logo
ABC no longer disputes that ‘Lebanese, Middle Eastern or Arab races exist', unlawful termination suit hears

ABC no longer disputes that ‘Lebanese, Middle Eastern or Arab races exist', unlawful termination suit hears

The Guardian11-02-2025

The ABC has amended its legal defence in the unlawful termination suit it is defending in federal court, after outcry about its claims that the onus was on the sacked journalist Antoinette Lattouf to prove the existence of a Lebanese, Arab or Middle Eastern race.
On Tuesday, the ABC's lead barrister, Ian Neil SC, began by amending the broadcaster's defence to say that the ABC accepted 'Lattouf is a person of Lebanese and Arab and Middle Eastern descent'.
'We are now instructed as follows: the ABC does not put in issue, that is, it does not dispute or contest that the Lebanese, Middle Eastern or Arab races exist, or that Ms Lattouf is one or more of those races,' said Neil.
'To be entirely clear about this, your honour will understand that the ABC continues to deny that Ms Lattouf's race or national extraction, together with any political opinion she may have had, were reasons for, or part of, the reasons for any the decision to take her off air in December 2023.'
The chief people officer, Deena Amorelli, emailed all ABC staff apologising for the distress caused by the legal tactic.
'Last Thursday I wrote to you regarding the ABC's defence of the current proceedings in the federal court brought by Ms Antoinette Lattouf,' Amorelli said in an email seen by Guardian Australia.
'As part of these proceedings, a proposition was made in the ABC's legal submission relating to race and matters that needed to be established by Ms Lattouf in her case against the ABC. This proposition was intended to state the legal elements that must be established, it was not to make a statement about any aspect of Ms Lattouf's race or national extraction.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'The ABC recognises that, regrettably, this legal argument has caused distress in some sections of the community and our workforce. This was not the ABC's intention.
'Today, the ABC has made clear to the court that it does not dispute or contest Ms Lattouf's race or national extraction being Lebanese, Middle Eastern or Arab.
'The ABC does, however, deny that any action was taken against Ms Lattouf because of her political opinion, race or national extraction.
'The ABC's commitment to diversity remains an important part of the ABC's workplace culture and we will continue to work to foster inclusion for all staff.'
Lattouf was hired as a fill-in presenter on ABC Sydney radio for one week in December 2023. She was taken off air three days into a five-day contract after she posted on social media about the Israel-Gaza war.
The amendment comes following outcry from cultural groups after the ABC's legal arguments were made public last week.
'It follows that Ms Lattouf's case … insofar as it depends on 'race' as an attribute, must fail,' it said in a submission released by the court.
However, Neil said in court on Wednesday that 'the ABC does not deny the existence of any race' and the onus was on Lattouf to provide evidence in relation to any race claim she may make.
David Anderson, the ABC's managing director, was asked under cross-examination on Thursday whether he had any doubts that 'there exists a Lebanese race'.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'If somebody tells me they're Lebanese, I don't question whether they mean it's race or national identity,' he said.
When pushed by Lattouf's barrister, Oshie Fagir, as to whether there is 'a Lebanese race in your view or not', Anderson replied: 'I haven't formed a view as to whether there is or there isn't.'
The Arab Council Australia called the ABC's legal defence 'disturbing' while the president of the Australian Lebanese Association, Raymond Najar, said the ABC's position was 'surreal and blatantly racist'.
'Here we have the head of the national broadcaster accusing Ms Lattouf of being racist for stating facts on the one hand and then erasing her race all within a couple of hours of each other and seemingly blind to the irony of it all,' Najar said.
The court is due to hear evidence from the former head of ABC Sydney Steve Ahern, the former ABC chair Ita Buttrose and Lattouf's line manager, Elizabeth Green, on Tuesday, before concluding hearing evidence on Wednesday.
Proceedings on Tuesday opened with Justice Darryl Rangiah sternly reprimanding the ABC's legal team after they filed an unredacted version of witness Chris Oliver-Taylor's affidavit, despite a federal court order that the names of the people who complained to the ABC about Lattouf should remain private.
The document was taken down later on Monday.
'I am deeply unhappy about the error made by the ABC's legal representatives,' Rangiah said.
Neil apologised for what he said was 'human error'.
'As leading counsel responsible for the presentation of the respondent's case, I stand before you this morning to tender my personal apology for what has happened.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House reportedly can't find people willing work for Pete Hegseth
White House reportedly can't find people willing work for Pete Hegseth

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

White House reportedly can't find people willing work for Pete Hegseth

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is reportedly struggling to fill vacant chief of staff and senior advisory roles, with several candidates declining the positions, according to NBC News. Vice President JD Vance and Donald Trump 's White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles are assisting with the recruitment efforts due to the difficulty in attracting qualified personnel. Hegseth's nomination was contentious, marked by accusations about his drinking and an allegation of sexual assault, and his tenure has been plagued by scandals, including the 'Signalgate' incident and the sharing of sensitive material. The departure of Hegseth's chief of staff and spokesperson, coupled with the suspension of three aides later found innocent of leaking classified material, has fueled upset within the Department of Defense. Hegseth's competence has been questioned, leading to his replacement on a visit to Israel by Homeland Security Kristi Noem.

