Maryland Del. Nino Mangione sponsors legislation in honor of Rachel Morin
BALTIMORE — In response to the 2023 death of Rachel Morin, a Harford County mother of five, Del. Nino Mangione is sponsoring legislation to prohibit Maryland towns and counties from adopting sanctuary policies for immigrants.
'HB 85 will not bring [Rachel Morin's] life back, nor to her five children their mother back, or the daughter or sister,' Mangione, a Baltimore County Republican, said at a Wednesday bill hearing in Annapolis. 'However, what it will do, hopefully, is prevent another horrible tragedy like this from happening, and send a message to the world that we will not tolerate these atrocities in the state of Maryland.'
House Bill 85, named in honor of Morin, who was killed on Bel Air's Ma and Pa Heritage Trail in 2023, would prohibit Maryland counties or municipalities from adopting or enacting sanctuary policies to protect people who entered the country illegally, and would require them to fully cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents seeking out people who have been convicted of violent crimes.
Morin's alleged killer, Victor Martinez-Hernandez, is an immigrant from El Salvador who police say illegally crossed the U.S. border. He is charged with first- and second-degree murder, first- and second-degree rape, third-degree sex offense and kidnapping.
A jury trial has been set for April 1 in Harford County.
Sharareh Borhani Hoidra, a private immigration attorney and chair of the Maryland State Bar Association's immigration law section, said Mangione's bill will lead to 'constitutional issues,' and that the language is 'at odds' with current state law.
Under the bill, residents who believe their jurisdiction or town has implemented sanctuary policies or is not cooperating with ICE would be able to submit complaints to the attorney general's office to determine whether the locality is in compliance with the provisions of the legislation. If the town or jurisdiction is not in compliance, they would be ineligible to receive state funds until the attorney general certifies that they are following the policies.
'If local jurisdictions are required to cooperate with with federal authorities in the way that HB 85 mandates, it increases the likelihood that criminals may have been detained or deported before they could harm people,' Mangione said.
The legislation would also repeal a portion of existing law that prohibits police officers asking about a person's citizenship or immigration status during regular stops.
Hoidra said that Mangione's bill seeks to turn state and local law enforcement into federal immigration agents.
Maryland's Democratic super-majority legislature has taken steps in the past to provide protections for the state's immigrant community.
In 2021, the General Assembly passed legislation that prohibits counties from entering into agreements with ICE to detain immigrants on its behalf. Another law was enacted the same year that requires state employees to deny the inspection of files containing photos or personal information for immigration enforcement purposes unless the requestor has a valid warrant.
Since President Donald Trump took office last month, Maryland Democrats have continued to put forth protections. Gov. Wes Moore said the state will 'follow the Constitution' in regard to ICE enforcement.
The 1996 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Printz v. United States determined that the Necessary and Proper Clause of the Constitution does not give the federal government the authority to force state officials to carry out federal programs.
Attorney General Anthony Brown has also issued guidance for law enforcement regarding interactions with ICE, reminding officers that they are not required to share information regarding a person's immigration status with federal officials.
Additionally, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Chair Will Smith, and House Ways and Means Committee Vice Chair Jheanelle Wilkins and Del. Jared Solomon — all Montgomery County Democrats — are sponsoring the Protecting Sensitive Locations Act this legislative session, which would limit ICE's access to schools, hospitals, courthouses and places of worship.
Maryland is currently contending with a neatly $3 billion budget deficit. Republicans have railed against Moore, a Democrat, alleging that he is spending beyond the state's means.
Noting that Mangione sits on the House Appropriations Committee, the House chamber's committee that primarily deals with the budget, Del. Aaron Kaufman, a Montgomery County Democrat, asked if Mangione was aware of and supported the bill's nearly $300,000 fiscal note, which gradually rises to $396,000 by fiscal year 2030.
'Yes, delegate, I am,' Mangione said in response. 'But we have a 60-plus-billion-dollar budget, and several hundred-thousand dollars to protect the lives of Marylanders, I think, is a very small price to pay — especially to the Morin family, as a perfect example.'
