'Everybody wants to self-optimize'
Keisha Sarpong needed a new work bag to ferry her documents and laptop to the office. But as she started looking, she realized she didn't want the bag to make her look too much "like a lawyer with a briefcase" when she went to happy hour, Sarpong, a 30-year-old nonprofit worker who also runs a TikTok fashion account, tells me. Oh, and it'd be nice if it had enough space for her to take it on a trip. Basically, she wanted a bag that could do it all.
The bag Sarpong eventually settled on features a stylish black leather finish, a laptop sleeve, and plenty of space for a water bottle and notebooks, plus an adjustable strap that can secure it on a rolling suitcase. It may not be perfect for everywhere, but it's pretty close.
Sarpong's search isn't an isolated instance of a picky shopper. She's part of a growing cohort of consumers demanding more from the products they spend their hard-earned money on. It's not just bags that you can work and play and travel with. It's air fryers that can cook almost anything. Makeup products that double as skincare items. Or even an unassuming ceiling lamp that, you see upon second glance, is also a smart projector and speaker. Faced with rising prices and increasingly busy lives, Americans are arming themselves with products that work like a Swiss Army knife.
"If I'm going to invest in a quality staple, I want to make sure I'm going to get a lot of use out of it. I'm really drawn to pieces that are multifunctional," Sarpong says. It's not just her bag that she's making work overtime — she also tells me she owns travel cubes that do triple duty as a purse organizer and cosmetics pouch. That's where she stores her all-in-one makeup products, which can be variously used on lips, cheeks, and eyelids.
Whether it's higher prices, hybrid work, or an ever-rising obsession with efficiency and optimization, there are a slew of reasons Americans are looking for stuff that can fill more than one role. And as tariffs threaten to raise prices even further, people are trying to find value wherever they can get it. For businesses, expanding their product offering to fill different parts of customers' lives can insulate them from fickle tastes and cushion their bottom lines in leaner times. As multifunctional goods become ever more popular, it's clear that we're living in a three-in-one economy.
American consumers are wrestling with a lot of uncertainty these days. Years of COVID-driven inflation have left people unsure of just how much things are supposed to cost. Economic upheaval has people worried about their jobs. And businesses are skimping on the quantity and sizes of their products (whether it's smaller portions at restaurants or fewer sheets of toilet paper per roll) — leaving Americans wondering whether they're really getting a bang for their buck. All these factors are pushing people to look for deals wherever they can: In a recent survey of consumers by the accounting and consulting firm EY, 77% of respondents said they were actively changing their buying habits to seek better value.
How do you make your dollar go further in this environment after you've already followed the classic budgeting advice? Hybrid products could be a tool in consumers' inflation-fighting toolbox. Inflation-weary consumers are increasingly turning to these products, especially for appliances and tech gadgets, says Steffen Schenk, the managing director of NielsenIQ's North America tech and durables sector. For example, he points to combination microwave-roaster-grill air fryers that save time and space in small kitchens and self-cleaning robotic vacuums with built-in mops. NielsenIQ has seen growing consumer demand for smart kitchen appliances and tech wearables.
"The reality is that convenience is now one of the key drivers of choice across most categories," Schenk says. "And once again, having those multifunctional devices really helps with that."
Kristen Jauregui, a 35-year-old payroll specialist who runs a lifestyle blog, has been putting a bigger emphasis on budgeting than she has in the past amid the chaos of tariffs and elevated inflation. Jauregui tells me that she's consuming much more mindfully, whether it's buying less, doing more price comparison before hitting " check out," or looking for products that serve more than one occasion.
"If I can find something that is multifaceted or can be used in more than one aspect, I will absolutely buy that over a product I can only use once," Jauregui says.
Jauregui has been optimizing her closet for both work and play. Ever since the pandemic, she's swapped out high heels for more comfortable loafers and sneakers that can be worn straight from the office to a night out. Another hybrid product Jauregui has recently started using is solid shampoo, a bar that can be used as shampoo, conditioner, face wash, and body soap. These bars — which Jauregui purchases from the beauty brand Kitsch — have saved her money and time, as Jauregui no longer needs to buy travel-size containers of different toiletries when she goes on trips. According to consulting firm Capgemini, big companies like L'Oreal are hopping on the trend and launching their own solid shampoo products.
In addition to everyday essentials, consumers are turning to products with various uses to justify their desire to splurge. Hardcore austerity has never been America's strength — when sales spiked after the 2001 stock market crash, former Estée Lauder CEO Leonard Lauder called the need to partake in small luxuries during major downturns the " lipstick effect."
After all, if the lipstick you purchased doubles as a moisturizer and blush, you're getting much more bang for your buck.
