Tiger moth finds new home at WW2 airfield museum
A Tiger Moth has found a new home at an airfield where dozens of the aeroplanes were used to train pilots during World War Two.
The biplane has been donated to the Bottisham Airfield Museum, near Cambridge, by the Imperial War Museum in Duxford.
Jason Webb, chair of the airfield's trustees, said he was delighted about the donation, adding Tiger Moths were "top of our wanted list of exhibits".
This type of aircraft was "the first to land at Bottisham in 1940 and the last to take off in 1946", he said. It will go on display at the museum for the first time on Sunday.
Mr Webb said: "We became aware about six months ago that the Imperial War Museum was disposing of it as part of its reorganisation and put a bid in for it - alongside other museums - and they kindly selected ourselves out of all the others."
The grass airfield at Bottisham was built in 1940 as a satellite for RAF Waterbeach and was initially used by Cambridge-based Tiger Moths from Marshalls (airfield) as a relief landing ground.
The aircraft remained a regular sight in the skies over RAF Bottisham until 1946, serving with the RAF, the USAAF and the RAF Belgian section.
Mr Webb said: "De Havilland Tiger Moths were elementary training aircraft, used to teach tens of thousands of pilots to fly, before they went on to fly Lancaster [bombers] or Spitfire [fighter aeroplanes].
"We want to put it on display to tell the story of pilots who flew them."
In particular, he said he wanted to focus on the Tiger Moth's little-known role in Operation Banquet Lights, where the aircrafts were fitted with bombs just in case the Germans invaded England in 1940.
"Luckily, this was not needed as it would have been a one-way trip for the pilots against modern German fighters," he added.
Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Anniversary flight for 99-year-old RAF veteran
Memorials planned for disused WW2 airfields
The untold story of the battle that helped end WW2 in Europe
WW2 plane's engine restored to honour RAF crew
World War Two veteran celebrates 105th birthday
Bottisham Airfield Museum
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Chagos Islands: Starmer's 'lousy deal'
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. "Keir Starmer has secured his legacy," said The Daily Telegraph: his "shameful surrender of the Chagos Islands will go down as this nation's foreign policy nadir". Last week, the PM signed a long-dreaded treaty that officially hands control of the Indian Ocean archipelago to Mauritius – effectively ceding a strategically vital territory that sits in an area of interest for China. To add insult to injury, once the treaty is ratified by MPs, we will pay Mauritius £101 million a year for the next 99 years to rent back a key UK-US military base on the largest island, Diego Garcia. "This lousy deal essentially amounts to a massive gift from British taxpayers to the Mauritian government," said Andrew Tettenborn in The Spectator. So why sign it? The answer, I'm afraid, "is legalism": the UN's top court had issued a non-binding ruling calling on the UK to give up control of Chagos – and the PM, ever the lawyer, eagerly bowed to international law. Perhaps he was hoping to set a "shining example" to other countries; instead, they will "regard us with contempt for being a pushover". The deal looks "odd" on the face of it, said James Landale on BBC News. But there were plenty of "practical" reasons to sign the treaty. Multiple UN bodies have ruled that the islands belong to Mauritius; had the UK continued to ignore those rulings, the operation of the base could have become "unworkable". Diego Garcia's satellite communications would have been threatened because the UK relies on a UN agency in Geneva to maintain access to a particular electromagnetic spectrum; aircraft might not be able to fly in or out, for fear of breaching international law. As for national security, said Sean O'Grady in The Independent, without this deal, Mauritius could have lawfully granted China permission to establish a military base on another of the islands, sparking a serious crisis. The deal specifically forbids it. This is all true in theory, said John Rentoul in the same paper. But in reality, Mauritius' claim to the islands was "weak" – Chagos has never been part of its territory – and UN courts have "no powers of enforcement". The base wasn't threatened in any meaningful way. And yet Starmer's government doubled down on a deal that will outrage the British public, given the nation's dire finances. I suspect the biggest driver of this decision was "postcolonial guilt", said Matthew Syed in The Sunday Times – that sense that, as a nation, we must self-flagellate to atone for the sins of the empire. But Starmer's conscience-cleansing comes at "extravagant expense" – and will help "no one but our rivals".
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
In pictures: Crowds enjoy Midlands Air Festival
Thousands of people have enjoyed seeing hot air balloons and air displays at the Midlands Air Festival in Warwickshire. The three-day event is held at Ragley Hall in Alcester from 30 May. The RAF aerobatic display team, the Red Arrows, featured on each day of the festival. Classic and military jets, along with other display teams could be seen at the event, which organisers say is the largest gathering of hot air balloons in Europe. Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram. Your pictures: RAF Cosford Air Show Your photos: Pesky pigs and poppy fields
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Donald Trump vs. Bruce Springsteen
Opening his 'Land of Hope and Dreams' tour in Manchester, England, New Jersey rocker Bruce Springsteen called the Trump administration 'corrupt, incompetent and treasonous.' To be fair, Europeans are used to these kinds of leaders. President Trump fired back, calling Mr. Springsteen 'a pushy, obnoxious JERK, who fervently supported Crooked Joe Biden' and a 'dried out 'prune' of a rocker.' A billionaire slap-fest! I'm claiming authority on this matter, as I did shots of Old Grand-Dad with Mr. Springsteen on his 35th birthday at Big Man's West in Red Bank, N.J. As with this feud, I wasn't invited. I just happened to be there. Sure, both men think they're the boss, but it's more than that. Truth be told, Mr. Trump has been playing to Mr. Springsteen's original audience for quite a while. Think downtrodden, desperate, struggling, working class—though Springsteen fans are more likely middle-aged folks absolving their guilt through music, thankful they didn't grow up that way. 'Workin' in the field / You get your back burned / Workin' 'neath the wheels / You get your facts learned.' Anyway, the psyche fits the MAGA crowd, minus 50 years. No wonder these guys are feuding. Mr. Springsteen had the perfect invented persona in the 1970s and '80s—as we emerged with fits and starts from an industrial era to a digital age, Slate called him an 'endearing Jersey wharf rat.' His music was rebellious. Nonconformist. 'I hid in the clouded wrath of the crowd / But when they said, 'Sit down,' I stood up.' Have problems? Just jump in your 'chrome-wheeled, fuel-injected' Chevy and roar down the highway 'jammed with broken heroes.' No one actually did this, but it felt good to think about. Now we doom-scroll instead.
