Video Of Man Feeding Raw Milk To Baby Straight From Cow's Udder Sparks Backlash
In the undated video, a man is seen smiling while making his baby drink raw milk straight from the cow, sparking a debate over the serious health risks linked to unpasteurised milk. The clip has garnered over 9 lakh views and led to a flood of comments expressing shock and concern.
Take a look below:
Is this good for a baby? Please answer pic.twitter.com/8wXKBvofaO
— Aulia dr (@DonaldTunp75739) July 21, 2025
Reacting to the video, one user wrote, "No! It's not good. Mainly because freshly made milk contains bacteria that are very dangerous for children. These bacteria are eliminated by pasteurization or cooking the milk."
"That poor baby is being potentially exposed to so many pathogens!!!! This is so hard to watch," commented another.
"Raw milk is not safe for babies. Raw human breast milk from the baby's own mother = SAFE. Raw cow/buffalo/goat milk = UNSAFE for babies (especially under 1 year)," said a third user.
"Hello Real Doctor here! Feeding Unpasteurised milk can cause lots of bacterial illnesses to anyone who consumes them, especially kids. Raw milk contains dangerous bacteria such as Salmonella, E. coli, Campylobacter, Staphylococcus aureus, Yersinia, Brucella, Coxiella, & Listeria. There was a reason pasteurization was taught in schools & field trips." explained another.
In a long X post, Dr. Cyriac Abby Philips, a hepatologist from Kerala known online as The Liver Doc, also reacted to the video, explaining how dangerous raw milk can be, especially for babies.
"Raw milk consumption has become a "trad fad" among the 'educated fools' now because of poor understanding of germ-theory of disease, but this level of child m*rder is a whole different level of human stupidity," he said.
"Always consume pasteurized milk. Some of the microbes that can harm you from raw milk are nightmarish, but those that can harm you from the cow's udder skin is downright hellish," the doctor added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
15 hours ago
- Time of India
Fisherman loses part of foot after rare flesh-eating bacteria infection in Mumbai
Mumbai: A 78-year-old fisherman from Worli lost a portion of his left foot due to an infection caused by a rare "flesh-eating" bacteria, according to doctors who treated him for a 20-day period before discharging him last week. The bacteria was identified as Vibrio vulnificus, belonging to the same family that causes cholera, an acute diarrhoeal infection. Vibrio vulnificus is found along the coasts, and infections could be caused either by eating contaminated raw shellfish or oysters or exposure due to broken skin while wading through contaminated salt or brackish water. "Vibrio vulnificus infections have been reported in India, but are extremely rare," said Dr Gunjan Chanchalani, who heads the critical care department in Wockhardt Hospital, near Mumbai Central railway station, and was part of the team that treated the fisherman. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai On June 26, the fisherman was brought to the hospital in a near-death situation. "He was in septic shock, with a bad left leg wound. We realised the infection was spreading through his body and his blood pressure was low," said the doctor. Through scans, tests, and history-taking from family members, the doctors realised he had necrotising fasciitis (flesh-eating disease) after a minor foot injury during a routine fishing trip off the Worli coast. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo He recalled a sharp prick while wading through brackish water a few days earlier. Necrotising fasciitis, which can be fatal, is caused by a combination of different bacteria, with the most common being Group A Streptococcus and Staphylococcus aureus. It is known to spread throughout the body within 48 hours, and the key is to identify the organism causing it and administer the right antibiotic. The Wockhardt microbiologists found Vibrio vulnificus in the culture they grew in the lab within 48 hours, and he was started on doxycycline, the antibiotic that works on cholera as well. However, as the infection spread through his bloodstream (sepsis) and lungs, he was on a ventilator for seven days. Also, surgeons had to carry out three debridements—removal of dead (necrotic) skin tissue to help the wounded leg heal — but they had to finally amputate the front portion of his left foot. "His son told us fishermen in their colony have had similar infections," said Dr Chanchalani. "This could be due to salinity of the sea water getting reduced or pollution due to climate change," she added. Dr Rahul Pandit, who heads the ICU at H N Reliance Hospital in Girgaum, said, "Flesh-eating is a loosely used terminology; the bacteria destroy the skin, soft tissue, and fascia (muscles)." Necrotising fasciitis is not commonly seen in Mumbai, he said, with a few ICUs getting one or two cases a year. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
What makes strawberries most likely to carry germs (and how to eat them safely)
