Indianapolis issues hundreds of no-turn-on-red tickets a year. Here are 5 hotspots
Some Republican state lawmakers pushed back on the restrictions as a "war on cars," introducing legislation that would have removed the no-turn-on-red signs. But the signs were allowed to remain after city officials agreed to stop putting up new ones downtown until July 1, 2025. The Department of Public Works has no immediate plans to install new ones and will conduct a study of their effectiveness before doing so, a spokesperson said.
Since the wave of new signs, the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department has written 94 total tickets in Mile Square as of May 1, 37 of which were tied to the South Meridian Street and West Washington Street intersection, according to data obtained by IndyStar. Across the city, drivers received 411 tickets for no-turn-on-red violations in that same timespan.
Police issued about 20 such citations a month. While nearly a quarter occurred in Mile Square — the downtown area bound by North Street, East Street, West Street, and South Street — there were multiple hotspots far beyond the city's urban core.
IMPD's traffic unit tends to write tickets in daily and weekly blitzes near troublesome intersections, the data shows.
The intersection of East Washington Street and Pine Street near downtown saw the most citations, with 96 drivers ticketed at the site. IMPD reported 49 tickets on nine non-consecutive days of August and September 2023. Then enforcement largely cooled off until February 2024, when officers logged 20 tickets on six days.
When officers in the traffic unit are on patrol, they don't focus solely on enforcing no-turn-on-red violations, IMPD Sgt. Amanda Hibschman told IndyStar. Traffic officers also watch for drivers who are speeding, running red lights or breaking other rules of the road.
"We tend to focus on higher-traffic areas, busier intersections, school zones and locations where we receive the highest number of traffic complaints," Hibschman said.
One of the main advocates for no-turn-on-red restrictions in Mile Square, the public health nonprofit Health by Design argued that crash data shows how drivers' failure to yield and turning movements are among the top contributors to pedestrian injuries and deaths citywide. In 2024, 41 pedestrians and cyclists died in vehicle crashes while 832, a record high, were involved in non-fatal incidents, according to Safe Streets Indy, a group that tracks collision reports.
Health by Design CEO Marc McAleavey said that while 411 tickets citywide and 96 in Mile Square may seem low compared with the actual number of violations, he understands that IMPD lacks the officers to do more robust enforcement. And enforcement alone can't be expected to make drivers comply with no-turn-on-red rules, he said — that will take smarter road designs with enhanced visibility for pedestrians, along with a cultural shift toward safer walking and bicycling.
"The core of the issue is that our downtown streets should be designed for people first — not just as a pass-through for cars," McAleavey said in an emailed statement.
From Aug. 1, 2023, to May 1, 2025, here are the five Indianapolis intersections where drivers received the most tickets for illegally turning right on red, according to IMPD data:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Admin Makes Concession After Lawsuit Filed in Washington, D.C.
