Secretary Collins: We owe America's veterans real solutions
We owe America's veterans — and hundreds of thousands of excellent VA employees — solutions.
For many years, veterans have been asking for a more efficient, accountable and transparent VA. This administration is finally going to give veterans what they want.
President Trump has a mandate to bring generational change to Washington, and that is exactly what we're going to deliver at VA. We are going to make the department work better for the veterans, families, caregivers and survivors we are charged with serving. Here's how:
In response to Trump's Department of Government Efficiency Workforce Optimization Initiative, VA is conducting a department-wide review of its organization, operations and structure. Central to these efforts is a pragmatic and disciplined approach to eliminating waste and bureaucracy, increasing efficiency and improving health care, benefits and services to veterans.
This will be a thorough and thoughtful review based on input from career VA employees and senior executives, as well as top department leaders.
Our goal is to reduce VA employment levels to 2019 numbers of roughly 398,000 employees from our current level of approximately 470,000 employees — a nearly 15 percent decrease. We will accomplish this without making cuts to health care or benefits to veterans and VA beneficiaries.
VA will always fulfill its duty to provide veterans, families, caregivers and survivors the health care and benefits they have earned. That is a promise.
And while we conduct our review, the department will continue to hire for more than 300,000 mission-critical positions to ensure health care and benefits for VA beneficiaries are not affected.
There are many people complaining about the changes we are making at VA. But what most of them are really saying is 'Keep doing the same thing VA has always done.'
Nope. The days of kicking the can down the road and measuring VA's progress by how much money it spends and how many people it employs — rather than how many veterans it helps — are over.
Here's just one example of the change we are bringing. We are conducting a comprehensive review of VA's 90,000 contracts, which total more than $67 billion. After reviewing roughly 2 percent of those contracts, we found almost 600 non-mission-critical or duplicative agreements that we will be cancelling, saving the department nearly $900 million. Just imagine how much we will be able to save after we complete our review of the remaining 88,000 VA contracts.
The money we're saving by eliminating non-mission-critical or duplicative contracts is money we are going to redirect to veteran-facing health care, benefits and services, resulting in massive improvements in customer service and convenience.
Improving services to veterans is exactly why VA exists. That is what everyone — Congress, the media and VA employees — should be focused on.
There has been a lot of news coverage regarding recent layoffs at VA. We regret when anyone loses their job, and its extraordinarily difficult for department leaders to make those types of decisions.
But the federal government does not exist to employ people. It exists to serve people. At VA, we are focused on serving veterans better than ever before, and doing so requires changing and improving the organization.
VA was never perfect, and it will never be perfect. But we can and will make it better. When we find problems we will fix them, and we will communicate what we are doing to the public. But we will be making major changes. So get used to it.
Right now, VA's biggest problem is that its bureaucracy and inefficiencies are getting in the way of customer convenience and service to veterans.
As I said before: We owe America's veterans — and the hundreds of thousands of amazing VA employees — solutions. And mark my words, that is what we will deliver.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
23 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
California Gov. Newsom signs legislation calling for special election on redrawn congressional map
SACRAMENTO, Calif — California voters will decide in November whether to approve a redrawn congressional map designed to help Democrats win five more U.S. House seats next year, after Texas Republicans advanced their own redrawn map to pad their House majority by the same number of seats at President Donald Trump's urging. California lawmakers voted mostly along party lines Thursday to approve legislation calling for the special election. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has led the campaign in favor of the map, then quickly signed it — the latest step in a tit-for-tat gerrymandering battle. 'We don't want this fight and we didn't choose this fight, but with our democracy on the line, we will not run away from this fight,' Democratic Assemblyman Marc Berman said. Republicans, who have filed a lawsuit and called for a federal investigation into the plan, promised to keep fighting it. California Assemblyman James Gallagher, the Republican minority leader, said Trump was 'wrong' to push for new Republican seats elsewhere, contending the president was just responding to Democratic gerrymandering in other states. But he warned that Newsom's approach, which the governor has dubbed 'fight fire with fire,' was dangerous. 'You move forward fighting fire with fire and what happens?' Gallagher asked. 'You burn it all down.' In Texas, the Republican-controlled state Senate was scheduled to vote on a map Thursday night. After that, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's signature will be all that is needed to make the map official. It's part of Trump's effort to stave off an expected loss of the GOP's majority in the U.S. House in the 2026 midterm elections. What states are doing in the battle over congressional maps as Texas pursues plan President Donald Trump soughtOn a national level, the partisan makeup of existing districts puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. The incumbent president's party usually loses congressional seats in the midterms. The president has pushed other Republican-controlled states including Indiana and Missouri to also revise their maps to add more winnable GOP seats. Ohio Republicans were also already scheduled to revise their maps to make them more partisan. The U.S. Supreme Court has said the Constitution does not outlaw partisan gerrymandering, only using race to redraw district lines. Texas Republicans embraced that when their House of Representatives passed its revision Wednesday. 'The underlying goal of this plan is straight forward: improve Republican political performance,' state Rep. Todd Hunter, the Republican who wrote the bill revising Texas' maps, said. On Thursday, California Democrats noted Hunter's comments and said they had to take extreme steps to counter the Republican move. 'What do we do, just sit back and do nothing? Or do we fight back?' Democratic state Sen. Lena Gonzalez said. 