‘The ocean is spitting our rubbish back': Italy's museum of plastic pollution
During one walk, Suma, 44, spotted a washed-up bottle of Ambre Solaire sunscreen. He was about to throw it away when he noticed something unusual: the price printed on the bottle was in lire, meaning it must have been produced before the euro replaced the lira in Italy.
In fact, after delving further, he was astonished to discover that the bottle dated back to the late 1960s.
A clear testament to the longevity of plastic and its persistence in the environment, the vintage suntan lotion became the catalyst for Suma's creation of Archeoplastica, an online museum that comprises more than 500 plastic relics washed ashore on beaches all over Italy.
'Whereas before I didn't pay too much attention to what I collected, from that moment on I started to look at everything very, very carefully,' said Suma, who studied environmental science at Ca' Foscari university in Venice before returning to Puglia.
He added: 'It's one thing to be taught that plastic lasts for centuries and never degrades, and another to see it with your own eyes.'
About 11m tonnes of plastic waste ends up in the world's oceans each year via rivers or after being dumped by people along shorelines or chucked into the sea from fishing vessels.
A new expert review published last week warned that plastics were a 'grave, growing and under-recognised danger' to human and planetary health.
The review concluded that the world was in a 'plastics crisis', the driver being the huge acceleration in plastics production since the 1950s. The timeline of relics gathered by Suma and his volunteers across Italy demonstrates this.
One of the oldest finds – a 1958 bottle cap featuring the trademark Moplen that was found on a beach in Emilia-Romagna region, northern Italy – points to the beginning of the plastic-production era. Moplen was the commercial name for isotactic polypropylene, a plastic material developed by the company Montecatini.
Other discoveries include a pink polyethylene bottle for talcum powder that was made in Germany in the late 1950s; a blue tub of hand cream dating to the 1960s with the brand name Gli Sette still clearly visible; and a clown-shaped bottle once filled with honey that was produced and only ever sold in Greece, also in the 1960s, but which turned up on a beach in the Lecce area of Puglia.
Finds of products made in subsequent decades include a Spic & Span bathroom cleaning powder from the 1970s, a Nesquik tub from the 80s and the remains of a souvenir Italia '90 World Cup football.
The most recent discovery, which is yet to be officially added to the Archeoplastica inventory, is a 45rpm vinyl record picked up on a beach by a seven-year-old boy who was in Puglia on holiday with his family.
After Suma's nephew miraculously managed to bend the record back in the shape, it was played on an old turntable and was revealed to be Jimmy Fontana's Il Mondo, a song released in 1965.
'This find struck me a lot,' said Suma. 'The record jumped a lot but you could clearly make out the song.' Barnacle encrustations found on the record indicated that it had been floating in the sea for quite some time.
Most of the work by Suma and his team is done during autumn and winter, when tonnes of plastic waste is left behind by beachgoers and authorities pay less attentionto keeping the beaches clean.
The vast majority of waste they find are single-use plastics such as bottles, bags, fast-food containers and straws.
The objective of Archeoplastica, which occasionally exhibits its finds at traditional museums, is to raise awareness and encourage people to limit their use of plastic.
But from Suma's experience, the problem is only getting worse, especially with no meaningful progress towards limiting plastic production.
The sea, meanwhile, is taking its revenge. 'The ocean is spitting our rubbish back in our faces,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
11 hours ago
- Daily Mail
'Divine blood' found on Jesus' burial cloth 'proves' Shroud of Turin is authentic
The Shroud of Turin is one of the most well-studied artifacts in history. Believed to be the burial cloth of Jesus following the crucifixion, scientists have long debated its authenticity. While radiocarbon dating in the 1980s suggested a medieval origin, some scholars have argued that the blood on the linen tells a different story. Dr Jeremiah Johnston, a biblical scholar, told the Tucker Carlson Network that testing from the 1990s identified blood type AB on the Shroud. 'The Shroud has type AB blood, identified as Semitic, present in only six percent of the population, confirmed as human and male, ruling out animal blood or a hoax,' Dr Johnston said. He also noted that testing showed it was human, male blood that was both premortem and postmortem. 'You would have to actually kill someone if you were trying to reproduce the shroud because we have premortem and post-mortem blood all over the shroud,' said Dr Johnston. The presence of both pre- and post-mortem blood on the Shroud is unusual, suggesting processes inconsistent with natural decomposition, interpreted by some as aligning with resurrection accounts. The AB blood type was first documented in 1982 by Italian biographer Dr Pierluigi Baima Bollone and colleagues, who analyzed a sample from the Shroud's pierced side. Subsequent testing also detected M, N, and S antigens in blood from the foot area, confirming the blood was unquestionably human. The researchers tested the samples in two ways to figure out the blood type. First, they checked for antibodies by putting the fibers on slides, keeping them cold at about 39°F for a long time, adding A1 or B red blood cells and letting them sit for 30 minutes. They looked at the slides under a regular microscope and later used a powerful electron microscope after preserving the fibers in alcohol and coating them with gold. Then the team tested for antigens, particles that stimulate the immune