&w=3840&q=100)
US hiring slowed to 130K new jobs amid uncertainty over Trump's policies
The American job market likely continued to slow last month, hobbled by worries over President Donald Trump's trade wars, deportations and purges of the federal workforce.
The Labour Department's numbers on May hiring Friday are expected to show that businesses, government agencies and nonprofits added 1,30,000 jobs last month. That would be down from 1,77,000 in April but enough to stay ahead of people entering the workforce and keep the unemployment rate at a low 4.2 per cent, according to a survey of forecasters by the data firm FactSet.
Mainstream economists expect Trump's policies to take a toll on America's economy, the world's largest. His massive taxes on imports tariffs are expected to raise costs for US companies that buy raw materials, equipment and components from overseas and force them to cut back hiring or even lay workers off.
Billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has slashed federal workers and cancelled government contracts. Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration is expected to make it harder for businesses to find enough workers.
For the most part, though, any damage has yet to show up in the government's economic data.
The US economy and job market have proven surprisingly resilient in recent years. When the inflation fighters at the Federal Reserve raised their benchmark interest rate 11 times in 2022 and 2023, the higher borrowing costs were widely expected to tip the United States into a recession.
Instead, the economy kept growing and employers kept hiring.
But former Fed economist Claudia Sahm warns that the job market of 2025 isn't nearly as durable as the two or three years ago when immigrants were pouring into the US job market and employers were posting record job openings.
Any signs of weakness in the data this week would stoke fears of a recession again, Sahm, now chief economist at New Century Advisors, wrote in a Substack post this week. It's too soon to see the full effects of tariffs, DOGE, or other policies on the labour market; softening now would suggest less resilience to those later effects, raising the odds of a recession.
Recent economic reports have sent mixed signals.
The Labour Department reported Tuesday that US job openings rose unexpectedly to 7.4 million in April seemingly a good sign. But the same report showed that layoffs ticked up and the number of Americans quitting their jobs fell, a sign they were less confident they could find something better elsewhere.
Surveys by the Institute for Supply Management, a trade group of purchasing managers, found that both American manufacturing and services businesses were contracting last month.
And the number of Americans applying for unemployment benefits rose last week to the highest level in eight months.
Jobless claims a proxy for layoffs still remain low by historical standards, suggesting that employers are reluctant to cut staff despite uncertainty over Trump's policies. They likely remember how hard it was to bring people back from the massive but short-lived layoffs of the 2020 COVID-19 recession as the US economy bounced back with unexpected strength.
Still, the job market has clearly decelerated. So far this year, American employers have added an average 1,44,000 jobs a month. That is down from 1,68,000 last year; 2,16,000 in 2023; 3,80,000 in 2022, and a record 6,03,000 in 2021 in the rebound from COVID-19 layoffs.
Trump's tariffs and the erratic way he rolls them out, suspends them and conjures up new ones have already buffeted the economy. America's gross domestic product the nation's output of goods and services fell at a 0.2 per cent annual pace from January through March this year.
A surge of imports shaved 5 percentage points off growth during the first quarter as companies rushed to bring in foreign products ahead of Trump's tariffs. Imports plunged by a record 16 per cent in April as Trump's levies took effect.
The drop in foreign goods could mean fewer jobs at the warehouses that store them and the trucking companies that haul them around, wrote Michael Madowitz, an economist at the left-leaning Roosevelt Institute.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi now in the line of fire - here's what happened and why it matters
It has been a tumultuous week for American politics, memory, and conscience. Another battle rages within the justice system. Pam Bondi , President Trump's Attorney General, has come under fire for what critics call serious ethical misconduct. The incident highlights broader tensions in Washington regarding justice, power, and political accountability. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Air conditioners without external unit. (click to see prices) Air Condition | Search Ads Search Now What exactly is Pam Bondi being accused of? In a 70-person ethics complaint submitted to the Florida Bar , US Attorney General Pam Bondi is charged with " serious professional misconduct ." Law professors, lawyers, and former chief justices of the Florida Supreme Court who lean liberal or moderate are among the signatories. They charged Bondi with misbehavior that "threatens the rule of law and the administration of justice,' as per a report by the Miami Herald. Live Events According to the Herald, the group's complaint claims that Bondi has violated her ethical obligations in her current position. Critics claim she is pressuring DOJ lawyers to act unethically. The complaint also claims that Bondi "sought to compel Department of Justice lawyers to violate their ethical obligations under the guise of 'zealous advocacy,'" as reported by the Herald. Why was the complaint dismissed so quickly? The petition was swiftly dismissed by the Florida Bar on jurisdictional grounds, but in Washington, one of the young punks who now work for the federal government, particularly at the Department of Justice (DOJ), sneered at it. In a statement given to the Miami Herald, Chad Mizelle, chief of staff for the Justice Department, stated that the Florida Bar has twice turned down performative attempts by these out-of-state attorneys to use the bar complaint procedure against AG Bondi. The signatories' lack of intelligence and independent thought will be the only outcome of this third futile attempt. ALSO READ: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez just entered the Trump–Musk fight, and the Internet can't get enough Pam Bondi, a native of Florida, was the first female attorney general of the Sunshine State. According to the Florida Bar, "Pamela Jo Bondi" is a member "in Good Standing,' as per a report by The Hill. During her confirmation hearing a few months ago, Bondi was questioned by Democrats about her capacity to oppose Trump, who had repeatedly declared that he would come for his enemies and that he had the "absolute right" to do as he pleased with her department. FAQs Why is Pam Bondi facing criticism right now? She is accused by dozens of legal experts of pressuring DOJ lawyers to violate ethical standards, particularly in a contentious Feb. 5 memo encouraging aggressive tactics. Has the Florida Bar taken action against Bondi? No, it dismissed the complaint due to a lack of jurisdiction, though the criticism sparked a national debate.


Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Elon is new to politics': JD Vance says he understands Musk's frustration, Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein
JD Vance says he understands Elon Musk's frustration but Trump had nothing to do with Epstein. Vice President JD Vance reacted to Elon Musk 's public spat with Donald Trump that unfolded on social media when he was on Theo Von's podcast. Reacting specifically to Elon Musk's allegation against Trump that Trump is there in the Epstein Files and that's why the Trump administration is dragging its feet in releasing all the documents, JD Vance said it was absolutely false. 'First of all, absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein . That's totally bs," Vance said. 'I'm always going to be loyal to the president. And I hope that eventually Elon kind of comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear.' 'I think it's a huge mistake for him to go after the President like that. It's going to be bad for the country and I don't think it's going to be good for Elon either," JD Vance said. Elon is an incredible entrepreneur, JD Vance said, adding that his DOGE work has been really good but Elon Musk is new to politics and he got a lot of blowback for his political involvement. "Part of this is that this guy gets into politics and suffered a lot for it. I get the frustration there," JD Vance said adding that the bill which is the center of their fight is good but not perfect and it can be frustrating for a businessman like Elon Musk. While the Musk-Trump feud took a rest for a day, Elon Musk deleted his most vile post against Trump in which he accused him of being involved with pedophile Epstein -- showing his willingness to repair things with Trump but the president said he is not thinking of Elon and is busy with a lot of work. Instead of further attacking the president, Musk Friday floated the idea of America Party -- a new party to break the two-party system of US politics.


New Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
'Epstein bomb' tweet defused by Musk as Republicans stress need to revive bromance with Trump
Hours after Republican party faithfuls, fearing aftershocks from the Donald Trump-Elon Musk clash, urged the duo to smoke the peace pipe, the world's richest man has deleted the 'Epstein bomb' tweet that targeted the US President. "Time to drop the really big bomb:@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" Musk had said in the deleted X post. It had been his biggest blow on a Thursday night (IST) that had seen the duo going after each other's jugular. Many in the Republican party had expressed apprehensions after the faceoff that, at a minimum, it could come in the way of the passage of the "One big, beautiful bill" -- the Republicans' massive tax and border spending legislation -- championed by Trump and slammed by Musk. "I hope it doesn't distract us from getting the job done that we need to," Representative Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington state, had been quoted as saying by the Associated Press. "I think that it will boil over and they'll mend fences," Newhouse had hoped. Musk began by holding his fire, posting about his various companies on social media rather than torching the president, and later pressed delete to consign the most contentious of his tweets against the US President. Trump, for his part, departed the White House for his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, without stopping to talk to reporters who shouted questions about his battle with Musk. Senator Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, was another who had expressed the hope to Fox News host Sean Hannity on Thursday night "that both of them come back together because when the two of them are working together, we'll get a lot more done for America than when they're at cross purposes." Senator Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, also lent his support to a compromise formula. Lee sounded almost pained on social media as Trump and Musk hurled insults at each other, sharing a photo composite of the two men and stressing, "But … I really like both of them." "Who else really wants @elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump to reconcile?" Lee posted, later adding: "Repost if you agree that the world is a better place with the Trump-Musk bromance fully intact." The signs now are that Musk at least may be paying heed to such a call. But whether the bromance will revive with the intensity it originally had or be a much colder acknowledgment by two superegos of each other remains to be seen.