Bergview principal lays charges against Malema, Mbalula for 'false rape claims'
Bergview College principal Jaco Pieterse (red tie) has filed charges against Julius Malema, Fikile Mbalula, and MEC Fundile Gade over alleged false claims linking him to the rape of a 7-year-old girl
Image: X
The principal of Bergview College, Jaco Pieterse, has laid criminal charges against ANC Secretary-General Fikile Mbalula, EFF leader Julius Malema, and Eastern Cape Education MEC Fundile Gade after being publicly accused of raping a 7-year-old girl, known as Cwecwe.
The charges, which were filed at Sophiatown police station in Gauteng, include crimen injuria, intimidation, and contravention of the Cybercrimes Act.
Barry Bateman, spokesperson for lobby group AfriForum, which is representing Pieterse, told the media on Friday morning outside the police station that the allegations had devastated the principal's life and career.
'South Africa has a rape crisis, we have a child abuse crisis, and being falsely accused of committing such a crime against a child is devastating,' Bateman said.
'This is why we are pursuing these charges.'
Bateman also criticised Mbalula, who he said had referred to Pieterse as 'an animal,' questioning how AfriForum could defend 'an animal who rapes children.'
'This is simply unacceptable. There must be consequences for people who falsely accuse others in the public domain,' he said.
'Social media has worsened the problem, where false allegations are repeated without question.'
Last month, IOL News reported that the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) confirmed it would not pursue criminal prosecution in the case.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The child was allegedly raped at Bergview College, a private school in Matatiele, in October 2024.
According to NPA national spokesperson Advocate Mthunzi Mhaga, the case docket was first submitted in November 2024 to prosecutors at the Matatiele Magistrate's Court and the Matatiele Thuthuzela Care Centre.
After interviewing the child and conducting a medical examination, prosecutors determined that the evidence was inconclusive and did not support prosecution.
The decision was later upheld by the Eastern Cape Director of Public Prosecutions after further review.
The case was subsequently returned to the police.
However, following public pressure in April 2025, the NPA decided to publicly disclose its decision and confirmed that police had resubmitted the docket for further consideration.
Police Minister Senzo Mchunu defended the investigation timeline, rejecting claims that it only began after public outcry.
'To say it took six months for SAPS to act is a dangerous exaggeration,' Mchunu previously said.
'The case was investigated as soon as it was reported in October.'
On April 1, 2025, Mbalula, during a media briefing at the Birchwood Hotel in Boksburg, condemned the alleged rape of a 7-year-old girl at Bergview College in Matatiele and sharply criticised AfriForum for defending the accused.
'We are outraged and deeply saddened by the brutal violation of a seven-year-old child at Bergview College,' Mbalula said.
'Even more disgraceful is the involvement of organisations like AfriForum, who shield suspects rather than standing for justice.'
Mbalula described the alleged perpetrator as 'an animal,' saying, 'It is not a person who can rape a seven-year-old. That's not a human being... it's cannibalism.'
Meanwhile, on April 6, during the EFF's Land Reclamation Day event in Johannesburg, Malema accused the principal of being treated differently by law enforcement.
'The principal who raped Cwecwe must know that we are coming for him,' Malema said.
'We call on all victims of that principal to come out. He should not be working with children.'
Eastern Cape Education MEC Fundile Gade also commented publicly.
According to the lobby group, in a March 30 interview on Newzroom Afrika, he said, 'The principal is one of the suspects who should have submitted a long time ago. When he was called for a DNA test, he ran to his lawyers, clearly avoiding the investigation.'
Bateman said AfriForum will now seek criminal convictions against those who made the accusations, including politicians.
'If that involves a custodial sentence, going to jail, that would be preferable,' Bateman said.
'Politicians who lie publicly and destroy lives should go to jail.'
He confirmed that AfriForum will also assist Pieterse in filing civil lawsuits against Malema, Mbalula, Gade, and former DA MP Phumzile Van Damme, whom Bateman accused of driving a 'disinformation campaign.'
'Allegations were made against our organisation that we were protecting a rapist - which are entirely false,' he said.
