Medical journal rejects RFK Jr.'s call for retraction of vaccine study
Kennedy has long promoted doubts about vaccines' safety and efficacy, and as health secretary has upended the federal government's process for recommending immunization. A recent media report said he has been considering whether to initiate a review of shots that contain aluminum, which he says are linked to autoimmune diseases and allergies.
The study, which was funded by the Danish government and published in July in the Annals of Internal Medicine, analyzed nationwide registry data for more than 1.2 million children over more than two decades. It did not find evidence that exposure to aluminum in vaccines had caused an increased risk for autoimmune, atopic or allergic, or neurodevelopmental disorders.
The work is by far the best available evidence on the question of the safety of aluminum in vaccines, said Adam Finn, a childhood vaccination expert in the UK and pediatrician at the University of Bristol, who was not involved in the study.
"It's solid, (a) massive dataset and high-quality data," he said.
More: Trump's ex-surgeon general slams RFK Jr.'s vaccine cuts: 'People are going to die'
Kennedy described the research as "a deceitful propaganda stunt by the pharmaceutical industry," and said the scientists who authored it had "meticulously designed it not to find harm" in a detailed Aug. 1 opinion piece on TrialSite News, an independent website focused on clinical research. He called on the journal to "immediately retract" the study.
"I see no reason for retraction," Dr. Christine Laine, editor in chief of the Annals and a professor of medicine at Thomas Jefferson University, said in an interview.
The journal plans to respond to criticism the article has received on its website, Laine said, but it does not intend to respond directly to Kennedy's piece, which was not submitted to the Annals.
The lead author of the study, Anders Peter Hviid, head of the epidemiology research department at the Statens Serum Institut in Denmark, defended the work in a response post to TrialSite. He wrote that none of the critiques put forward by Kennedy were substantive and he categorically denied any deceit as implied by the secretary.
More: Trump admin orders federal agencies to scrub all worker COVID vaccination records
"I am used to controversy around vaccine safety studies - especially those that relate to autism, but I have not been targeted by a political figurehead in this way before," Hviid said in an emailed response to Reuters. "I have confidence in our work and in our ability to reply to the critiques of our study."
Kennedy had a number of critiques, including the lack of a control group, that the study deliberately excluded different groups of children to avoid showing a link between aluminum and childhood health conditions - including those with the highest levels of exposure - and that it did not include the raw data.
Hviid responded to the criticisms on TrialSite. He said some of the points were related to study design choices that were reasonable to discuss but refuted others, including that the study was designed not to find a link. In fact he said, its design was based on a study led by Matthew Daley, a pediatrician at Kaiser Permanente Colorado, which did show a link, and which Kennedy cited in his article.
More: There's a war brewing between medical groups and RFK Jr. It's about to explode.
There was no control group because in Denmark, only 2% of children are unvaccinated, which is too small for meaningful comparison, Hviid added. The data is available for researchers to analyze, but individual-level data is not released under Danish law, he said.
Other prominent vaccine skeptics including those at the antivaccine organization Kennedy previously ran, Children's Health Defense, have similarly criticized the study on the Annals site.
TrialSite staff defended the study for its scale, data transparency and funding while acknowledging the limitations of its design, a view seconded by some outside scientists.
Laine said that while some of the issues Kennedy raised in his article may underscore acceptable limitations of the study, "they do not invalidate what they found, and there's no evidence of scientific misconduct."
An HHS spokesman said the department had "no further comment than what the secretary said."
