Disney+ viewers in UK risk £1k TV Licence fine if caught tuning into new content
Millions of Disney+ viewers are being warned they risk fines of up to £1,000 if they watch new content being added later this year.
Usually, if you are watching streaming services like Netflix, Disney+ or Amazon Prime you do not require a TV licence.
However, household in the UK is legally required to have a TV licence if they watch or record live TV, regardless of what channel it is on.
Disney+ announced last month it had won the broadcasting rights to the UEFA Women's Champions League until 2030.
This new deal will allow fans to watch every match live "at no extra cost".
Powerful, fearless, determined and unstoppable 🏆 The UEFA Women's Champions League is coming to Disney+ #UWCL || @DisneyPlusUK pic.twitter.com/VIzmegwKsb
— UEFA Women's Champions League (@UWCL) May 23, 2025
However, those hoping to watch the UEFA Women's Champions League on Disney+ will need to be careful of TV Licensing rules.
The BBC confirmed to Cord Busters last year that viewers will need to purchase a TV Licence if they are to watch live events on streaming platforms.
If viewers are caught watching live content without a TV licence, they could be fined up to £1,000.
The majority of Disney+ content remains exempt from the TV Licence fee, as long as it is not being broadcast live.
These are the occasions when you do not need a TV Licence.
You do not need a TV Licence to watch:
Streaming services like Netflix and Disney+
On-demand TV through services like All 4 and Amazon Prime Video
Videos on websites like YouTube
Videos or DVDs
You do need a TV Licence if you:
Watch or record live TV on any channel or service
Use BBC iPlayer
For those aged 75 or over who are in receipt of Pension Credit, the TV Licence can be obtained for free rather than costing £174.50.
Guidance provided by TV Licensing says: 'Free TV Licences are only available if you're 75 or over and you, or your partner living at the same address, are receiving Pension Credit.
'If you think you're eligible for a free licence but can't apply online, please call 0300 790 6117* and speak to one of our advisors to request an application form (our lines are open between 8.30am and 6.30pm, from Monday to Friday).
'Once we've received your application it may take a few weeks to process. If there are any problems we'll write to let you know. We may also call you if you have given us your phone number.
'There are separate arrangements in place for over 75s on the Isle of Man, the Bailiwick of Jersey and the Bailiwick of Guernsey.'
Even if you do not meet the eligibility criteria for a free TV Licence you may be able to get some money back on yours, so long as it is no longer needed.
RECOMMENDED READING:
Netflix Tudum 2025 recap - all announcements from Stranger Things to Squid Game
How to get up to £170 TV Licence refund ahead of licence fee rise this year
Netflix to double, amid rises for Disney+ and Amazon, says new report
If you have already purchased a TV licence but do not watch or record live TV, or stream BBC iPlayer, you could be entitled to a refund worth £174.50.
Households across the UK can apply for a refund if you won't need your licence again before it expires, and you have at least one complete month left, or the licence fee for you expired less than two years ago.
You can apply for a refund on the TV Licensing website (a link to which can be found above).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Popular Kids Entertainer Says She'll Risk Her Career To Stand Up For Children In Gaza
A modern-day Mr. Rogers is not backing down. Ms. Rachel, an extremely popular YouTuber whom toddlers may adore even more than chicken nuggets and bubbles, told NPR's 'Here and Now' Tuesday that she's willing to risk her career to advocate for children in Gaza. 'I wouldn't be Ms. Rachel if I didn't deeply care about all kids,' she told the outlet. 'And I would risk everything, and I will risk my career over and over to stand up for them. It's all about the kids for me.' There's quite a bit at stake. Ms. Rachel, whose full name is Rachel Accurso, has over 15 million subscribers on her YouTube channel, where kiddos tune in to watch the chipper children's educator teach and sing in her trademark overalls and pink headband. She has a Netflix deal where episodes of her interactive teaching program are available with subtitles in 33 languages. She's also got a toy chest's worth of merch. Accurso first made her stance about kids in Gaza public in May 2024, when she announced a fundraiser for children in Gaza and other war zones. Since then, she's consistently drawn attention to the tragedy in the territory — but last month, she seemed to hit a nerve. On May 21, she posted a video to her social media accounts in which she sang her popular song 'Hop Little Bunnies' while a 3-year-old girl from Gaza named Rahaf, who lost her legs in an airstrike, danced beside her. In response to the video, the pro-Israel group StopAntisemitism — which the Guardian says 'doxes people it deems antisemitic' — wrote a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi calling on her to investigate Ms. Rachel for being 'remunerated to disseminate Hamas-aligned propaganda to her millions of followers.' Ms. Rachel admitted to NPR that she finds the pushback 'painful,' but has continued her advocacy. 'It's really painful. And I have to remind myself that people don't know my heart, and people try to tell you who you are, but you know who you are,' she said. 'And I know how deeply and equally I care for all children, and I do lean on my faith in that situation.' She doubled down on her stance on Tuesday with a statement on social media. 'I stand against all forms of hate and violence — including antisemitism, anti-Palestinian hate, anti-Arab hate, anti-Muslim hate and all hate meant to divide us and cause harm rather than bring us together,' she wrote. 'Every child, person and every family deserves to feel valued, loved and safe.' She continued, 'Let's continue to model empathy, compassion and teach our children that we are all connected.' 'When we hate, deny people human rights and attack each other, we all suffer,' she concluded. 'When we love, respect all people's human rights and show compassion, we all thrive. We all rise.' Ms. Rachel also illustrated on Tuesday how her advocacy extends to every child by posting an Instagram Story in support of the Jewish community after a man attacked a peaceful protest calling for the release of Israeli hostages in Boulder, Colorado, on Sunday. 'Our hearts are with the Boulder Jewish Community and everyone impacted by this horrendous violence,' she wrote. Israeli Forces Kill At Least 27 People On Their Way To Aid Site In Gaza 'Indiscriminate, Unrestrained, Brutal': Former Israeli PM Calls Gaza Assault 'War Crimes' Israel's Latest Strikes In Gaza Kill 38 People Including Children
