US State Department makes claim of targeted attacks on white farmers in South Africa
Image: AFP
The US has insisted on its claim that white farmers are being targeted in South Africa with the US State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights & Labor (DRL) saying the farm attacks in the country are not ordinary crimes.
The DRL said it has visited the country recently to learn more about the rural farm attacks and the breakdown of the rule of law.
The bureau said the trip to South Africa was in support of the President of the United States' executive orders.
US President Donald Trump took aim at South Africa earlier this year after he took office for the second term, promoting claims that white farmers were targeted-he stopped all aid to South Africa, accusing it of discriminating against its white minority.
The South African government and President Cyril Ramaphosa have labelled notions that there is a genocide against White South Africans as false and said while there was crime in South Africa, the majority of victims were Black.
Trump also imposed a 30% tariff wall on South African exports, while other African nations, including Nigeria, Ghana, Lesotho and Zimbabwe have been hit with 15%, which is expected to come into effect in days.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
The bureau said South Africa holds enormous economic and geopolitical promise but the current breakdowns in law and order are not conducive to growth or collaboration with the US.
It said the South African government must speak clearly and act decisively to address crime and condemn the violence.
The bureau said violent crime is rampant in South Africa, but rural attacks - especially on farms- display a distinctly brutal pattern.
'Local sources reported 296 farm attacks and 49 murders in 2023, and that victims are disproportionately elderly, isolated and face delayed police response. The South African Police Service reports the number increased to 55 murders in 2024,'' said the DRL.
The bureau said that these are not ordinary crimes, adding that in some documented cases, reports detail victims tortured or killed without anything being stolen.
'Earlier this year, a man was beaten and hacked with a machete. In another incident, an elderly woman was assaulted and repeatedly stabbed. In both cases, no theft occurred. These attacks are not motivated by poverty alone.''
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
10 minutes ago
- IOL News
How the Kunene-Malema case reshapes the conversation on hate speech in politics
Kenny Kunene lost his appeal against the Equality Court judgment and must now finally apologise to Julius Malema for calling him a cockroach. Image: Sharon Seretlo / Independent Newspapers Suspended Patriotic Alliance deputy president Kenny Kunene has no choice but to issue an apology to EFF leader Julius Malema for repeatedly calling him a cockroach during a television interview. The Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, on Tuesday turned down Kunene's appeal against an earlier Equality Court finding that his use of the words 'cockroach', 'little frog' and 'criminal' to refer to Malema amounted to hate speech within the meaning of the Equality Act. These utterances were made during an eNCA interview with Kunene. The aggrieved Malema subsequently turned to the Equality Court. The Equality Court at the time ordered Kunene to apologise for using these words to describe Malema and interdicted Kunene from doing so in the future. On appeal, it was argued that Kunene's remarks were personal attacks on Malema rather than targeting any group of which Malema is a member. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ To the extent that Kunene's attacks on Malema might reasonably be construed to be based on his membership of an opposing political party, political attacks of that nature cannot amount to hate speech since political affiliation is not a ground on which the Equality Act recognises that hate speech can be addressed, it was further argued. Judge Stuart Wilson, who wrote the judgment on behalf of the full bench, in the opening of his appeal judgment, remarked that the central question in this appeal is whether one political leader who calls another political leader a 'cockroach' in the course of a televised discussion of the outcome of a local election commits an act of hate speech. 'We conclude that he does. This is because that conduct falls squarely within the textual definition of 'hate speech' outlined in section 10 of the Equality Act.' The judge added that political speech in South Africa must be prevented from degenerating into an act of mutual dehumanisation. Judge Wilson said the consequences of such dehumanisation are written largely across the pages of history. 'They reveal themselves in the pogroms and genocides that the use of the word 'cockroach' evokes... The Constitution and the Equality Act require us to enforce the modest limits on political discourse that are necessary to prevent it from doing so.' Kunene referred to Malema as a 'cockroach' four times during the televised interview about the outcome of an election. The court found that the words did amount to hate speech. However, the order of the Equality Court cannot stand in its current form, the court said. It said the order must be purged of the declaration that the use of the words 'criminal' and 'little frog' was hateful. Nor can the referral of Kunene's utterances to the National Prosecuting Authority be sustained. Criminal sanction of unlawful expression is a measure of last resort, which should be applied only in the most serious of cases, it remarked.
