ABC no longer disputes that ‘Lebanese, Middle Eastern or Arab races exist', unlawful termination suit hears
The ABC has amended its legal defence in the unlawful termination suit it is defending in federal court, after outcry about its claims that the onus was on the sacked journalist Antoinette Lattouf to prove the existence of a Lebanese, Arab or Middle Eastern race.
On Tuesday, the ABC's lead barrister, Ian Neil SC, began by amending the broadcaster's defence to say that the ABC accepted 'Lattouf is a person of Lebanese and Arab and Middle Eastern descent'.
'We are now instructed as follows: the ABC does not put in issue, that is, it does not dispute or contest that the Lebanese, Middle Eastern or Arab races exist, or that Ms Lattouf is one or more of those races,' said Neil.
'To be entirely clear about this, your honour will understand that the ABC continues to deny that Ms Lattouf's race or national extraction, together with any political opinion she may have had, were reasons for, or part of, the reasons for any the decision to take her off air in December 2023.'
The chief people officer, Deena Amorelli, emailed all ABC staff apologising for the distress caused by the legal tactic.
'Last Thursday I wrote to you regarding the ABC's defence of the current proceedings in the federal court brought by Ms Antoinette Lattouf,' Amorelli said in an email seen by Guardian Australia.
'As part of these proceedings, a proposition was made in the ABC's legal submission relating to race and matters that needed to be established by Ms Lattouf in her case against the ABC. This proposition was intended to state the legal elements that must be established, it was not to make a statement about any aspect of Ms Lattouf's race or national extraction.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
'The ABC recognises that, regrettably, this legal argument has caused distress in some sections of the community and our workforce. This was not the ABC's intention.
'Today, the ABC has made clear to the court that it does not dispute or contest Ms Lattouf's race or national extraction being Lebanese, Middle Eastern or Arab.
'The ABC does, however, deny that any action was taken against Ms Lattouf because of her political opinion, race or national extraction.
'The ABC's commitment to diversity remains an important part of the ABC's workplace culture and we will continue to work to foster inclusion for all staff.'
Lattouf was hired as a fill-in presenter on ABC Sydney radio for one week in December 2023. She was taken off air three days into a five-day contract after she posted on social media about the Israel-Gaza war.
The amendment comes following outcry from cultural groups after the ABC's legal arguments were made public last week.
'It follows that Ms Lattouf's case … insofar as it depends on 'race' as an attribute, must fail,' it said in a submission released by the court.
However, Neil said in court on Wednesday that 'the ABC does not deny the existence of any race' and the onus was on Lattouf to provide evidence in relation to any race claim she may make.
David Anderson, the ABC's managing director, was asked under cross-examination on Thursday whether he had any doubts that 'there exists a Lebanese race'.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'If somebody tells me they're Lebanese, I don't question whether they mean it's race or national identity,' he said.
When pushed by Lattouf's barrister, Oshie Fagir, as to whether there is 'a Lebanese race in your view or not', Anderson replied: 'I haven't formed a view as to whether there is or there isn't.'
The Arab Council Australia called the ABC's legal defence 'disturbing' while the president of the Australian Lebanese Association, Raymond Najar, said the ABC's position was 'surreal and blatantly racist'.
'Here we have the head of the national broadcaster accusing Ms Lattouf of being racist for stating facts on the one hand and then erasing her race all within a couple of hours of each other and seemingly blind to the irony of it all,' Najar said.
The court is due to hear evidence from the former head of ABC Sydney Steve Ahern, the former ABC chair Ita Buttrose and Lattouf's line manager, Elizabeth Green, on Tuesday, before concluding hearing evidence on Wednesday.
Proceedings on Tuesday opened with Justice Darryl Rangiah sternly reprimanding the ABC's legal team after they filed an unredacted version of witness Chris Oliver-Taylor's affidavit, despite a federal court order that the names of the people who complained to the ABC about Lattouf should remain private.
The document was taken down later on Monday.
'I am deeply unhappy about the error made by the ABC's legal representatives,' Rangiah said.
Neil apologised for what he said was 'human error'.
