Where inflation jumped in July – and where it eased
When comparing figures month on month, air fares jumped 30.2% between June and July: more than double the rise of 13.3% between the same months in 2024, and the largest July increase since monthly inflation data for air travel began in 2021.
Prices accelerated for a range of household groceries last month, which further pushed up the cost of living.
The average cost of coffee was up 18.0% year on year in July compared with 12.3% in June; tea was up 4.9% compared with 0.5%; fruit juices were up 8.6% compared with 3.6%; and whole milk was up 11.3% compared with 8.4%.
Inflation also picked up pace for margarine, eggs, potatoes, crisps, breakfast cereals, chocolate and bread.
Energy bills edged higher, with electricity costs up 8.0% year on year in July, greater than the 4.5% jump in June, while gas was up 13.0% compared with 12.3% the previous month.
Both petrol and diesel recorded a negative annual rate of inflation in July, but by a smaller margin than in June, indicating a rise in the cost of filling up at the pumps.
The average price of petrol in July was down 7.3% year on year, compared with a fall of 9.5% the previous month, while diesel was down 6.0% compared with a previous drop of 8.6%.
Not everything saw a jump in price last month, however.
Items where prices fell faster year on year in July than in June included pasta and couscous, fish, olive oil and sugar.
Inflation eased for cheese, which stood at 3.4% in July compared with 5.2% in June, while children's shoes swung from positive annual inflation (1.9%) to negative (down 1.9%).
Below are some examples of how the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation rate has eased or accelerated.
Two figures are listed for each item: the average rise in price in the 12 months to June, followed by the average rise in price in the 12 months to July.
– Examples where annual inflation has accelerated, ranked by the size of change:
Passenger air travel: June up 0.5%, July up 15.5%Coffee: June up 12.3%, July up 18.0%Cinemas/theatres/concerts: June up 0.4%, July up 5.7%Fruit & vegetable juices: June up 3.6%, July up 8.6%Tea: June up 0.5%, July up 4.9%Electricity: June up 4.5%, July up 8.0%Hotels/motels: June down 2.7%, July up 0.3%Whole milk: June up 8.4%, July up 11.3%Breakfast cereals: June up 2.2%, July up 5.1%Eggs: June up 3.4%, July up 4.9%Ready-made meals: June up 4.5%, July up 5.7%Potatoes: June up 0.7%, July up 1.9%Crisps: June up 4.2%, July up 5.1%Chocolate: June up 16.3%, July up 17.2%Women's clothes: June up 2.3%, July up 2.9%Soft drinks: June up 5.6%, July up 6.1%
– Examples where annual inflation has eased:
Children's footwear: June up 1.9%, July down 1.9%Passenger train travel: June up 8.4%, July up 6.1%Fridges/freezers: June up 1.7%, July down 0.5%Dried fruit/nuts: June up 7.4%, July up 5.4%Cheese/curd: June up 5.2%, July up 3.4%Yoghurt: June up 3.0%, July up 1.2%Children's clothes: June down 2.1%, July down 3.8%Pasta/couscous: June down 0.7%, July down 2.1%Fish: June down 0.4%, July down 1.8%Washing machines/dryers: June down 2.0%, July down 3.4%
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
4 hours ago
- Times
Rising food prices mean hefty obesity costs
Stung by the price of olive oil? Burnt by the cost of your coffee? You are not alone. The cost of food and drink is increasing fast, faster than prices in general. This is a bigger problem, politically, socially and economically, than any politician has yet noticed. The government in particular should be paying attention to food bills, and taking action. The Office for National Statistics this week put the annual inflation rate at 3.8 per cent, but also showed that food and drink prices are rising at 4.9 per cent. The average household spends a bit more than £5,000 annually on food, so those numbers add up to about £250 a year. ONS tracking of public opinion shows that the cost of living remains the number one concern for the public, with more than 90 per cent of people citing rising food bills as a reason — well above the share who cite energy bills as an inflationary worry. Being reminded that things are getting more expensive — meaning that you feel poorer — every time you fill your shopping basket is not a happy experience. Food prices rising faster than the cost of other purchases has been a dismally common feature of the UK economy since 2022, for several reasons: war in Ukraine; too much rain; not enough rain; higher energy costs; not enough migrant workers to pick fruit and veg; higher taxes. The public's daily dismay at food prices, I'd bet, is a bigger reason for Britain feeling generally dissatisfied than noisier issues like immigration or crime. Yet it gets curiously little political attention, given how much it matters to voters' lives and outlook. Labour's spin team should give more thought to finding someone else to blame for