
Ed Flynn is one of Wu's loudest critics on the Boston City Council. Is he needlessly obstructionist, or needed balance?
the
'We all have to understand that not everything has to be a fight, and when we do fight, it should be something worth fighting for,' said Councilor Julia Mejia at the November meeting, pushing back against Flynn's moves to delay the grants. 'I don't think that this is a really good use of our political capital to stop something that I think is going to benefit so many residents.'
Advertisement
Flynn has had other public spats
Just over a year ago, Flynn was the council's leader,
was viewed as a moderate who
Advertisement
Today though, on a more progressive council than the one he oversaw, and one that's increasingly favorable to Mayor Michelle Wu and her policy agenda, he acts more like a lone wolf.
Now in his fourth term, Flynn has emerged as one of Wu's most vocal critics on the council, what many Boston political insiders say is a dramatic change of tack for a councilor who used to be known as a peacemaker and
In a statement to The Boston Globe, Flynn defended his approach to his council work, saying his priority has been to provide 'positive leadership' and 'advocate for working families.'
'Especially during these challenging times, leadership often requires making difficult decisions, taking unpopular votes, and looking to protect the rules and norms of the institution,' Flynn wrote in the statement. 'From what I learned serving in the most diverse organization in the world for over 24 years (the U.S. military), it's also about hard work, professionalism, and treating everyone with respect and dignity.'
The Wu administration did not comment for this article.
Those who support Flynn say he provides a needed balance against Wu's influence on the city's legislative body.
Former councilor Annissa Essaibi George, a moderate who ran against Wu in the 2021 mayoral race, defended him, arguing more councilors should take a similar approach and challenge the administration.
'If it was a more balanced body with more councilors questioning, challenging, or holding the mayor's office accountable to certain decisions, [he] wouldn't be as stark of a standout,' she said.
But others argue Flynn has become deliberately antagonistic, even when debating issues he supports: more willing to engage in public spats on social media than to collaborate with colleagues on substantive policy solutions.
Advertisement
He's clashed with council President Ruthzee Louijeune over her enforcement of the council rules, and repeatedly slammed the administration for not appointing a
His complaints have spanned the seasons. In the spring, he complained to city officials about what he saw as
to the Boston Marathon and promote diversity, inclusivity, and accessibility in long distance running.
Over the summer, he called for a
— a proposal the mayor and several councilors promptly and publicly dismissed, emphasizing the city's
On X, he
Flynn's disputes with councilors reached a boiling point in the fall, when he sent a letter to Louijeune
consideration of a resolution he filed in support of striking dockworkers, saying she wanted more time to research and understand the politics of the strike before taking a public vote. She later voted in support of the resolution.
Advertisement
Flynn's recent approach to his council work has been noticeable to those inside and outside City Hall.
'There's been a difference in his personality,' said Joyce Ferriabough Bolling, a longtime Boston political strategist. 'It's a good thing, don't get me wrong, to have someone sort of as a counter to a particular issue. But [it's] another thing to come across as a contrarian. . . . Instead of saying, 'No, no, no, it's all wrong, all wrong,' [offer] your own position.'
Flynn has argued he is the
Councilor Liz Breadon, who's worked with him for more than five years, sees it differently.
'There's a lot of space for developing policy that's productive and in line with all of our values. . . . [But] being disagreeable is not helpful,' she said.
Louijeune told the Globe she has also seen a 'marked change' in how Flynn approaches his work in City Hall. In her view, he's intentionally sought to undermine her authority as his successor.
'He prefers to put things on letters and communications with me on X than actually speaking to me as a colleague,' Louijeune said. 'Instead of being an elder statesman that councilors can turn to for advice and guidance, he instead wants to play the role of antagonist.'
Flynn's defenders say he is taking a leadership role and asserting his political stance after one of the most contentious City Council terms in recent history — one that
Advertisement
Under Flynn's leadership, meetings often grew
Arroyo and one of his closest allies, Councilor Kendra Lara, ultimately lost their bids for reelection, and several other councilors chose to give up their seats. But some wonder if Flynn is
'He was president of the council during a time when the council was really divided,' said David Hopkins, a political science professor at Boston College. 'You're in the position where you're going to be in the middle of whatever conflict exists, and you're going to absorb a lot of criticism and conflict from the other members of the council. . . . I have to imagine that that would leave an impact on anyone.'
But others disagree with the characterization that Flynn has been deliberately antagonistic or obstructionist.
'In no way do I think he's angry, I think he's just strongly opinionated,' said Reynolds Graves, a Boston political consultant. 'I think that he is really leaning into what he believes, and is really leaning into some of the things that he wants to do, that he feels are the better policies and advocacy and issues for the city of Boston.'
