South Korea: Airplane catches fire at Busan airport
Yonhap cited fire authorities as saying that the Air Busan plane was bound for Hong Kong, but caught fire before taking off.
One person suffered a minor injury and was taken to the hospital.
The fire began at 10:30 p.m. local time (1330 UTC) in the plane's tail. The report did not provide the cause of the fire.
A total of 169 passengers and seven crew were evacuated from the aircraft.
Last month, South Korea suffered its deadliest aviation disaster when a Jeju Air plane crash-landed and exploded at an airport in southwestern Muan county after it had departed from Thailand.
179 of 181 of the passengers and crew were killed in the crash.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
12 hours ago
- Observer
Takeaways from investigation into Jeju air crash: NYT
MUAN, South Korea — Seven months after Jeju Air Flight 2216 crashed at Muan International Airport in South Korea, the cause of the accident is still being investigated. The crash — the worst aviation disaster on Korean soil, with 179 dead — came shortly after the pilots reported a bird strike. Investigators are also looking into whether the pilots may have erred by shutting down the less-damaged engine after colliding with the birds. But the high death toll may owe more to circumstances on the ground. After crashing on its belly without its landing gear deployed, the plane skidded along the runway and slammed into a concrete wall before bursting into flames. 'There is a cause for the accident and a separate cause for death,' said Lee Jun-hwa, an architect based in Seoul who lost his mother in the crash. A New York Times investigation found that a series of design and construction choices led to the presence of the concrete hazard close to the runway. Government regulators ignored a safety warning, making a disastrous outcome of any collision more likely. Reporters for the Times obtained blueprints and other design documents and asked five experts to review them. They also combed through documents issued by Korean authorities over the past 26 years. The report found that the problems began even before the airport opened for service. The original master plan, issued in 1999, called for breakable foundations to anchor navigation antennas, known as localizers, to 'minimize fatal damage to an aircraft in the event of a collision.' This aligned with recommendations from the International Civil Aviation Organization, a United Nations agency. But the design was altered a few years later, and the consortium of four construction companies that built the airport, led by Kumho Engineering & Construction, built solid concrete foundations to house the localizers. At the end of Runway 19, where the fatal explosion happened, the contractors mounted the localizer on a foundation wall that rose more than 7 feet above the ground. They then covered it with an earthen mound, hiding it from pilots' view. What prompted the design change is not clear, but experts said that concrete was a common choice on construction sites because it is cost-effective. The problem was compounded when government regulators signed off on the construction despite knowing that the unbreakable foundation walls posed safety risks, documents show. In May 2007, six months before Muan International Airport opened, the Korea Airports Corporation, a state-owned enterprise that supervises airports, warned that the foundation walls were too close to the runway. But the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport dismissed the warning and allowed the airport to open. In a third misstep, the ministry missed a chance years later to fix the problem during mandatory renovation works. Instead of moving the wall or replacing it with frangible materials, the design company hired for the renovations, Anse Technologies, added a reinforced concrete slab on top of the existing foundation. Regulators signed off on the project, and the construction was completed in February 2024, 10 months before the fatal crash. The companies in the consortium that built the airport did not answer detailed questions from reporters. One design company told reporters that it no longer had relevant documentation because the project was too old. Anse Technologies, which was responsible for the renovations, did not respond to questions, either. The company designed localizer structures at three other Korean airports, two of which were later found to have safety problems. Government regulators, who have wide discretion to interpret and enforce international standards, did not answer detailed questions, citing an ongoing police investigation. The safety lapses were not confined to the Muan airport. Officials have since discovered problems at six other Korean airports where solid structures stand close to runways. There were other issues at Muan International Airport, too. Airport managers did not do enough to repel birds near the airport, even though it is surrounded by bird habitats, and they ignored warnings about the dangers, the Times has previously reported. That made bird strikes more likely during takeoff and landing, according to experts. As authorities attempt to unravel the accident's cause, the concrete wall itself has become the focus of multiple investigations. In June, police said they were investigating 24 people, including government officials who were responsible for 'air traffic operations, bird strike prevention and airport facility management.' This article originally appeared in
Observer
20-07-2025
- Observer
South Korea pulls plane crash report after families protest
