UK to roll out red carpet for second Trump state visit
The US president, "accompanied by the First Lady Mrs. Melania Trump, has accepted an invitation from His Majesty The King to pay a state visit to the United Kingdom from 17 September to 19 September 2025," said a palace statement.
The visit will come only two months after Charles, and his wife Queen Camilla, welcomed French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte to Windsor.
Trump was invited by a personal letter from Charles, which Prime Minister Keir Starmer handed to him in February during a visit to Washington.
Starmer has sought to woo Trump with a charm offensive to boost ties and gain better leverage for the UK in tough trade talks with Washington.
A delighted Trump, who has long been a big fan of the British royal family, has called the invitation a "very great honour", and opened the letter from the king in the glare of the world's cameras.
"This is really special, this has never happened before, this is unprecedented," Starmer said in the Oval Office as he handed Trump a hand-signed letter from the monarch.
"This is truly historic."
Britain rolled out the red carpet for Trump in 2019 when he met the late Queen Elizabeth II, King Charles's mother. No foreign leader has ever had a second state visit.
The Times daily said the king had however sought to put off the new visit until later in Trump's second term, but "Starmer has gone against the wishes of the king" in bringing the visit forward.
"The prime minister has expedited a full 'bells and whistles' visit in an attempt to capitalise on the president's fascination with the royal family," The Times said.
Canada concerns
Starmer will also meet with Trump this month when the Republican leader is expected to visit Scotland, where he has two golf resorts.
The visit has not been publicly confirmed by the White House, but Downing Street said Monday that Trump would be "visiting in a private capacity" and "the prime minister is pleased to take up the president's invite to meet during his stay".
Trump's threats against Canada have put Charles, who is the country's head of state, in a delicate position.
Trump has threatened to slap a 35 percent tariff on imports from Canada starting August 1 and has regularly mused that Canada should become the 51st US state.
Reading the letter aloud in the Oval Office in February, Trump said he had been invited to the historic Windsor Castle, near London, one of the royal family's ancient homes.
After reading the letter, Trump said of Charles: "He's a beautiful man, a wonderful man -- I've gotten to know him very well, actually. First term and now second term."
He added: "On behalf of our wonderful First Lady Melania and myself, the answer is yes and we look forward to being there and honouring the King and honouring really your country."
Unlike Macron, who addressed the British parliament during his state visit last week, Trump is not currently scheduled to address the House of Commons which will be then on a break.
During the French leader's visit last week, Britain laid on a pomp-filled welcome, including a horse-drawn procession and a lavish banquet in the castle where the leaders hailed a new era in UK-France relations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
In reversal, Trump arms Ukraine and threatens sanctions on countries that buy Russian oil
Trump threatens secondary sanctions on Russia in 50 days Says up to 17 Patriot batteries could be available 'very soon' Russian markets rise, suggesting relief over delay By Anastasiia Malenko, Steve Holland and Dan Peleschuk But Trump's threat of sanctions came with a 50-day grace period, a move that was welcomed by investors in Russia where the rouble recovered from earlier losses and stock markets rose. Sitting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office, Trump told reporters he was disappointed in Russian President Vladimir Putin and that billions of dollars of U.S. weapons would go to Ukraine. 'We're going to make top-of-the-line weapons, and they'll be sent to NATO,' Trump said, adding that Washington's NATO allies would pay for them. The weapons would include Patriot air defence missiles Ukraine has urgently sought. 'It's a full complement with the batteries,' Trump said. 'We're going to have some come very soon, within days… a couple of the countries that have Patriots are going to swap over and will replace the Patriots with the ones they have.' Some or all of 17 Patriot batteries ordered by other countries could be sent to Ukraine 'very quickly', he said. Rutte said Germany, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Canada all wanted to be a part of rearming Ukraine. Trump's threat to impose so-called secondary sanctions on Russia, if carried out, would be a major shift in Western sanctions policy. Lawmakers from both U.S. political parties are pushing for a bill that would authorise such measures, targeting other countries that buy Russian oil. Throughout the more than three-year-old war, Western countries have cut most of their own financial ties to Moscow, but have held back from taking steps that would restrict Russia from selling its oil elsewhere. That has allowed Moscow to continue earning hundreds of billions of dollars from shipping oil to buyers such as China and India. 'We're going to be doing secondary tariffs,' Trump said. 'If we don't have a deal in 50 days, it's very simple, and they'll be at 100%.' A White House official said Trump was referring to 100% tariffs on Russian goods as well as secondary sanctions on other countries that buy its exports. Eighty-five of the 100 U.S. senators are co-sponsoring a bill that would give Trump the authority to impose 500% tariffs on any country that helps Russia, but the chamber's Republican leaders have been waiting for Trump to give them the go-ahead for a vote. In Kyiv, people welcomed the announcement but some remained cautious about Trump's intentions. 