
PRASA hikes Metrorail ticket prices: Here's how much MORE you'll pay
PRASA said the decision to raise fares was taken after comprehensive stakeholder consultations held back in 2023 and has received the green light from the Department of Transport.
'Fares have remained unchanged since 2015. This is the first adjustment in a decade,' PRASA noted.
Under the new pricing structure: Single tickets will increase by R2.50
will increase by Return tickets will rise by between R5.50 to R6.00, depending on the distance and zone
The revenue generated from the fare hike will go toward essential operational costs, including energy bills, rail maintenance, and improved safety and security at stations and on board trains.
'Even with this fare adjustment, PRASA Rail fares remain the most affordable across all modes of public transport,' said PRASA Rail CEO Nwabisa Gqamane-Ntiyane.
'We are committed to providing affordable, safe, and efficient commuter services.'
Return of weekly and monthly tickets
PRASA Rail also announced the reintroduction of weekly and monthly tickets, offering significant savings for regular commuters.
Off-peak discounts still apply
Passengers travelling between 09:00 and 14:00 will continue to benefit from 40% to 50% discounts during off-peak hours.
PRASA has long faced criticism for service disruptions, infrastructure decay, and security concerns.
This fare increase is part of its long-term strategy to restore financial sustainability and improve service quality on South Africa's most critical commuter rail network.
Despite the fare hike, PRASA insists that rail remains the most economical transport option for millions of working-class South Africans who rely on it daily.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
11 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Call to extend driver's license validity
South Africans have complained about the slow pace at which driver's license cards are being issued. The Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) executive director advocate Stefanie Fick has written to Minister of Transport Barbara Creecy to consider extending the validity for all licence cards to 10 years and waive fines and temporary licences for those whose new licence cards are stuck in the backlog. This comes after the Department of Transport reported a backlog of 690 000 driving licence cards, arising from the breakdown earlier this year of the sole card-printing machine. Outa CEO Wayne Duvenhage said after months of delay, the department had finally filed papers in the High Court in Pretoria aimed at overturning the R898 million contracts awarded to Idemia South Africa to supply a new driving licence card machine. Duvenhage said the auditor-general took their concerns seriously: 'We commend Minister Creecy for acting on them. This is how civil society, oversight institutions and public representatives should work together to tackle maladministration.' He added: 'In early September last year, Outa exposed procurement irregularities in this contract and submitted a detailed report to Creecy, who passed it on to the auditor-general of South Africa and asked for further investigation. That request was accompanied by Outa's detailed report outlining allegations of procurement irregularities.' ALSO READ: 'Self-destructing' number plates for Gauteng? Here's what to know Duvenhage said the court papers outline multiple flaws in the contract, including a nearly R400 million cost escalation, from the original Cabinet-approved budget of R486.385 million to the signed contract of R898.597 million. Also contributing was the use of outdated pricing, omission of printing material costs, evaluation errors in scoring, machine assessments and bidder non-compliance and weak documentation. AfriForum also wanted Creecy's to issue temporary licences free of charge to motorists who renew their licences on time, amid the backlog in the issuing of driving licence cards. Spokesperson Louis Boshoff said the department had ignored workable solutions, such as extending the validity period of licence cards. – [email protected] NOW READ: RAF CEO placed on special leave with full pay, as MPs grill fund


Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The GNU has failed the only test that matters: growing the economy and delivering jobs
