logo
How far is my hospital? In India, it's 15 kms for OPD, 44 kms for admission

How far is my hospital? In India, it's 15 kms for OPD, 44 kms for admission

First Post22-04-2025
Estimates published in The Lancet Regional Health-Southeast Asia journal showed a significant urban-rural disparity – urban older adults availed out-patient facilities within 10 kilometres of reach, while the distance was nearly 30 kilometres for their rural counterparts. read more
Older adults in India are travelling considerable distances to access healthcare, with some commuting up to 15 kilometres for outpatient visits and nearly 44 kilometres for hospitalisation, according to new research.
The study, published in The Lancet Regional Health – Southeast Asia, highlights sharp urban-rural disparities in healthcare access. While seniors in urban areas typically accessed outpatient services within 10 kilometres, their rural counterparts had to travel nearly three times as far, the researchers found.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The findings are based on data from nearly 32,000 individuals aged 60 and above, surveyed during the first wave of the Longitudinal Ageing Study of India (LASI) in 2017-2018. India's elderly population, currently estimated at 138 million, is projected to rise from 7.4% of the total population in 2001 to 13.2% by 2031.
The study also noted that proximity plays a critical role in healthcare usage: 73% of older adults accessed outpatient services and 40% used inpatient care when facilities were located within 10 kilometres.
However, with an increase in commute distance, a commensurate decline in the use of out-patient services was found – 17 per cent utilisation of facilities for 11-30 kilometres distance, and 10 per cent for 30 kilometres and above, respectively.
A longer commute and far placed facility is a barrier for receiving timely, essential healthcare for people in this age group, often seen grappling with multiple long-term, debilitating conditions requiring continuous care, the team said.
They wrote, 'Older adults, on an average travelled a distance of nine miles (14.54 kilometres) to seek outpatient services and 27 miles (43.62 kilometres) for inpatient care respectively.' State-wise, Tripura, Manipur and Kerala, had the highest in-patient and outpatient visits within 10 kilometres – over 80 per cent, 75 per cent and 59 per cent of older adults availed in-patient services, respectively, while 88 per cent, 78 per cent and 84 per cent availed out-patient ones, respectively
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
.The authors attributed Kerala's high rates to 'easy access and better availability of infrastructure'. In Manipur and Tripura, it may be because people rely on nearby facilities during emergency in-patient situations, they said.
Hilly states such as Nagaland, Sikkim and Himachal Pradesh could pose geographical challenges as zero per cent, 17 per cent and about five per cent of older adults in these areas made in-patient visits within 10 kilometres, the study found.
Further, in northeastern states, such as Mizoram and Nagaland, a higher percentage of older adults were found to travel more than 60 kilometres to access in-patient and out-patient services, indicating a poor and limited access to nearby facilities.
Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Madhya Pradesh showed a moderate proximity of 11-60 kilometres for older adults accessing out-patient care, but a higher share of in-patient visits at distances beyond 30 kilometres.
The authors added that less variability in commute distance among southern states indicated a well-distributed healthcare infrastructure. For an equitable and inclusive healthcare system in India, improving access to services and reducing geographical barriers are paramount, the team said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

When Machines Take Over: Lancet Study Warns Doctors Could Lose Critical Skills from Regular AI Use
When Machines Take Over: Lancet Study Warns Doctors Could Lose Critical Skills from Regular AI Use

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

When Machines Take Over: Lancet Study Warns Doctors Could Lose Critical Skills from Regular AI Use

Why Does Skill Loss Occur? Striking a Safe Balance Live Events As AI technologies become more embedded in clinical practices, their ability to transform medicine is being hailed globally. The promise: Accelerated diagnoses, reduced errors, and customized treatments. But hidden behind these shiny possibilities is a subtle danger: the deskilling of physicians who become overly dependent on AI assistance.A landmark study in The Lancet included 1,443 colonoscopy procedures across several Polish healthcare facilities, with skilled endoscopists who perform these regularly. Researchers detected a significant reduction in physicians' capacity to spot precancerous growths without AI after AI support was implemented: adenoma detection rates reduced from 28.4% to 22.4% a 20% relative decrease within months of regular AI exposure. This indicates that during the time before AI existed, physicians detected fewer precancerous tumours than after they began working with machine and accuracy of AI can produce a false sense of security, luring physicians into deferring to machines and eventually making less autonomous decisions. This "automation bias" makes clinicians doubt their own judgment; they may even defer to AI suggestions, opting for technical concurrence over professional judgment, a problem particularly dangerous when AI systems fail or become unavailable because of from colonoscopy, specialists fear this wave may cascade through other areas of medicine. As medical dependence on AI increases, abilities sharpened by years of practice and training can become stale much like drivers who rely too heavily on autopilot are likely to be unprepared in case of emergencies. Deskilling could render physicians liable if technology malfunctions or needs close attention. The Lancet study authors and independent commentators urge the medical community not to rush headlong into full AI adoption. They call for more robust research into AI's long-term impact on clinical skills and strategies for safeguarding human expertise. The key may lie in collaborating with AI as a partner, not a replacement, and in maintaining training requirements that ensure doctors can always revert to 'manual mode' when technology AI promises to deliver vast potential, the silent erosion of core clinical competencies must serve as a wake-up call. The finest medicine is a combination of innovation and unreplaceable human judgment a marriage of code and compassion

As wildfires rage across North America, new study says smoke is 14 times more lethal than earlier estimates
As wildfires rage across North America, new study says smoke is 14 times more lethal than earlier estimates

Time of India

time18 hours ago

  • Time of India

As wildfires rage across North America, new study says smoke is 14 times more lethal than earlier estimates