'I am pleased that finally European politicians, with their patience and convictions, have slightly swayed him (Trump) to our side, because from the very beginning it was clear that he did not really want to help us,' said Denys Podilchuk, a 39-year-old dentist in Kyiv. GRACE PERIOD Artyom Nikolayev, an analyst from financial information firm Invest Era, said Trump did not go as far as Russian markets had feared. 'Trump performed below market expectations. He gave 50 days during which the Russian leadership can come up with something and extend the negotiation track. Moreover, Trump likes to postpone and extend such deadlines,' he said. Asked about Trump's remarks, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said an immediate ceasefire was needed to pave the way for a political solution and 'whatever can contribute to these objectives will, of course, be important if it is done in line with international law.' Since returning to the White House promising a quick end to the war, Trump has sought rapprochement with Moscow, speaking several times with Putin. His administration has pulled back from pro-Ukrainian policies such as backing Kyiv's membership in NATO and demanding Russia withdraw from all Ukrainian territory. But Putin has yet to accept a proposal from Trump for an unconditional ceasefire, which was quickly endorsed by Kyiv. Recent days have seen Russia use hundreds of drones to attack Ukrainian cities. Trump said his shift was motivated by frustration with Putin, who talked about peace but continued to strike Ukrainian cities. 'I don't want to say he's an assassin, but he's a tough guy,' he said. 'We actually had probably four times a deal. And then the deal wouldn't happen because bombs would be thrown out that night and you'd say we're not making any deals,' he said. Last week he said, 'We get a lot of bullshit thrown at us by Putin.' U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said Trump's announcement was 'positive, but overdue' and he needed to commit 'to a sustained flow of security assistance to Ukraine over the long term' if he wanted Putin to negotiate and the war to end. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy held talks with Trump's envoy Keith Kellogg on Monday. Zelenskiy said they discussed 'the path to peace and what we can practically do together to bring it closer', including 'strengthening Ukraine's air defence, joint production and procurement of defence weapons in collaboration with Europe.' An air-raid alert was declared in Kyiv shortly after Zelenskiy's talks with Kellogg. Separately on Monday, Zelenskiy said he would replace his long-serving Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal with Shmyhal's first deputy, Yulia Svyrydenko, an economist who played a key role in negotiations between Kyiv and Washington on a minerals deal. Her appointment will require parliamentary approval. Russia began its full-scale invasion in February 2022 and holds about one-fifth of Ukraine. Its forces are slowly advancing in eastern Ukraine and Moscow shows no sign of abandoning its main war goals. (Additional reporting by Frank Jack Daniel, Sergiy Karazy and Vladyslav Smilianets in Kyiv, Kevin Lamarque and Patricia Zengerle in Washington, Sabine Siebold in Berlin, Lidia Kelly in Warsaw and Michelle Nichols at the United Nations, Writing by Timothy Heritage, Peter Graff and David Brunnstrom; Editing by Gareth Jones, Andrew Heavens, Don Durfee and Cynthia Osterman)
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
When lies Trump truth — debunking the migrant myth in South Africa's healthcare crisis
Blaming migrants for South Africa's ailing healthcare system is a dangerous and politically convenient fiction. Despite mounting evidence to the contrary, this narrative persists, deflecting attention from the real source of collapse: State failure. There is no question that South Africa's public health system is in crisis. Healthcare professionals, policy analysts and political parties highlight systemic dysfunction, characterised by chronic underfunding, collapsing infrastructure, staff shortages and weak governance. ActionSA itself has admitted that Gauteng's health crisis stems from ' inadequate project management, lack of accountability and consequence management, coupled with a lack of skilled personnel and inefficient supply chain processes '. Few would dispute that the state, across all spheres, has failed to deliver quality, accessible healthcare to all. Yet, the claims that foreign nationals are 'overburdening' hospitals or 'abusing' the system continue to dominate the discourse. So widespread is this scapegoating that it has taken on the illusion of truth. But there is no credible evidence to support such claims. On the contrary, multiple studies, including government-commissioned reports, show that many migrants – especially those who are undocumented – actively avoid healthcare facilities due to fear of arrest, discrimination and outright denial of care. When they do seek help, many pay out of pocket, often at higher rates than South African citizens. Scapegoating is not a solution. It's a distraction – and not a new one. There is a deep irony in a nation forged through the struggle against racial oppression now deploying the same exclusionary logic against 'outsiders'. The parallels with Trump-era politics are disturbing. Just as the US president weaponised the myth of white victimhood to slash aid to South Africa and promote a whites-only refugee policy, local politicians have embraced the same playbook – fear-driven, fact-free and designed to divide. Figures like Gayton McKenzie and Herman Mashaba, and movements such as Operation Dudula have built platforms on xenophobic conspiracy theories, and revived colonial-era stereotypes. Their messages, amplified through social media, reach millions, spreading fear and misinformation. Trump would be proud. We may not be exporting white refugees, but we are certainly importing white nationalist logic. 