rising food bills, not least because the problem is going to get worse. The Bank of England reckons food inflation will hit 5.5 per cent by the end of the year, while the British Retail Consortium says 6 per cent. Get ready for a winter of headlines about the painful cost of your Christmas lunch. Looking further ahead, the problem is even worse, reaching beyond simple political unease into questions of fairness, public health and economic performance. Rising food prices affect some groups more than others, with the poorest facing both the greatest financial pain but also the worst long-term consequences. The worst of these is rising obesity levels. Perhaps that will surprise some readers. How do rising food prices make poor people fat? Surely if it's getting harder to buy food, people will eat less of it and get thinner? In fact, a wealth of evidence shows that when low-income households face rising food prices, they trade quality for quantity, buying more cheap foods that are high in calories but low in nutrients. Social scientists grandly call this the 'food insecurity obesity paradox' but it's arguably just the human version of a common animal instinct to put on fat when times are tough and a hard winter is coming. • From peanuts to pomegranates — the 19 foods that will keep you young Almost a third of UK adults are obese, with rates highest among the poorest. There are many links between obesity and poverty but raw economics is a significant factor. According to the Food Foundation, a campaigning charity founded by former Tory MP Laura Sandys, recent years of inflation have made it almost impossible for poorer people to eat healthily. The foundation reckons that the poorest households would need to spend almost half of their disposable income on food to afford a healthy diet high in fruit and veg with limited sugars and fats. For poor parents, a healthy grocery shop could cost 70 per cent of disposable income. Healthier foods are just more expensive per calorie than stuff that's full of sugar and fat. Government calculations show that cauliflower and broccoli might cost almost 2p per calorie; for cheap biscuits it's less than half as much. Obesity means more sickness — diabetes and heart disease, in particular — and shorter lives. It means misery for individuals and mounting costs to taxpayers. My back-of-an-envelope calculations suggest that just a one percentage point increase in the obesity rate (roughly 550,000 more people getting too fat) costs the state more than £3 billion over ten years in higher NHS and care costs. We must make good food cheaper for poorer people, but that's far easier said than done. Continuing education to overcome ignorance about nutrition helps but new ideas are needed. What about Nutrition Impact Bonds? Building on NHS 'social prescribing' models, public and private investors could pay upfront for subsidised or even free healthy food for poorer households, then be paid back from the savings the state makes from lower obesity spending. The causes of higher food prices are big, complicated and long-term. Likewise the public health challenge of obesity and poor diets. It follows that fixing them will be a long-term project, the sort of job that no government, especially an unpopular one worrying about its next election, rushes to tackle. • Eating home-cooked food 'helps you lose twice as much weight' But Labour should lift food prices and obesity up its agenda, because they interact with the government's emerging economic focus. Ministers are planning an autumn drive on productivity, correctly identifying Britain's basic economic effectiveness — how much stuff do we generate from each hour of work we do? — as a national priority. Helping business to finance and deploy technology and training to make workers more effective is a key part of productivity, but so too is ensuring the availability of a healthy workforce. And our fatter, sicker population is emerging as a drag on productivity, as more and more people go off sick or leave work outright. Last month a paper by Nesta, a think tank, and Frontier Economics put the cost of productivity lost to obesity at £31 billion a year. The study shows that obesity doesn't just drag on the economy by taking people out of the workforce through sickness. Boldly, it says that obese people just aren't as effective at work as healthy colleagues and cost the economy almost £10 billion a year, it estimates. The government rightly wants to increase productivity but the fact is that Britain is simply too fat and ill to be fully productive. And in large part that's because of bad and increasingly expensive diets. Sadly, the cost of food is even higher than you think. James Kirkup is a senior fellow of the Social Market Foundation
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Tesco hikes meal deal prices – so which supermarket has the best value lunch?
