
Justice Department Official Suggested Ignoring Court Orders on Deportations, Whistleblower Claims
A top Justice Department official suggested the Trump administration might have to ignore court orders as it prepared to deport Venezuelan migrants it accused of being gang members, a fired department lawyer alleged in a whistleblower complaint made public Tuesday.
The whistleblower's claims about Principal Assistant Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove come a day before Bove is set to face lawmakers Wednesday for his confirmation hearing to become a federal appeals court judge. In a letter seeking a congressional and Justice Department watchdog investigation, the former government lawyer, Erez Reuveni, alleges he was pushed out and publicly disparaged after resisting efforts to defy judges and make arguments in court that were false or had no legal basis.
The most explosive allegation in the letter from Reuveni's lawyers centers around a Justice Department meeting in March after President Donald Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act over what he claimed was an invasion by the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. Reuveni says Bove raised the possibility that a court might block the deportations before they could be carried out. Reuveni claims Bove used a profanity, saying the department would need to consider telling the courts 'f— you' and ignore any such order, according to the filing. 'Mr. Reuveni was stunned by Bove's statement because, to Mr. Reuveni's knowledge, no one in DOJ leadership – in any Administration – had ever suggested the Department of Justice could blatantly ignore court orders, especially with an expletive,' the filing says.
Reuveni's claims were first reported Tuesday by The New York Times. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche denied the allegations in a post on X Tuesday morning. Blanche said Reuveni's claims are 'utterly false,' adding that he was at the meeting and 'at no time did anyone suggest a court order should not be followed.' 'Planting a false hit piece the day before a confirmation hearing is something we have come to expect from the media, but it does not mean it should be tolerated,' Blanche wrote.
Reuveni had been promoted under the Trump administration to serve as acting deputy director of the Office of Immigration Litigation. He had worked for the Justice Department for nearly fifteen years under both Republican and Democratic administrations.
Reuveni's firing came after he conceded in an April court hearing that a Salvadoran man, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, should not have been deported to an El Salvador prison and expressed frustration over a lack of information about the administration's actions. After that hearing, Reuveni says he refused to sign onto an appeal brief in Abrego Garcia's case that included arguments that were 'contrary to law, frivolous, and untrue.'
'The consequences of DOJ's actions Mr. Reuveni reports have grave impacts not only for the safety of individuals removed from the country in violation of court orders, but also for the constitutional rights and protections of all persons – citizen and noncitizen alike – who are potential victims of flagrant, deliberate disregard of due process and the rule of law by the agency charged with upholding it,' Reuveni's lawyers wrote.
Trump nominated Bove last month to fill a vacancy on the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals, which hears cases from Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. He was already expected to face tough questioning before the Senate Judiciary Committee given his role in some of the department's most scrutinized actions since Trump's return to the White House in January.
Sen. Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the committee, said Tuesday that the allegations from Reuveni are part of a 'broader pattern by President Trump and his allies to undermine the Justice Department's commitment to the rule of law.' 'I want to thank Mr. Reuveni for exercising his right to speak up and bring accountability to Mr. Bove,' Durbin said in a statement. 'And I implore my Senate Republican colleagues: do not turn a blind eye to the dire consequences of confirming Mr. Bove to a lifetime position as a circuit court judge.'
