logo
Amarillo City Council takeaways: Election results, public accusations, police chief search

Amarillo City Council takeaways: Election results, public accusations, police chief search

Yahoo09-07-2025
The Amarillo City Council on Tuesday, July 8 approved two resolutions affirming and clarifying the results of the May 3 and June 7 municipal elections, aiming to resolve lingering procedural concerns while drawing sharp criticism from a resident who contended the actions violated state law.
The council also voted to move forward with the city's search for a new police chief, approving a contract with a national recruitment firm specializing in public safety leadership.
Resolutions No. 07-08-25-2 and No. 07-08-25-3 attach previously omitted voting tabulations and certificates of election from the May 3 general election and the June 7 runoff. City officials said the documents had been part of the original canvassing process but were not included in the initial resolutions.
'These actions are consistent with state law and ensure completeness of the record and transparency for the public,' City Manager Grayson Path told council members. 'The results and outcomes remain unchanged.'
The resolutions passed unanimously among the three members present: Mayor Cole Stanley, Councilmember Les Simpson, and Councilmember David Prescott. Councilmembers Don Tipps and Tim Reid were absent.
Mayor Stanley said the city followed Texas Election Code and described the resolutions as 'an affirmation and clarification — not a re-canvass.'
'We simply received the tabulated results and fulfilled our duty under the law,' Stanley said. 'This doesn't change the election outcome, but it does complete the public record.'
He said any concerns about election procedures should be directed to the county election administrator, not the council, which hires the county to run city elections. Stanley acknowledged the need for clearer communication and said policy updates are likely.
During public comment, Amarillo resident Michael Ford challenged the legality of the city's actions. He argued the elections had not been lawfully canvassed and that the newly passed resolutions were an attempt to retroactively validate flawed procedures.
'All I've asked, and all the law requires, is that you hold a lawful canvass,' Ford said. 'Open the sealed returns, tabulate the votes by precinct, and include early voting — recorded in the minutes.'
He contended that the city's failure to perform a public canvass in accordance with Texas Election Code Section 67.004 rendered the certificates of election invalid. Ford warned that the council was knowingly adopting false records and cited several sections of state law outlining potential criminal penalties.
In a direct challenge, he questioned the legitimacy of newly seated Place 3 Councilmember David Prescott and others.
'You are not legally qualified to be here,' Ford said. 'Per the Secretary of State, no lawful canvass means no lawful certificate, no lawful oath, and no legal authority.'
Mayor Stanley did not directly respond to Ford's accusations during the meeting but emphasized afterward that 'everyone has a right to raise concerns' and that the council took an extra step 'to close the loop and provide transparency.'
The council also approved a contract with Public Sector Search & Consulting Inc., a California-based firm composed of former law enforcement executives who specialize in police and fire chief recruitments. The firm has conducted high-profile searches in cities like Dallas, Irving, Killeen, and Oklahoma City, and it has developed a national reputation for identifying community-oriented law enforcement leaders.
Deputy City Manager Andrew Freeman said the firm was selected from a competitive pool of 10 applicants. It stood out for its deep law enforcement knowledge and exclusive focus on public safety recruitment.
'They've built a strong national network of candidates and are constantly engaged with active and emerging police leaders through conferences and association events,' Freeman said. 'They understand what modern policing requires, and they know what Amarillo needs.'
The contract carries a base cost of $42,500 and is expected to exceed $50,000 with travel and logistical expenses. It will be paid for using salary savings from the currently vacant chief position.
Freeman said the process is already underway and includes stakeholder engagement, department input, and the creation of a recruitment brochure. Finalists — expected to number between three and five — will visit Amarillo for interviews and public forums.
'We're going to work with the firm to define the qualities we're looking for — someone with leadership strength, a commitment to transparency, and a strong sense of community connection,' he said.
The city hopes to have a new chief in place by November or December.
The council also authorized $3.8 million in funding for street preservation projects, including microsurfacing and cape seal work. The funds are part of a larger $11-12 million effort to address long-deferred infrastructure needs. Residents can track project locations through an online city map.
Stanley reaffirmed the city's opt-out policy on automated water meters and emphasized their benefits: real-time leak detection, accurate billing, and usage tracking.
He also addressed a shift in how public comments are managed during council meetings, including the return of a visible countdown timer to enforce speaking limits.
'Public meetings are about balance,' he said. 'We've made it easier for people to speak, but we also need to manage time to serve everyone.'
As the city addresses calls for greater transparency and prepares to select new public safety leadership, Stanley said the focus remains on public trust and progress.
'We're listening,' he said. 'And we're committed to doing the work to earn people's trust moving forward.'
This article originally appeared on Amarillo Globe-News: City council votes on election affirmation, police chief search firm
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration expands ‘good moral character' requirement to become naturalized citizen
Trump administration expands ‘good moral character' requirement to become naturalized citizen

CNN

time29 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump administration expands ‘good moral character' requirement to become naturalized citizen