The national coalition is entering yet another week it may not survive. While there have been real mistakes of leadership – and the ANC and the DA cannot give up their patterns from the past – it is becoming increasingly obvious that what is missing is a sense of mission. Because the parties involved are not focusing on the economy, and particularly youth unemployment, the coalition can give the impression that it is doomed. When the national coalition was formed and the ANC and the DA agreed to work together, along with eight other parties, there was some discussion about how to assess, in the future, whether the coalition was a success. Because the lived experience of so many South Africans has become so much tougher so quickly, it was pretty obvious, back in June 2024, that the real test was the economy. As has been said many, many, many times before, our youth unemployment is now so bad that it is easily the biggest long-term problem we face. Despite this obvious fact, disputed by nobody, the coalition has done nothing. At the same time, it appears the coalition is missing a sense of unity around a purpose. There appears to be no sense of 'mission' that could help bring people from different political backgrounds together. Instead, it can give the impression of a group of people united only by their belief that they should be in Cabinet and the MK party and the EFF should be out of it. If the coalition had created a sense of mission by focusing on youth unemployment, perhaps this could have brought them together. Surely parties as far apart politically as the PAC and the FF+ agree that helping young people into jobs and giving them hope is vital for our future. If the coalition had this sense of mission, perhaps it would have been able to overcome the lack of leadership and personal chemistry that is currently on display. It would have been much easier to overcome disagreements over the Budget, or the still-strange firing of the DA's Andrew Whitfield, if there had been another ultimate aim. But that is curiously lacking. And, strangely, it is not just the coalition. Direction unknown While there are many differing views about whether a National Dialogue would really be constructive, one of the most powerful arguments against it is that it will lack focus. It appears to include people from almost all parts of our public life. And their job is to discuss pretty much everything. This will probably be fatal to the process. It is hard to see what can really be achieved. Surely no decisions will be made that will alter the nature of our economy. Instead, it appears that many of our politicians, whether they are a part of the coalition, or supporting a dialogue, are more comfortable discussing issues other than the economy. There is a curious lack of focus. Of course, Operation Vulindlela and the progress it is making should not be ignored. Some of its measures, dealing with load shedding and the progress it's made at Transnet, are making slow changes to our economy that should be celebrated. But our politicians appear to lack the will to make the real changes that will matter. This is part of a pattern which took hold some time ago. Fifteen years ago, I made the same point about the ANC's lack of focus on the economy. At least eight years ago, ANC members made the same point on these pages. Government itself said back in 2020, even before the pandemic, that the economy was not going to grow unless there was action. This lack of focus obviously predates President Cyril Ramaphosa. Rather, it may be a feature of how the ANC has governed over the years. In 2007, days after winning the ANC leadership at Polokwane, Jacob Zuma gave very few clues on governance priorities. In 2009, the ANC said it had five 'apex priorities'. During the Zuma era in government, this lack of focus revealed itself in interesting ways. For example, in 2014 he appointed inter-ministerial committees to deal with particular issues. These committees were huge. The committee appointed to work against corruption (this was in the relatively early days of the Zuma era – the full irony of this committee would emerge later) included nine ministers. The committee on information and publicity had 12 (twelve!) members. It should be no surprise to anyone that nothing constructive was done here. Too many cooks There is, of course, a structural reason for all of this. As our society is so diverse, with so many different constituencies, politicians often struggle to be involved in discussions that will involve trade-offs. They do not want to be seen to be losing a single vote. The fact that the ANC set the tone for this may well be because it had the most diverse group of constituencies of all our parties. Simply put, it was always too broad a church to create economic policy that could include trade-offs. Something similar might well be happening today. The coalition is simply too broad to make the decisions that matter. For this reason, the National Dialogue might well appear to fail as well. It is true that there are many other factors holding our economy back. They include the fact that so many people have literally been betrayed by our education system, that inequality generally harms economic growth and that our infrastructure has been allowed to rot. None of this will be overcome without political will. For the moment, members of the national coalition are displaying none of the will, and the unity, necessary to change this. There will be many casualties as a result of this inaction.


Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
AI scams surge — Experts warn as people to adopt ‘zero trust mindset'
At Nelson Mandela University's SecureHER seminar, cybersecurity expert Prof Kerry-Lynn Thomson warned that AI-powered scams are evolving fast, putting South Africans at risk of losing more than just money. As fraud surges nationally, Thomson urged vigilance to stay one step ahead of scammers in an increasingly deceptive digital world. In a world where a single click or call can cost you everything — from your savings to your identity — the latest wave of AI-powered scams is leaving South Africans more vulnerable than ever. That warning came loud and clear this week at Nelson Mandela University, where cybersecurity experts gathered to arm women with the tools to fight back. Held in honour of South Africa's approaching Women's Day, the seminar tackled topics across the spectrum of cyber, financial, educational and personal safety. But it was Professor Kerry-Lynn Thomson's sobering warning on the rise of AI-enabled cybercrime that left the audience with a new sense of urgency. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Fraud is rising — and getting personal According to the Southern African Fraud Prevention Service (SAFPS), there was a 600% increase in incidents of fraud from 2018–2022. Digital payments in particular have come to represent the highest proportion of financial loss attributed to fraud – consumers lost over R740 million in 2022. In May at the SAFPS annual summit, CEO Manie van Schalkwyk said, 'Fraud has evolved and is becoming more sophisticated, more targeted and more personal.' Read more: Fraud prevention service saves clients more than R5bn as scams soar in 2024 The new face of cybercrime Thomson, a leading cybersecurity expert at the Institute of Information Technology Professionals South Africa and a professor at Nelson Mandela University, agreed, painting a picture of a rapidly shifting digital landscape — one where malicious actors exploit the very technologies designed to improve our lives. 'Artificial intelligence is only going to get better and better,' she cautioned. 'We are entering an era where it will become increasingly difficult — if not impossible — to distinguish what is real from what isn't.' advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads She warned of the growing prevalence of deepfakes, synthetic voices and AI-generated scams that prey on people's trust. 'Cybercriminals are playing a long game. They research you, mimic your family and friends, and then use that information against you,' she said. The result? People aren't just losing money. They're losing their identities, their privacy, and in many cases, their dignity. According to Prof Thomson, three of the most common AI-enabled attacks are: Investment and cryptocurrency scams, often accompanied by AI-generated adverts or fake videos featuring celebrities promising massive returns. 'Those 'too good to be true' opportunities usually are,' she said. Highly convincing phishing emails, now written without the spelling and grammatical errors that used to give them away. 'AI makes them perfect — polished, professional, and sometimes even personalised,' she noted. Business Email Compromise (BEC), where scammers use voice cloning and deepfakes to impersonate senior executives, requesting urgent payments or access to confidential data. 'Cybersecurity incidents are increasing year on year, both for individuals and organisations, and threat actors are constantly finding new ways to exploit us using AI and emerging technologies,' said Thompson. Her advice? Adopt a 'zero trust mindset'— an approach that's less about paranoia and more about pause. 'It's not about removing trust, it's about establishing it. Think before you react. Social engineers thrive on emotional triggers like fear and panic. So when something feels urgent or emotionally charged — a message, a phone call, a WhatsApp — take a breath, pause, and verify.' advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Real-world stories brought home the importance of everything Thomson said. Professor Margaret Cullen, the event organiser, shared her brush with cybercrime. 'I received a call from my bank, or so I thought, very late at night. They were asking for details that were just a bit too confidential. I knew something was not right,' she said. 'I ended the call immediately. But it was a close one.' Nomfezeko Gqadu also opened up about her experience. 'I just noticed that I couldn't make or receive any calls. My phone was completely dead. I couldn't access WhatsApp or anything,' she recalled. 'Then I quickly got hold of a lady I know who is tech-savvy. She dialled a few things and got it sorted. But I could see there had been several attempts to get into my banking apps.' Prof Thomson emphasised that while there was no 'silver bullet' for online security, there are steps South Africans can take to protect themselves. 'Two-factor authentication—or even better, multi-factor authentication—is one of the most effective tools available,' she said. 'Yet so many people still haven't enabled it.' Other critical steps include using a password manager to create unique, strong passwords for every account, keeping all devices updated, and installing reputable antivirus software. 'Reusing passwords across multiple platforms is still one of the most common mistakes,' she warned. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads The South African Banking Risk Information Centre (Sabric) also recently issued an urgent warning that criminals are using artificial intelligence to clone voices, impersonate bank officials and trick unsuspecting victims into handing over their life savings. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Read more: AI-powered scams drain South Africans' bank accounts — here's how to protect your money How to protect yourself from fraud Sabric recommends these steps to avoid becoming a victim: Be wary of investment offers promising guaranteed returns. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. of investment offers promising guaranteed returns. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Never download banking apps from links sent via WhatsApp, SMS, or email. Always use official app stores. from links sent via WhatsApp, SMS, or email. Always use official app stores. Verify before you trust. If someone claims to be from your bank, hang up and call the official number directly. before you trust. If someone claims to be from your bank, hang up and call the official number directly. Banks will never ask for your PIN, OTP, or banking passwords. for your PIN, OTP, or banking passwords. Report suspicious activity. Contact your bank and report fraud attempts. DM