Nowadays, consumers stressed from constant budgeting might forgo expensive vacations but still decide to treat themselves to a little retail therapy, Schenk says. If consumer sentiment continues to decline and tariff-induced uncertainty drags down the US economy, Schenk expects the lipstick effect to kick in during the back half of this year.
"If you look at some of the trends we're seeing around self-indulgence, wellness, and so on, we would expect a similar lipstick effect in this cycle," Schenk tells me.
Young people tend to be the early adopters, but if something is hybrid, it makes everyone's lives easier.
Sarpong has already been indulging in some lipstick effect shopping — literally. She's a big fan of the beauty brand Rhode's pocket blushes, which come in a small, unassuming cylinder, not unlike a glue stick. The pigment can be used as a blush, lip color, or moisturizer.
"It's in the name. It's a nice handheld size, so I can bring it with me everywhere," Sarpong tells me. "I can touch it up on my cheek but also my lips. It's a nice two-for-one."
Multifunctional products can help consumers use some "girl math," as TikTok would say, to justify those nonessential splurges during economic hardship. After all, if the lipstick you purchased doubles as a moisturizer and blush, you're getting much more bang for your buck.
In addition to acute economic drivers, longer-term trends have also increased consumer appetite for products that do it all. One is the pandemic-driven downfall of the five-day in-office expectation. As the divide between where work ends and where the rest of our lives begin has become less clear, consumers seek products that can cross over from one side of the divide to the other. This cross-functionality appears to appeal especially to Gen Z and millennials. Saoirse Cleary, the creative strategy director at the marketing agency MG Empower, tells me that the younger generations' emphasis on work-life balance makes them more open to trying new products that offer unique wellness or lifestyle features, such as athleisure wear and multifunctional makeup products. These demographics are also much more likely to find these multifunctional products through social media channels rather than traditional brick-and-mortar stores.
Convenience seeking isn't just a Gen Z or millennial thing, though. "Young people tend to be the early adopters," Cleary added. "But if something is hybrid, it makes everyone's lives easier."
Yet another driving factor for the three-in-one economy is Americans' desire to optimize every part of their life. Devices and goods that fulfill multiple needs can feed people's drive to be the best, healthiest, or most efficient. Schenk, from NielsenIQ, tells me smartwatches that track health metrics while keeping time have been especially popular. From 2019 to 2023, the number of new products in the wearables category jumped from 5,000 to 80,000 — an increase not seen in any other product category, NielsenIQ GfK Market Intelligence says.
Oura rings, which provide users with various biometric data.
Everybody wants to self-optimize, so everything you buy has to be the best version of what you could get.
"People started out with just wanting to track their steps with a wearable device or on their phone, and now it's about period tracking, sleep tracking, and heart rate tracking," Cleary says.
"You have to highlight the hybrid benefits of a product nowadays," Cleary adds. "Everybody wants to self-optimize, so everything you buy has to be the best version of what you could get."
Amid this consumer phenomenon, companies are increasingly leaning into the desire for multifunctional goods to add to their bottom lines, especially when those products can satisfy people's craving for a "little treat." Cleary tells me that appealing to people in various walks of life can expand the awareness of a brand outside its core constituency, which helps to lure in new customers who may not have run into the company's offerings otherwise.
"A bag that functions for work, the gym, and social outings can be embraced by minimalists, professionals, and fitness enthusiasts alike, creating crossover appeal that strengthens a brand's reach," she says.
Cleary adds that in her work helping global brands develop their influencer marketing strategies, she's seen companies launch multifunctional product campaigns.
Multiuse products can also deepen relationships with existing customers, especially during an economic downturn. When companies launch value-rich products that make people's lives easier, they build trust within their customer base. On the other hand, price increases and a decrease in perceived product value isolate cash-sensitive shoppers. With consumers like Sarpong and Jauregui putting more thought into their purchases, a multifunctional aspect helps brands make buyers feel like they're getting the best option.
Twice in the past few years, the fragility of our global economic system has been pushed to the forefront. When the pandemic hit, businesses shut down, and a toilet paper shortage had people rushing to store shelves. Now, as businesses grapple with tariff-driven uncertaint y and DOGE drives federal worker layoffs, consumers are feeling déjà vu. For everyday people, there isn't much you can do to shield yourself from breakdowns in complex supply chains or policy decisions made in DC, but changing your consumption patterns is one actionable way to exert your economic agency.
"The way that we've used technology has changed. The way that we shop has changed. The way we interact with people has changed. So I try to make sure that anything I purchase is multifaceted," Jauregui tells me.