Though Pieterse remains the official principal of Bergview College, he has not returned to work and remains in a difficult personal situation, Bateman said.
'He has had to leave his home. His family has received threats. His own daughter was contacted on Instagram and threatened with rape if he didn't submit DNA samples,' Bateman said.
'His entire life has been turned upside down.'
Bateman said classes at the school have since resumed.
He said despite the accusations, Pieterse remains committed to seeing justice served.
'He believes people who make false allegations should face the music,' he said.
simon.majadibodu@iol.co.za
IOL News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
26 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Here's why Rasool won't be able to help ANC reclaim the Western Cape
Political analysts say Rasool's extensive experience may not be enough to bolster the ANC's campaign ahead of the upcoming elections. ANC, SACP and Cosatu members welcome former South African Ambassador to the US Ebrahim Rasool at the Cape Town International Airport on 23 March 2025 in Cape Town. Picture: Gallo Images/Die Burger/Theo Jeptha The Western Cape is a lost cause to the ANC, whether or not South Africa's former ambassador to the US, Ebrahim Rasool, comes to its rescue. Political analysts argue that Rasool could not gain ground for the ANC when he was previously the provincial leader in the province. They added that it will be more difficult now because many Western Cape voters, particularly coloureds, have found new and more attractive political homes. The Western Cape, which has been dominated by the DA for 16 years, has become a formidable challenge for the ANC. Can Rasool rescue the ANC? The analysts believe that even Rasool's potential involvement, with his extensive experience, diplomatic prowess, and his role as the province's former leader, may not be enough to bolster the party's campaign efforts in the upcoming elections. The landscape is increasingly challenging now with new dynamics. The ANC faces an uphill battle to reclaim ground that has slipped from its grasp since the DA ousted it in 2009. ALSO READ: Mapaila says SACP to contest 2026 elections as standalone party, Ramaphosa warns against the move Independent political analyst, Goodenough Mashego, gives the ANC no chance of reclaiming the Western Cape. Asked if Rasool could rescue the party now that he had returned after his controversial exit as the country's envoy in Washington, Mashego said: 'The return of Rasool is not going to get them the votes. The ANC used to own the coloured votes in the Western Cape because of Alan Boesak and others, but it has since lost those votes to other parties. 'It would be unwise of the ANC to impose a coloured leader merely to win an election. Many coloured people had permanently abandoned the ANC and joined other parties, old and new. 'I think the Western Cape is a lost cause for the ANC, I don't think Rasool is going to salvage them,' he said. Mashego said the ANC lost the plot when it put black African leaders instead of coloured ones in the forefront after those leaders toppled Rasool as the ANC provincial chairperson. He said Rasool's exit left a vacuum that would be difficult for anyone to fill. He said many of the ANC's coloured voters were disgruntled after Rasool's removal and joined other parties, such as the DA, Independent Democrats, Patriotic Alliance and other coloured-inclined parties. ANC recovery 'highly unlikely' This view was shared by political economy analyst Daniel Silke, who said it's too late for the ANC to even imagine retaking the Western Cape. 'It's a very long haul for the ANC to claw back any semblance of hope that it can get close to a majority in the Western Cape. Western Cape voters have systematically left the ANC in previous elections, with the last election being its lowest performance for the party to date. I think the ANC's recovery, ultimately, to a position of threatening the DA is highly unlikely,' Silke said. He added that the ANC brand had been severely dented, both in the Western Cape and nationwide. The province itself has an additional dynamic that complicates the ANC position. The DA, the Patriotic Alliance and other smaller parties have 'provided potential ANC voters with other choices and perhaps more attractive choices as well'. ALSO READ: A fight for survival: Next political moves will be crucial ahead of 2026 elections Mashego said the ANC has lost ground in the province since Boesak's days in the Western Cape, and the party is unlikely to recover soon. If Rasool were to return as the face of the ANC in the province, he would have no choice but to carry the coloured race card in an attempt to attract voters, but that could tarnish his image and damage his legacy. 