Per 100 gms of these red delights offer around 59 mg of vitamin C and are good for heart and skin health. They help fight infections and heal faster. They are said to promote collagen production and help with firm skin. They also neutralize harmful free radicals that cause cell damage and aging and reduce oxidative stress and inflammation, supporting healthy blood to consume: They are best enjoyed as a bowl of salad, or one can use them in smoothie, shake or make a compote that can be paired with toast, ice cream, or even pancake. Strawberries might look sweet and harmless, but they're actually one of the dirtiest fruits around, literally. So before you pop one in your mouth, give them a serious wash, like a soak in cold water with a splash of vinegar. A quick rinse won't cut it. Tasty? Absolutely. But handle them right to keep things safe. Why are strawberries prone to germs? They grow right on the ground Strawberries literally rest on the soil as they grow. Being so close to dirt means there's a direct opportunity for bacteria, viruses, and even animal droppings (think birds, rodents, insects) to get on the fruit. This constant ground contact is a huge part of the risk. Thin skin, juicy center Strawberries have super-thin, delicate skins. That means bacteria, viruses, and any chemical residues can stick easily or even be absorbed. Unlike produce with thick peels (like oranges), there's no tough barrier blocking germs from getting in or sticking to the surface. Eaten raw and unpeeled Unlike potatoes or squash that get cooked, almost everyone eats strawberries raw—skin and all. There's no 'kill step' (like heat from cooking) to zap any germs present. Plus, a lot of people just rinse their berries quickly or sometimes not at all before popping them whole into their mouths. They're handled a lot Strawberries are usually hand-picked and packed—often multiple times from farm to store. Each touch (from farmworkers to grocers to you) is a chance for germs to transfer, especially if proper handwashing isn't happening at every step. Workers who are sick, or don't practice good hygiene, have caused real outbreaks of things like Hepatitis A linked to strawberries. Contaminated water Strawberries need a lot of water to grow, and sometimes that irrigation water carries bacteria or viruses (like norovirus or Hepatitis A) if it's not properly treated. Sprinklers can splash germs from soil or manure right onto the berries. They spoil fast These berries are fragile and go bad quickly, which makes it easier for bacteria that cause food poisoning—think Salmonella or E. coli—to grow if temperatures aren't kept cold from farm to table. What germs have been found? Viruses: Hepatitis A and Norovirus have both been tied to strawberry outbreaks in the US and Canada. These often come from contaminated water or infected workers handling the fruit. Bacteria: Salmonella, E. coli, and even Listeria can end up on strawberries, especially if manure is used as fertilizer, or if packing equipment isn't clean. Other microbes: Strawberries can pick up all sorts of other bacteria and fungi from the environment, which can cause spoilage and, less often, foodborne illness. Safety tips Wash really well: Before eating, rinse strawberries thoroughly under running water, gently rubbing them with your hands. Skip the soaps or fancy washes—plain water is best. Eat quickly: Buy strawberries right before you plan to use them, and keep them refrigerated to slow down bacterial growth. Mind recalls: Pay attention to warnings or recalls (the FDA posts them online) and never eat strawberries (fresh or frozen) involved in an outbreak, especially if they're linked to viruses like Hepatitis A. Wash hands and surfaces: Wash your hands before and after handling strawberries, and keep cutting boards and knives clean. Strawberries are awesome—just a bit risky because of how and where they grow, and how we eat them. Give them a good rinse and stay aware of food safety info, so you can snack safely!
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
Pollution board says it found coliform and E. coli contamination in 6 Janakpuri homes
New Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), which collected samples of tap water from 12 houses in Janakpuri, has found the presence of total and fecal coliform bacteria in six houses and E. coli in two homes. "… in six samples, total coliform and E. coli were not detected. In three samples, total coliform was detected but with values close to the lowest detection limit, and E. coli was not detected. In two samples, total coliform was detected but E. coli was not detected in one and detected in the other, but the E. coli value was close to the lowest detection limit, and in one sample, both total coliform and E. coli were detected above detection limits," CPCB said in its report. The central agency has told National Green Tribunal that the samples of the Delhi Jal Board supplied water were collected on July 20. T he tribunal had earlier sought details from the pollution watchdog to assess the water quality after residents complained about the contaminated water. "In compliance with the order dated July 16, 2025, CPCB collected samples... from 12 houses on July 20, 2025," it said in the report dated July 28. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi CPCB had also collected seven water samples on June 30 from other houses of A1 Block of Janakpuri. It added that the samples were analysed for bacteriological parameters such as total coliform, fecal coliform, E. coli, and free residual chlorine. It pointed out that "The Drinking Water Standards of Bureau of Indian Standards-IS 10500:2012 prescribes that total coliform and E. coli shall not be detected in 100ml of drinking water samples." Last week, DJB also apprised the tribunal that it discovered an interconnection of a dead water pipeline with an active one, which led to the contamination in the Janakpuri area. It said that several short-term remediation steps were taken to resolve the issue. DJB also said that it had collected 59 samples between March and July from Janakpuri, A Block. DJB said that out of 59 samples, it found samples from only three houses to be unsatisfactory and contaminated with coliform.