The Trump administration is expanding the requirement for immigrants who are hoping to become US citizens to display 'good moral character,' in a move that some immigration lawyers denounced as a troubling change that adds uncertainty to the naturalization process. US Citizenship and Immigration Services, an agency within the Department of Homeland Security that administers the country's legal immigration system, directed its officers in a memo last week to more heavily consider both positive and negative 'attributes or contributions' of people going through the naturalization process to become US citizens. The memo, which was sent to USCIS officers on Friday, requires them to take a more 'holistic approach in evaluating whether or not an alien seeking naturalization has affirmatively established that he or she has met their burden of establishing that they are worthy of assuming the rights and responsibilities of United States Citizenship.' The agency said in a statement that the new policy is intended to ensure its officers are accounting more heavily for an immigrant's positive attributes, rather than simply the 'absence of misconduct,' to reflect their character. 'U.S. citizenship is the gold standard of citizenship—it should only be offered to the world's best of the best,' USCIS spokesperson Matthew J. Tragesser said in a statement. The standard to show good moral character has long been part of the naturalization process in the US. But immigration attorneys told CNN that the memo is designed in a way that places additional burdens on people going through the process. Emily Ryo, a professor of law and sociology at Duke University whose research focuses on immigration, said the 'mandate is likely to introduce a great deal of uncertainty, unpredictability, and administrative burden.' 'What does it mean to require that a noncitizen 'affirmatively' establish that they are 'worthy' of US citizenship?' Ryo said in an email. 'What kind of documentation will noncitizens be required to provide to make this affirmative showing, and how exactly are the officials to weigh and verify such evidence?' Susan Ramos, an immigration attorney based in Arizona, described the policy change as 'troubling' and said it 'appears to effectively change the substantive requirements for naturalization without notice and comment, just by policy.' 'It creates a new subjective standard without providing the analysis that will be performed in adjudicating an application for naturalization,' Ramos said. 'For example, how much volunteer work is enough to tip the scales in favor of the applicant? Who decides that formula, and using what analysis? What will USCIS consider sufficient achievement for someone who doesn't work?' And because the directive is broadly written, it makes it more difficult to challenge an individual officer's decision on whether the character standard has been met, said Kathrin Mautino, a California-based immigration attorney. 'Generally, it will give individual officers more authority to ask about private lives,' Mautino said. But the memo does contain some more concrete and stringent requirements for potential new citizens. Previously, immigrants who owed overdue taxes were required to only show they were participating in a payment plan with the IRS to meet the character standard, Mautino said. But the new memo now requires the 'full payment' of overdue taxes, as well as other obligations including child-support payments. USCIS said in the memo this is to make sure immigrants 'who have engaged in wrongdoing are properly rehabilitated and reformed.' People who have multiple traffic tickets can now be found to lack good moral character, as well as people who engage in 'harassment or aggressive solicitation,' though it is not clear what the memo means by that. The updated policy is just one way the Trump administration is more heavily scrutinizing the lives of people applying for citizenship or for the right to live, work or study in the United States. In late May, the US State Department ordered embassies to pause visa interviews for international students so they could more heavily scrutinize students' social media. The pause was lifted after the State Department told embassies to screen for 'hostile attitudes towards our citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles.' On Tuesday, USCIS announced that type of vetting will expand to seek out 'anti-American' attitudes in those seeking immigration-related benefits such as the right to live or work in the US.

Oklahoma Proposes ‘America First Test' for Teachers From New York and California
Oklahoma Proposes ‘America First Test' for Teachers From New York and California

New York Times

time29 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Oklahoma Proposes ‘America First Test' for Teachers From New York and California

Oklahoma will require teachers coming from New York and California to pass a test to combat what it calls 'woke indoctrination' before being hired, according to the state's public schools superintendent. Its America First Test is designed to filter out teachers with views contrary to Oklahoma values, said Ryan Walters, the state superintendent. It is meant to ensure that educators promote American exceptionalism and help protect against what he called 'radical gender ideology.' 'If you come to Oklahoma, you will abide by our state law, you will abide by our standards and teach those in the classroom,' said Mr. Walters, a Republican, in an interview on Tuesday. The test, designed by PragerU, a conservative nonprofit, is the latest attempt by education officials in Oklahoma to push the state's education system to the right. Critics of Oklahoma's decision argued that the test was more a means to garner attention from the president and his supporters than effect real change. Historically, only a handful of teachers each year move there from New York and California. 'His priority should be educating students,' said Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, one of the country's largest teacher's unions, 'but instead, it's getting Donald Trump and other MAGA politicians to notice him.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Trump admin imposes sanctions on more International Criminal Court officials
Trump admin imposes sanctions on more International Criminal Court officials

CNN

time31 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump admin imposes sanctions on more International Criminal Court officials

The Trump administration escalated its fight against the International Criminal Court by imposing sanctions on four more court officials involved in work related to alleged Israeli and US war crimes. In a statement Wednesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the State Department was designating Kimberly Prost of Canada, Nicolas Guillou of France, Nazhat Shameem Khan of Fiji and Mame Mandiaye Niang of Senegal for their work in the ICC 'to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute nationals of the United States or Israel, without the consent of either nation.' The sanctions were imposed under an executive order issued by President Donald Trump in February that authorizes punitive measures like sanctions and possible entrance bans on ICC personnel because of its 'illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America and our close ally Israel.' The executive order was already used to sanction ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan and four ICC judges. According to a State Department fact sheet, Prost, an ICC judge 'is being designated for ruling to authorize the ICC's investigation into U.S. personnel in Afghanistan.' Guillou, another judge, 'is being designated for ruling to authorize the ICC's issuance of arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant,' the fact sheet said. 'Deputy Prosecutors Shameem Khan and Niang are being designated for continuing to support illegitimate ICC actions against Israel, including upholding the ICC's arrest warrants targeting Prime Minister Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Gallant since they assumed leadership for the ICC's Office of the Prosecutor,' it said. The ICC issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Gallant in November 2024 for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. Trump also signed an executive order authorizing sanctions and visa restrictions for members of the court during his first term in 2020, months after the ICC authorized a probe into alleged war crimes committed in Afghanistan by US and Afghan forces as well as alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the Taliban.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store