"I've changed how I purchase makeup and skincare products because I want to make sure they're versatile," Jauregui adds. "If something happens tomorrow, and the world shuts down, will I be able to find a way to get this?"

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Points of Light, founded by the Bush family, aims to double American volunteerism by 2035
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — The Bush family's nonprofit Points of Light will lead an effort to double the number of people who volunteer with U.S. charitable organizations from 75 million annually to 150 million in 10 years. The ambitious goal, announced in New Orleans at the foundation's annual conference, which concluded Friday, would represent a major change in the way Americans spend their time and interact with nonprofits. It aspires to mobilize people to volunteer with nonprofits in the U.S. at a scale that only federal programs like AmeriCorps have in the past. It also coincides with deep federal funding cuts that threaten the financial stability of many nonprofits and with an effort to gut AmeriCorps programs, which sent 200,000 volunteers all over the country. A judge on Wednesday paused those cuts in some states, which had sued the Trump administration. Jennifer Sirangelo, president and CEO of Points of Light, said that while the campaign has been in development well before the federal cuts, the nonprofit's board members recently met and decided to move forward. 'What our board said was, 'We have to do it now. We have to put the stake in the ground now. It's more important than it was before the disruption of AmeriCorps,'' she said in an interview with The Associated Press. She said the nonprofit aims to raise and spend $100 million over the next three years to support the goal. Points of Light, which is based in Atlanta, was founded by President George H.W. Bush to champion his vision of volunteerism. It has carried on his tradition of giving out a daily award to a volunteer around the country, built a global network of volunteer organizations and cultivated corporate volunteer programs. Speaking Wednesday in New Orleans, Points of Light's board chair Neil Bush told the organization's annual conference that the capacity volunteers add to nonprofits will have a huge impact on communities. 'Our mission is to make volunteering and service easier, more impactful, more sustained,' Bush said. 'Because, let's be honest, the problems in our communities aren't going to fix themselves.' According to data from the U.S. Census Bureau and AmeriCorps, the rate of participation has plateaued since 2002, with a noticeable dip during the pandemic. Susan M. Chambré, professor emerita at Baruch College who studied volunteering for decades, said Points of Light's goal of doubling the number of volunteers was admirable but unrealistic, given that volunteer rates have not varied significantly over time. But she said more research is needed into what motivates volunteers, which would give insight into how to recruit people. She also said volunteering has become more transactional over time, directed by staff as opposed to organized by volunteers themselves. In making its case for increasing volunteer participation in a recent report, Points of Light drew on research from nonprofits like Independent Sector, the National Alliance for Volunteer Engagement and the Do Good Institute at the University of Maryland. Sirangelo said they want to better measure the impact volunteers make, not just the hours they put in, for example. They also see a major role for technology to better connect potential volunteers to opportunities, though they acknowledge that many have tried to do that through apps and online platforms. Reaching young people will also be a major part of accomplishing this increase in volunteer participation. Sirangelo said she's observed that many young people who do want to participate are founding their own nonprofits rather than joining an existing one. 'We're not welcoming them to our institutions, so they have to go found something,' she said. 'That dynamic has to change.' As the board was considering this new goal, they reached out for advice to Alex Edgar, who is now the youth engagement manager at Made By Us. They ultimately invited him to join the board as a full voting member and agreed to bring on a second young person as well. 'I think for volunteering and the incredible work that Points of Light is leading to really have a deeper connection with my generation, it needs to be done in a way that isn't just talking to or at young people, but really co-created across generations,' said Edgar, who is 21. Karmit Bulman, who has researched and supported volunteer engagement for many years, said she was very pleased to see Points of Light make this commitment. 'They are probably the most well known volunteerism organization in the country and I really appreciate their leadership,' said Bulman, who is currently the executive director of East Side Learning Center, a nonprofit in St. Paul. Bulman said there are many people willing to help out in their communities but who are not willing to jump through hoops to volunteer with a nonprofit. 'We also need to recognize that it's a pretty darn stressful time in people's lives right now,' she said. 'There's a lot of uncertainty personally and professionally and financially for a lot of people. So we need to be really, really flexible in how we engage volunteers.' ___ Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP's philanthropy coverage, visit
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lululemon Stretched by Tariffs, Macro