'As leading counsel responsible for the presentation of the respondent's case, I stand before you this morning to tender my personal apology for what has happened.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Israeli forces recover bodies of two hostage in Gaza, PM says
Israeli security forces operating in Gaza have recovered the bodies of two Israeli hostages, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu named one of them as Yair (Yaya) Yaakov, 59, who was killed inside his home at Kibbutz Nir Oz during the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October teenage sons, Or and Yagil, and his partner, Meirav Tal, were abducted alive and released in November 2023, as part of a ceasefire deal between Israel and said the name of the other hostage had not yet been released, but that their family had been are now 53 hostages still being held by Hamas in Gaza, at least 20 of whom are believed to be alive. News of the recovery of Yair Yaakov's body initially came from his sons."Dad, I love you," Yagil wrote in a post on Instagram on Wednesday evening, according to the Haaretz newspaper. "I don't know how to respond yet. I'm sad to say this. I'm waiting for your funeral, I love you and knew this day would come."Yagil also thanked the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the Shin Bet internal security service and expressed hope that the remaining hostages "will be brought [back] in a deal that doesn't risk soldiers".Later, Netanyahu issued a statement saying: "Together with all the citizens of Israel, my wife and I extend our deepest condolences to the families who have lost their most beloved.""I thank the soldiers and commanders for another successful execution of the sacred mission to return our hostages."The Hostages and Missing Families Forum, which represents many hostages' families, said in a statement that it "bows its head in sorrow over the murder of Yaya and shares in the profound grief of the Yaakov family"."There are no words to express the depth of this pain," it added. "The hostages have no time. We must bring them all home, Now!"The Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the 7 October attack, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken least 55,104 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
RE Trump Palestine warning
Donald Trump's administration is discouraging governments around the world from attending a UN conference next week on a possible two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians, according to a US cable seen by Reuters. The diplomatic demarche, sent on Tuesday, says countries that take 'anti-Israel actions' following the conference will be viewed as acting in opposition to US foreign policy interests and could face diplomatic consequences from Washington. The demarche runs squarely against the diplomacy of two close allies, France and Saudi Arabia, who are co-hosting the gathering next week in New York that aims to lay out the parameters for a roadmap to a Palestinian state, while ensuring Israel's security. 'We are urging governments not to participate in the conference, which we view as counterproductive to ongoing, life-saving efforts to end the war in Gaza and free hostages,' read the cable. Emmanuel Macron has suggested France could recognise a Palestinian state in Israeli-occupied territories at the conference. French officials say they have been working to avoid a clash with the US, Israel's staunchest major ally. 'The United States opposes any steps that would unilaterally recognise a conjectural Palestinian state, which adds significant legal and political obstacles to the eventual resolution of the conflict and could coerce Israel during a war, thereby supporting its enemies,' the cable read. The United States for decades backed a two-state solution between the Israelis and the Palestinians that would create a state for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza alongside Israel. Trump, in his first term, was relatively tepid in his approach to a two-state solution, a longtime pillar of US Middle East policy. The Republican president has given little sign of where he stands on the issue in his second term. But on Tuesday, the US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, a long-time vocal supporter of Israel, said he did not think an independent Palestinian state remained a US foreign policy goal. 'Unilaterally recognizing a Palestinian state would effectively render Oct 7 Palestinian Independence Day,' the cable read, referring to when Palestinian Hamas militants carried out a cross-border attack from Gaza on Israel in 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking about 250 hostages. Hamas' attack triggered Israel's air and ground war in Gaza in which almost 55,000 Palestinians have been killed, most of the population of 2.3 million displaced and the enclave widely reduced to rubble. If Macron went ahead, France, home to Europe's largest Jewish and Muslim communities, would become the first Western heavyweight to recognise a Palestinian state. This could lend greater momentum to a movement hitherto dominated by smaller nations generally more critical of Israel. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Macron's stance has shifted amid Israel's intensified Gaza offensive and escalating violence against Palestinians by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank, and there is a growing sense of urgency in Paris to act now before the idea of a two-state solution vanishes forever. The US cable said Washington had worked tirelessly with Egypt and Qatar to reach a ceasefire in Gaza, free the hostages and end the conflict. 'This conference undermines these delicate negotiations and emboldens Hamas at a time when the terrorist group has rejected proposals by the negotiators that Israel has accepted.' This week the UK, Australia and Canada were joined by other countries in placing sanctions on two Israeli far-right government ministers to pressure Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister, to bring the Gaza war to an end. 'The United States opposes the implied support of the conference for potential actions including boycotts and sanctions on Israel as well as other punitive measures,' the cable read. Israel has repeatedly criticised the conference, saying it rewards Hamas for the attack on Israel, and it has lobbied France against recognising a Palestinian state. 'Nothing surprises me anymore, but I don't see how many countries could step back on their participation,' said a European diplomat, who asked for anonymity due to the subject's sensitivity. 'This is bullying, and of a stupid type.'
