
Trump's assault on public media funding is dangerous to safety and democracy
Here's what's happening: the Senate is about to vote on a rescissions package, meaning it will vote to formalize some of the cuts made by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. If it passes, funding for public broadcasting dries up — full stop.
Although NPR and PBS might survive in major cities, small-town stations — the ones that rely on federal grants — could vanish. These are communities where public radio isn't a luxury — it's the only source for local news, educational content, even emergency alerts.
Seventy percent of CPB's budget directly funds more than 1,500 local stations. Take that away, and many simply can't keep their lights on.
This push isn't random. It's part of a decades-long conservative effort to gut public media, now supercharged by President Trump. Public broadcasting leaders call this the most serious threat they've ever faced.
And they're not exaggerating. This isn't just about losing 'Sesame Street' or 'PBS NewsHour.' It's about silencing local voices across America.
We're standing at a crossroads. If this passes, hundreds of stations could go dark by fall. And once you shut down the news, you silence the truth.
But let's be honest: this fight over public broadcasting is just the tip of the iceberg. We're witnessing a broader assault on journalism itself. This isn't about budgets—it's about control.
Public broadcasters are some of the last trusted, unbiased sources of news in many places. Defunding them doesn't just cut television shows — it dismantles community lifelines. Seriously, these stations provide emergency updates during storms, wildfire warnings, even Amber Alerts.
Critics claim public media leans liberal. I disagree. What they really mean is: any criticism of Trump is unacceptable. Journalists should be free to speak truth to power — even when the powerful don't like it.
Meanwhile, media power is consolidating. Corporate deals tied to politics are reshaping major outlets. We're seeing billionaires push papers like The Washington Post toward MAGA aligned narratives, while longtime journalists quit. Small-town newspapers face legal threats just for reporting poll results. And don't forget the Associated Press got banned from The White House for refusing to call The Gulf of Mexico 'The Gulf of America.'
If public media falls, what's next? National outlets are under pressure. Local journalism is dying. Killing NPR and PBS isn't a budget cut — it's a step toward dismantling the free press itself.
And without a free press, democracy doesn't stand a chance.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Coca-Cola agrees to use cane sugar in US sodas, Trump says
Coca-Cola has agreed to use real cane sugar for its soda beverages sold in the U.S., President Donald Trump announced Wednesday afternoon, July 16. "I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!" Coca-Cola uses high fructose corn syrup to sweeten its U.S. products while cane sugar is used in other countries, Reuters reported. The switch comes as the president continues to support Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s efforts to move away from certain food ingredients, like artificial dyes. Through the Make America Healthy Again initiative, the Trump Administration aims to stop food industry from contributing to chronic health problems that Americans face from obesity to heart disease. In-N-Out: No, the chain didn't switch to '100% beef tallow,' contrary to White House claim USA TODAY has reached out to Coca-Cola for confirmation on the president's announcement. Contributing: Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Coca-Cola to use cane sugar for sodas in the US, Trump says
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
People Genuinely Cannot Believe The Trump Administration Ordered The Burning Of Enough Food To Feed 1.5 Million Kids For A Week
Remember when billionaire Elon Musk boasted about DOGE's cuts to the federal government in what he said was an attempt to rid the government of wasteful spending? Related: Well, one of those cuts dismantled foreign-aid programs, the Atlantic reports, and now, the Trump administration has ordered the burning of about 500 metric tons of soon-to-expire food meant to feed families and children in Afghanistan and Pakistan. To scale, that is enough food to feed about 1.5 million children for an entire week. However, instead of being distributed in the US or abroad, it's set to be burned. (And guess who's footing the bill?) This level of waste drew major backlash from US citizens. One person reacted, "Raise your hand if you're an American and would prefer this food be sent to the children currently being starved in Palestine." Related: Many couldn't fathom the idea of burning food when there are children who need it. "They're so 'pro life' until it comes to taking care of actual living breathing children," someone wrote. "Kids are starving & dying in Gaza & he's incinerating food," another agreed. This was a common response throughout the internet: Related: "Maga and trump are evil," people said. "The cruelty of this administration is unbelieveable," said another. Taxpayers also expressed displeasure with their money being symbolically burned with the food. "He's incinerating food that's already been paid for with our $$." Related: "so our tax dollars..... he's just lighting on fire? I HATE IT HERE." Netizens could not seem to find justification. "it's already been purchased," someone said. "he's not just burning food, he's burning money and staving people." And finally, alarms were raised about homelessness in the US as well. "If our taxes paid for it.... Why not give it to our homeless? What the hell?!?!? Such a waste!!!" What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:


The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Supporting Elon Musk's Third Party: Fmr. House Speaker McCarthy
Former Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) opened his remarks Wednesday at the Hill Nation Summit by saying that postcongressional life was 'fabulous. We don't have Matt Gaetz anymore.' The remark from McCarthy, who has had a long-running feud with former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), drew laughter from the audience. 'The party is so much stronger now,' McCarthy added, comparing President Trump to former President Reagan for having 'transformed where America is in this world.' Gaetz is now retired from Congress after he was initially nominated to serve as attorney general for the Trump administration. The nomination was pulled after it became clear that Gaetz did not have the support to win confirmation. McCarthy separately commented on the breakup between Trump and tech mogul Elon Musk, calling it unfortunate. 'Elon is extremely bright. You tell me how many of the people in the world can privately build a rocket without buying a Russian rocket and go to Earth to come back and capture it, right?' McCarty told The Hill's Emily Brooks. He also suggested it would be better for U.S. competitiveness if the two joined together again, while dismissing the idea of a third party.