Niki Griswold can be reached at

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
43 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump administration live updates: Legislators in Texas set to vote on Republican redistricting plan
Texas House Minority Leader Gene Wu will introduce an amendment today to the GOP congressional redistricting bill to try to put Republicans in a tough spot on the Jeffrey Epstein files — an issue that has not gone away in the minds of voters. The amendment would block the new map from going into effect until there is a 'complete release' of the files. Because Republicans are in the majority in the Texas House, the amendment likely won't go anywhere. Wu's move today mirrors what we've seen happen in Congress in Washington, with Democrats forcing Epstein-related votes on a variety of issues before the August recess. Wu invoked Trump's ties to the late billionaire financier and sex offender Epstein in his statement on the amendment, saying: 'At the same time he's demanding Abbott ram through racist maps, he's making sure Congressional Republicans block the release of files that could expose his decades-long relationship with a child sex trafficker. This amendment forces Republicans to choose between their loyalty to Trump and their obligation to expose sexual predators.' The Texas House will convene this morning to debate and vote on the GOP- and Trump-backed congressional district map.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Boston will never back down': Mayor Wu responds to US AG Bondi's sanctuary city ultimatum
Mayor Michelle Wu declared that "Boston will never back down" after U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi sent her a letter criticizing the city's "sanctuary" policies around immigration. The mayor took the podium outside Boston City Hall on Aug. 19 to respond to Bondi's recent letter demanding the elimination of any "laws, policies, and practices that impede federal immigration enforcement." Wu and 31 other local leaders from across the United States were given until Tuesday to concede to the Trump administration's demands or face the possibility of criminal charges and loss of funding. "The U.S. Attorney General asked for a response by today, so here it is," Wu said at the Aug. 19 press conference. "Stop attacking our cities to hide your administration's failures." What Boston Mayor Michelle Wu said about Boston's immigration policies In addition to hosting a press conference at City Hall to defend Boston's "sanctuary city" status, Wu sent Bondi a response in the form of a letter. In the letter, Wu calls Boston the safest major city in America, saying the title is a result of community policing and partnership between local law enforcement and community leaders. She cites the Boston Trust Act, enacted in 2014, which prohibits the Boston Police Department from helping federal immigration enforcement without a criminal warrant. This allows local police to collaborate with ICE's Homeland Security Investigations – helping with cases such as human trafficking and child exploitation – while staying away from civil immigration enforcement, the city says. The policy ensures that "immigrants can engage with local law enforcement without fear of deportation, thereby enhancing public safety and community trust," the resolution says. Courts have held that local public safety laws like this one are valid exercises of local authority, Wu explains in the letter. "Our City's longstanding and productive partnership with state and federal law enforcement to protect the people of Boston far predates your tenure," she says in the letter. In the response, Wu explains that Boston police work to address counterterrorism threats and hold perpetrators accountable for crimes, and that they do not need to "actively participate in mass deportations" to do so. "Boston will never back down from being a beacon of freedom, and a home for everyone," Wu says. Her recent sentiments echo those she shared in front of the U.S. Oversight Committee in Washington, D.C., with the mayors of Denver, Chicago, and New York back in March. What US Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote in her letter Bondi initially wrote to Wu on Aug. 13, calling the cooperation of state and local law enforcement with federal authorities "vital to enforce federal law and protect national security." The attorney general notified Wu that Boston was identified by the Trump administration as a jurisdiction that "engages in sanctuary policies and practices." Local leaders who use their official positions to interfere with federal immigrant enforcement efforts "may be subject to criminal charges," Bondi says in her letter. "Additionally, the President directed federal agencies to identify and evaluate their statutory authority to issue grants, contracts, and federal funds, to determine where immigration-related terms and conditions may be added to combat sanctuary policies that violate federal immigration law," she says in the letter. She says Boston could receive additional consequences as permitted by law if Wu does not comply. Bondi has not yet issued a response to Wu's rebuttal, as of Aug. 20. This article originally appeared on The Patriot Ledger: Boston Mayor Michelle Wu responds to US AG Pam Bondi's demand letter Solve the daily Crossword


Axios
12 hours ago
- Axios
Wu vs. Kraft tries to stay local in the Trump era
With less than a month to go before the preliminary election for mayor, incumbent Michelle Wu and challenger Joshua Kraft are starting to make their closing arguments to any Boston voters still listening. Why it matters: This mayor's race — Wu's first reelection campaign and a major test of her administration — has mostly been overshadowed by the rolling barrage of political news coming out of the White House. Between the lines: No one would claim the race has captured the rapt attention of Bostonians in 2025, who are more likely to tune into news about Harvard's struggles with the president or how the state economy will survive with reduced medical and life science research. The big picture: Kraft's campaign has consistently hammered Wu's style of City Hall leadership as out-of-touch and unwilling to hear feedback from residents, business owners and anyone else not already on the mayor's side. Playing defense hasn't been hard for Wu. Trump has made it a good year to be an experienced progressive in Massachusetts, especially when the alternative is an untested centrist and billionaire's son like Kraft. Zoom in: Both Kraft and Wu have campaigned on the biggest issue facing the city: affordability and our absurd cost of living. But much of the daily tit-for-tat between the candidates has been pettifogging over bike lanes, public drug use, campaign finances and not one, but two, soccer stadium projects. Reality check: Polls suggest Wu has a commanding lead, perhaps as much as a 60%-30% advantage over Kraft. The bottom line: The preliminary election results could shift things around. If Kraft outperforms expectations and lands within striking distance of Wu, it would re-energize his campaign and make the final two months of the race pivotal. What's next: Voters go to the polls Sept. 9 to narrow the field of four (two lesser-known contenders are also in the race) down to the top two.