'Rasool is a coloured person, but I don't think he is capable of really building very strong structures of the ANC that can contest the DA and other coloured parties,' Mashego said. Rasool better suited to national politics He suggested that Rasool should be deployed at the national level, perhaps at the Department of International Relations and Co-operation, where his experience as a former ambassador would be better used. According to Silke, Rasool was not universally liked within the Western Cape ANC during his reign as provincial leader and premier. Instead, the ANC became divided and polarised around him. 'So, in terms of being a unifying candidate, it's not a given that he can achieve that. I think we are in for fragmented politics in the Western Cape – the DA clearly remains the ascendant power in the Western Cape. However, I think for the ANC it's a hard slog and an unlikely slog to think that it could get back into the seat of power unless it is part of a much broader coalition following a surprise decline for the DA, but I don't necessarily see that happening in any dramatic form in the near future,' he said. NOW READ: WATCH: 'I will wear my persona non grata as a badge of dignity,' says expelled Rasool
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Trump's white South African resettlement plan and the global colour line
The narrative that white South Africans are victims of racial persecution has long circulated in far-right echo chambers, sustained by groups like AfriForum and amplified by conservative US media. Yet no credible human rights body has substantiated claims of systematic violence or oppression based on race in South Africa. Image: File/X THE arrival of over 3 000 white South Africans in the United States under President Donald Trump's fast-tracked refugee resettlement programme is a racial spectacle of historic proportions. Framed by Trump as a rescue mission from 'racial discrimination' and even 'genocide' in post-apartheid South Africa, the scheme repackages whiteness as victimhood while reasserting racial hierarchies through the veneer of humanitarian concern. Cheryl Harris's seminal concept of 'whiteness as property' is especially instructive here. This programme protects not the displaced, but the entitlements embedded in whiteness — land, social status, and the right to global mobility. These arrivals, facilitated under a controversial executive order, mark the first time in US history that white South Africans have been accepted en masse as refugees. The move has drawn intense scrutiny, with South African Foreign Minister Ronald Lamola dismissing the claims as 'unfounded and inflammatory'. He clarified that the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) had no involvement and had consistently found no basis for refugee status for white South Africans. 'The resettlement of South Africans under the guise of being 'refugees' is a political project to delegitimise our democracy,' Lamola asserted. The narrative that white South Africans — particularly Afrikaner farmers — are victims of racial persecution has long circulated in far-right echo chambers, sustained by groups like AfriForum and amplified by conservative US media. Yet no credible human rights body has substantiated claims of systematic violence or oppression based on race in South Africa. In February 2025, Trump signed Executive Order 14152: Addressing Egregious Actions of the Republic of South Africa, suspending non-essential aid. He cited South Africa's land reform policies and its support for Palestine at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as evidence of 'anti-white discrimination'. His language echoed apartheid-era rhetoric, framing land expropriation without compensation — a constitutional measure designed to redress historical injustice — as proof of racial targeting. This is not a story about humanitarian rescue. It is about the repackaging of privilege as persecution. Trump's administration, by reclassifying specific 'South African communities' for humanitarian parole, has revived the settler-native divide. As Mahmood Mamdani has noted, this manoeuvre casts descendants of apartheid's beneficiaries as 'refugees' and South Africa itself as the oppressor. Achille Mbembe's critique of global humanism is relevant here: the programme renders Black suffering invisible while privileging whiteness as a passport to refuge and legitimacy. Consequently, while Black refugees languish in camps, whiteness is deemed inherently worthy of protection, effectively enacting a form of apartheid within the asylum system itself. The 1951 Refugee Convention defines a refugee as someone fleeing a 'well-founded fear of persecution.' Neither the Convention nor US law has ever interpreted this to include the loss of economic dominance or historical privilege. Fleeing land redistribution or reduced social status does not amount to persecution, especially when these changes are legally enacted by a democratic society seeking to correct historical wrongs. The parallels to earlier racial engineering are striking. In 1932, the US-sponsored *Carnegie Poor White Study* analysed the 'problem' of poor whites in South Africa. The initiative was not rooted in concern for poverty but in preserving white supremacy. The report warned