Tesco has raised prices across its meal deals from today, meaning that a standard meal deal with a Clubcard will set you back £3.85. Whether you regularly go to Tesco for your lunch, or you're curious about whether your local supermarket's deal is as good as it seems, we've rounded up prices from all the major supermarkets to let you know the best value meal deal. It's not just the price of lunch that's on the up. The latest inflation figures show that in the year to July 2025, prices were rising at their highest rate in a year and a half. This was, in large part, because of stubbornly high food prices. Data from the Office of National Statistics showed that the cost of food and non-alcoholic drinks rose by 4.9 per cent. So if you're still feeling a pinch at the supermarket checkout, it's not in your head. You could offset this slightly by going for the cheapest meal deal, which is Co-op (with a membership) at £3.60. However, real meal deal connoisseurs know that the best way to get your money's worth is to buy the most expensive items as part of the deal. Fortunately, we've crunched the numbers for you. Read on to find out more about Tesco's price rises, and the best value meal deal in 2025 out of Asda, Morrisons, Sainsbury's and more. How Tesco's meal deal prices are changing Tesco has two tiers of meal deal, standard and 'premium', and both of these have different prices depending on whether or not you have a Clubcard. All of these prices have now increased by between six and 10 per cent, even higher than food inflation more broadly. For standard meal deals, these have increased by 25p: From £3.60 to £3.85 with a Clubcard From £4 to £4.25 without a Clubcard Meanwhile, premium meal deals have increased 50p: From £5 to £5.50 with a Clubcard From £5.50 to £6 without a Clubcard Arguably, it's more worthwhile than ever to sign up for a Clubcard if you continue to buy Tesco meal deals. According to Tesco, more than 80 per cent of its customers do this already. If you're prone to forgetting yours, I suggest getting the Tesco app and then adding your Clubcard to your Apple or Google wallet. This way, not only will you always have your Clubcard with you, but you'll avoid missing out if you can't get a signal in your local shop. However, Tesco isn't the only game in town. Though prices change depending on your location (you probably won't find these deals in airports, for example), we've rounded up the cost of all the best high street meal deals – and worked out the most valuable combo for each lunch. Best value meal deal We can't attest to the actual quality of the items in each meal deal, as we haven't tried all of them (with the significant exception of Tesco's birthday cake sandwich, which proved controversial among our testers). There are some slightly odd combinations in here, but for maximising value, this is as good as it gets. We worked out the best value meal deal by looking at the price of the individual items compared with what you could save under the deal. Where two items are the same price, we went for the one that gives you more food – for example, Waitrose's Taiko duck poke bowl and its High protein Mexican style chicken & grain salad both cost £4.75 before a meal deal, but the duck bowl is heavier, giving you more food for your money. With that in mind, here are the best value meal deals. Tesco: Save up to £4.80 Even with the price rise, Tesco's standard meal deal is cheaper than Sainsbury's with a Clubcard, but more expensive without. That said, if you go for maximum value, it's the least valuable meal deal. Here's the breakdown: Sainsbury's: Save up to £5 Sainsbury's meal deal has seen several price rises this year alone. It's much cheaper than Tesco if you don't have a Tesco Clubcard, but if you do, Tesco is 10p cheaper. However, Sainsbury's is slightly better value overall if you're trying to go for the best value meal deal. Co-op: Save up to £5.15 If you go for maximum value, Co-op isn't the biggest saving. However, it has the lowest price for a standard meal deal, as long as you're a Co-op member, which costs £1 to join. Morrisons: Save up to £5.30 Morrisons has a good value meal deal. Though it's not necessarily better than Boots', there's a slightly better saving with a Morrisons More Card than a Boots Advantage Card. However, you'll save less at Morrisons if you don't have either. Boots: Save up to £5.25 While it's not a supermarket, Boots is well known for its meal deal, and it's not shabby in terms of value for money. It's only slightly more expensive than Morrissons, and the total price of its most valuable meal deal is 10p more valuable: While it's the most expensive meal deal on this list, Waitrose's standard meal deal provides the best value, allowing you to get the most expensive items for less than half price. A benefit is that you don't need to sign up for the Waitrose loyalty scheme to benefit from the lowest price meal deal. If you do, however, you can get a free coffee or tea every day, with no other purchase necessary, when you sign up for MyWaitrose and bring in a reusable cup, which is a great perk. Asda's three-for-two meal deal Asda's meal deal is a three-for-two offer where you get the cheapest item in your lunch for free. We've included it for completeness, but it can't really be compared with the others, where you can max out the value by going for the most expensive items. The total price of your Asda meal deal will vary depending on which main, snack and drink you choose. Here are the priciest items you can get: In the end, this can only be a rough guide. With volatile food price inflation, you could, of course, make the argument that some of the individual items are overpriced in the first place. For example, the Emmi skinny caffe latte Mr Big single coffee is sold at Tesco, Sainsbury's and Ocado for £2.95, compared to £3.10 at Waitrose. However, if you're trying to beat the supermarkets at their own game, these are the combos that deliver maximal value.