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration and District of Columbia attorneys agreed Friday to partially scale back U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi's order placing the city's police force under federal control, preserving the authority of the D.C. police chief rather than handing full command to DEA Administrator Terry Cole. Earlier Friday, the nation's capital filed a lawsuit to block Republican President Donald Trump's takeover of its police department. Chief Pamela Smith will now remain in control of the Metro Police Department (MPD), but the Trump administration will still be able to use MPD officers for federal purposes on an emergency basis, according to ABC 7 News' Tom Roussey. Speaking to reporters, D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb, standing alongside Mayor Muriel Bowser, both Democrats, said he was grateful a judge affirmed that under the Home Rule Act, only the mayor can appoint the chief of police, adding, "the chief of police remains the chief of police." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
N.H. Republicans threaten to impeach high-ranking Democrat over emails helping partisan law firm
Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up The Elias Law Group, which represents Democrats and progressive causes, Advertisement Republican State Representative Joseph F. Sweeney of Salem, who serves as deputy majority leader in the New Hampshire House, said the emails show Liot Hill used her office to help a Democratic law firm recruit plaintiffs to challenge the new state law. 'That's not public service; that's political lawfare run out of a taxpayer-funded inbox,' he said in a statement. Advertisement Liot Hill is pushing back, however, saying her responsibilities as an elected official include advocating for the voting rights of her constituents. She said she offered to make some introductions and was 'happy' to disclose those emails publicly, adding that she doesn't have any further plans to make email introductions to anyone connected with the Elias Law Group. 'I will continue to use my official email address to do my job, including constituent services, which is standard practice for elected officials,' she said. 'It is outrageous but not surprising that Republicans are attacking me for doing my job and serving my constituents.' The emails in question — which The Boston Globe obtained via a public records request — were first reported Wednesday by the Liot Hill told the Globe that the support she lent to the Elias Law Group was uncompensated. 'I used the phrase 'working with some folks' in the sense of 'assisting in an effort,' not in the sense of 'receiving compensation,'' she said. 'My offer of assistance was to provide email introductions, which I did.' Liot Hill said she doesn't have an attorney-client relationship with Tina Meng Morrison, the Elias Law Group lawyer who was copied in her email messages. Sweeney, the state representative, said on Thursday that executive councilors can be impeached by the House and tried by the Senate for corruption, malpractice, or maladministration. Liot Hill's conduct clearly implicates the latter two categories, he said. Advertisement If she doesn't resign before the legislative filing period opens in September, then he will file articles of impeachment against her, he said. 'New Hampshire's message is simple: we protect the integrity of our elections, we don't outsource state policy to D.C. operatives, and no official, not even the highest ranking Democrat in state government, is above accountability,' he added. The new law at the center of Liot Hill's emails will require absentee voters to either bring a photo ID to their local election officials to request a ballot in person, or submit a copy of their ID or a notarized signature along with their application. While proponents of the change said it will better protect election integrity, critics said it will cause confusion and Liot Hill is the only Democrat on the Executive Council, which serves as New Hampshire GOP Chairman James MacEachern sent a letter on Thursday asking New Hampshire Attorney General John M. Formella to open an investigation into Liot Hill's conduct. Without citing a particular statute, MacEachern's letter claimed Liot Hill had engaged in 'taxpayer-funded electioneering.' To support that claim, he cited a New Hampshire Journal New Hampshire Democratic Party Chair Raymond Buckley said in a social media post that his GOP counterparts had misused the term 'electioneering,' and he called the New Hampshire Journal a ' Advertisement One provision of state law defines ' Michael S. Garrity, a spokesperson for the DOJ, acknowledged that Formella's office had received MacEachern's letter. 'We will assess the information provided and determine the appropriate course of action based on the facts and applicable law,' he said. Aside from the emails issue, MacEachern's letter also mentioned prior incidents for which Liot Hill has faced scrutiny: She was arrested in 2010 and 2018 for drunken driving (as was 'Granite Staters expect their elected officials to use their positions to serve the people, not to further their political interests,' MacEachern wrote. 'Liot Hill's decision to use her official capacity to communicate on behalf of a political law firm adds to the ethical concerns that have already been generated by her previous scandals.' Steven Porter can be reached at
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Liberty University faces second lawsuit accusing it of mishandling sexual assault cases