Democrats have raised alarm about several other actions by Bove, including his order to dismiss New York Mayor Eric Adams' corruption case that led to the resignation of a top New York prosecutor and other senior Justice Department officials. Bove also accused FBI officials of insubordination for refusing to hand over the names of agents who investigated the US Capitol riot and ordered the firings of a group of prosecutors involved in the Jan. 6 criminal cases.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump whirlwind tests NATO summit unity
Will he play nice? That was the question for NATO leaders nervously waiting to see if a carefully choreographed show to please US President Donald Trump would pay dividends as the alliance summit began on Wednesday. Every precaution is in place to avoid a Trump blow-up at the Hague gathering, from giving him credit for a historic spending deal to keeping the meeting short and sweet. But that did not stop the volatile US leader launching a pre-summit grenade as he crossed the Atlantic on Air Force One, casting doubt on the very foundation of the 32-member alliance. He refused to state his commitment to NATO's Article Five clause, the basic agreement that says an attack on one member is an attack on all. 'Depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article Five,' Trump told journalists in comments sure to rattle the European allies he dined with upon arrival on Tuesday night. 'I'm committed to being their friend,' he said. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte played down the comments as the summit opened on Wednesday, saying he believed Trump and the United States were still 'totally committed' to Article Five. In an earlier message, probably not designed for public consumption, Rutte heaped flattery on Trump, praising him for bringing everyone on board for the spending hike. 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win,' Rutte wrote in a gushing, caps-filled missive to Trump, who promptly posted it on social media. 'You are flying into another big success in The Hague,' wrote Rutte. NATO allies are set on Wednesday to rubber stamp a pledge to allocate 3.5 percent of GDP to core defense spending, plus another 1.5 percent to broader security-related areas such as cybersecurity and infrastructure. Rutte said that the spending boost by Europeans nations and Canada would make sure 'that we not only are able to defend ourselves against the Russians and others, but also to equalize.' 'And this is fair, that we spend the same as the US is spending,' Rutte said. Rutte said that Trump was in an 'excellent mood' after dining in royal splendour with the Dutch king and queen on Tuesday night and spending the night in their palace. 'This is incredible' Trump has long groused that European countries pay too little for their own security, upended by Russia's war in Ukraine. The spending hike is designed to keep him engaged with the alliance, after his return to power sparked fears that he could blow up the seven-decade-old organization. Spain was the main hold-out on the five-percent target, complaining that spending that amount on defense was 'unreasonable' -- and drawing Trump's ire in the process. Trump took fresh aim at Madrid en route to The Hague, calling its stance 'very unfair' and posting a graphic entitled 'Spain threatens to derail NATO summit' showing the relative outlay of alliance members. One of the lowest-spending NATO countries on defense in relative terms, Spain is only set to hit the current NATO target of two percent this year after a 10-billion-euro injection. Rutte stressed that the spending hike -- billed as 'historic' -- is needed to keep Russia in check, but even here Trump threatens to spoil NATO unity. The US leader has turned Western policy on Ukraine on its head, reaching out to Russian President Vladimir Putin and maintaining a volatile relationship with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Trump and Zelenskyy are slated to have a tete-a-tete in The Hague -- with officials hoping to avoid a bust-up like their infamous Oval Office shouting match. Unlike previous summits, Zelenskyy has not been invited to the main working session of the leaders -- cut to two and a half hours, reportedly due to Trump's dislike of lengthy talks. Rutte said that allies would send the message that support for Kyiv was 'unwavering and will persist.' But despite his insistence that Ukraine's bid for membership remains 'irreversible', NATO will avoid any mention of Kyiv's push to join after Trump ruled it out. One European diplomat put it succinctly. 'We have a completely unpredictable US president.' 'We are hoping there won't be an ill-timed comment that is all anyone remembers. Everything has been done to reduce this risk,' the official said.


Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
How Netanyahu has used Hamas attack to reshape Middle East
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been campaigning against Iran since the 1990s. He has used all possible excuses to demonize the Tehran regime, just as he incited Washington against Iraq's Saddam Hussein and Syria's Assad regime. Yes, Iran, Iraq, and Syria were sworn enemies of Israel. But while Netanyahu used the US to threaten, penalize, and eventually attack these regimes, he made sure no one raised the essential question about why such hostilities existed in the first place. The tragedy of Palestine lay at the heart of all three conflicts. Netanyahu never made that connection. For him, these countries represented an existential threat to the state of Israel out of pure hatred and animosity toward his country. The Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack provided a beleaguered Netanyahu with the excuse to wage war not only against the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank but also Iran's proxies in the region and, finally, against Iran itself on June 13. Last week, he was able to lure the Trump administration into his war. The US attack on Iran's nuclear site