A recent study reveals the deadly impact of wildfire smoke, linking short-term exposure to significantly more deaths than previously estimated. Researchers found that wildfire-generated fine particulate matter is far more harmful than traffic-related pollutants, increasing the risk of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. As climate change intensifies wildfires, understanding and tracking this threat becomes crucial for global health. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why wildfire smoke is so lethal Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads For every 1 µg/m³ rise in PM2.5, all-cause mortality increased by 0.7 per cent, respiratory mortality by 1 per cent, and cardiovascular mortality by 0.9 per cent. Researchers found wildfire-generated PM2.5 is more harmful than traffic-related pollutants, intensifying risks of respiratory and heart diseases. How the study was conducted They combined daily mortality records with fire-related and non-fire-related PM2.5 levels. By broadening the timeline to include deaths occurring within seven days of exposure, the study captured wildfire smoke's delayed but deadly effects. Previous estimates were dangerously low A climate-linked threat to global health Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads As North America battles one of its most destructive wildfire seasons, with more than 40,000 blazes scorching nearly 3 million acres in the US and over 5.5 million acres in Canada as of July 2025, a new study warns that the health toll of wildfire smoke is far deadlier than previously now say short-term exposure to smoke-related fine particles is linked to 14 times more deaths than past estimates to the study, the health risks of wildfire smoke were underestimated by nearly 93 percent. Published in The Lancet Planetary Health by researchers from the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), the findings suggest exposure to wildfire smoke is responsible for an average of 535 deaths California alone, 5,362 wildfires have resulted in 31 fatalities this year as per the CalFire study examined wildfire pollutants, particularly fine particulate matter (PM2.5), microscopic particles small enough to penetrate the lungs and bloodstream deeply.'These estimates were made using specific data on how wildfire smoke affects health, allowing for a more precise calculation compared to general air pollution data,' the authors team relied on data from the EARLY-ADAPT project, covering 654 regions across 32 European countries and a population of 541 million people between 2004 and study found that short-term exposure to wildfire smoke particles (PM2.5) caused an average of 535 deaths each year, including 31 from respiratory diseases and 184 from cardiovascular methods that treated wildfire smoke the same as other fine particles had suggested only 38 deaths per year, a massive applying risk data specific to wildfire smoke, researchers discovered that the actual toll is nearly 14 times higher, meaning previous estimates underestimated the danger by 93 the climate crisis fuels longer fire seasons and more intense blazes, exposure to wildfire smoke is expected to rise dramatically.'The rising frequency and intensity of wildfires makes improving estimates of PM2.5-related wildfire mortality imperative to better track this climate change-related threat,' said Anna Alari, ISGlobal researcher and study co-author.

As wildfires rage across North America, new study says smoke is 14 times more lethal than earlier estimates
As wildfires rage across North America, new study says smoke is 14 times more lethal than earlier estimates

Economic Times

time18 hours ago

  • Economic Times

As wildfires rage across North America, new study says smoke is 14 times more lethal than earlier estimates

A recent study reveals the deadly impact of wildfire smoke, linking short-term exposure to significantly more deaths than previously estimated. Researchers found that wildfire-generated fine particulate matter is far more harmful than traffic-related pollutants, increasing the risk of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. As climate change intensifies wildfires, understanding and tracking this threat becomes crucial for global health. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why wildfire smoke is so lethal Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads For every 1 µg/m³ rise in PM2.5, all-cause mortality increased by 0.7 per cent, respiratory mortality by 1 per cent, and cardiovascular mortality by 0.9 per cent. Researchers found wildfire-generated PM2.5 is more harmful than traffic-related pollutants, intensifying risks of respiratory and heart diseases. How the study was conducted They combined daily mortality records with fire-related and non-fire-related PM2.5 levels. By broadening the timeline to include deaths occurring within seven days of exposure, the study captured wildfire smoke's delayed but deadly effects. Previous estimates were dangerously low A climate-linked threat to global health Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads As North America battles one of its most destructive wildfire seasons, with more than 40,000 blazes scorching nearly 3 million acres in the US and over 5.5 million acres in Canada as of July 2025, a new study warns that the health toll of wildfire smoke is far deadlier than previously now say short-term exposure to smoke-related fine particles is linked to 14 times more deaths than past estimates to the study, the health risks of wildfire smoke were underestimated by nearly 93 percent. Published in The Lancet Planetary Health by researchers from the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), the findings suggest exposure to wildfire smoke is responsible for an average of 535 deaths California alone, 5,362 wildfires have resulted in 31 fatalities this year as per the CalFire study examined wildfire pollutants, particularly fine particulate matter (PM2.5), microscopic particles small enough to penetrate the lungs and bloodstream deeply.'These estimates were made using specific data on how wildfire smoke affects health, allowing for a more precise calculation compared to general air pollution data,' the authors team relied on data from the EARLY-ADAPT project, covering 654 regions across 32 European countries and a population of 541 million people between 2004 and study found that short-term exposure to wildfire smoke particles (PM2.5) caused an average of 535 deaths each year, including 31 from respiratory diseases and 184 from cardiovascular methods that treated wildfire smoke the same as other fine particles had suggested only 38 deaths per year, a massive applying risk data specific to wildfire smoke, researchers discovered that the actual toll is nearly 14 times higher, meaning previous estimates underestimated the danger by 93 the climate crisis fuels longer fire seasons and more intense blazes, exposure to wildfire smoke is expected to rise dramatically.'The rising frequency and intensity of wildfires makes improving estimates of PM2.5-related wildfire mortality imperative to better track this climate change-related threat,' said Anna Alari, ISGlobal researcher and study co-author.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store