
One in seven women ‘have had their finances controlled in recent months'
Two-fifths (42%) did not speak to anyone, such as a family member or friend, about what they were going through, according to the report from charity Surviving Economic Abuse (SEA).
The charity commissioned Ipsos UK to carry out a survey of more than 2,800 women across the UK in October and November 2024.
The research was developed by SEA with input from victim-survivors and academic advisers from London Metropolitan University and the University of Warwick.
The charity also found many women do not know anything about economic abuse.
Some 55% of women said they do not know anything about this form of domestic abuse and a third (33%) know 'a little' about it.
Economic abuse is a dangerous and prevalent form of domestic abuse that takes many forms – including a current or ex-partner restricting access to money or bank accounts, damaging property or possessions, taking out loans or building up debt in a victim-survivor's name, SEA said.
The report, Counting The Cost: The Scale And Impact Of Economic Abuse In The UK, indicated women from ethnic minority backgrounds, disabled women and younger women aged 18 to 24 were particularly likely to say they had experienced at least one form of economic abuse.
Meanwhile, 28% of women with children in the household had experienced economic abuse, compared with 10% of UK women without children, the research indicated.
The report also found victim-survivors who had heard the term 'economic abuse' and knew something about it were more likely to seek help.
Those who had heard the term economic abuse were also more likely to speak to a domestic abuse charity or a bank.
Sam Smethers, chief executive of Surviving Economic Abuse, said: 'Awareness is critical because those who are aware are more likely to get the help they need.
'Many are trapped in dangerous situations with an abuser or left with mountains of debt, homeless and experiencing this form of coercive control long after the relationship has ended.'
She said economic abuse is devastating for all victim-survivors, but the charity's data 'shows the impact of this abuse is felt particularly strongly by younger women, mothers, black and minoritised women and disabled women'.
The charity quoted one woman saying of her former partner: 'He used money as a weapon – even after the relationship ended. I had to sell our home, live with the consequences of the bad credit he'd forced me into, and over 20 years later, I'm still in housing insecurity.
'Knowing this was economic abuse would have made such a difference. It's not just 'what happens' after divorce – it's abuse, and people need to know that. That's why I tell anyone going through this to contact SEA, and to speak to their bank – there is help, and you're not alone.'
Jess Phillips, the minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, said: 'No woman should ever be trapped in an abusive relationship because of the suffering they will face if they try to leave, whether that is the threat of physical violence or the prospect of being plunged into poverty and homelessness.
'Tackling economic abuse – a true hidden crime – will be integral to achieving our ambition of halving violence against women and girls in a decade.'
The charity said 'systemic change' must be driven across the public and private sectors, turning good practice into common practice, to transform the lives of victim-survivors.
It is also calling for the public to join its mission to raise awareness of economic abuse, to help people spot the signs and access support.
Surviving Economic Abuse highlighted some potential signs of economic abuse people can look out for:
1. Are they short of money or unable to buy inexpensive items even if they work? Have they asked to borrow money to pay bills or for essential items?
2. Do they say their partner deals with all money matters? Are their wages or benefits paid directly into their partner's account? Are they counting the pennies, or seeking their partner's permission before making any purchases?
3. Have they left their work when they liked their job?
4. Do they make excuses not to join friends for coffee and meals out?
5. Do they wear ill-fitting or worn-out clothing? Do they not have the money to go to the hairdresser or buy personal items?
The charity said people can support victim-survivors of economic abuse by telling them help is available and they are not alone.
It said people can also offer practical support, such as by offering a spare room or providing essential items such as food, clothing, and toiletries, as well as having information about domestic abuse services to hand.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
The government must ensure the promise of free childcare is delivered
Takeup of the government's offer of free childcare has been one-quarter higher than predicted, which has prompted some voices in the sector to warn of its imminent 'collapse', because it is unclear how the planned expansion of the scheme in September will be funded. Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, in an exclusive interview with The Independent, says the unexpectedly high numbers signing up for the scheme is a 'good problem to have'. There is no doubt that there is a problem, however. The higher takeup meant that the Department for Education spent £2bn on the scheme in the last financial year, covering most of the first year of the Labour government, rather than the planned £1.6bn. That gap was covered by additional funding announced in the spending review in March, but as we report today, the Institute for Fiscal Studies estimates that the gap will continue to widen as the scheme expands. The next expansion will happen in September, when working parents with children aged nine months and older will be offered 30 hours a week of 'free' childcare. Of course, the care is not 'free' in that it has to be paid for by taxpayers generally – on the grounds that helping the parents of young children to work is a public good. As Ms Phillipson puts it: 'If people are able to work, or work a few more hours, that helps us all as a society as well and it gets economic growth going.' The funding of the scheme will continue to be under pressure, but the most important fact about the scheme so far is that it has not collapsed. The Independent was among those voices warning that it had been underfunded by the Conservative government, but to its credit the new government has increased the money available. The finances of the scheme may be stretched, and many childcare providers continue to say that they cannot recruit enough staff at the wages they can afford, but the gloomier warnings of chaos and thousands of parents left without places have not yet been borne out. It is crucial to remain vigilant as the scheme expands so that remains the case. At the insistence of Jeremy Hunt, the chancellor in the previous government, the scheme was designed to start small, with a limited offer of free hours to older children, before expanding gradually to provide full coverage. This September's expansion is the final stage of that planned rollout, which so far has gone more smoothly than we expected. If the last stage is a stretch too far and some parents cannot immediately find the places they want, that would be a blow to the government's ambitions. Ms Phillipson is right that the problem facing the scheme in its final phase is the problem of success. The higher-than-expected demand means additional pressure on the public finances in the later years of this parliament – pressure that coincides with other increased demands on Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, from slow growth, higher interest rates and a government U-turn on disability benefits spending. Providing greater access to free childcare is a good policy that will help working families. Its success and ambition should be applauded. The government must now make sure that its expansion is a success.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Charming English town is getting new £42million train station that will reopen key link shut for over 60 years