Leader Live
6 hours ago
- Leader Live
Government borrowing less than expected in July in boost for Reeves
The Office for National Statistics said the figure, which was £2.3 billion less than the same month a year earlier, is the lowest July borrowing figure for three years. It came after a rise in self-assessed income tax and national insurance payments helped increase tax receipts for the month. July borrowing was lower than the £2 billion figure predicted by a consensus of economists. Borrowing for the first four months of the financial year stood at £60 billion, £6.7 billion more than during the same period last year. Public sector net borrowing excluding public sector banks was £1.1 billion in July 2025. This was £2.3 billion less than in July 2024 and the lowest July borrowing for three years. Read more ➡ — Office for National Statistics (ONS) (@ONS) August 21, 2025 ONS deputy director for public sector finances Rob Doody said: 'Borrowing this July was £2.3 billion down on the same month last year and was the lowest July figure for three years. 'This reflects strong increases in tax and national insurance receipts. 'However, in the first four months of the financial year as a whole, borrowing was over £6 billion higher than in the same period in 2024.' The figures showed that central government receipts – the amount of money brought in, typically through taxes – was £100.1 billion for the month, up £8.8 billion against the same month last year. This came as compulsory social contributions, which include national insurance payments, increased by £2.6 billion to £16.3 billion after recent changes to national insurance contributions (Nics) paid by employers. Meanwhile, the Government also saw a £2.7 billion rise in self-assessed income tax receipts to £15.5 billion. The ONS also reported that state spending rose by £5.3 billion to £92.1 billion in July, partly linked to increases to pay and benefits, as well as cost inflation within departments. The figures come after warnings the Chancellor may need to raise taxes again in the budget in order to plug a black hole of up to £51 billion in the public finances. It has been reported that the Government is looking at hitting owners of high-value houses with capital gains tax (CGT) when they sell their family home. The Guardian also reported that the Government is considering an overhaul of the current system on stamp duty on property purchases. Nevertheless, the Labour government has ruled out increasing income tax, employees' national insurance contributions and VAT, restricting Ms Reeves' options when it comes to raising money. On Thursday, economists said that the latest data was positive for the Chancellor but does not halt the need for potential tax increases or spending cuts. Elliott Jordan-Doak, senior UK economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said: 'The Chancellor will still have to raise taxes in October despite borrowing matching official forecasts. 'The big picture remains that the public finances are in chronically weak condition. 'We think the Chancellor will need to resort to 'sin' and 'stealth' tax hikes, duty increases, and a pensions tax raid in order to meet her fiscal rules if she wants to meet her pledge of keeping headline tax rates unchanged.' Chief secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones said: 'We're investing in our public services and modernising the state, to improve outcomes and reduce costs in the medium term. 'Far too much taxpayer money is spent on interest payments for the longstanding national debt. 'That's why we're driving down government borrowing over the course of the parliament – so working people don't have to foot the bill and we can invest in better schools, hospitals and services for working families.'