had fulfilled Netanyahu's plan for what he has repeated several times: a new Middle East shaped by Israel. Since December 2023, the Israeli leader has been declaring that Israel was fighting a war on behalf of the Western world, seeking to reshape the Middle East. He has said many times that he is closer than ever to achieving this goal. Regardless of how this latest Israel-Iran faceoff will end, Tehran will have to de-escalate to preserve the regime and avoid a wider war with the US. Only one party can claim an overwhelming victory: Netanyahu's Israel. But what does a humbled Iran mean in regional geopolitical terms? An Iranian capitulation is highly unlikely Osama Al-Sharif If Iran finally resorts to diplomacy, now that its nuclear program has been gravely degraded, then there will be new terms. It may have to relent and accept stricter conditions on its ability to enrich uranium, which has been the main issue of disagreement. Any political route to a peaceful settlement will have to resolve this point. But, for Netanyahu, this is no longer the issue. For him, regime change is now the ultimate prize. For the Trump administration, this is a case where its position remains ambiguous. An Iranian capitulation — an issue the mediators will struggle to define — is highly unlikely. Netanyahu will resist any political compromise between Washington and Tehran. But the Trump administration has to think of his MAGA base, which has been overly against a new Middle Eastern war. The US will have to take into account the position of its regional Arab allies, who are anxious about a new extended war in the region. Pushing Iran against the wall may result in an extended battle of attrition that stands to hurt Western economies and force Tehran to adopt extreme measures such as closing the Strait of Hormuz or attacking US military assets in the region. In all cases, one potential winner will emerge and ensure the world knows about it. Netanyahu will claim that in less than two years, his army had destroyed Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, helped bring the regime of Bashar Assad down, degraded the power of the Houthis in Yemen, neutralized the pro-Iran militias in Iraq, and impeded Iran's ability to retaliate. He will say that he did all this on behalf of the West, while reshaping the Middle East. And in many ways, he will be right. If Iran and its proxies are sidelined, Israel will emerge as a significant regional power with virtually no enemies. That is becoming a likelier scenario, and one can go back to the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks to see how a grand geopolitical domino effect has taken place, serving Israel's interests. But what does that mean for this region? With Iran humbled and out of the way, Israel will emerge as the region's supreme power with no real threat. Iran may rely on its regional proxies, but none can present a real challenge to Israel. However, a triumphant Israel will not offer an olive branch to the region. Even with Iran's nuclear threat averted, Israel is unlikely to join the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It will continue to be the only country in the region to possess nuclear weapons. Also, an Israeli victory against Iran will encourage Netanyahu and his extremist government to annex most of the West Bank, while carrying out the most extensive plan of ethnic cleansing in Gaza, with little international rejection. The fact is that Israel has been gaslighting the international community for months about its genocidal war in Gaza. Now, it wants to tell the world that it is fighting Iran on behalf of the Western world. Trump is in a position to redraw the lines Osama Al-Sharif The US is in a position to redraw the lines. Yes, Iran has a history of destabilizing the region, but so does Israel. At the end of the first Gulf War, President George Bush Sr. called for the Madrid Conference. President George W. Bush tried to launch a peace process after the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Can we expect something similar this time around? At this crucial moment, Trump must initiate a new political process that addresses the root causes of all conflicts in the region. Defeating Iran will not eliminate the source of these hostilities. On the contrary, it will embolden Netanyahu and the Israeli extremists to push for Biblical premises that claim Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq as part of a greater Israel. Arab governments have had a complex relationship with Islamic Iran since 1979. But in the end, there will have to be a balance between where Iran, as a thousand-year culture, stands and what Netanyahu's new Middle East means. If Netanyahu's new Middle East spells out Israeli hegemony, then the countries of the region should think deeply about what that means for the entire area. Does that allow Israel to expel 2 million Palestinians from Gaza? Or does it pave the way for Israel to expel almost 3 million from the West Bank? How would that affect Jordan and Egypt? Netanyahu's new Middle East offers the Palestinians nothing. It assumes that life can go on with Israel as a regional hegemon, while giving nothing to the Palestinians. Even worse, it believes that it can push for a greater Israel that spans territories belonging to sovereign Arab states. At one point, the Arab world will have to respond.

Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Iran ‘much further away' from building nuclear weapon after US strike, Rubio tells Politic
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Politico on Wednesday that Iran is 'much further away from a nuclear weapon' after a US strike on Iran's three main nuclear sites over the weekend. 'The bottom line is, they are much further away from a nuclear weapon today than they were before the president took this bold action,' Rubio told Politico. 'Significant, very significant, substantial damage was done to a variety of different components, and we're just learning more about it,' he added. Developing