(Reporting by Michael Erman in New York and Jennifer Rigby in London; Editing by Michele Gershberg, Caroline Humer and Mark Porter)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Long Covid's lingering financial side effects
LONG COVID'S TOLL — More than five years after the Covid-19 pandemic first ravaged the nation, many Americans are still dealing with the social and economic fallout of having contracted the disease. People with long Covid — those who have new or persistent symptoms lasting three months past infection — have experienced worse financial and employment outcomes, lasting up to three years after their initial infection, compared with people who haven't had the disease, according to a study published Tuesday in JAMA Network Open from researchers at Rush University Medical Center, Yale School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and other research institutions. Long Covid patients reported worse work impairment, missed work and financial distress compared with those who never had Long Covid, the study found. Vaccination against Covid was associated with improved work and economic outcomes. Not just physical: 'While much of the focus in Long COVID research has been on the medical impact, we must also consider the sustained financial burden faced by those whose symptoms persist,' lead author Michael Gottlieb, an emergency medicine doctor and vice chair of research at Rush, said in a statement. Addressing the financial burden of long Covid might 'require policy interventions, such as expanded disability benefits or workplace accommodations to help combat the work and financial impact of this condition,' the authors wrote. The researchers analyzed self-reported data from more than 3,600 participants in the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infections Registry, a CDC-funded initiative aimed at better understanding Covid's long-term effects. Why it matters: About 6 percent of U.S. adults suffer from some form of long Covid, according to CDC estimates. The National Institutes of Health believes that as many as 23 million people have the illness, which can range in severity from mild to debilitating. The symptoms, which can include fatigue, headaches and brain fog, can be life-disrupting for many patients. Some treatments, like Paxlovid, have shown promise in reducing symptoms, but being diagnosed and finding suitable treatment can be difficult because of the disease's wide range of symptoms that often overlap with other conditions. HHS recently shut down its long Covid office, a casualty of the Trump administration's sweeping reorganization of the agency. At the time the closure was announced, an HHS employee who worked on long Covid and who was granted anonymity to share details of the move told POLITICO that abandoning work that could have cured the disease means the country's health care system will have to provide years, if not decades, of costly care for tens of millions of chronically ill people. In March, the Trump administration also canceled dozens of grants for long Covid projects, but some funding was restored after advocates fought back. WELCOME TO WEDNESDAY PULSE. I'm still reeling from Taylor Swift announcing her new album. Send your Swiftie theories, scoops and feedback to khooper@ and sgardner@ and follow along @kelhoops and @sophie_gardnerj. At the Agencies LOOMER'S LATEST PREY — After successfully ousting several members of Trump's administration for alleged insufficient loyalty, far-right activist and MAGA influencer Laura Loomer tells our colleagues at Playbook that she has her next target: Stefanie Spear, the principal deputy chief of staff and senior counselor to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The reason why, in part: 'I think that there's a clear intention by Stefanie Spear to utilize her position to try to lay the groundwork for a 2028 RFK presidential run,' Loomer alleges. Asked for comment by Playbook, a senior HHS official did not deny that Kennedy is weighing a presidential bid. Read the full story in this morning's Playbook. CDC LATEST — CDC officials held a tense all-hands meeting Tuesday in the aftermath of last week's shooting at the agency's Atlanta headquarters, Sophie reports with POLITICO's Amanda Friedman and Lauren Gardner. The meeting came as law enforcement officials revealed early Tuesday additional information about the nature of the shooting: The man who opened fire at the agency on Friday died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound and was motivated by his distrust of Covid-19 vaccines. Agency update: At the CDC's all-hands meeting, Director Susan Monarez thanked employees for their work and acknowledged that 'misinformation can be dangerous,' according to a live transcript obtained by POLITICO. 'In moments like this, we must meet the challenges with rational, evidence-based discourse spoken with compassion and understanding,' she said. 'That is how we will lead.' CDC employees were closely watching Monarez at the meeting to see how she would respond to the shooting and the news that the suspected shooter had expressed distrust of the Covid vaccine. Two CDC employees, granted anonymity to speak candidly, told POLITICO that Monarez's speech was not what they'd hoped. '[Twenty minutes] of reading off a teleprompter,' one of the employees said in a text, adding that Monarez's remarks prompted an 'overwhelmingly negative response from folks in my immediate orbit.' Another agency employee said the meeting was in stark contrast to a separate meeting held for the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases staff on Saturday, where employees could ask Monarez questions. What's next: HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said that staff would have 'continued opportunities' to voice their perspectives to CDC leadership in the days ahead. 