Republican admits he voted for the GOP megabill, though key elements were ‘unknown' to him
On the surface, the House Republicans' massive reconciliation package — the inaptly named 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' — focused on redistributing wealth from the bottom up. Republican policymakers set out to reward the wealthy with tax breaks, while punishing struggling families with cuts to health care and food assistance.
But before last week's House vote on the legislation, GOP officials tucked all kinds of smaller provisions into the bill, some of which have gone largely overlooked.
For example, as Austin Sarat, a political science professor at Amherst College, explained in a piece for MSNBC, the Republican's proposal 'snuck in a little noticed but very important provision into the megabill that would effectively remove from judges the ability to hold litigants who defy court orders in contempt.' The apparent goal, Sarat added, was to 'insulate [Donald Trump] from judicial accountability.'
With this in mind, Republican Rep. Mike Flood held a town hall meeting with constituents in his Nebraska district, and some wanted to know why the congressman would vote to restrict the ability of federal courts to hold the president and his administration in contempt of court. As HuffPost noted, Flood had to admit something deeply embarrassing: He didn't know that was in the bill.
'I do not agree with that section that was added to that bill,' Flood said, prompting a roar of disapproval from the crowd. 'I do believe that the federal district courts, when issuing an injunction, it should have legal effect.' Then Flood got unusually candid for a member of Congress. 'I am not going to hide the truth. This provision was unknown to me when I voted for that bill, and when I found out that provision was in the bill, I immediately reached out to my Senate counterparts and told them of my concern,' Flood said.
As part of the same comments, the GOP lawmaker said he intends to tell his Republican colleagues the party 'cannot support undermining our court system' — despite the fact they put this provision in the legislation, and despite the fact that Flood already voted for it.
At face value, Flood's apparent ignorance (I'm assuming he was actually in the dark and didn't lie to his constituents about his foreknowledge) isn't too surprising. House Republican leaders wrote and rewrote their not-so-beautiful bill in the middle of the night, and it was changed repeatedly in response to backroom deals. House Speaker Mike Johnson and his leadership team then rushed the bill onto the floor for a vote before members could read it.
But at that point, it was incumbent on policymakers such as Flood to use their leverage, slow the process down and tell their party that they wouldn't vote for a bill this important without knowing what's in it. The Nebraska Republican didn't do anything of the kind. He chose instead to link arms with his far-right brethren and pass the wildly regressive legislation — while effectively wearing a blindfold about its contents.
No wonder his constituents didn't seem pleased.
As for the road ahead, the reconciliation package is now pending in the Republican-led Senate, where it's unclear whether the provision in question will remain intact. Watch this space.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
Hegseth warns NATO can't be centered around ‘reliance on America'
NATO allies can't entirely hedge their security concerns around 'reliance on America,' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly warned during his visit to Brussels Thursday to meet with allied defense ministers. Hegseth contended that while the US will continue to support its allies in the powerful military bloc, the Trump administration is demanding that they step up and pull more of their own weight. 'The United States is proud to be here, to stand with our allies, but our message is gonna continue to be clear: It's deterrence and peace through strength, but it cannot be reliance,' Hegseth said during a press conference in Brussels. 'It cannot and will not be reliance on America. It can't just be US capabilities.' President Trump has long insisted that NATO allies beef up their own defense capabilities. At times, the president has questioned the US' commitment to the mutual defense clause of NATO countries that don't spend enough on defense. 3 Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth urged NATO allies to step up. REUTERS 3 Defense ministers in NATO gathered for a group photo during the Brussels meeting. REUTERS Top administration officials such as Vice President JD Vance and Hegseth have repeatedly conveyed similar demands. Hegseth also called for NATO allies to spend 5% of their gross domestic product on defense. Last year, the US spent an estimated 3.3% of its GDP on defense, which is projected to decline over the next decade unless Congress passes an increase such as the one buried in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The NATO guideline calls on members of the 32-nation bloc to spend at least 2% of GDP on defense. Last year, a record 23 NATO nations hit that target, with Croatia, Portugal, Italy, Canada, Belgium, Luxemburg, Slovenia and Spain falling short, per data from the powerful military alliance. Now, NATO members are negotiating over a higher, 5% of GDP target, something that no country, including the military bloc's highest defense spender, Poland, has met. 'We're here to continue the work that President Trump started, which is a commitment to 5% defense spending across the alliance, which we think will happen,' Hegseth told reporters before the meeting in Brussels. 'To be an alliance, you got to be more than flags. You got to be formations,' he added. 'You got to be more than conferences. You need to be, keep combat-ready capabilities.' 3 NATO boss Mark Rutte has been described as the 'Trump whisperer.' AFP via Getty Images Hegseth conveyed confidence that NATO will ultimately adopt that new target threshold. European leaders have been working to rearm over recent years in response to Russia's unprovoked invasion of neighboring Ukraine, but there have been many political hurdles to get there. The gathering in Brussels comes ahead of the summit later this month in The Hague, during which the alliance is expected to consider the new 5% of GDP defense spending target. During the Brussels meeting, alliance members are expected to discuss new standards for military equipment. Hegseth also skipped the Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting at NATO headquarters.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' losing momentum in Senate