MUAN, South Korea — South Korean officials on Saturday abruptly canceled the release of an intermediate report into the deadly crash of a Jeju Air passenger jet, after relatives of the victims disrupted a news conference, saying that the report was inadequate. The confrontational scene unfolded after officials had earlier briefed the families privately on the latest stage of the investigation. The officials were planning to publicly release some findings from an analysis of the engines on the Boeing 737-800 that crashed Dec. 29, killing 179 of the 181 people on board. A lawyer for the relatives, who saw the officials' presentation in the private meeting, said the investigators had found no fault with the engines and instead appeared to blame birds — which struck the engines minutes before it made an emergency landing — and the plane's pilots prematurely. 'The families did not get an adequate explanation,' said Pillkyu Hwang, the lawyer, speaking at a lectern in the Muan International Airport where the investigators of the crash had been expected to give their report. 'Depending on how you look at it, it kind of puts all the blame on the dead birds and the dead pilots,' he said, without specifying what details officials gave about the pilots' actions. 'Of course, that may be the outcome of the investigation. But that requires tremendous rigor and very careful wording. And something came out that wasn't careful at all,' Hwang said. The relatives' delegation said in a statement that the framing of the report could imply that conclusions had been reached when the crash was still under investigation. Many relatives said they feared the report could be misconstrued by the news media as being more definite than it truly was. The Transport Ministry distributed copies of its report to journalists as they waited in a meeting room for the news conference to begin. Kim Byung-chae, a ministry spokesperson, said the report would not officially be made public until the start of the briefing. But after the families burst in, shouting objections, the news conference was canceled. Officials took the copies back, declaring that the report had not been issued. Jeju Air Flight 2216 landed on its belly after reporting a bird strike and issuing an emergency call. The plane overran the runway and struck a concrete berm that housed navigation aids, bursting into a deadly fireball. Only two people — flight attendants at the back of the plane — survived. The cause of the disaster, the deadliest plane crash on South Korean soil, is still being investigated, hampered by the absence of a crucial piece of evidence: Flight recorders, known as black boxes, stopped recording for about the final four minutes of the flight. Investigators have previously disclosed that bird feathers were found in both engines of the plane, but have not addressed their role in the disaster. The report expected Saturday was about the engines, which were manufactured by CFM International, a joint venture between GE Aerospace and Safran Aircraft Engines. The start of the news conference was repeatedly postponed as reporters were told investigators were still speaking to the relatives in the nearby terminal building. After about an hour of postponements, chaos erupted in the room where the reporters waited. Some members of the relatives' delegation who had been speaking to the investigators stormed in, shouting. 'This briefing is not happening. Everyone get out!' one bereaved woman yelled. 'They've just blamed it all on the pilots!' a man cried out. Officials from the Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board, dressed in black uniforms, entered the room. One began speaking into the microphone, saying over the shouting relatives that he was going to start the news conference. A group of relatives swiftly pushed him out of the room. Kim, the ministry spokesperson, said that the news conference was canceled and that investigators would consult further with the relatives. The report about the engine analysis could be rescheduled, he added. Kim Yu-jin, president of the relatives' delegation, said the families did not disagree with the report's findings but felt the presentation was unsatisfactory. 'When the investigators take a position, it should be accompanied by many documents that support their position and convince the bereaved family that their conclusions are inevitable,' she told reporters. 'But we were only given their conclusions and told they couldn't disclose the process or evidence that led them to those findings.' In the families' meeting with officials, she said the delegation had requested the original findings of the analysis of the engine, which was conducted by U.S., French and South Korean investigators in France, where Safran, one of the engine manufacturers, is based. 'We have repeatedly asked them to be careful about these disclosures because the way that the results of the investigation are communicated can have an impact on the compensation that families receive,' she told reporters. 'What we heard today did not take into account those things.' This article originally appeared in
Observer
15-07-2025
- Observer
India orders a fuel switch check on Boeing planes
New Delhi - India has ordered its airlines to examine fuel switches on several Boeing models after they came under scrutiny following last month's crash of an Air India jet, which killed 260 people. A preliminary report, issued by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau on Saturday, found that the switches had flipped from run position to cutoff shortly after takeoff. The report did not offer any conclusions or apportion blame for the June 12 disaster, but indicated that one pilot asked the other why he cut off fuel, and the second pilot responded that he had not. India's Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) issued the order Monday to investigate the locking feature on the fuel control switches of several Boeing models, including 787s and 737s. The order came after Boeing notified operators that the fuel switch locks on its jets were safe. But it was in line with a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) issued by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 2018, which recommended inspection of the locks to ensure they could not be moved accidentally. Several Indian and international airlines have already begun their inspections of fuel switches. "It has come to the notice of DGCA that several operators -- internationally as well as domestically -- have initiated inspection on their aircraft fleet as per the SAIB," DGCA said in a statement. Given the SAIB, all airline operators of the affected aircraft must complete the inspection by July 21, it added. The Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner was headed from Ahmedabad in western India to London when it crashed, killing all but one of the 242 people on board as well as 19 people on the ground. In a letter to employees on Monday, Air India CEO Campbell Wilson said the investigation into the crash was ongoing and it would be unwise to jump to "premature conclusions". South Korea was also going to order its airlines to examine fuel switches on Boeing jets, its land and transport ministry said on Tuesday. "The ministry is preparing to order all South Korean airlines that operate Boeing aircraft to examine fuel switches by the FAA 2018 directives," a spokesperson for the ministry told AFP.
