logo
Labour under attack for £400m sewage plant ‘the size of Wembley Stadium'

Labour under attack for £400m sewage plant ‘the size of Wembley Stadium'

Telegraph10-04-2025

The Environment Secretary has been attacked for his decision to relinquish swathes of Cambridge's green belt for a £400m sewage plant as big as Wembley Stadium.
Steve Reed has approved controversial plans to relocate Anglian Water's sewage plant in Milton to Honey Hill, as part of a major development across Cambridge which will include 8,000 new homes.
It comes despite a backlash from local residents and advice from planning inspectors to withhold the plans to build sealed sewage digesters as tall as 26m on agricultural land. The new plant would occupy 22 hectares – exceeding Wembley Stadium's 18 hectares of internal floor space.
The Government has committed £277m of taxpayer money on the project, with total costs running to £400m.
Despite assurances from Anglian Water, local communities have warned that nearby villages and schools will be affected by fumes emitted from the plant.
Charles Jones, a resident of nearby village Fen Ditton, said: 'Anglian Water says it's unlikely we'd have any odour problems in the village – but that's not the same as saying you never would.
'There's a number of stresses here, but the most immediate thing is, we are going to lose a slice of Cambridge's green belt. To see it go with this big industrial thing in the middle of it … Next thing you know, you'll get speculative developments around the outside.
'It'll all end up being spoilt and not very good to anybody.'
Mr Reed gave the green light to plans to deliver 5,500 homes on the site of the vacated plant, as well as an extra 1,425 homes on land that had otherwise been constrained by an 'odour zone' around the Milton site.
The historic city is central to Labour's ambitions to build 1.5m homes by the end of parliament. It has mandated the Cambridge Growth Company to draw up a housing target for the city, which could add hundreds and thousands of homes by 2050.
Ministers are also on a drive to increase building on green belt land. Under Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner's planning reforms, large swathes of green belt land have also been redesignated as 'grey belt' areas to make it easier to build homes on.
Heather Williams, leader of the Conservatives at South Cambridgeshire District Council, said the decision is 'sad and devastating' for residents, and that ministers appear to be treating Cambridge as a 'cash cow' at the expense of the countryside.
Ms Williams said: 'The Government needs to understand that for us in the countryside, this is our quality of life that they're messing around with. The stress they have put people through, to then just ignore the evidence and do what they want – it's cruel.
'Where we're heading as a country is very concerning, because the green belt can't be replaced – once it's gone, it's gone.'
Campaigners are assessing the scope for a judicial review and looking to raise funds for the undertaking.
Margaret Starkie, chairman of the Save Honey Hill campaign group, said: 'Cambridge is such a crowded, small city that we need these green spaces.
'As you drive towards Cambridge, your entrance from the east will be overshadowed by stacks as high as 26m, taking up an area as big as Wembley's football grounds. This will have such a terrible impact.'
'We are angry that the process is such that it's really not fit for purpose, that planning inspectors with many years of experience, who looked very carefully at everybody's submissions, should have their recommendations thrown out at the whim of a Secretary of State.'
A spokesman for Defra said: 'The Secretary of State's decision follows a thorough examination during which all the relevant issues were considered in detail.'
David Barnetson, of Anglian Water, said Mr Reed's decision was 'a significant milestone in facilitating this for Greater Cambridge and moving to the next phase of activity'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New call for full State Pension for half a million older people after Winter Fuel Payment U-turn
New call for full State Pension for half a million older people after Winter Fuel Payment U-turn

Daily Record

time11 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

New call for full State Pension for half a million older people after Winter Fuel Payment U-turn