system to produce antibodies, using a mixed agglutination method. They kept the slides cold for 24 hours with anti-A and anti-B serums, washed them several times with saltwater and a cow protein solution, added A1 or B red blood cells, and checked them under a regular microscope, followed by electron microscope checks. The results showed the Shroud's bloodstained fibers had both A and B antigens but no antibodies, pointing to type AB blood. The clean Shroud fibers had no antigens, proving they were free of blood. Dr Johnston also told Carlson that the Sudarium of Oviedo in Spain, which is the facecloth that John's Gospel talks about that covered his face, was also found to have type AB blood. There is no image on this cloth. Only stains are visible to the naked eye, although more is visible under the microscope. However, Dr Kelly Kearse, an immunologist who has extensively studied the Shroud of Turin, has expressed skepticism about the claim that the blood on the Shroud is type AB. Dr Kearse argued that the methods lacked proper controls and could produce false positives due to contamination, such as bacteria, or degradation of the blood over centuries. 'Regarding tests to determine blood type, it could be AB, but I really don't think there's any solid scientific evidence to back that up,' he wrote in a 2020 study. Dr Johnston estimated there are roughly 700 wounds visible on the Shroud. 'This was a very badly wounded man, pints of type AB blood, all over it,' he said, noting that the injuries align with what is known about Roman crucifixions. Dr Johnston also highlighted the image itself, a faint, full-body imprint of a bearded man. 'The image on the Shroud is only two microns thick and does not penetrate through the cloth,' he explained. 'If this were a hoax, painted or dyed, the material would have soaked through completely. 'Instead, the image is so thin we could shave it off with a razor. Even the world's best scientists are baffled.' He suggested the imprint could have formed through a sudden chemical reaction triggered by an immense burst of energy, possibly corresponding to the moment of the Resurrection. Paolo Di Lazzaro, a physicist and laser specialist at ENEA Laboratories near Rome, spent five years studying the Shroud. His team managed to recreate the chemical change in the linen fibers using a massive burst of 34 trillion watts of energy. This 'cold' energy, lasting just a quarter of a billionth of a second, altered the linen's structure to form the image on the Shroud, Dr Johnston explained. Measuring 14 feet long, the linen was first publicly displayed in the 1350s and presented as the actual burial cloth of Christ. While 1988 radiocarbon dating placed its origin between 1260 and 1390 AD, Dr Johnston contends that only a contaminated corner patch, not the original linen, was tested. 'The actual linen has never been radiocarbon dated, just the upper-left corner patch, which was contaminated,' he said. Dr Johnston described the Shroud as 'the most lied about and misunderstood artifact in the world' and thanked Carlson for the opportunity to share his findings.
Daily Mail
11 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Tucker Carlson's jaw drops at staggering 1-in-200-billion Shroud of Turin odds
Tucker Carlson was left astounded by evidence presented by a biblical scholar regarding the Shroud of Turin, a linen cloth believed to be the burial cloth of Jesus. Dr Johnston revealed that mathematician Bruno Barbaris of the University of Turin analyzed the shroud's unique characteristics, concluding there is a mere one-in-200-billion chance 'it's anyone other than Jesus of Nazareth.' This staggering statistic left Carlson reeling, challenging decades of skepticism about the shroud's legitimacy, sparked by a 1988 radiocarbon dating study that suggested a medieval origin Barberis's calculation likely factored in multiple elements, including the shroud's dimensions, rare type AB blood and the presence of both pre-mortem and post-mortem blood, aligning with patterns described in the Bible. Beyond statistics, forensic evidence has further supported the shroud's authenticity as scientists have identified more than fifty species of pollen trapped in the fabric, including flowers that bloom only in Israel, and only in April. Traces of limestone and clay unique to Jerusalem are smeared on the nose, knees, and feet, precisely where they would appear if a man stumbled while carrying a rough wooden crossbeam through the streets. 'The image on the shroud is only two microns thick and does not penetrate all the way through the cloth,' Dr Johnston explained. 'I f this were a hoax, painted or dyed, the material would have soaked through completely. Instead, if we took a razor to the shroud, we could shave off the image because it's so thin. This quality has baffled even the world's best scientists.' Dr Johnston suggested the image may have formed through a sudden chemical change triggered by an incredible burst of 34,000 billion watts of energy in just a fraction of a billionth of a second, possibly at the moment of the Resurrection. The 14-foot-long linen bears a faint, full-body image of a bearded man, which many Christians believe to be a miraculous imprint of Jesus. When first exhibited in the 1350s, the shroud was presented as the actual burial cloth used to wrap the mutilated body of Christ after his crucifixion. Radiocarbon dating performed in 1988 placed the shroud's origin between 1260 and 1390 AD, suggesting a medieval origin. However, Dr Johnston argued that only a contaminated patch, not the original linen, was tested. 'The actual linen cloth has never been radiocarbon dated, just the upper left corner patch, which was contaminated,' he told Carlson. 