'Friday's shooting was a traumatic event for the agency, and leadership is working to provide continued updates along with resources for healing and recovery,' Nixon said in a statement. DOGE SAVINGS — The Trump administration has drastically exaggerated how much money it has saved through DOGE-related cuts to federal contracts, including at health agencies, according to an analysis of public data and federal spending records from POLITICO's Jessie Blaeser. Through July, DOGE said it had saved taxpayers $52.8 billion by canceling contracts, but of the $32.7 billion in actual claimed contract savings that POLITICO could verify, DOGE's savings over that period were closer to $1.4 billion. Despite the administration's claims, none of that $1.4 billion will lower the federal deficit unless Congress steps in. Instead, the money has been returned to agencies mandated by law to spend it. The health claims: Under the VA, DOGE's wall of receipts reported savings of $932 million from contracts canceled through June, including awards for a cancer registry, suicide-prevention services and other health care support. Federal records show the VA recovered just $132 million from the awards, or less than 15 percent of what DOGE claimed, and that the VA reinstated the contract for suicide-prevention support. One of DOGE's largest savings claims is from a canceled contract for a shelter in Pecos, Texas, to house unaccompanied migrant children. In a post on social media platform X in February, DOGE said HHS 'paid ~$18M/month' to keep the now-empty center open. Canceling the agreement, it said, would translate to more than $215 million in annual savings for taxpayers. By the time the contract was added to the DOGE termination list, that savings claim skyrocketed to $2.9 billion. But HHS and its Office of Refugee Resettlement were not on track to spend anywhere close to the contract's $3.3 billion ceiling. WHAT WE'RE READING POLITICO's Tyler Katzenberger reports on a federal judge blocking the Trump administration from using Medicaid beneficiaries' personal data for immigration enforcement purposes. Bloomberg Law's Celine Castronuovo reports on Texas' attorney general accusing Eli Lilly of unlawfully pushing providers to prescribe its blockbuster obesity drugs and other treatments to receive Medicaid payments.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Schools brace for MAHA changes to lunches
The Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement is taking aim at school lunches in a move advocates say is unrealistic without devoting more federal resources to K-12 students. While some schools can only afford to buy frozen meals that are heated up and served, the Trump administration is looking for freshly cooked meals that will take more employees and ingredients to put together. The MAHA Commission was required to send over recommendations to the White House by Tuesday to combat childhood chronic diseases, a document experts and advocates are eagerly awaiting. But three people familiar with the matter told CNN the report will not be released immediately to the public, keeping schools on their toes as it is expected to impact their food. 'We're guessing at this point what we think that the report is going to say around school nutrition, but we have a few hints. RFK Jr. has said that school lunch programs have deteriorated. He's mentioned how many ultraprocessed foods are in school meals. He's suggested that school meals are poisoning children. … I think we're all pretty much anticipating something around that,' said Meghan Maroney, campaign manager for federal child nutrition programs at the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has railed against school lunches before, saying the ultraprocessed food and food dyes are hurting student health. He has moved to ban artificial food dyes from the nation's supply chain and has pushed fast food chains to cook their food in beef tallow over seed oils. 'We need to stop poisoning our kids and make sure that Americans are once again the healthiest kids on the planet,' Kennedy said in April. He has celebrated states such as Utah, West Virginia and Arizona, where certain dyes and processed food were banned from school lunches. But other moves by the Trump administration, advocates argue, have been counterintuitive to helping schools produce fresh meals. The U.S. Agriculture Department (USDA) in the spring ended two programs, totaling $1 billion, that helped schools buy food from local farmers and producers. USDA is in charge of the nutrition standards for the National School Lunch Program. 'They are being asked to create healthy and appealing meals on very slim budgets, and there have been things that have been happening recently that have taken away even more of their resources,' said Alexis Bylander, director of child nutrition programs and policy at the Food Research & Action Center. 'I think what this really comes down to is, are the recommendations going to provide enough resources so that schools really can enhance the quality and appeal of the meals that they are serving?' she added. In Oklahoma, Ryan Walters, the state superintendent of public instruction, has already been working on implementing the MAHA agenda in school food, saying schools can no longer serve food that is ultraprocessed or grown with pesticides and processed snacks in vending machines. The districts are expected to overhaul the foods without additional room in the budget. 'What we're seeing with the MAHA movement as it's applied in our state is lots of talk about restriction and what people can have and what choices they can make, but not a lot of talk about making sure people have access to the healthy things they need or the resources they need to not be food insecure … because, ultimately, if you don't have access to enough food, nutritious or not, your health outcomes are worse than if you do,' said Chris Bernard, CEO and president of Hunger Free Oklahoma. Along with changes to food costs, schools would have to pay for more employees to make the food and, in some cases, would need to acquire equipment to be able to handle making fresh food for hundreds of students every day. The Hill has reached out to HHS for comment. Some are hoping for a definitive set of markers to build upon for what types of food should be served and what the cost will be. 