Wildlife rangers search for Noosa crocodile after potential sighting
Rangers have been scouring the area from the air, land and water following the potential sighting by long-time angler James Graham.
He said he spotted the croc-shaped silhouette on his "fish finder" on the weekend, prompting a search of the Noosa River that continued last night.
A drone has been deployed and the search will continue today and into this evening.
Program coordinator Scott Booth said there had not been other public sightings since Mr Graham's report.
"We'd also expect to see a crocodile sitting out for long periods trying to soak up any sunshine on exposed banks near the edge of the water, and we just haven't seen that," Mr Booth said.
He said there was a chance the sighting involved a different animal.
"That's probably more indicative of potentially a dolphin or shark, or something like that moving across the bottom of the water," Mr Booth said.
Yesterday Mr Graham told the ABC he had spent time fishing off northern Queensland and had seen crocodiles on the fish-finder monitor before.
The habitat for Queensland crocodiles is thought to end at Gladstone's Boyne River, about 300km north of Noosa.
In recent months a crocodile was euthanased at Mary River and another was photographed at Inskip Point.
University of Queensland professor Craig Franklin said there were sometimes "stragglers" outside traditional crocodile habitats because a larger male has forced them out of their territory.
Professor Franklin said there were historical cases of crocodiles recorded as far south as the Brisbane and Logan rivers.
He said the reptiles generally made their way back north to warmer waters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Parasitic wasp collected by Queensland students identified as new species
A parasitic wasp captured in a trap set by Queensland school students has been identified as a new species. It was recently recognised in peer-reviewed research after it was found in 2022. Since the discovery is so new, researcher Andy Howe said not much was known about the species other than how it reproduced. "They will lay their eggs in or on a host, another insect," Dr Howe, an entomologist at the University of the Sunshine Coast, said. Despite the gruesome parasitoid life cycle, Dr Howe said the creatures had delicate features. "It has lovely long antennae and cool little wings. It's very small, which is impressive in itself, but it has really fine, beautiful detailed structure on its back and cool big eyes," Dr Howe said. But outside of that, he said it was not clear how widespread the wasps were. "We know nothing, or very little, about how abundant they are … that would depend on their host, and the type of habitat that they use." The students who discovered the species at Gin Gin, west of Bundaberg, described the wasp as "creepy" but "very cool". Gin Gin was one of 50 schools in Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia involved in a citizen science program in 2022, capturing hundreds of insects. The students used Malaise traps, which are tent-like structures made of netting. Specimens were sent to the Centre for Biodiversity Genomics in Canada for DNA barcoding. It was there, the parasitoid species was identified, and the Gin Gin school community chose its name, Cotesia ginginensis. The findings have now been published in the peer-reviewed Zootaxa Journal. Karyn Goodman, head of science at Gin Gin State High School, said it had been an anxious but exciting wait for news. "The kids and the staff are just so excited that we've gone through the long process, and finally we have an outcome, and we're forever going to be in the history books," she said. Ms Goodman said the project had strengthened the students' understanding of science and respect for the land. "Making that connection for them that what they do now, what they get involved in, what they contribute to, does have that ripple effect out there in the world." Past student at Gin Gin State High School, Caitlin Caunt, said the group had not expected to find anything new. "It's very cool. We didn't really believe at first and [finding out] it was published was like, 'Wow, that actually happened,'" she said. Ms Caunt said the project gave the students some valuable life lessons. "We learnt that even though we think that we've discovered everything, we've always got to keep looking, because there's always something that we haven't found," she said. Dr Howe said it was the ideal outcome. "We thought that they would [but] we didn't make any promises," he said. "There are 220,000-plus species of insects in Australia, and like 30 to 33 per cent of them have been described, so they have a formal scientific name. "So that means that the chance of finding one of those [undescribed species] is fairly high, and thankfully, we did."