'This is how we fight back and protect our democracy.' Republicans and some Democrats championed the 2008 ballot measure that established California's nonpartisan redistricting commission, along with the 2010 one that extended its role to drawing congressional maps. Democrats have sought a national commission that would draw lines for all states but have been unable to pass legislation creating that system. Trump's midterm redistricting ploy has shifted Democrats. That was clear in California, where Newsom was one of the members of his party who backed the initial redistricting commission ballot measures, and where Assemblyman Joshua Lowenthal, whose father, Rep. Alan Lowenthal, was another Democratic champion of a nonpartisan commission, presided over the state Assembly's passage of the redistricting package. Newsom on Thursday contended his state was still setting a model. 'We'll be the first state in U.S. history, in the most democratic way, to submit to the people of our state the ability to determine their own maps,' Newsom said before signing the legislation. Former President Barack Obama, who's also backed a nationwide nonpartisan approach, has also backed Newsom's bid to redraw the California map, saying it was a necessary step to stave off the GOP's Texas move. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach,' Obama said Tuesday during a fundraiser for the Democratic Party's main redistricting arm, noting that California voters will still have the final say on the map. Bipartisan group led by ex-Obama officials 'rolling the dice' on new remapping plan for Illinois legislatureThe California map would last only through 2030, after which the state's commission would draw up a new map for the normal, once-a-decade redistricting to adjust district lines after the decennial U.S. Census. Democrats are also mulling reopening Maryland's and New York's maps for mid-decade redraws. However, more Democratic-run states have commission systems like California's or other redistricting limits than Republican ones do, leaving the GOP with a freer hand to swiftly redraw maps. New York, for example, can't draw new maps until 2028, and even then, only with voter approval. In Texas, outnumbered Democrats turned to unusual steps to try to delay passage, leaving the state to delay a vote by 15 days. Upon their return, they were assigned round-the-clock police monitoring. California Republicans didn't take such dramatic steps but complained bitterly about Democrats muscling the package through the Statehouse and harming what GOP State Sen. Tony Strickland called the state's 'gold-standard' nonpartisan approach. 'What you're striving for is predetermined elections,' Strickland said. 'You're taking the voice away from Californians.'
Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
Newsom signs California redistricting measures in response to Texas bill
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed two redistricting bills into law on Thursday evening after a Democratic-controlled Legislature passed them earlier in the day. Why it matters: The legislation is in direct response to Texas' Republican-controlled House passing a new congressional map at the urging of President Trump, and the consequences of both could prove pivotal in the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential election.
Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
Argentina snafu with Noem leads Rubio, White House to seek better coordination on foreign policy
When Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem signed a visa-waiver accord with Argentinian officials last month, Marco Rubio — the National Security Director and Secretary of State — didn't get a heads-up until after the fact, according to five sources familiar with the situation. Now the White House and National Security Council want to make there's no repeat of such a scenario. Why it matters: All U.S. government workers must "clear the purpose and scope of any proposed call, conversation, meeting or trip with the NSC prior to engagement," according to an Aug. 8 memo penned by Rubio and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles that was reviewed by Axios. "Any proposed agreements, directives or demands involving foreign leaders or countries must be notified, coordinated and approved through the interagency process at the White House, via the NSC," the memo said. "No commitments or statements binding the United States may be made without prior NSC approval." The big picture: Foreign policy under President Trump is conducted in a top-down fashion at breakneck speed in multiple high-stakes situations across the globe. That sometimes has led to occasions in which different departments and Cabinet secretaries aren't completely on the same page. The Argentina case wasn't the only such instance but it was the biggest one yet, the sources said. "This memo was not directed at any specific individual," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a written statement. "It was sent to the president's entire top-tier team to emphasize the importance of a coordinated and deliberate approach to advancing the President's foreign policy agenda." The backstory: Noem traveled to Latin America last month and signed a July 28 " statement of intent" with Argentinian counterparts to readmit the country to the U.S. Visa Waiver Program to eventually enable citizens of that country to travel to the U.S. for 90 days without a waiver. Rubio, however, wasn't informed in advance and was "blindsided" and "annoyed" by the announcement, two sources who spoke with him said. "The policy itself isn't a problem, it was just a breach of protocol," one of the sources said. "Marco likes Kristi and he talks to her all the time. It's just that this is not a good way to conduct foreign policy if the lines of communication are like this." One source said the NSC was made aware of Noem's plans in Argentina, however, and speculated that it didn't reach Rubio's desk in Trump's streamlined NSC that has scrapped a slower, deliberative processes that would have avoided this situation. Sources in other departments say they weren't aware of any briefing on the visa waiver plan and that it didn't reach Rubio. The intrigue: Axios was first made aware of the situation in reporting an Aug. 14 story about the unusual work status of Noem's de facto chief of staff, Corey Lewandowski. Lewandowski, a former Trump campaign aide, is classified as a temporary employee. The White House is tracking his work hours at DHS amid suspicions he's worked more days than allowed. Last month's memo didn't single out Lewandowski but was partly prompted by his activities. House Democrats, also are investigating his work arrangement. "Corey went with Noem to Argentina and someone should've flagged this visa situation to Rubio," one official said. "It's not big deal. But it's one of those deals that could have been a problem." Earlier in the administration, Rubio and Trump's special envoy to Venezuela, Ric Grenell, appeared to be at loggerheads on occasion.
