logo
Amid ongoing attacks, Jewish people are afraid. Is anyone listening?

Amid ongoing attacks, Jewish people are afraid. Is anyone listening?

USA Todaya day ago

Amid ongoing attacks, Jewish people are afraid. Is anyone listening? | Opinion
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Jewish Boulder resident recounts attack at pro-Israel protest
Lisa Turnquist, a Jewish Boulder resident, used her a towel she had to smother flames on an elderly woman after an attack at a pro-Israel protest.
This week, in Colorado, a Molotov cocktail was thrown at a group of Jews marching peacefully on behalf of hostages held by Hamas. The attacker shouted, 'How many children have you killed?' and 'We need to end Zionists' as he hurled fire at Holocaust survivors and Jewish children.
In Washington, D.C., two Israeli embassy staff members were gunned down in cold blood. In Paris, the Holocaust museum was defaced. In London, a Jewish business was vandalized with red paint and smashed windows.
Each attack happened in a different country. The perpetrators didn't know each other. And yet, every Jew I know understands how deeply they're connected.
This is what Jewish anxiety looks like in 2025. Not just fear of a lone extremist – but fear of a global pattern no one wants to name. A time when violence against Jews isn't just ignored, but politically inconvenient to acknowledge.
The attacker in Colorado wasn't reacting to silence. He was reacting to noise. To slogans. To lies. To the viral fabrication that 14,000 Palestinian babies would be starved in 48 hours – a claim with no evidence, pushed by some of the most trusted news outlets in the world. By the time fact-checkers caught up, the lie had triggered an already radicalized man, preparing firebombs in America.
That's where the anxiety begins. Not with the fire – but with the match.
Because we've seen this before. Words become slogans. Slogans become an ideology. And ideology, left unchecked, becomes violence.
Not long ago, we were told to 'believe all victims.' But today, Jewish victims are asked to justify their pain. Were you wearing an Israeli flag? Were you near a protest? Are you a Zionist? Are you a European colonizer? As if our humanity is conditional. As if the firebomb wasn't about us – we just happened to be standing in the way.
I come from the political left. My parents were Iraqi and North African Jewish refugees. My relatives were murdered, raped and tortured. From that pain, I learned not to hate, but to seek peace. I've stood for coexistence. I've criticized Israeli leaders when they fail our Jewish values. But today, that's not enough. Because if you are Jewish and visible, you are a target. And if you're attacked, you're met with silence – or worse, moral gymnastics.
In case you missed it: Ye's antisemitic rant, that $20 swastika shirt and why we need to talk about it
Mainstream media repeated Hamas' invented casualty statistics with barely a pause. Days later, the numbers were quietly revised. But those burned by the flamethrower will attest: It was a blood libel.
Moreover, words matter.
'Globalize the intifada.'
'End Zionists.'
'By any means necessary.'
These are not abstract ideas. They are instructions. They are adrenaline for the unstable. They justify horrific violence.
What's most painful isn't just the attacks – it's the shrug. The way the Colorado firebomb wasn't covered until hours later. The way Jewish blood doesn't trend. The way those who claim to fight hate won't name this one.
We're told: this isn't antisemitism; it's anti-Zionism. And yet, somehow, the flames always find the flesh of Jews.
Why is it never OK to target people for a government's actions unless the people are Jewish?
Does the 88-year-old Holocaust survivor lying in agony in a hospital bed deserve it? Does anyone? What world are we in where I have to explain that setting people on fire is evil and does no good?
Deep dive: How a father of 5 morphed into a terror suspect with Boulder's Jews in his crosshairs
The truth is, we are afraid. Not in a viral-post kind of way, but in the quiet way you hesitate before entering a synagogue. The way you scan a crowd before speaking Hebrew. The way you wonder if your accent or your name might be the thing that puts you in someone's crosshairs.
And what we're asking is simple: to be seen. Fully. Not as a proxy. Not as a debate. But as human beings – hurting, vulnerable and real.
The shooting in D.C., the firebomb in Colorado – these weren't the beginning. They were the result. And if we still can't name what led us here, we'll be even less prepared for what's coming next.
Hen Mazzig is an Israeli-born writer, speaker, and digital influencer known for his powerful advocacy for Jewish identity and his fight against antisemitism. He is the co-founder of the Tel Aviv Institute, a nonprofit that launched in 2019 to counter online antisemitism through strategic, data-driven social media campaigns. In 2022, he published his debut book, The Wrong Kind of Jew. Hen Mazzig continues to inspire a new generation to embrace advocacy. Most recently he created his series "And They're Jewish" which celebrates Jewish diversity and builds bridges rooted in tolerance and peace.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Detained Columbia graduate claims ‘irreparable harm' to career and family as he pleads for release

time29 minutes ago

Detained Columbia graduate claims ‘irreparable harm' to career and family as he pleads for release

