive workforce. However, while the shift toward a Just Energy Transition presents unprecedented employment opportunities, it has been historically difficult for young people to enter the renewable energy sector. These challenges have limited participation in what is otherwise a high-growth and future-focused industry. This newly approved programme serves as an entry-level qualification, offering a practical and accessible route into the wind energy industry without requiring prior technical experience. By helping demystify renewable energy careers, it raises awareness and enables young South Africans to connect with previously unattainable opportunities. NQF Level 3 Wind Turbine Operator Skills Programme The programme is also backed by EWSETA bursary and grant funding, and will provide much-needed financial support to students from low-income households, thereby reducing cost barriers and ensuring accessibility. Developed through an industry-led process, the programme was initiated by SAWEA's Social Impact Standing Committee (SISC). A working group of training providers was formed in collaboration with the Energy and Water Sector Education and Training Authority (EWSETA), reinforcing the sector's commitment to a skills-driven transition. Growing interest in renewable energy careers Another initiative is SAWEA's Wind Industry Internship Programme. This programme provides aspiring graduates with hands-on experience across various disciplines in the renewable energy sector. It not only nurtures talent, it also builds a skilled and knowledgeable cohort of green professionals poised to lead the industry's expansion. The programme continues to receive a high volume of applications annually, with over 5,000 submitted for the 2025 intake - a notable increase from the 256 applications received for the 2024 intake. Despite this demand, placement capacity remains limited, with only 29 interns placed in 2024 and 53 in 2025. This significant rise in applications reflects the growing interest in renewable energy careers among unemployed youth. This trend also underlines the need for greater industry support and collaboration to expand such initiatives, ensuring more young people gain the experience and skills needed to enter the sector. Collaboration is key The Skills Development Act 97 of 1998 provides a framework for national, sectoral, and workplace strategies aimed at improving workforce skills while facilitating recognised occupational qualifications through learnerships. However, addressing the gap between industry demands and post-school education requires collective action. Recognising this need, the South African Wind Energy Association (SAWEA) actively fosters collaboration through initiatives such as PowerUp, a digital skills facilitation hub that connects industry leaders, educational institutions, and key stakeholders to tackle critical skill shortages in the renewable energy sector. By working alongside the Energy and Water Sector Education and Training Authority (EWSETA), SAWEA strengthens workforce readiness and reinforces the importance of coordinated efforts in South Africa's energy transition. Mpumalanga: A case study in transition Drawing from Mpumalanga's evolving skills landscape, the province's transition from a coal-based economy to a renewable energy hub presents a compelling case for South Africa's broader energy shift. Historically home to many of the country's coal-fired power stations, Mpumalanga is now witnessing the growth of wind energy projects - these are reshaping workforce dynamics and necessitating large-scale reskilling and upskilling efforts. Studies on this transition highlight both challenges and opportunities. While the shift raises concerns about potential job losses in traditional coal sectors, it also presents substantial prospects for local employment, value creation, and skills development in the renewable space. The Just Energy Transition in Mpumalanga is expected to have significant socio-economic effects, particularly in towns like eMalahleni, where coal has long been central to the local economy. To ensure an inclusive transition, targeted workforce empowerment programmes must be prioritised. Mpumalanga's proactive approach demonstrates the importance of strategic planning and collaboration. With 3.3GW of available grid capacity and additional capacity anticipated from decommissioned coal plants by 2030, the province is well-positioned for large-scale renewable energy projects. However, critical challenges and other complexities, such as skills and environmental considerations, must be carefully navigated to enable a seamless transition. This transformation exemplifies the broader necessity for industry collaboration, policy alignment, and workforce investment to ensure that no one is left behind. Continued investment in workforce development As South Africa moves forward in its energy transition, building an inclusive green economy must remain at the forefront - one that empowers individuals through skills development while securing the country's position as a competitive investment destination for wind and renewable energy. While South Africa's energy needs and priorities are clear, the question remains: are we adequately equipped to support government efforts in implementing energy policies while maintaining the country's status as a leading investment destination for wind and renewable energy? As the sector grows, continued investment in workforce development will be crucial to unlocking the full potential of South Africa's wind energy industry. Addressing unemployment, skills gaps, and educational accessibility through targeted initiatives can ensure that the transition to renewable energy is inclusive, sustainable, and capable of driving long-term economic growth. All rights reserved. © 2022. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (
