logo
Two dead, 10 injured in explosion at US steel plant in Pennsylvania

Two dead, 10 injured in explosion at US steel plant in Pennsylvania

Al Jazeera3 days ago
Multiple explosions at a US Steel plant near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania have killed two people and injured 10, according to the company and local authorities.
The blasts at the Clairton Coke Works – part of a sprawling industrial complex along the Monongahela River – took place just before 11am Eastern Time (15:00 GMT) on Monday.
Firefighters battled flames and heavy smoke that billowed out of the plant, which is owned by US Steel, a subsidiary of Nippon Steel.
Initially, two people were reported missing. One person was found and transported to a local hospital, said Allegheny County Police Assistant Superintendent Victor Joseph at an afternoon briefing.
There was no word yet on the possible cause of the explosion.
The investigation into the explosion would be 'a time-consuming technical investigation', Joseph said.
David Burritt, president and chief executive officer of US Steel, said in a statement that the company was working with local authorities to discover the cause.
Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro posted on X that there were multiple explosions at the plant and that his administration was in touch with local officials.
'The scene is still active, and folks nearby should follow the direction of local authorities,' he wrote at the time the employee was missing.
The severity of the injuries was not known, but news accounts said several people were taken to hospital burn units.
Steel sector in decline
Clairton Mayor Rich Lattanzi said it was a horrible day for the city, about 32km (20 miles) south of Pittsburgh, long known as the US Steel City.
US Steel has produced steel in the area since the late 19th century, but in recent decades, the industry has been in decline, leading to plant closures and restructurings.
In June, Nippon Steel, Japan's biggest steelmaker, closed its $14.9bn acquisition of US Steel after an 18-month struggle to obtain United States government approval for the deal, which faced scrutiny due to national security concerns.
While air quality monitors did not detect a dangerous rise in sulphur dioxide after Monday's explosions, residents within 1.6km (1 mile) of the plant were advised to remain indoors, close windows and doors, set HVAC systems to recirculate, and avoid activities that draw in outside air, said Allegheny County Executive Sara Innamorato at the briefing.
The Clairton Coke Works is the largest coke manufacturing facility in the US, employing about 1,300 workers. It operates 10 coke oven batteries, which produce about 4.3 million tonnes of coke a year.
Coke is produced by heating coal at high temperatures. It is used in blast furnaces as part of the process of making steel.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can Putin sway Trump with economic offers in Alaska?
Can Putin sway Trump with economic offers in Alaska?

Al Jazeera

time4 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Can Putin sway Trump with economic offers in Alaska?

United States President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin are set to meet in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday in a bid to try and end Russia's three-year assault on Ukraine. In the run-up to the meeting, Trump said that he believes Putin is ready to agree to a ceasefire. But his suggestion that Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy could 'divvy things up' has alarmed observers in Kyiv. For their part, remarks from top Russian officials suggest that Moscow has tried to water down discussions about the war by linking them with other bilateral issues, particularly restoring economic ties with the US. On Thursday, Putin sat down with top officials at the Kremlin to discuss the Alaska meeting. He said that he believed the US was making 'sincere efforts to stop the fighting, end the crisis and reach agreements of interest to all parties involved in this conflict'. Earlier on Thursday, Yuri Ushakov, one of Putin's top foreign policy aides, told reporters about Russia's preparations for the talks. He said it was 'obvious to everyone that the central topic will be the settlement of the Ukraine crisis'. 'An exchange of views is expected on the further development of bilateral cooperation, including in the trade and economic sphere,' he said, pointing out that: 'I would like to note that this cooperation has a huge and, unfortunately, untapped potential.' Ushakov also announced that in addition to Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Russia's delegation in Alaska would also include the country's finance minister, Anton Siluanov, and Kirill Dmitriev, Putin's envoy on foreign investment and economic cooperation. The inclusion of Siluanov and Dmitriev is another sign that the Kremlin hoped to discuss economic matters at the summit. What does Russia-US trade look like? In 2021, before Russia's full-fledged invasion of Ukraine, total trade between Russia and the US amounted to $36.1bn. This included $6.4bn in US exports to Russia, and $29.7bn in US imports from Russia – amounting to a US trade deficit of $23.3bn. For context, Russia was America's 30th largest trade partner in 2021. Since then, after numerous rounds of American sanctions, trade between Russia and the US has fallen roughly 90 percent. Incidentally, Russia's overall trade balance – leaving the US – declined significantly following its decision to invade Ukraine. From 2022 to 2023, its international balance of payments fell by a whopping 70 percent, to just $86.3bn. But back in 2021, Russia's trade surplus with the US was concentrated almost exclusively in commodities. Oil, minerals and base metals like iron and steel made up roughly 75 percent of Russia's exports. Meanwhile, US exports to Russia were concentrated in manufactured goods. Were Russian exports to the US vital? The short answer is no. By the time Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, the US – whose energy sector was transformed by hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling in the early 2000s – was already the world's largest oil producer, at 11.9 million barrels of oil per day. One area where Russia did hold limited significance was in certain types of energy products. Russia supplied certain grades of crude oil – notably Urals – as well as refined products like vacuum gas oil (VGO), residual fuel oil and naphtha. Russian VGO was especially important for making gasoline and diesel products in US refineries, which lacked enough domestic feedstock with the optimal chemical and physical properties. Elsewhere, the US continues to import limited quantities of uranium hexafluoride, a chemical important in uranium processing, from Russia. Some US utility companies still have supply contracts with Russia, which accounted for about one-third of America's enriched uranium needs when war broke out. As with energy products, however, American firms exposed to Russian uranium supplies have readjusted their supply chains in response to sanctions. What's more, US companies like X-energy and Orano have invested heavily in domestic production in recent years. Does Russia have any other leverage? In the wake of sanctions after February 2022, most Russian commodity shipments were rerouted from Western countries to China at discounted prices, including for energy products and uranium. Indeed, trade between China and Russia has grown in parallel with sanctions on Russia. A common border, shared geopolitical perspectives and joint opposition to the US have deepened bilateral relations. Russia-China trade saw annual growth of nearly 30 percent in both 2022 and 2023, when it hit $240.1bn, according to the Centre for European Policy Analysis. In 2024, Russia climbed to 7th place among China's trading partners, up from 13th place in 2020. During that time, China has supplied Russia with more high-end products – like advanced electronics and industrial machinery – while Moscow has solidified its position as a top supplier of oil and gas to Beijing. What's more, the two countries conduct regular naval exercises and strategic bomber patrols together. The US has consistently expressed concerns over joint military drills and views the China-Russia alignment as a threat to its global leadership role. Putin will be aware of these dynamics heading into Friday's meeting. What else could Putin offer Trump? In March, Putin's investment envoy – Kirill Dmitriev – claimed that Russia and the US had started talks on rare earth metals projects in Russia, and that some American companies had already expressed an interest in them. 'Rare earth metals are an important area for cooperation, and, of course, we have begun discussions on various rare earth metals and (other) projects in Russia,' Dmitriev told the Izvestia newspaper. China's almost total global control over the production of critical minerals – used in everything from defence equipment to consumer electronics – has focused Washington's attention on developing its own supplies. The US Geological Survey estimates Russia's reserves of rare earth metals at 3.8 million tonnes, but Moscow has far higher estimates. According to the Natural Resources Ministry, Russia has reserves of 15 rare earth metals totalling 28.7 million tonnes, as of January 2023. But even accounting for the margin of error hanging over Russia's potential rare earth supplies, it would still only account for a tiny fraction of global stockpiles. As such, the US has been pursuing minerals-for-security deals with the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Ukraine in recent months, in an effort to wrestle control of the global supply chain away from China. It may try and do the same with Russia. What does Russia want from these meetings? Since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, Western countries have imposed 21,692 sanctions on Russia, mostly against individuals. Key sanctions on Moscow include import bans on Russian oil, a price cap on Russian fuel, and the freezing of Russian central bank assets held in European financial institutions. But on July 14, Trump threatened to impose so-called secondary sanctions, that if carried out, would mark a notable shift. Since then, he has targeted India – the second biggest buyer of Russian oil – by doubling a 25 percent tariff on its goods to 50 percent, as a penalty for that trade with Moscow. So far, Trump has not imposed similar secondary tariffs on China, the largest consumer of Russian oil. But he has suggested that Beijing could face such tariffs in the future, as the US tries to pressure countries to stop buying Russian crude, and thereby corner Putin into accepting a ceasefire. Members of Trump's administration have also indicated that if the Trump-Putin talks in Alaska don't go well, the tariffs on India could be increased further. Meanwhile, lawmakers from both US political parties are pushing for a bill – the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 – that would also target countries buying Russian oil and gas. The bill would give Trump the authority to impose 500 percent tariffs on any country that helps Russia. US senators are reportedly waiting on Trump's OK to move the bill forward. In Alaska, Putin is expected to demand that Western sanctions on Russia be eased in exchange for Moscow agreeing to any peace deal.

Trump's tariffs push US companies to the brink
Trump's tariffs push US companies to the brink

Qatar Tribune

time19 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Trump's tariffs push US companies to the brink

Agencies When U.S. President Donald Trump announced tariffs on almost all trading partners in April, Ben Knepler contacted the factory in Cambodia producing his company's outdoor furniture. 'Stop production,' he ordered. The announcement involved a 10-percent levy on imports from most partners, set to rise further for many of them. For Cambodia, the planned duty was a staggering 49 percent. 'That night, we spoke to our factory,' Knepler told AFP. 'We literally cannot afford to bring our own product into the U.S. with that kind of tariff.' The decision was even more painful for Knepler and his Pennsylvania-based company, True Places, given that he had previously shifted production of his outdoor chairs to Cambodia from China, following tariffs on Chinese imports imposed by Trump during his first presidency. 'We were facing 25-percent tariffs in China, and there were zero-percent tariffs in Cambodia,' Knepler recalled. It took him a year to move the massive equipment and molds to Cambodia only to see another steep levy. With Trump's 'reciprocal' tariff hikes taking effect last Thursday, these Cambodia-made chairs face a lower -- though still significant -- 19 percent duty. Knepler's experience echoes that of many U.S. companies producing everything from yo-yos to clothing abroad, after years of offshoring American manufacturing. To cope, businesses use various strategies. Some pass on the new costs as a surcharge to customers. Others halted imports when duties reached prohibitive levels, hoping Trump would strike bilateral trade deals that would make their businesses viable again. Trump frames his tariffs as paid for by other countries, touting tens of billions in revenue this year -- but firms contest this description. 'We make the tariff payments when the product comes into the U.S.,' Knepler stressed. 'Before we sell it, we're the ones who pay that tariff.' Now saddled with hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt he took on to relocate the company's production to Cambodia, Knepler worries if his business will survive. He likens the rapid policy changes to spinning a 'wheel of misfortune,' resulting in a new tariff each time. Over four months this year, the planned tariff rate on Cambodian exports has gone from 0 to 49 percent, to 10 percent, to 36 percent, to 19 percent, he said. 'No one knows what it's going to be tomorrow,' he added. 'It's impossible to have any kind of confidence in what the rate will be in three- or four-months' time.' Economists warn that tariffs could fuel inflation and drag on growth. EY chief economist Gregory Daco noted that the duties effective Thursday raise the average tariff rate to 17.6 percent from 2.8 percent at the start of the year -— the highest level since the early 1930s. While Trump lauds the limited effects his duties have had on U.S. prices so far, experts say tariffs take time to filter through to consumers. Many of Trump's sweeping levies also face legal challenges over his use of emergency economic powers. The global tariffs are especially hard to avoid. Barton O'Brien said he accelerated production and borrowed money to bring in as much inventory as possible before Trump took office. On the election campaign trail, the Republican leader had floated a 60-percent tariff on imports from China, where O'Brien makes most of his products. The Maryland-based veteran selling dog harnesses and other accessories rented a container to ship as many products as he could before Trump's new tariffs would take effect. 'I had dog life jackets in the bathroom,' he told AFP. There is 'no way' to produce domestically, he said, adding that comparable American-made products sell for nearly six times his retail prices. He makes some items too in India and Vietnam. But Chinese products face an additional 30-percent duty this year, even under an extended truce now expiring in November. The rates for India and Vietnam are 25 percent and 20 percent respectively. 'If you look at the brands I compete with, we're all made in the same countries. We're all going to have to raise prices together,' said O'Brien.

LA28 to be first Olympic Games to sell naming rights for venues
LA28 to be first Olympic Games to sell naming rights for venues

Al Jazeera

timea day ago

  • Al Jazeera

LA28 to be first Olympic Games to sell naming rights for venues

Organisers of the Los Angeles Olympics will sell naming rights for a handful of its venues in deals expected to bring multiple millions of dollars to the 2028 Games while breaking down the International Olympic Committee's long-sacrosanct policy of keeping brand names off its arenas and stadiums. The organising committee announced the landmark deal Thursday, saying contracts were already in place with two of its founding partners – Honda, which already has naming rights for the arena in Anaheim that will host volleyball, and Comcast, which will have its name on the temporary venue hosting squash. LA28 chairman and CEO Casey Wasserman said revenue from the deals goes above what's in LA's current $6.9bn budget. He portrayed the deal as the sort of paradigm-shifting arrangement that Los Angeles needs more than other host cities because, as is typical for American-hosted Olympics, the core cost of these Games is not backed by government funding. 'We're a private enterprise responsible for delivering these games,' Wasserman said in an interview with The Associated Press. 'It's my job to push. That doesn't mean we're going to win every time we push, but it's our job to always push because our context is pretty unique.' Wasserman said he also spent time explaining to IOC members how arena and stadium names are part of the lexicon in US sports. 'People know 'Crypto' as 'Crypto,' they don't know it as 'the gymnastics arena downtown,'' Wasserman said of the home of the Lakers, Arena, which will host gymnastics and boxing in 2028. Rights for up to 19 temporary venues could be available. The IOC's biggest sponsors – called TOP sponsors – will have the first chance to get in on the deals. Wasserman said no venues will be renamed – so, for instance, if organisers do not reach a deal with SoFi (opening and closing ceremonies, swimming) or Intuit (basketball), no other sponsor can put its name on the arena. Not included in this new arrangement are the LA Coliseum, Rose Bowl and Dodger Stadium, some of the most iconic venues in a city that hosted the Games in 1932 and 1984. Organisers said IOC rules that forbid advertising on the field of play will still apply. The deal adds to a growing list of accommodations pushed through for Los Angeles, which is once again poised to reshape the Olympic brand, much the way it did in 1984. In 2017, the city was bidding for the 2024 Games against Paris, but agreed to instead host the 2028 Games. It was part of a then-unheard-of bid process that rescued the IOC from the reality that cities were becoming reluctant to absorb the cost and effort to bid for and host the Summer Games. Olympic watchers viewed the return of softball and baseball for 2028, along with the introduction of flag football, with help from the NFL, as changes that maybe only Los Angeles could have pulled off. LA will also make a major scheduling change for the Olympics Games, moving track and field to the opening week of the games and swimming to the end. Wasserman said the organising committee's position as a private entity plays a major role in its relationship with the IOC. 'We spend the time, we do the work, we make the argument, and we don't settle for a 'No,' because we don't have that luxury,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store