ABC News
17 hours ago
- ABC News
Extinct Species
MICHELLE WAKIM, REPORTER: What do you think about bringing extinct animals back to life? PERSON: I think it's a bit scary, but I think it's a really cool idea. PERSON: The world has adapted without them, but then if they come back, the right climates and stuff won't be right for them. PERSON: It would be really cool, but it could interrupt the food web or the food chain. PERSON: It could go really wrong. PERSON: It could very wrong. PERSON: Some things would go wrong. PERSON: It just depends on the animal and what it can do to society, like a dinosaur, that would just not be a good thing. PERSON: Well, I watched Jurassic Park. So not the plot of Jurassic Park? PERSON: Yeah, no, not the plot of Jurassic Park. PERSON: I think the plot of Jurassic Park would be cool. When we talk about de-extinction, bringing extinct animals back to life, Jurassic Park, the 1993 sci-fi film, often comes to mind. JURASSIC PARK: Welcome to Jurassic Park. But now, in real life, America Biotech company Colossal Biosciences has announced plans to de-extinct this. Do you know what this animal is? PERSON: An emu? PERSON: Uh, it looks like an emu. PERSON: I don't know. PERSON: An emu? This is the moa, and to be fair, it is in the same family as the emu. Moa were big flightless birds that once inhabited New Zealand and became extinct around 500 years ago due to over-hunting, habitat destruction and introduced predators. And the moa isn't the first animal Colossal Biosciences is keen to de-extinct. They've been working on woolly mammoths, the Tassie tiger, and these guys, which the company says are the first dire wolves to be born in more than 10,000 years. BETH SHAPIRO, COLOSSAL BIOSCIENCES: The process of de-extinction is that we extract DNA from ancient bones, and we sequence that DNA and assemble ancient genomes. DNA, which stands for deoxyribonucleic acid, is like a blueprint that exists inside the cells of all living things. It's made up of chemical bases, adenine, thionine, cytosine, and guanine. They form the building blocks of DNA, which determines how all living things look and act. Sometimes you can also find DNA preserved in dead things. Now might be a good time to bring in Associate Professor Nick Rawlence. Part of his job is to get DNA out of archaeological, and fossil remains. NIC RAWLENCE, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO: So, think Jurassic Park, but we don't bring back dinosaurs. De-extinction in the strictest sense is bringing back an animal that has been extinct, bringing it back to life. The only way to do that is through the process of cloning. So, if we think of Dolly the sheep. NEWS REPORTER: When the world first said, 'Hello Dolly' there were hopes this was the beginning of a revolution. Dolly was the first mammal to be cloned and was born back in 1996. But the thing about cloning is you need really high-quality DNA for it to work. ASS. PROF. RAWLENCE: The problem with extinct animals is that for the most part, their DNA is really badly degraded. It's like you've taken that DNA, and you've put it in a wood-fired pizza oven at 500 degrees overnight, and it comes out fragmented in shards, crumbs, dust, chemically modified. Nic says while we can take these damaged bits of DNA and kind of put them back together like a puzzle, there will be missing pieces and holes in the final product. Sound familiar? JURASSIC PARK: Gaps in the DNA sequence. We use the complete DNA of a frog to fill in the holes and complete the code, and now, we can make a baby dinosaur. So, if ancient DNA is too damaged to clone, what is Colossal Biosciences actually doing when they claim to de-extinct animals? BETH SHAPIRO, COLOSSAL BIOSCIENCES: To de-extinct the moa, we are collecting DNA from all nine species of moa. We'll be comparing the genome sequences to genomes of living birds to identify what it is that made moa unique, and using the tools of genome editing to make those changes in the DNA sequence of the living close relatives. ASS. PROF. RAWLENCE: So, the only way to get an animal that's similar to one that was extinct is to use genetic engineering. So, bringing back the dire wolf, you've created a genetically engineered grey wolf; you would do the same with emu and moa. A good analogy is if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's a duck. What we have is we've got something that looks like a dire wolf, but we're not entirely sure it actually behaves like a dire wolf. PERSON: If you made it look like it and genetically put it together like that, then it might not have the same behaviours as it had a long time ago. PERSON: If they're just taking an emu and sort of like changing it to bring it back, I mean, what are we really going to gain from this? I don't think it's very necessary. PERSON: Why do we need the moa, kind of? It's like, what purpose does it have here? It could maybe endanger emus? PERSON: They might create a new animal, that's