'So, it was the patched sample, not a fine linen sample.' Carlson asked, 'So, not the real thing?' to which Dr. Johnston replied, 'Correct.' Dr Johnston described the shroud as 'the most lied about and misunderstood artifact in the world,' and thanked Carlson for the opportunity to share his findings. Dr Johnston also criticized the British Museum's handling of the 1988 radiocarbon dating data, claiming critical information was suppressed for 29 years. Stunned, Carlson admitted, 'I'm being baffled right now.' Further forensic evidence includes wounds consistent with Roman crucifixion practices, including puncture marks in the wrists and heels, hundreds of scourge marks from lead-tipped whips, and more than 50 punctures from a brutal crown of thorns. A spear wound between ribs five and six matches John 19:34: 'But one of the soldiers pierced his side with a spear, and at once there came out blood and water.' Studies show the blood in that region bears signs of pre-mortem injury, aligning with the Gospel account. In total, there are more than 700 wounds displayed on the shroud. Those include marks left behind from the crucifixion nails. 'You can actually see in the four arms of the crucified man. We see by the way wrist, hands, the entire hand, it's all the same,' Dr Johnston said. 'We know that the nail penetrates through the wrist and the palm. And that's how the Romans would crucify their victims.' For Johnston, the shroud is not simply an archaeological puzzle but a testament, what he calls 'the receipt of God's gift.' Every bloodstain, every fiber, every unexplained detail is, to him, a silent witness to the greatest moment in history: the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Recent scientific studies, including wide-angle X-ray scattering from the Institute of Crystallography in Rome, support the shroud's 2,000-year age, citing the absence of vanillin, a compound that would be present in younger linen. Dr Johnston also criticized the British Museum's handling of the 1988 radiocarbon dating data, claiming critical information was suppressed for 29 years. Stunned, Carlson admitted, 'I'm being baffled right now.'
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Microplastics found in highest amounts in these popular drinks
Microplastics are all around us – in the air we breathe, in seas and rivers, they're found in the guts of sharks, and inside growing plants. They're also inside humans, too: in our blood, accumulating in our brains, and even in our testicles. So it is perhaps unsurprising to learn that one of the key means of entering the body is through the fluids we drink. Previous studies have established that microplastics are present in both tap water and bottled water, but new research has revealed that hot drinks may be an even bigger source of microplastics than was previously realised. A research team at the University of Birmingham tested 155 common soft drinks, including hot and cold drinks, for microplastics to get a picture of average human exposure through a realistic spectrum of daily drinks available in one country. The study, believed to be the first of its kind, found the highest concentrations of microplastics were in hot tea and hot coffee. The study also tested iced tea and coffee for microplastics, but found significantly less, suggesting the high temperatures and processes used for making hot drinks contribute to the levels of microplastics which end up in the product. The team assessed 31 different types of drinks in total from popular UK brands, all bought from supermarkets and coffee shops in 2024. These included hot and iced coffee, hot and iced tea, juices, energy drinks, and soft drinks. The samples were filtered, and then microplastic counts were determined through microscope imaging. Cold drinks were filtered immediately, while hot drinks were allowed to cool for 30 minutes before analysis. Hot tea in disposable cups contained the highest level of microplastics (MPs), averaging 22MPs per cup, compared to 14MPs per cup for glass cups. More expensive teabags leached the greatest amount of plastic, the study found, averaging 24 to 30MPs per cup. Similarly, the research team said that for hot coffee, their findings "strongly suggest that the disposable cup material is a primary source of [microplastics] in our hot coffee samples'. As not all samples were cup-sized, the team expressed their overall findings in microplastics per litre. The authors said their study "proves for the first time that assessment of exposure via drinking water only may substantially underestimate the risk" posed to humans by higher microplastics prevalence in other drinks. The same team published research in 2024, revealing the average microplastics concentration in tap water (24 to 56 MP per litre) was 'statistically indistinguishable" from that in bottled water (26 to 48 MP per litre). Professor Mohamed Abdallah from the University of Birmingham, who was one of the lead authors of the new research, told The Independent: "We noted that a lot of research in the microplastics sphere is focusing on drinking water – tap water, bottled water – and we've also released a paper from the UK on water. But we realised that people don't only drink water during their day. You drink tea, coffee, juices... "We found a ubiquitous presence of microplastics in all the cold and hot drinks we looked at. Which is pretty alarming, and from a scientific point of view suggests we should not only be looking at water, we should be more comprehensive in our research because other sources are substantial." He added: "We're consuming millions of teas and coffees every morning so it's something to definitely look at. There should definitely be legislative action from the government and also from international organisations to limit human exposure to microplastics … they're everywhere." The authors said the new research "serves as a critical step towards better understanding of the extent of MPs exposure under real-life scenarios, and advocates for more comprehensive studies for accurate risk assessment of MPs intake via dietary sources, to enable broader environmental and public health interventions".