Battle Lines: Inside Hamas leader's secret Gaza tunnel
Battle Lines: Inside Hamas leader's secret Gaza tunnel

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Battle Lines: Inside Hamas leader's secret Gaza tunnel

On today's episode, we confront the brutal realities of two of the world's most controversial flashpoints. First, our man on the ground, Jerusalem correspondent Henry Bodkin, joins Israeli troops in Gaza for a rare and eye-opening embed. He takes us inside the tunnel where Hamas leader Mohammed Sinwar was allegedly hiding before an Israeli airstrike on May 13th — one that struck the entrance of the European Hospital, sparking outrage and headlines around the world. We cut through the noise and get straight to what really happened. We also discuss Hamas's so-called 'last man standing' — and what his survival means for the future of the conflict. Then, we turn to the pariah state of North Korea. Despite suffocating sanctions, Pyongyang is now in its strongest strategic position in decades, doubling its nuclear arsenal and quietly amassing the world's fourth largest military. How did that happen — and why isn't the West doing more about it? Our new Asia correspondent Allegra Mendelson explains all.

Israel seized a Gaza-bound boat with Greta Thunberg on board. Can it do that?
Israel seized a Gaza-bound boat with Greta Thunberg on board. Can it do that?

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Israel seized a Gaza-bound boat with Greta Thunberg on board. Can it do that?

Israeli naval forces, far from the country's shores, intercepted and seized a Gaza-bound ship carrying international activists, including Greta Thunberg, in an early morning raid Monday. The operation sparked accusations that Israel's actions, apparently in the high seas, were a breach of international law. The activists say their journey was meant to protest Israel's ongoing war in Gaza and the humanitarian crisis there. The ship was carrying aid destined for people in Gaza, including baby formula and food. The activists, including Thunberg, were detained and were headed to Israel for likely deportation. It's not the first time Israel has halted ships carrying aid bound for the Palestinian territory. A raid in 2010 descended into violence between activists and Israeli commandos, leaving eight Turks and one Turkish-American killed. Most of the other operations against Gaza-bound boats have ended uneventfully, with ships diverted and activists detained. Israel says the latest ship planned to violate its blockade on Gaza and says it acted in accordance with international law. Can Israel storm a ship in the high seas? Here is a look at the legal debate. Intercepted far off the coast of Gaza The Freedom Flotilla Coalition, which organized the latest ship, says the Madleen was intercepted in international waters some 200 kilometers (124 miles) off the coast of Gaza, a claim that could not be independently verified. Israeli authorities have not disclosed the location where the ship was halted. Robbie Sabel, an international law expert and former legal adviser to the Israeli Foreign Ministry, said the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea stipulates that a state only has jurisdiction up to 12 nautical miles (19 kilometers) from its shores. In general, states don't have the right to seize ships in international waters, but there are exceptions, including during armed conflict, Sabel added. He said that even before the latest war, Israel was in an armed conflict with Hamas, allowing it to intercept ships it suspected were violating its longstanding blockade of Gaza, which Egypt also enforced. Rights groups have long criticized the blockade as unlawful collective punishment against Palestinians. Sabel cited a U.N. report on the 2010 raid that ended in activist fatalities, which stated that 'attempts to breach a lawfully imposed naval blockade place the vessel and those on board at risk.' The debate over the legality of Israel's blockade remains unresolved among legal experts. The U.N. report urged states to be cautious in the use of force against civilian vessels and called on humanitarian missions to deliver aid through regular channels. It said a country maintaining a naval blockade 'must abide by their obligations with respect to the provision of humanitarian assistance.' A debate over Israel's right to act Yuval Shany, an expert on international law at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, said that so long as Israel's blockade of Gaza is 'militarily justified' — meant to keep out weapons — and the ship intended to break it, Israel can intercept the vessel after prior warning. Whether the blockade is militarily justified is also up for debate. Suhad Bishara, head of the legal department at Adalah, a legal rights group in Israel representing the activists, said Israel was not justified in acting against a ship in international waters that posed no military threat. 'In principle, Israel cannot extend an arm into international waters and carry out whatever action against a ship there,' she said. Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesperson Oren Marmorstein said that 'everything that was done was done in accordance with international law,' referring to the ship takeover. Gaza and Israel's obligations under international law Rights groups say the legal questions are complicated by Gaza's unique status. The United Nations and much of the international community view Gaza as Israeli-occupied territory, along with east Jerusalem and the West Bank, all of which Israel captured in the 1967 Mideast war. The Palestinians want the three territories to form their future state. Israel argues that it withdrew from Gaza in 2005, when it pulled out its soldiers and settlers, even though it maintained control over Gaza's coastline, airspace and most of its land border. Hamas, which does not accept Israel's existence, seized power in Gaza two years later. Amnesty International says Israel has an obligation as the occupying power to make sure that Palestinians in Gaza have enough access to humanitarian supplies, something Amnesty says Israel was preventing by not allowing the Madleen through. Amnesty and other groups see the seizure of the Madleen as part of a campaign by Israel throughout the war to limit or entirely deny aid into Gaza. Israel says it has allowed enough aid to enter Gaza to sustain the population and accuses Hamas of siphoning it off, while U.N. agencies and aid groups deny there has been any systematic diversion. Israel's aid policy during the war has driven the territory toward famine, experts say, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is accused by the International Criminal Court of using starvation as a method of warfare by restricting humanitarian aid into Gaza, charges he has rejected. 'By forcibly intercepting and blocking the Madleen, which was carrying humanitarian aid and a crew of solidarity activists, Israel has once again flouted its legal obligations towards civilians in the occupied Gaza Strip,' Amnesty International's secretary general, Agnès Callamard, said in a statement. The group called for the immediate and unconditional release of the activists, who it said were on a humanitarian mission. ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store