A former Liberty University employee says she was terminated in part for cooperating with a federal investigation of the school's handling of sexual assault, according to recently filed court documents. In her suit against the private Christian university, Erika Woolfolk stated she was paid less, required to work more, and the subject of a hostile work environment while employed in the university's office of Equity and Compliance and Title IX. Woolfolk's work involved investigating cases of sexual violence on campus, of which she alleged her bosses would improperly predetermine their outcomes, according to her lawsuit. She claimed in the filing that she shared that information and more about the university's 'systemic violations of federal law' with the U.S. Department of Education. She also claims she was fired for it. She is now the second former Liberty University employee who has alleged in lawsuits that they reported the university's improper and unethical investigations into sexual assault and were later terminated. Most recently, Peter Brake sued the university along similar grounds and his firing was cited in Woolfolk's filing. Both suits also name as a defendant Ashley Reich, a former top administrator at the university who oversaw the Title IX office. In a statement to USA TODAY, Liberty University declined to respond to all the allegations but disagreed with Woolfolk's claims. It stated that her termination did not have to do with her race or her interactions with the federal government. Instead, her firing was tied to "legitimate business reasons" related to Title IX investigations. USA TODAY reached out to Reich for comment but received no response prior to publication. The Biden-era Education Department in 2024 found that the university had created a culture where students and others were afraid to report sexual violence. The university was penalized $16 million as a result. It also remains on federal monitoring through April 2026. Liberty has previously said it believed it was treated unfairly by the Biden administration, while agreeing 'there were numerous deficiencies that existed in the past' with its compliance with the Clery Act. That regulation includes requirements for how universities respond to and report sexual assault and other crimes on their campuses. More: Liberty to pay Jerry Falwell Jr. $15 million settlement after high-profile sex scandal The government's final report found that college administrators overlooked and failed to track repeat cases of sexual violence on campus, and that it failed to warn students of potential danger. It laid out how university officials tried to cover their tracks by seeking technology staff to delete hard drives. Liberty, based in Lynchburg, Virginia, is among the nation's largest and most prominent Christian universities. The school is also hugely popular among Republican politicians. Jerry Falwell, a televangelist and conservative figure, started the school in 1971. The university has grown thanks to online students – about 124,000 combined in the 2023-24 academic year, according to the school – and it took nearly $880 million in federal financial aid for its students in the 2022-2023 academic year, according to the Department of Education. What did Woolfolk allege? In her lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court in the Western District of Virginia, Woolfolk stated she earned undergraduate and master's degrees at the school and had been working there since 2014. She initially produced content for the Liberty Flames Sports Network, before transferring to the Office of Equity and Compliance/Title IX in 2018. In that office, she was the only Black employee and faced a hostile work environment, the suit states. She alleged she was paid less than her more inexperienced peers and was asked to work longer hours on more arduous tasks. She said she was denied promotions and accommodations, like remote work, while Reich routinely stayed home, according to the lawsuit. She also described facing racial comments from her colleagues, like one who stereotyped 'Blacks as either 'black-black' or 'white-black'' with more positive connotations for the latter, according to the lawsuit. The suit also included screenshots from Microsoft Teams chats where her peers joked about naming a coworker's new dog after Confederate generals. Woolfolk's suit also states that Reich regularly influenced the findings of Title IX cases, either directly or through another employee. In another instance, Woolfolk learned details of a confidential case were improperly shared throughout the office, which 'posed significant risks of prejudice to complainants and respondents.' That was because members of her team would sometimes have to serve as neutral deciders in cases other than their own. In 2022, Woolfolk spoke to Education Department investigators. Her suit states she told them about numerous violations of Title IX, which included 'systematic efforts to minimize and downplay sexual assault reports; and predetermined case outcomes before investigations were completed.' She also alleged that Reich was aware of her actions. By June 2024, Woolfolk said she had filed an internal complaint against Reich related to workplace discrimination and retaliation for cooperating with the federal government. She was assigned to work virtually, but was fired days later. The suit stated that the university fired her for unspecified compliance issues. She was terminated on the same day as two other investigators, including Peter Brake, who had also raised complaints about Reich. Reich now works at the Education Department where she'll be recused from matters involving the school. In a statement to USA TODAY, a department official praised her nearly two decades of working in higher education, policy development and government affairs, and said that she'll help advance President Donald Trump's agenda but didn't offer more details about her is seeking legal fees and an unspecified amount of Quintana is an investigative reporter at USA TODAY. He can be reached at cquintana@ or via Signal at 202-308-9021. He is on X at @CQuintanaDC