NEW YORK -- A Columbia graduate facing deportation over his pro-Palestinian activism on campus has outlined the 'irreparable harm' caused by his continued detention as a federal judge weighs his release. Mahmoud Khalil said in court filings unsealed Thursday that the 'most immediate and visceral harms' he's faced in his months detained in Louisiana relate to missing out on the birth of his first child in April. 'Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone,' the 30-year-old legal U.S. resident wrote. 'When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep.' He also cited potentially 'career-ending' harms from the ordeal, noting that Oxfam International has already rescinded a job offer to serve as a policy advisor. Even his mother's visa to come to the U.S. to help care for his infant son is also now under federal review, Khalil said. 'As someone who fled prosecution in Syria for my political beliefs, for who I am, I never imagined myself to be in immigration detention, here in the United States,' he wrote. 'Why should protesting this Israel government's indiscriminate killing of thousands of innocent Palestinians result in the erosion of my constitutional rights?' Spokespersons for the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. Khalil's 13-page statement was among a number of legal declarations his lawyers filed highlighting the wide-ranging negative impacts of his arrest. Dr. Noor Abdalla, his U.S. citizen wife, described the challenges of not having her husband to help navigate their son's birth and the first weeks of his young life. Students and professors at Columbia wrote about the chilling effect Khalil's arrest has had on campus life, with people afraid to attend protests or participate in groups that can be viewed as critical of the Trump administration. Last week, a federal judge in New Jersey said the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil likely violates the Constitution. Judge Michael Farbiarz wrote the government's primary justification for removing Khalil — that his beliefs may pose a threat to U.S. foreign policy — could open the door to vague and arbitrary enforcement. Khalil was detained by federal immigration agents on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment, the first arrest under Trump's widening crackdown on students who joined campus protests against .

US slaps sanctions on ICC judges in ‘clear attempt to undermine' actions against Netanyahu, Israel
US slaps sanctions on ICC judges in ‘clear attempt to undermine' actions against Netanyahu, Israel

News24

timean hour ago

  • News24

US slaps sanctions on ICC judges in ‘clear attempt to undermine' actions against Netanyahu, Israel

The US imposed sanctions on four judges of the International Criminal Court. The sanctions are an attempt to undermine the court's independence, the ICC said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed the sanctions. The US on Thursday imposed sanctions on four judges at the International Criminal Court including over an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as it ramped up pressure to neuter the court of last resort. The four judges in The Hague, all women, will be barred entry to the US and any property or other interests in the world's largest economy will be blocked - measures more often taken against policymakers from US adversaries than against judicial officials. 'The United States will take whatever actions we deem necessary to protect our sovereignty, that of Israel, and any other US ally from illegitimate actions by the ICC,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement. 'I call on the countries that still support the ICC, many of whose freedom was purchased at the price of great American sacrifices, to fight this disgraceful attack on our nation and Israel,' Rubio said. The court swiftly hit back, saying in a statement: 'These measures are a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution which operates under the mandate from 125 States Parties from all corners of the globe.' READ | Israel returns 2 bodies of Hamas hostages in Gaza 'special operation' Israel's Netanyahu welcomed the move, thanking US President Donald Trump's administration in a social media post. 'Thank you President Trump and Secretary of State Rubio for imposing sanctions against the politicised judges of the ICC. You have justly stood up for the right of Israel,' he wrote on Friday. Brendan Smialowski/AFP Human Rights Watch urged other nations to speak out and reaffirm the independence of the ICC, set up in 2002 to prosecute individuals responsible for the world's gravest crimes when countries are unwilling or unable to do so themselves. The sanctions 'aim to deter the ICC from seeking accountability amid grave crimes committed in Israel and Palestine and as Israeli atrocities mount in Gaza, including with US complicity', said the rights group's international justice director, Liz Evenson. Two of the targeted judges, Beti Hohler of Slovenia and Reine Alapini-Gansou of Benin, took part in proceedings that led to an arrest warrant issued last November for Netanyahu. The court found 'reasonable grounds' of criminal responsibility by Netanyahu and former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant for actions that include the war crime of starvation as a method of war in the massive offensive in Gaza following Hamas' unprecedented 7 October 2023 attack on Israel. AFP Israel, alleging bias, has angrily rejected charges of war crimes as well as a separate allegation of genocide led by South Africa before the International Court of Justice. The two other judges, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru and Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, were part of the court proceedings that led to the authorisation of an investigation into allegations that US forces committed war crimes during the war in Afghanistan. Neither the US nor Israel is party to the Rome Statute that established the International Criminal Court. But almost all Western allies of the US as well as Japan and South Korea, the vast majority of Latin America and much of Africa are parties to the statute and in theory are required to arrest suspects when they land on their soil. Hassan Jedi/Anadolu via Getty Images Trump in his first term already imposed sanctions on the then ICC chief prosecutor over the Afghanistan investigation. After Trump's defeat in 2020, then president Joe Biden took a more conciliatory approach to the court with case-by-case cooperation. Rubio's predecessor Antony Blinken rescinded the sanctions and, while critical of its stance on Israel, worked with the court in its investigation of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. ICC judges in 2023 issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin over the alleged mass abduction of Ukrainian children during the war. Odd Andersen and Maxim Shemetov/various sources/AFP Both Putin and Netanyahu have voiced defiance over the ICC pressure but have also looked to minimise time in countries that are party to the court. The ICC arrest warrants have been especially sensitive in Britain, a close US ally whose Prime Minister Keir Starmer is a former human rights lawyer. Downing Street has said that Britain will fulfil its 'legal obligations' without explicitly saying if Netanyahu would be arrested if he visits. Hungary, led by Trump ally Viktor Orban, has parted ways with the rest of the European Union by moving to exit the international court. Orban thumbed his nose at the court by welcoming Netanyahu to visit in April.