'How can we improve access to quality healthcare?' asks ActionSA. Well, take a look: they don't know. Their solution? ActionSA asserts: ' No South African can enter another country legally without providing proof of medical insurance.' This statement isn't just factually flawed, it reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of both international mobility and health equity. Many South Africans can and do travel without medical insurance, and many countries do not require it for entry. But more importantly, health access should not be framed as a zero-sum, transactional privilege – it is a human right Debunking the 'healthcare rescue' myth South Africa's healthcare system is not collapsing under the weight of so-called medical tourism. It is crumbling under decades of budget cuts, poor planning and political neglect. The South African Human Rights Commission has warned that denying foreign nationals access will not alleviate pressure on the system. The government's own data shows that migrants constitute just 4% of South Africa's population. They are not responsible for drug shortages, collapsing infrastructure or staff vacancies. Yet, the fearmongering has deeply distorted public perception. The Human Sciences Research Council's South African Social Attitudes Survey found that most South Africans believe there are more than 25 million foreign nationals in the country, with more than 20 million assumed to be 'illegal'. This is not just incorrect, it is the result of sustained political misinformation. Until evidence replaces ideology, this 'alternative truth' will continue to thrive – and 'trump' truth. Scapegoating isn't policy, structural reform is South Africa's crises – whether in healthcare, housing or public safety – are not demographic pressures. They are the result of structural failures. Blaming the marginalised is easier than confronting the uncomfortable truths about misgovernance. In provinces like the Eastern Cape per capita health spending has declined even as patient numbers continue to grow. Experts have consistently pointed to institutional neglect, not migrants, as the root cause. The Life Esidimeni tragedy, in which 144 mental health patients died due to state negligence, had nothing to do with foreign nationals. And yet the migrant 'burden' myth endures – because it serves a purpose: it redirects public anger away from those in power and towards those with the least power. We must hold all political rhetoric to the same standard. Just as we rightly demand evidence when Trump claims white victimhood, we must also demand it when Mashaba, McKenzie or Dudula blame migrants for systemic failures. We cannot selectively suspend our commitment to truth. The real crisis is not migration. It is misgovernance. And the sooner we name it, the sooner we can begin to rebuild what has been broken. DM Associate Professor Jo Vearey is director of the African Centre for Migration & Society at Wits University and vice-chair of the international Migration Health and Development Initiative. Dr Rebecca Walker is an independent researcher and associate of the African Centre for Migration & Society at Wits University. Diego Iturralde is chief director for demography and population statistics at Statistics South Africa, co-chair of the South African Migration and Urbanisation Forum and former chair of the UN expert group on international migration statistics.
Eyewitness News
3 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Cameroon President Biya says will seek eighth term
YAOUNDÉ - Cameroon's President Paul Biya said Sunday that he would be seeking an eighth term in office in October's elections in a bid to extend his nearly 43 years in power. Biya, 92, posted the announcement on X in French and English. "I am a candidate for the 12 October 2025 presidential election. Rest assured that my determination to serve you is commensurate with the serious challenges facing us," he wrote. "Together, there are no challenges we cannot meet. The best is still to come." Biya was already the de facto candidate of the Cameroon People's Democratic Movement (CPDM), of which he is party leader. But given his age, the president's health and his capacity to govern have become the subject of debate. Several longstanding supporters have appeared to distance themselves from him in recent months, and there have been two high-profile defections from Biya's camp in recent weeks. Employment minister Issa Tchiroma Bakary resigned from government in June to stand in the election for his Front for the National Salvation of Cameroon (FSNC). And former prime minister Bello Bouba Maigari, an ally of Biya's for nearly 30 years, said he was standing for National Union for Democracy and Progress (NUDP). Both Tchiroma's and Maigari's parties were longstanding allies of Biya's CPDM, which has held power since independence in 1960. Also in the running are Maurice Kamto, who came second in the 2018 presidential election and is Biya's fiercest critic, and prominent opposition figure Cabral Libii from the Cameroonian Party for National Reconciliation (CPNR). Candidates have until 21 July to declare that they intend to run for office. But the opposition is deeply divided and is struggling to unite behind a single candidate, even though public opinion is critical of the government. Cameroonians frequently complain about rampant youth unemployment, rising prices and poor public services. In addition, violence occasionally erupts from separatists, especially in English-speaking regions of the mostly francophone country.