that poor whites threatened the racial order and recommended state interventions to uplift them, while black South Africans were systematically excluded from similar support. This laid the foundation for apartheid's white welfare state and established a pattern of American intervention when white South Africans faced hardship, real or perceived. Trump's resettlement scheme is the 21st-century iteration of this pattern. White South Africans are framed not as beneficiaries of a violent racial order, but as victims of transformation, worthy of rescue. South Africa's Constitutional Court recently affirmed that acquiring foreign nationality — whether through refugee resettlement or otherwise — does not automatically strip someone of South African citizenship. In a landmark ruling, the Court struck down a section of the Citizenship Act that had quietly revoked citizenship without due process, calling the move irrational and unconstitutional. However, the case of these white South Africans is unique. Their refugee claims are based on false premises and a political agenda. South Africa may therefore have grounds to argue that accepting the US offer constitutes a voluntary renunciation of citizenship. The Constitutional Court's ruling on dual citizenship might not protect them in this politically charged context. Nowhere is the hypocrisy more glaring than in the American South. In the Mississippi Delta, six Black farmworkers filed a federal lawsuit in 2021 after being replaced by white South Africans brought in under the H-2A visa programme. The plaintiffs, many descended from enslaved people who built Southern agriculture, earned just $7.25 per hour — the federal minimum wage — while their white South African replacements were paid over $11. The lawsuit alleges that these Black workers were forced to train their replacements, who were then housed in better accommodations and elevated in status simply because they were white. Between 2011 and 2020, the number of South Africans on H-2A visas increased by 441%, making them the second-largest national group in the programme. The majority are white. The message is clear: in the racial calculus of US capitalism, white foreign labour is worth more than black American lives. Mexican seasonal workers, once the backbone of US agriculture, are also increasingly excluded — both by border walls and by labour policies that privilege whiteness over need. The result is a reshuffling of the global racial order, disguised as economic necessity. Trump's South African refugee programme is less about humanitarian concern and more about reaffirming a hierarchy of global suffering, where privilege continues to mask itself as victimhood. What we are witnessing is the reinforcement of a global colour line — one where whiteness retains its claim to mobility, safety, and opportunity, while blackness and brownness are rendered threats to be contained. The implications are profound: Refugee systems that prioritise whiteness over need. Economic visas favour white foreign farmers over Black citizens. Historical privilege is purposely mistaken for victimhood. This is not humanitarianism. It is neo-colonialism in motion. As the world watches Trump engineer the next stage of global apartheid, we must ask: What kind of refugee is it when only the privileged are welcome? When does skin colour ration citizenship, safety, and opportunity? If the notion of 'refuge' is to mean anything, it must centre justice, not historical comfort. Siyayibanga le economy! * Siyabonga Hadebe is an independent commentator based in Geneva on socio-economic, political and global matters. ** The views expressed here do not reflect those of the Sunday Independent, Independent Media, or IOL.
Eyewitness News
14 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
ANC believes there's no 'theoretical basis' for SACP to contest elections alone
JOHANNESBURG - The African National Congress (ANC) believes there is no 'theoretical basis' for the SA Communist Party (SACP) contesting elections alone. Last year, the SACP resolved to no longer contest elections under the ANC umbrella. The ANC has criticised the decision, saying it will split the alliance vote and benefit opposition parties, while the Communist Party says it wants more influence in the direction of the country. ALSO READ: SACP to contest local govt elections 'to advance working class, not as alternative to GNU' Speaking at the Chris Hani regional conference in the Eastern Cape on Friday, ANC Secretary General Fikile Mbalula says if the SACP wants more of its councillors to be on the deployment lists, that can be resolved. 'I know comrades from the Communist Party are always arguing that there is a theoretical basis to their contest, but I need to be educated on it. What is the theoretical basis of this contest? What is this hurry that now we have reached the point where the party can stand on its own, and it believes that will be favourable to the democratic forces in the NDR (National Democratic Revolution), how will that strengthen us?'