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal judge blocks enforcement of law barring kids from social media
The Joseph Woodrow Hatchett U.S. Courthouse and Federal Building in Tallahassee, Sept. 27, 2022. Credit: Michael Moline A federal judge blocked on Tuesday the state's enforcement of a 2024 state law requiring social media platforms to delete accounts of kids 15 years old and younger. The preliminary victory for the two trade associations representing social media giants comes after U.S. District Judge Mark Walker had dismissed the suit in March because the companies had not proven they would be affected. However, Walker barred the state from enforcing the law on Tuesday (HB 3), writing that it stifled minors' First Amendment rights and that there were other avenues to combat mental health concerns associated with the use of social media. 'Assuming the significance of the State's interest in limiting the exposure of youth to websites with 'addictive features,' the law's restrictions are an extraordinarily blunt instrument for furthering it,' Walker wrote. NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association, representing companies including Google, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube, filed the suit against the law in October and the former Attorney General Ashley Moody had agreed not to enforce it while the parties waited for a decision from Walker on whether to temporarily block it or allow fines of up to $50,000 per violation. The attorney general's office will appeal Walker's block to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, said Jeremy Redfern, the attorney general's director of communications, in an email to Florida Phoenix. 'Florida parents voted through their elected representatives for a law protecting kids from the harmful and sometimes lifelong tragic impacts of social media,' Redfern wrote. 'These platforms do not have a constitutional right to addict kids to their products.' Walker disagreed with the state's argument that parental control features weren't enough to protect kids from addictive features and that the law only prohibits kids from having accounts and doesn't restrict access to the content altogether. 'While it is true that at least one of these platforms, YouTube, does not require users to be account holders to passively view some content, all require users to hold accounts in order to share one's own content—in other words, to speak,' Walker wrote. CCI's president and CEO, Matt Schruers, celebrated the ruling. 'This ruling vindicates our argument that Florida's statute violates the First Amendment by blocking and restricting minors—and likely adults as well—from using certain websites to view lawful content,' he wrote in a press release. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The MRC Re-Affirms YouTube's Brand Safety Accreditation
This story was originally published on Social Media Today. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Social Media Today newsletter. YouTube has been awarded the Media Rating Council (MRC)'s brand safety accreditation for in-stream ads for the fifth year in a row, providing additional assurance for advertisers around their video ad placements. MRC accreditation means that YouTube's ad system has been approved by the MRC for its controls and metrics, based on a third-party audit of the platform's ad systems and processes. As per the MRC: 'Accreditation indicates that the Service complies with: (1) the Minimum Standards for Media Rating Research and the Enhanced Content Level Context and Brand Safety Guidelines published by the MRC; the Ad Verification Guidelines published by the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) and MRC; (2) the procedures described in Google's answers to the MRC questionnaire; and (3) the procedures described in procedure manuals and textual materials included in reports of the Service.' So it's really just confirming that Google/YouTube is maintaining its systems on this front, and ensuring compliance with relevant industry standard guidelines, but it does give advertisers some level of recourse, if they find that these systems are failing to meet the relevant benchmarks. The MRC's accreditation also certifies that YouTube's inventory filters deliver brand-safe ad placements, with content suitability based on advertiser selection. As per YouTube: 'Over the years, we've expanded advertisers' ability to choose where their ads run, and we've made sustained investments in policy and enforcement to ensure ads don't run alongside brand-unsafe content. As part of the accreditation process, the MRC assessed our AI-powered enforcement systems, our teams of human reviewers, and the policies that determine which videos are eligible to run ads.' It's a good endorsement of Google's ad systems, which, as noted, will give YouTube advertisers additional peace of mind. But I would note that, as specified by the MRC, this is only an audit of Google/YouTube's documented systems, not a test of them in action, as such. And with more and more AI elements being integrated into its ad placement process, such processes, in practice, could still veer from those parameters. Recommended Reading YouTube Launches New Experiment to Restrict Content from Those Using Ad Blocking Tools Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