IOL News
40 minutes ago
- IOL News
Number of jobs affected by Donald Trump's tariffs' on South Africa likely higher than recognised
Letters to the Editor. Image: Supplied ICJ case against Israel may be invalid South Africa was once hailed as the 'darling of the world' – thanks largely to Madiba magic and the peaceful transition from apartheid. But today, the country is barely recognisable. With crises piling up on every front, the ANC-led government appears increasingly out of its depth, especially in foreign affairs. Recent claims have emerged implicating President Cyril Ramaphosa and senior government figures in potentially having had prior knowledge of the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israeli and American citizens attending a music festival. In a recent podcast hosted by Byron Shepherd, lobbyist Justin Lewis alleged that a R400-million lawsuit may be looming against Ramaphosa for this alleged complicity. If these allegations prove true, the implications are enormous – not just for South Africa's credibility, but also legally, especially under executive order 14204 signed by US President Donald Trump. That order allows for serious consequences for foreign actors found to be aiding those targeting US citizens or leaders. While these are yet unproven claims, they are nonetheless deeply concerning. Hamas, often misleadingly labelled a 'resistance movement,' is not a state and is not party to the International Court of Justice. If the ANC – particularly through former foreign minister Naledi Pandor – had prior knowledge of the attack, as some are suggesting, and used it to build a legal case against Israel at the ICJ, then the legitimacy of that case must be questioned. This raises a disturbing possibility: that South Africa may have politically or financially gained from a tragedy of mass civilian international legal institutions for political ends erodes their credibility and damages South Africa's reputation. If these allegations are substantiated, they could trigger global backlash and diplomatic isolation – not to mention profound national shame. Before pointing fingers at other sovereign nations, South Africa must confront its own festering crises: rampant crime, poverty, corruption, and the ongoing horror of farm murders – issues that our government continues to deny or ignore. | L Oosthuizen Durban Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Malema's mixed messages For its hilarity, hyperbole and hypocrisy, EFF leader Julius Malema's rant at the weekend claiming US President Donald Trump poses a danger to global stability would have been more appropriate if featured among a list of jokes. Since his debut on the world stage when Trump screened the little demagogue exhorting the slaughter of whites, Malema's opinion of himself has challenged the size of his red beret. Fancying himself as a mentor on the world stage, his advocacy that ties with imperialist powers must be cut is laughable given his solid siding with the imperialism of Marxism-Leninism. Simultaneously it is also contradictory to assert that the EFF is positioned 'as an enemy of global imperialism.' In a word salad of 'isms' between imperialism, capitalism and socialism Malema seems confused about when capitalism is the enemy. It appears to bother him that Trump might destroy capitalism 'inadvertently' because his approach to it is 'illiterate". Grand stuff, indeed, from Limpopo province's sage in adjudicating America's highly successful capitalist president .Just how Malema's goal of socialism is supposed to bestow its enlightenment on the world is also fuzzy. He says if Trump destroys capitalism that 'will kill any and all possibilities of socialist economic order.' Of course, it is common knowledge, as Joe Slovo once conceded, that for the top order of socialists to live in grand style, it is necessary to exploit the pillars of capitalism. Cuba's billionaire socialist Fidel Castro exemplified that magnificently. The ultimate contradiction of Malema's entire muddled broadside against capitalism is that he is a major beneficiary of it and as such a hypocrite of note. | DR DUNCAN DU BOIS Bluff Govt failure on tariffs will cost us dearly As a practicing labour lawyer and an individual who sits on the Portfolio Committee of Parliament with regard to employment and labour, I believe that the estimate of the loss of 100 000 jobs is actually low over the course of the next six months. Unfortunately, it is incredibly difficult to try and claw back these jobs and it will take years. In this instance I believe that government has failed us completely. | MICHAEL BAGRAIM Cape Town There's hope yet for the Holy Land The mayhem in Gaza with the IDF let loose by Benjamin Netanyahu like a pack of marauding wolves will sadly remain a stain on the Israeli people for years to come … most of whom want peace and don't trust their government according to