nothing like the original one, that went extinct. So, knowing all of this, we're left with the classic dilemma. JURASSIC PARK: Yeah, yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should. ASS. PROF. RAWLENCE: I'm against de-extinction. I would say by all means develop the technology but use it to save what we've got left. You could use this technology to genetically engineer animals to be resistant to a disease, giving them the chance to evolve with climate change in a fast-changing world. Colossal scientists said we have a moral obligation to bring back these species and undo the sins of the past; I'd say we need to learn from them, otherwise we're doomed to repeat them. PERSON: If it's used for commercial purposes, that would cross the line, I reckon. If it's used to kind of help the environment and save endangered species or stuff like that, that could be really good. PERSON: Maybe like polar bears. I know they're, like struggling because of climate change. So maybe, yeah, doing something for the polar bears. PERSON: If it's going to cause more harm than good then there's no need to bring them back and take money out of the science budget as a whole. PERSON: Especially with climate change it's a much better idea to focus on the animals that we have now because, like, we don't know if in a while those animals are going to be extinct as well.
ABC News
18 hours ago
- ABC News
VitalTrace fetal monitoring device touted as 'absolute revolution' in childbirth
For the first time ever, health professionals will be able to accurately monitor oxygen levels in babies during childbirth to prevent major health issues and unnecessary emergency procedures. Experts have described the "breakthrough technology", developed in Western Australia, as a world-first and the biggest development in fetal monitoring in 50 years. The VitalTrace device attaches to the baby's head and transmits small, continuous electrodes to measure the baby's heart rate and level of lactate, which can detect fetal distress. University of WA professor Jane Pillow described the device as "the first breakthrough in fetal monitoring that we've had since the 1960s". She said the current method of fetal monitoring was not a "good predictor" of how well oxygen was being delivered to the baby during labour, she said. "The problem with that is … sometimes we miss babies that are not getting oxygen all that well," she said. "And at other times the diagnosis of when they aren't getting oxygen might be significantly delayed, and the consequence of that for babies is really devastating." A lack of oxygen could result in death but often it's the cause of significant health issues like cerebral palsy, brain damage and organ function complications. Emily Stone said it could provide re-assurance to mothers. "There were times during the birth of my daughter, when her heart rate couldn't be detected," she said. "It can be quite frightening in what's already an intense experience. "If this device was available, it just would have given me greater piece of mind that she was healthy and safe." Obstetrician and associate professor and the University of WA Scott White said the new development had the potential to halve unnecessary emergency caesareans, describing it as "an absolute revolution in childbirth". "It allows us to better identify those babies who are compromised," Ms Scott said. "But equally as important, it allows us to reduce the interventions we unnecessarily apply to women, which is a real profound improved health outcome." Mr Scott explained one of the well-known side effects of traditional heart rate monitoring is its inaccuracy. "At the moment, we look at changes in the babies heart rate pattern, that requires a lot of training, skill and interpretation and therefore errors can happen," Mr Scott said. "Whenever you use an indirect measure, you get false positive results and false negative results … [and] it tells us babies are unhappy when frequently they're not. "But this device is much more accurate which allows us to safely leave babies in when they're safe and to more accurately recognise those babies that truly do need to be delivered early." The device has taken about seven years to develop and the technology is similar to what people with diabetes use to monitor their glucose levels. VitalTrace co-founder and chief executive Arjun Kaushik said the response to the device had been overwhelming. "The enthusiasm to adopt this device cannot be overstated, I think this is an area of medicine that has long been under-served in technology," he said. Both the state and federal government have backed the device, with the state government contributing about $5 million to the technology's development. Early trials of the technology involved 20 mothers who participated nationwide. But professionals are hoping another larger trial will start next year to test the devices efficacy and dependability with the aim of getting regulatory approval in 2027.