'When we establish that baseline, then we can move from it, then we actually have something that we can achieve goals and we can achieve targets with,' said Gregory Bundschoks, founder for the Foundation of Healthy Schools. He added that there needs to be 'consistency' for businesses trying to make a profit while also remaining within the new mandates. Advocates note school food is the healthiest many students eat and, for some, it might be the only full meal they get in a day. While schools have partnered with some nonprofits to help bring fresher meals to their students, not every district is able to afford it. According to USDA, in 2023, 1 in 5 children were unsure where their next meal would come from. Black, Latino and single-family households were more likely to be food insecure. 'I do think school meals are one of the last remaining universal public school services that are reaching every child, nearly in America … so making school the ideal environment to shape their wellness behavior, and a lot of that starts with food,' said Alexina Cather, director of policy and special projects for Wellness in the Schools. 'As we see increasing rates of food insecurity, food again at school becomes one of the places that kids can be guaranteed a nutritious meal if we put that energy and effort into making sure that's a nutritious meal,' she added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump weighs marijuana reclassification as Oklahoma eyes recreational legalization
President Donald Trump said his administration is weighing whether to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug. This move could mark the most significant federal shift in cannabis policy in half a century. "We're looking at reclassification and we'll make a determination over the next few weeks," Trump said at an Aug. 11 news conference. The federal government lists marijuana alongside heroin and LSD as a Schedule I drug — the category reserved for substances deemed highly dangerous, addictive and without medical value. Reclassifying it to Schedule III, as recommended by federal health officials in 2023, would put marijuana in the same legal tier as Tylenol with codeine and anabolic steroids, allowing it to be prescribed by licensed medical providers and dispensed by pharmacies. It would not, however, legalize recreational use under federal law. What a federal shift could mean for Oklahoma Oklahoma legalized medical marijuana in 2018 and more than 2,000 dispensaries now operate statewide. But under current law, adults can only purchase cannabis with a medical patient license. That could change if voters approve State Question 837, which would legalize recreational sales for adults 21 and older. The measure cleared a major procedural hurdle in July and organizers have already started gathering signatures. Organizers have until Nov. 4 to collect at least 172,993 valid signatures to get on the ballot in 2026. If Trump reclassifies marijuana to Schedule III, Oklahoma's medical marijuana market — already among the largest per capita in the nation — could see smoother banking operations, lower compliance risks for dispensaries and broader medical research opportunities. But the move would do nothing to authorize recreational sales in the state; that decision would still rest entirely with Oklahoma voters. The push for SQ 837 Oklahomans for Responsible Cannabis Action (ORCA), the group behind SQ 837, is betting that public sentiment has shifted since voters rejected a similar measure, State Question 820, in 2023 by a 61% margin. This time, ORCA is pursuing a constitutional amendment, making it harder for lawmakers to alter or repeal the law without another statewide vote. The proposal would tax recreational sales at 10% while preserving the medical system and exempting licensed patients from the new tax. The campaign faces new hurdles, including a 2025 state law limiting how many petition signatures can come from a single county. That means ORCA can't rely solely on the city center like Tulsa or Oklahoma City for signatures and will have to fan out into rural areas — such as Harmon County, where just 117 residents will be allowed to sign. "Maybe we'll go and hang out at the co-op for a day or go to the county courthouse," ORCA Director Jed Green said. "Voters of Harmon County — get ready, we'll come out and visit." Open primary supporters have challenged Senate Bill 1027 in the Oklahoma Supreme Court, which has not yet issued a ruling. The bigger picture Trump's comments come after years of fits and starts on federal marijuana policy. President Joe Biden initiated the reclassification review in 2022, and federal health officials recommended the downgrade in 2023. The Drug Enforcement Administration proposed a rule change in 2024, but the process stalled after Trump returned to the White House in January. Terrance Cole, Trump's newly confirmed DEA administrator, has said reviewing marijuana's classification will be one of his first priorities, though he has not signaled whether he supports the change. Trump said the decision is complicated, weighing the benefits of marijuana use for medical reasons against potential societal impacts. "Some people like it, some people hate it," he said. "Some people hate the whole concept of marijuana." If the administration follows through, Oklahoma's cannabis industry could get a boost in legitimacy and access to services — but recreational marijuana will still live or die by the state's ballot box. This article originally appeared on Bartlesville Examiner-Enterprise: Trump considers marijuana shift; Oklahoma advances recreational use Solve the daily Crossword