Hoidra told lawmakers that Mangione's bill would violate the separation of powers, saying that the 10th amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that the federal government cannot mandate state or local law enforcement to carry out immigration policy.
According to Hoidra, Mangione's bill would not be enforceable under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Enacted in 1952, the Immigration and Nationality Act is a set of provisions that determines who can come into and stay in the country and if someone is violating the law by being in the United States.
'House Bill 85 attempts to punish Maryland counties and municipalities based on a misunderstanding of federal law,' Hoidra said. 'It's impossible to sanction a state or municipality for granting lawful presence within state boundaries in violation of federal law.'
--------
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
39 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Iowa governor rejects GOP bill to increase regulations of Summit's carbon dioxide pipeline
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds on Wednesday rejected a bill that could have introduced more complications for a massive carbon-capture pipeline project routed across several Midwestern states, issuing a rare veto in the Republican-controlled statehouse. The legislation was designed by Iowa House Republicans to increase regulations of Summit Carbon Solutions' estimated $8.9 billion, 2,500-mile (4,023-kilometer) project that cuts across Iowa and already has an approved permit in the state. But the bill provoked loud opposition from members of Iowa's powerful ethanol industry, which argued the project is essential for Iowa's agricultural dominance, for farmers and for construction jobs. And it exposed a rift within the party over how to protect property rights. 'While I shared the bill's goal of protecting landowners, good policy should draw clear, careful lines. This bill doesn't,' said Reynolds, a Republican, in the explanation of her veto. 'It combines valid concerns with vague legal standards and sweeping mandates that reach far beyond their intended targets.' Despite her veto, Reynolds said she was 'committed to working with the legislature to strengthen landowner protections, modernize permitting, and respect private property.' Iowa state Rep. Bobby Kaufmann, a Republican who supported the bill in the House, said Wednesday that her commitment is too little, too late. 'If she was willing to work with us on this, where in the world has she been the last three years?' Kaufmann said. 'She is clearly not siding with the constitutional rights of landowners but rather she's siding with special interests.' Summit has said it has invested nearly $175 million to enter into voluntary agreements with landowners in Iowa and more than $1 billion on the project overall. In a statement, Summit thanked the governor for a thoughtful review of the bill and said their goal is to proceed with voluntary agreements with landowners. Even with the relief from Reynolds' veto, Summit will likely have to readjust plans after South Dakota's governor signed a ban on the use of eminent domain — the government seizure of private property with compensation — to acquire land for carbon dioxide pipelines. Summit's permit application was also rejected in South Dakota. The project has permit approvals in Iowa, Minnesota and North Dakota but faces various court challenges. The Iowa bill would have prohibited the renewal of permits for a carbon dioxide pipeline, limited the use of such a pipeline to 25 years and significantly increased the insurance coverage requirements for the pipeline company. Those provisions would likely have made it less financially feasible for a company to build a carbon dioxide pipeline. 'We look forward to continued discussions with state leaders as we advance this important project,' Summit said Wednesday. 'At a time when farmers are facing increasing pressures, this project opens the door to new markets and helps strengthen America's energy dominance for the long term.' Rift in Republican-controlled statehouse Republican House Speaker Pat Grassley said after Reynolds' veto that he would pursue a special session to vote on an override, saying in a statement that the veto 'is a major setback for Iowa.' The Iowa Constitution states that a request for special session from two-thirds of both chambers, or the governor, can bring lawmakers back to Des Moines. Two-thirds of both chambers would need to vote for an override for the bill to become law without the governor's approval. 'We will not stop fighting and stand firm on our commitment until landowners' in Iowa are protected against Eminent Domain for private gain,' Grassley said. Senate Majority Leader Jack Whitver suggested that would be unlikely in his chamber. Thirteen Republican senators had joined with 14 Democrats in voting in favor of the bill, but 21 Republicans and one Democrat voted against it. 