A RURAL English town has been given the green light for a new £42million train station that will reopen a vital link. After more than 60 years without a railway station, Cullompton has been granted funding by the Department of Transport and HM Treasury. 2 2 The announcement is set to turbo-charge the economy of the Devon town and provide desperately needed transport links for locals and visitors. The funding will also help to support plans for a new station in Wellington. Cullompton station first opened in 1844 and closed in 1964. The reopening will be key to enabling the Culm Garden Village development, which will create around 5,000 homes. The new station will also be next to the motorway services at Junction 28 of the M5. Councillor Jacqi Hodgson, Devon County Council Cabinet Member for Climate Change and Biodiversity, said: 'Further investment in rail infrastructure in Devon is always welcome and this railway station for Cullompton is key to the town's economic growth and will help reduce carbon emissions in the county. "People need improved public transport options if they're going to be encouraged to change their travel habits. "Hopefully Cullompton could follow the success of Okehampton Station and the re-opening of the Dartmoor Line, which is a great example of what can be achieved given the necessary funding from government.' In April, a delegation of 30 people from the region travelled to London to hand-deliver powerful letters of support to rail minister Lord Hendy. Backed by a cross-party group of South West MPs and Wellington Town Council, the letters stressed how restoring rail links to both Okehampton and nearby Wellington could unlock major economic, social and environmental benefits. Lord Hendy said: 'The stations would contribute to sustainable development, connecting new residential areas with regional employment, education and healthcare opportunities. "The case for taking a combined approach presents significantly higher value for money compared with a stand-alone project in either area.' He added: 'Reopening Cullompton and Wellington stations would be a strategic investment aligning with the Government's goals to drive economic growth, reduce environmental impact and improve social mobility.' Economic growth Gideon Amos, who also backed the scheme, said: 'For the cost of around £42 million, £180 million of economic growth would go into the region — which I know the Government would want to see. 'Frankly, there is no other rail project in the south-west that is ready to go and could be built and completed in the next two years, as the project is so far advanced. 'In fact, had it not been for the review in July last year, the spades would be in the ground and the platforms under construction, because the contract was about to be let and the detailed design was almost finished.' And Labour MP Simon Lightwood added in the Commons: 'The strategic objectives are clear. "Enhancing public transport connectivity will support growth and productivity in Exeter, Taunton and Bridgwater, while also reducing road congestion, car dependency and carbon emissions. ' He continued: 'The stations would contribute to sustainable development, connecting new residential areas with regional employment, education and healthcare opportunities." This comes as satellite images of a new £15million train station at Okehampton were revealed. The station, which will be the newest addition to the Dartmoor Line, connecting West Devon, Torridge and North Cornwall with Exeter and beyond, will also benefit education and leisure services in the region. GWR Regional Growth Manager David Whiteway said the project would provide "valuable support for the community and local economies". Satellite images show the rapid development of the £15million scheme, which is being funded by the Department for Transport with contributions from Devon County Council and West Devon Borough Council. Since work began in January, major progress has been made to create the new station on the edge of Okehampton, two minutes from the A30. In March, 300 metres of the single-line track was moved 90cm north to allow a new platform to be built alongside it.


Times
an hour ago
- Times
SEC reforms tipped to ‘turn on the tap' for London Stock Exchange
The US market regulator is considering plans to change how foreign companies are listed in New York, which could provide a much-needed boost to the London Stock Exchange. Under ideas circulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), foreign companies that are quoted in New York could be required to have a secondary listing in another location if they aren't already listed elsewhere. This demand, if enacted, could affect prominent companies including Arm, the Cambridge-based chip designer that is listed in New York. Foreign companies could also be subject to American accounting rules, which might have the effect of forcing them to move their entire domicile to the US. Lawyers at the global legal firm DLA Piper said the work under way at the SEC could 'turn on the tap' for London to attract secondary listings from these so-called foreign private issuers (FPIs). This would lift the London Stock Exchange, which has faced criticism for losing out on initial public offerings (IPOs) to New York. It has also been deserted by a number companies that have switched their listings to America in the quest for higher valuations. • How to save London's stock market, by LSE boss David Schwimmer Companies using the FPI rules are not subject to quarterly reporting requirements and can use international accounting standards to retain their New York listings. However, the SEC said it had devised these rules decades ago on the basis that they would be 'subject to meaningful disclosure and oversight in their home jurisdictions'. Before 2003, the vast majority of FPIs were European and subject to oversight by their domestic regulator. But 20 years later, the largest jurisdiction in terms of 'issuer incorporation' was the Cayman Islands, and the largest by headquarters was China, the SEC said. Rob Newman, co-head of capital markets for DLA Piper in the UK, said that if the changes were implemented, there could be repercussions for a wide range of companies. 'What we're talking about is companies [like] Arm Holdings, which chose to list in New York, doesn't have its stock traded anywhere else, and is currently relying on exemptions of being a foreign private issuer,' he said. Another company to take advantage of the FPI regime has been Virax Biolabs, a Glasgow-based biotech company that listed its shares on Nasdaq after incorporating in the Cayman Islands. In a letter to the SEC, Virax Biolabs' chief executive, James Foster, said: 'Our company was advised by our underwriter at the time of IPO to incorporate in the Cayman Islands as a means to facilitate a US listing. Our operational headquarters, executive leadership and business administration have always been located in the United Kingdom. We would not have adopted the Cayman structure but for this advice.' The SEC has asked for responses to its consultation by early September. It is unclear when it would make any rule changes.