The sprawling bill to enact President Trump's 'big, beautiful' agenda is losing momentum in the Senate in the face of blistering attacks from Elon Musk and outspoken opposition from conservatives. Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) warned colleagues at a special conference meeting Wednesday afternoon that there are two likely 'no' votes against the bill within the Senate GOP conference, which means just one more defection would derail the legislation, according to a senator who attended the meeting. 'Crapo just said, 'I think [there] are two of us who are pretty definite no's,' which means we can't lose anybody else,' the source said. Crapo did not name names, but colleagues assumed he was talking about conservative Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). Paul says he will vote against the bill because it includes language to raise the debt ceiling by $4 trillion, extending the federal government's borrowing authority past the 2026 midterm election. Johnson, meanwhile, has called for Senate GOP colleagues to scrap the House-passed bill and move a smaller measure that would focus on extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts, securing the border and banking on the spending cuts identified by House committee chairs. 'What I am rock-solid on is that I can't accept this as the new normal,' he said of projections that the annual federal deficit will reach $2.2 trillion in 2025 and grow to $2.7 trillion by 2035. 'We have our chance to reverse this,' he said of growing deficits. 'I will not be responsible for continuing this.' Paul and Johnson are stepping up their criticism of the bill just as Musk is urging lawmakers to 'KILL' the legislation, warning it will blow up the deficit. 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL,' Musk posted on his social platform X. The Congressional Budget Office projected Wednesday that the 1,116-page bill passed by the House will add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. Trump has set a July 4 deadline for Congress to get the bill to his desk. But some GOP lawmakers say that's looking increasingly unlikely because of a battle between Republican senators over cuts to Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the repeal of renewable energy tax incentives. 'It won't happen,' Johnson said. 'The sooner President Trump recognizes the reality of the situation, the sooner we can work on a smaller version of the bill, do the things that have to be done: Extend current tax law, increase the debt ceiling, provide border funding,' he said. He said the package could include spending cuts already passed by the House, such as a proposal to reduce federal subsidies to Medicaid by $698 billion and reduce SNAP spending by $267 billion. The expectation that Paul and Johnson will vote against the bill could give more leverage to Republicans who want to make other changes, further delaying the effort. Those moderates include Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), who are warning against Medicaid spending cuts that would affect benefits. Senate Republicans control 53 seats, which means they could only afford three defections and still pass the bill. Collins, Murkowski, Hawley and Moran say they are closely following the proposed reforms to Medicaid. 'I am evaluating those provisions,' Collins said of the changes to Medicaid. She said it's difficult to fully assess the bill until the Senate parliamentarian weighs in on what policy changes can remain in the legislation and which need to be stripped out for it to qualify for fast-track consideration on the floor. She said some of the most controversial provisions 'may fall out.' 'We still don't know exactly what we're looking at,' she said. Collins, who is up for reelection in a state that former Vice President Kamala Harris carried in the 2024 election, said she's concerned about changes to the SNAP program that would require Maine to shoulder more of its costs. She said the bill 'switches a lot of the administrative costs' for SNAP 'onto the state.' Murkowski said it will be 'hard' to meet Trump's deadline of passing the bill by July 4, noting that even after Republican senators reach a deal, many of the provisions will need to be vetted by the Senate parliamentarian. Moran said he's 'waiting for where we end up in the Ag [Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry] Committee' on reforms to SNAP. 'What we do will be different from the House. I'm analyzing and participating in the discussion,' he said. He said the negotiations over the nutrition program for low-income Americans are 'taking time.' Republicans at a special meeting Wednesday afternoon discussed expanding their search for savings to Medicaid, despite Trump's warning to House lawmakers last month not to 'f‑‑‑ with Medicaid.' And, notably, they raised the possibility of changes to Medicare. 'There's a legitimate debate about, 'Can we do more with Medicaid? Are we doing too much with Medicaid? How much waste, fraud and abuse is there in Medicare? Why don't we go after that?' I think we should,' Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) said after meeting with colleagues to discuss the bill. Cramer said senators talked about also examining waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare to further reduce future deficits. 'There was a lot of presentation and then debate, people throwing out other ideas, like, 'What about waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare?'' he said. But tackling waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare would be a time-consuming task and likely generate a lot of anxiety among GOP senators who are balking at cuts to Medicaid that they worry could impact benefits. 'Some people are making that case, other people are wringing their hands,' Cramer said of the internal debate. Updated at 8:37 a.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Democrat: Trump travel ban a distraction from GOP policy package
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said late Wednesday that President Trump's revived travel ban is meant to 'distract' the nation from what he described as 'super unpopular' aspects of the massive GOP policy package working its way through Congress. During an interview on MSNBC's 'The Briefing with Jen Psaki,' the Senate Democrat said that the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' will 'steal from regular Americans in order to pad the rich.' 'Nobody wants that. That's super unpopular. So how do you get that done?' he continued. 'You distract people by making them think that they're at war with other Americans — making them think that they have something to fear from people who look different from them or speak a different language.' Murphy described the strategy as something 'demagogues have done all throughout time… while, on the side, they're stealing from us.' Trump earlier Wednesday signed a proclamation banning travel to the United States for individuals from 12 countries, citing national security concerns. He also announced new restrictions for entry into the U.S. for travelers from an additional seven countries. The proclamation, which echoes a travel ban Trump instituted in his first term, takes effect Monday. Trump, in another move on Wednesday, ordered a probe of former President Biden's mental state and executive actions his predecessor took while in office. The actions come as Trump's agenda faces new roadblocks in the Senate, with tech billionaire Elon Musk vocalizing criticism of the massive bill and calling on lawmakers to block it from passing. Murphy said Trump's moves are 'chiefly in service' of changing the focus of the national conversation. 'This is important, you know, anytime you ban people coming to the United States from other countries, it has a real impact,' Murphy told Psaki. 'But it is chiefly in service of trying to get us all talking about that — or talking about the Biden investigation they launched today — instead of talking about the centerpiece of this story, which is this bill to make the rich even richer at the expense of everybody else.' The Hill has reached out to the White House for a response to Murphy's remarks. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