Lululemon beat Wall Street's top- and bottom-line expectations, but it cut guidance over macroeconomic concerns. The company's international business posted solid growth, but the Americas region was weak. Lululemon is taking steps to mitigate the impact of tariffs, but until U.S. consumer confidence grows, there is little the company can do to bounce back. 10 stocks we like better than Lululemon Athletica Inc. › Here's our initial take on Lululemon Athletica's (NASDAQ: LULU) financial report. Metric Q1 2024 Q1 2025 Change vs. Expectations Revenue $2.2 billion $2.4 billion 7.3% Beat Earnings per share $2.54 $2.60 2% Beat Comparable sales 6% 1% -500 bps n/a Gross margin 57.7% 58.3% 60 bps n/a Athletic apparel specialist Lululemon beat Wall Street top- and bottom-line expectations for the quarter, delivering 7.3% revenue growth and a slight uptick in earnings per share. But CEO Calvin McDonald warned of a "dynamic macroenvironment" that the company expects to weigh on results in the quarters to come. First, the good news. Revenue growth came in toward the top of Lululemon's guidance, fueled by strong 6% international comparable sales. Overall international net revenue increased by 19%, or 20% when adjusted for currency fluctuations. But Americas comp sales were down 2% and overall revenue was up by just 3%, pressured by an uncertain American consumer. Lululemon does not expect those pressures to ease in the months to come. The company cut its full-year guidance, saying it now expects to earn between $14.58 and $14.78 per share. That's down from its previous $14.95 to $15.15 per share guidance, and below Wall Street's $14.89 consensus estimate. The somber tone and cut guidance appeared to have caught investors off guard. Lululemon shares, already down 11% for the year heading into earnings, were down 20% in after-hours trading ahead of the New York open Friday. McDonald pledged to "leverage our strong financial position and competitive advantages to play offense, while we continue to invest in the growth opportunities in front of us." Lululemon has the wherewithal to weather this storm, but there is only so much the company can do in this environment. Chief financial officer Meghan Frank, on the post-earnings call, said the company is looking to take "strategic price increases" to mitigate the impact of tariffs, as well as evaluating sourcing options. But any efficiency gains made will take time to play out. The good news for investors is Lululemon market share held up well in a rough environment, which implies there is nothing wrong with the brand. But until there is more certainty on the macro front, Lululemon stock could be stuck in neutral. Full earnings report Investor relations page Additional coverage Before you buy stock in Lululemon Athletica Inc., consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lululemon Athletica Inc. wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Lou Whiteman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Lululemon Athletica Inc. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Lululemon Stretched by Tariffs, Macro was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
If Elon Musk's Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across America, How Much Money Would Every Person Get?
We've seen the headlines that reveal how rich the world's top billionaires are — but it's hard to comprehend just how rich they are. Consider this: Let's say you had $1 billion in your bank account and had to spend $100,000 every day, for an entire year. After 365 days, you would still have $963,500,000 (nine hundred sixty-three million five hundred thousand). Discover More: Find Out: Over the last two decades, billionaires have ballooned their wealth to unparalleled levels. In 2005, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates ranked as the world's richest person, with a net worth of $46.5 billion, as reported by CNN. Today, that title belongs to Tesla CEO Elon Musk, whose net worth stands at $368 billion as of June 5, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Even when adjusted for inflation, Gates' former net worth would be equivalent to roughly $76 billion in today's dollars. It is worth noting that other billionaires have also increased their wealth during the same time. For instance, tech billionaires Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos are worth $229 billion and $227 billion, ranking second and third globally. For many Americans, this trend is not sitting well. The sky-high cost of living has catalyzed support for redistributive tax policies, especially among younger voters and the progressive base of the Democratic Party. While higher taxation may or may not happen in the years to come, here's hypothetically how much you'd get if the world's richest man gives a check to every American. The United States Census Bureau estimates the current population to be around 341 million people, ranking only behind India and China. If Musk's enormous $368 billion were equally divided in the U.S., each person would receive $1,079 (rounded to the nearest dollar). A couple would receive $2,158, while a family of four would get $4,316. Despite the enormous wealth of billionaires, much of their fortune is tied up in stocks, real estate, and other holdings. Only a small percentage of their assets is held in cash. Based on data from Forbes, Musk has a 12% ownership stake in Tesla and to date, he remains the largest shareholder in the $1.15 trillion electric vehicle company. This is in addition to a 42% slice in SpaceX and a 54% interest in xAI, among many other businesses. Interestingly, Bloomberg reported that Musk's financial holdings appreciated by 77% after joining the campaign trail with President Donald Trump late last year, as reported by Bloomberg. Investors became bullish on Tesla and Musk became the first person to ever reach a net worth exceeding $400 billion. Since then, Tesla's market value has fluctuated as a result of volatile market conditions, macroeconomic factors and the threat of a global trade war. Editor's note: Data is accurate as of June 5 and is subject to change. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Says Trump's Executive Order To Lower Medication Costs Has a 'Real Shot' -- Here's Why This article originally appeared on If Elon Musk's Wealth Was Evenly Distributed Across America, How Much Money Would Every Person Get?