the Times of Israel. The legacy that will be left behind in Palestinian minds following this heinous war….those young Palestinian children who will survive the slaughter and those yet to be born, will define who they are. The lesson they will take forward including the past 78 years of living on charity and handouts by those who stole their land will be how not to do it. Palestinians will show the world instead that there is a better way based on humanity peace co-operation and respect and that chasing a bee around a room full of people with a machine gun was never the answer and solved nothing. As the world prepares for the establishment of the State of Palestine alongside the State of Israeli so will these ugly days fade into the mists of time, but will never be forgotten! | Colin Bosman Newlands Palestinian recognition With the UK set to follow France and formally recognise a Palestinian state as early as September, unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in Gaza and a two-state solution, it will be very difficult for Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and other national leaders not to respond in kind. | Eric Palm Gympie, Australia Financial freedom or funeral? In today's patriarchal time, a woman who depends on a man is like a lamb tied outside a butcher's shop – sooner or later, she'll be slaughtered. Why should a woman earn her own money? Why is her own bank account necessary? Why should she beg for a seat she built? Because if she doesn't – this society will feast on her flesh and gulp it down. What happens to women who depend on men? Look around. They get raped, thrown out, beaten like animals, used like tissue paper, and dumped like trash. She says one word back, and she's slapped. She asks for what's hers, and she's told to shut it before she gets replaced. She gets divorced, and suddenly, she's a sinner. Her honour? Gutted. Her name? Trash. What did he lose? Nothing. What did she lose? Everything. The man at fault walks free, laughing, drinking tea, and marrying some naïve girl half her age. Here's why earning money is so important: If your husband divorces you, with no money, where will you live? How will you eat? Who will pay for your children's school? If your husband hits you , can you leave if you have no savings? No. You'll have to stay and suffer. If your husband marries again or has an extramarital affair, without your own income, you'll have to quietly accept this tormenting humiliation. If you become a widow, relatives might take your property. Without money, how will you fight them? If your family forces you to do something , without money, your 'NO' is just a desperate collapse. With money, it's a thunderous command. Many girls make the mistake of thinking that, 'my father/brother/husband will take care of me.' But the world sharpens its blades while you sleep. Men die. (Then you beg.) Men betray. (Then you suffer.) Men vanish. (Then you starve.) And your rescue fantasy? A coffin with pretty flowers. Still waiting for Prince Charming? Wake up , he doesn't exist. The only hero in your story is you. Society doesn't pity weak women, it preys on them. Earn. Save. Fight. | Yumna Zahid Ali Karachi, Pakistan DAILY NEWS
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
'The President is both player and referee': Families fight Ramaphosa's attempt to delay apartheid justice case
The Pretoria High Court will hear President Cyril Ramaphosa's government bid to delay the constitutional damages case brought by families and survivors of apartheid-era human rights violations. The Pretoria High Court will on Wednesday hear an application brought by President Cyril Ramaphosa and the government seeking to reinstate their opposition in the constitutional damages case. The case, filed by 25 families and survivors of apartheid-era gross human rights violations, seeks accountability for political interference in the prosecution of crimes recommended by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). IOL previously reported that the families of victims who were forcibly disappeared or killed during apartheid, supported by the Foundation for Human Rights (FHR), filed an application against Ramaphosa and the government earlier this year. They are seeking R167 million in constitutional damages for the state's 'gross failure.' The families say there was 'a gross violation of their human rights as the state failed to investigate and/or prosecute the cases referred by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission to the National Prosecuting Authority.' The government is also requesting a postponement or stay of the case pending the outcome of a judicial commission of inquiry established on May 29, 2025. The families, survivors, and the FHR, who have welcomed the establishment of the commission in principle, have expressed strong opposition to the government's attempt to delay the matter.