Around 453,000 pensioners are living in a country which does not have a reciprocal agreement with the UK Government. Pension Credit – Could you or someone you know be eligible? Earlier this week the UK Government announced Winter Fuel Payments will be reinstated for over 9 million pensioners later this year. The U-turn and Chancellor Rachel Reeves Spending Review on Wednesday have prompted calls from the 'End Frozen Pensions Campaign' for the annual State Pension uprating to be reinstated for around 453,000 retirees living in countries which do not have a reciprocal agreement with the UK Government. The campaign said it would cost the UK Government just under £60 million per year to end this 'historic wrong'. The policy, which prevents State Pensions from being increased annually - to counteract the impact of inflation for UK pensioners living in certain countries - means some are receiving as little as £60 per week, far below the current £176.45 rate for the Basic State Pension for those living in Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland. John Duguid, Chair of the End Frozen Pensions Campaign, said: "The Government's U-turn on Winter Fuel Payments shows there is a common consensus that the most vulnerable in our society rely on such payments as essential lifelines during times of need. 'Victims of the Frozen Pensions scandal, who receive only a fraction of their full UK State Pension because they live in some countries overseas, should not be excluded from this rationale. Yet the Government's continued refusal to address this longstanding discrimination means they continue to suffer from often negligible levels of state support. 'These British pensioners, many of whom spent their working lives in the UK, receive on average just £60 per week compared to the more than £170 per week they would be entitled to in the UK, or a non-frozen country.' He added: 'Ending this historic wrong would cost just under £60 million per year. This would barely register in the overall State Pension budget. But this isn't only about cost, it is about the principle of treating British state pensioners fairly and equally. 'Similar to the Government's decision to reinstate Winter Fuel Payments, ending this scandal is the correct and morally just action to take. The Government should do right by those who paid fairly into the system, and ensure they have dignity in their retirement.' Last month, cross-party MPs united to intensify pressure on the UK Government over its refusal to reform the so-called 'frozen pensions' policy. Only British overseas pensioners living in specific countries - mostly within the Commonwealth - are impacted, in what Rebecca Smith MP described as "the ultimate postcode lottery'. Those in the USA see the same annual increase as British pensioners living in the UK or France, while those in Australia or Canada, see their State Pension remain 'frozen' and effectively fall in value. For example, 100-year-old Second World War veteran Anne Puckridge, who lived and worked in the UK until the age of 76 and served in all three of the RAF, Navy and the Army, has received just £72.50 per week since 2001, the year she moved to Canada to be nearer her daughter. Jim Shannon MP similarly questioned the logic of the policy applying in only some countries and not others, arguing 'the arbitrary distinction between countries with and without an operating agreement lacks logic and smacks of red tape and bureaucracy gone mad." The Minister for Pensions, Torsten Bell MP, was mostly notably challenged on the estimated cost of ending the policy, which is estimated at £60m per year - 0.04 per cent of the annual State Pension budget - rather than the £950m per year quoted by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). The difference explained by the fact the DWP are quoting for uprating and backdating payments to account for the years affected pensioners have been frozen. However, campaigners are instead asking to receive the annual increase from this point onwards. Douglas McAllister MP stressed that campaigners and supportive MPs are 'not seeking a full backdating, but for the Government to introduce some form of yearly indexing to answer that injustice'. Longterm critic of the policy Sir Roger Gale MP argued the policy is 'not a matter of cost. It is a matter of moral responsibility and duty.' The Minister was also reminded by a number of MPs that 'the vast majority of impacted pensioners still report having no knowledge of the policy's existence prior to moving overseas'. ‌ State Pension payments 2025/26 Full New State Pension Weekly payment: £230.25 Fortnightly payment: £460.50 Four-weekly payment: £921 Annual amount: £11,973 Full Basic State Pension ‌ Weekly payment: £176.45 Fortnightly payment: £352.90 Four-weekly payment: £705.80 Annual amount: £9,175 Future State Pension increases The Labour Government has pledged to honour the Triple Lock or the duration of its term and the latest predictions show the following projected annual increases: 2025/26 - 4.1% (the forecast was 4%) 2026/27 - 2.5% 2027/28 - 2.5% 2028/29 - 2.5% 2029/30 - 2.5% Article continues below Recent analysis released by Royal London revealed only around half of people receiving the New State Pension last year were getting the full weekly amount - and around 150,000 were on less than £100 per week.

'Fed up' Brian Cox hits out at Keir Starmer on BBC Debate Night
'Fed up' Brian Cox hits out at Keir Starmer on BBC Debate Night

The National

time26 minutes ago

  • The National

'Fed up' Brian Cox hits out at Keir Starmer on BBC Debate Night

The Succession star was speaking as he appeared on the BBC Scotland Debate Night programme on Wednesday evening. Cox called for more unity of purpose from Scottish politicians and the public more widely. READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: John Swinney needs to rethink his strategy over Scottish independence 'I'm not just talking about parties, I'm talking about the country,' he said. 'I'm talking about this country, which I love, and I'm very proud that I come from this country, but I've seen it time and time again where there's this endless debate: debate this, that, this, that, this. 'I just feel that we need unity, we need unity of purpose, and we haven't got unity of purpose. I'm sorry, but we simply don't. 'We have so much dissension, and we've lost the way really big time, and I feel that we should resume that, we should get it back.' Cox said he did not know which political party could unite Scotland, but suggested it was 'certainly' not Labour under Starmer. The actor went on: 'I'm not pleased with Mr Starmer and his attitude towards Scotland, because everything for him is England. 'He talks about England, he talks about English football.' After applause from the audience, the Dundee-born star added: 'I'm at heart a socialist, so I get, I do really get annoyed when it's not about socialism, it's about something else, and that's what I feel is lacking. 'I'm just, I'm sick of it really, I'm fed up. READ MORE: These key economic truths show how independent Scotland and Wales can succeed 'I come back to this country. I love this country and I see dissension after dissension after dissension, the inability to come together, and it's an appalling situation.' Asked if pro-independence parties should unite, Cox said: 'Absolutely they should, because it's in everybody's interests.' Talking about the Labour Government, he added: 'They're not interested in us. I know for a start that Starmer is certainly not interested and doesn't want an independent Scotland. 'He only sees it as a sort of encumbrance to what he is, so I'm not happy about that situation.' Brian Cox is known for his role as Logan Roy in the smash hit SuccessionElsewhere, Cox, a former Labour supporter, said that the UK Government's attitude to Scotland was 'nebulous'. 'I worry about a lot of things that go on, and I'm particularly worried about the attitude towards Scotland,' he said of the impact of the Spending Review, which Rachel Reeves announced on Wednesday. Cox went on: 'There certainly should be more detail, but they also should certainly understand what the need of this country is – and that's what gets me. 'It's a bit bland, it's a bit off, you know, just off the cuff, and I really want to see really what they think about Scotland, and I find it a little bit nebulous.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store