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Lammy is picking a needless fight with America
The alarming revelation that 2024 recorded the highest number of global conflicts since the Second World War should be taken as an incentive to deepen ties with key allies, not fracture them. That would certainly be the response of any government committed to the defence of the realm faced with the depressing statistic that last year saw 61 conflicts taking place in 36 countries. Of these, 11 were defined as full-blown conflicts – those that claimed at least 1,000 battlefield deaths – and included the ongoing wars in Ukraine and Gaza, as well as other less-publicised violent eruptions in Sudan, Syria, Nigeria and Ethiopia. At a time when Sir Keir Starmer is attempting to promote his national security credentials, the rising tide of conflict detailed in a report by Sweden's Uppsala University should prompt his Government to strengthen ties with key allies such as the US and Israel. Instead, by opting to target two members of the Israeli government with sanctions, Starmer has shown that he is more interested in virtue-signalling than common sense. National security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and finance minister Bezalel Smotrich may come from the ulta-nationalist fringe of Israeli politics, but they remain important members of Israel's democratically elected government, which is one of the UK's closest allies in the Middle East. Moreover, Israel, just like Ukraine, finds itself in the vanguard of the West's deepening confrontation with two of the most potent threats it faces, in the form of Vladimir Putin's Russia and Iranian-sponsored Islamist terrorism. The UK's support for Ukraine, together with its European allies, is predicated on the understanding that Western security would be fatally compromised if Russia's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine were to succeed. Similarly, the UK's declaration of support for Israel in the wake of the October 7 attacks in 2023 was based on the tacit acknowledgement that it was in the West's interests that Iran's backing for Hamas terrorists must not be allowed to go unchallenged, especially given the ayatollahs' fixation with developing nuclear weapons. The Labour Government's decision, therefore, to single out two prominent members of the Israeli government for public censure not only threatens to undermine relations with a key regional ally. It runs the risk of jeopardising our own national security, especially if the Israelis conclude it is no longer in their interests to share vital intelligence with the UK. Israeli foreign minister Gideon Saar has already announced the Israeli cabinet will meet next week to respond to what he called an 'unacceptable decision'. The British Government's decision to pick on the two politicians is hardly surprising given its previous lamentable track record of targeting Israel, with Foreign Secretary David Lammy declaring his support for the International Criminal Court and its highly politicised move to prosecute Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu for war crimes. Yet, by siding with other self-righteous, but wholly naive, administrations in Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway, to provoke an entirely avoidable diplomatic row with Israel, Starmer and Co have placed themselves firmly on the wrong side of history. Apart from alienating Israel, the move also risks causing a rift with the US, another key ally. America's secretary of state Marco Rubio was particularly critical of the measures imposed against Ben-Gvir and Smotrich for 'inciting violence against the Palestinian people'. The sanctions 'do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home and end the war,' he said, urging the UK 'not to forget who the real enemy is'. Hitting two controversial Israeli politicians with sanctions might play to Labour's vociferously anti-Israel supporters, but it could prove to be a self-defeating move in terms of safeguarding our own long-term interests. In terms of the likely impact it will have on Israeli policy, the sanctions will be about as effective as Greta Thunberg's equally puerile attempt this week to break Israel's Gaza blockade with her Freedom Flotilla. At the same time they run the risk of sending a signal to Iran and other hostile regimes that the UK is more interested in embarrassing its allies than confronting its enemies. It is certainly hard to grasp the logic of why, when Western powers like the UK are preparing to confront Iran over its nuclear programme, they should choose this moment to pick a fight with Israel, Tehran's sworn enemy. The need to impose fresh sanctions against Iran was very much in evidence at this week's meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, when Rafael Grossi, the body's director general, confirmed three new previously undeclared nuclear sites had been identified in Iran that could be used for developing nuclear weapons. The UK is among a number of European powers that have responded by pressing for the reimposition of sanctions against Tehran. But the ayatollahs are unlikely to change course on their nuclear ambitions if they believe they share a common interest with Britain and its allies in targeting the Israelis.