BBC blamed Israel for aid massacre on word of single Palestinian source
BBC blamed Israel for aid massacre on word of single Palestinian source

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

BBC blamed Israel for aid massacre on word of single Palestinian source

A BBC report claiming Israeli troops killed Palestinians at an aid distribution centre was based on the accounts of a single Palestinian journalist and a Hamas spokesman, it has emerged. The White House has attacked the BBC's coverage of the incident, accusing the broadcaster of taking Hamas's word as 'total truth'. The BBC's first report on the June 1 incident said that at least 15 Palestinians had been killed by 'Israeli tank shelling and gunfire', according to 'medics and local residents'. But the 'local residents' amounted to one Palestinian journalist, Mohammed Ghareeb, who told the broadcaster that Israeli tanks had approached and opened fire on the crowd queuing for food. No medics in the article spoke of tank shelling or gunfire, only reporting the number of dead and injured. The BBC also included a quote from Mahmud Bassal, a civil defence spokesman, claiming that victims were killed and wounded 'due to gunfire from Israeli vehicles towards thousands of citizens'. The broadcaster did not mention that civil defence in Gaza is run by Hamas. As highlighted by the White House, the story was altered several times during the day. The first report was published on the BBC News website at 5.15am. The story was updated two hours later to increase the claimed number of fatalities from at least 15 to 26. The death toll was increased to 31 in a third version of the story, published at 2.12pm. That story was updated to include denials from the Israel Defense Forces, and from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which runs the aid distribution centre. Another update, at 4.23pm, included a denial from an IDF soldier in Rafah, who contacted the BBC to say that Israeli soldiers fired near the crowd but not at them, and nobody was hit. Finally, at 8.34pm, the headline and opening paragraph were changed to remove references to Israeli tanks and gunfire, instead admitting that the incident was the subject of 'disputed reports'. The BBC Verify unit – billed by the corporation as experts in fact-checking and rooting out disinformation – also looked into the incident, and concluded the following day that 'it's extremely complicated because we have conflicting reports from multiple sources'. Israel does not allow international journalists to enter Gaza. On Tuesday, the contentious reporting was held up for ridicule by Karoline Leavitt, Donald Trump's press secretary. She brandished a print-out of the changing headlines on the BBC story, saying: 'Unlike some in the media, we don't take the word of Hamas as total truth. We like to look into it when they speak… unlike the BBC.' The BBC has rejected the claims. Danny Cohen, the BBC's former director of television, said he expected the corporation to dismiss the White House criticism. Speaking to the Daily T podcast, he said: 'They will take on an uber-defensive posture in response to this, because it has come from the Trump administration, rather than actually look at what they've said.' Mr Cohen claimed that there was 'anti-Israel bias in the newsroom' and condemned the BBC's rush to put out stories without first checking their validity. 'The BBC should no longer be using this approach, which is 'report first and ask questions later' because it leads to dangerous misinformation from a genocidal terrorist group into the mainstream,' he said. Mr Cohen added of BBC Verify: 'If it wasn't so serious, it would be a really bad joke. First of all, there is an absolute obsession with Israel. And second of all, it often doesn't verify anything. It just does a report and doesn't prove anything.' Verify is the brainchild of Deborah Turness, the chief executive of BBC news and current affairs. A day after the offending report, she announced the launch of BBC Verify Live, in which the team will share its work throughout the day in a rolling news feed on the corporation's website. Ms Turness described it as 'a new way of working, and an exciting step towards even greater transparency'. Asked about the Gaza story, a BBC spokesman said: 'As we made clear already, we stand by our journalism, including the accurate attribution of sources throughout our coverage. We continue to press for international independent journalists to be able to report from inside Gaza.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store