'Based on the votes on that bill in the Iowa Senate, a significant majority of our caucus supports a better policy to protect landowner rights. I expect that majority of our caucus would not be interested in any attempt to override her veto,' he said. As the legislative session wound down, a dozen Republican senators insisted their leaders bring the House-approved bill to the floor for a vote after several years of inaction. The stalemate ended in a long and divisive debate among the Iowa Senate's Republican supermajority, with senators openly criticizing one another and exposing the closed-door discussions that got them there. Summit's project and its critics The Summit pipeline was proposed to carry carbon emissions from ethanol plants in Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota to be stored underground permanently in North Dakota. By lowering carbon emissions from the plants, the pipeline would lower their carbon intensity scores and make them more competitive in the renewable fuels market. The project would also allow ethanol producers and Summit to tap into federal tax credits. The pipeline's many critics have for years begged lawmakers for action. They accuse Summit of stepping on their property rights and downplaying the safety risks of building the pipeline alongside family homes, near schools and across ranches. Lee Enterprises and The Associated Press reviewed hundreds of cases that reveal the great legal lengths the company went to to get the project built. In South Dakota, in particular, a slew of eminent domain legal actions to obtain land sparked a groundswell of opposition that was closely watched by lawmakers in Iowa as well. A group of landowners released a statement Wednesday calling the veto a slap in the face. 'Big money, greed & self interest won the day,' said Jan Norris, a landowner in southwest Iowa whose neighbor is in the pipeline's route. 'Our property rights are for sale to the highest bidder.'
San Francisco Chronicle
40 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Families file suit challenging Arkansas law that requires Ten Commandments be posted in classrooms
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Seven Arkansas families filed a lawsuit Wednesday challenging an upcoming state requirement that public school classrooms have posted copies of the Ten Commandments, saying the new law will violate their constitutional rights. The federal lawsuit challenges a measure Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed into law earlier this year, similar to a requirement enacted by Louisiana and one that Texas' governor has said he'll sign. The Arkansas law takes effect in August and requires the Ten Commandments to be prominently displayed in public school classrooms and libraries. 'Permanently posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom and library — rendering them unavoidable — unconstitutionally pressures students into religious observance, veneration, and adoption of the state's favored religious scripture,' the lawsuit said. The suit was filed on behalf of the families by the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State and the Freedom from Religion Foundation. The lawsuit names four school districts in northwest Arkansas — Fayetteville, Bentonville, Siloam Springs and Springdale — as defendants. A spokesperson for Fayetteville schools said the district would not comment on pending litigation, while the other three districts did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A spokesperson for Attorney General Tim Griffin said his office was reviewing the lawsuit and considering options. Attorneys for the families, who are Jewish, Unitarian Universalist or nonreligious, said they planned to ask the federal judge in Fayetteville for a preliminary injunction blocking the law's enforcement. The attorneys say the law violates longstanding Supreme Court precedent and the families' First Amendment rights. 'By imposing a Christian-centric translation of the Ten Commandments on our children for nearly every hour of every day of their public-school education, this law will infringe on our rights as parents and create an unwelcoming and religiously coercive school environment for our children," Samantha Stinson, one of the plaintiffs, said in a news release. Louisiana was the first state to enact such a requirement, and a federal judge blocked the measure before it was to take effect Jan 1. Proponents of Louisiana's law say that ruling only applies to the five school boards listed in the suit, but The Associated Press is unaware of any posters being displayed in schools as the litigation continues.
Los Angeles Times
40 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Amid protests, questions loom about how active ICE will be at Club World Cup games
The Department of Homeland Security said border patrol agents will provide security for Saturday's FIFA Club World Cup opener between Inter Miami and Egyptian club Al Ahly at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, Fla. 'Let the games begin,' U.S. Customs and Border Protection wrote in a social media post Tuesday. 'The first FIFA Club World Cup games start on June 14 in Miami, FL at the Hard Rock Stadium. CBP will be suited and booted ready to provide security for the first round of games.' The post has since been deleted. But it included a reference to 'the first round of games,' suggesting immigration agents were not limiting their presence to the opening match. The month-long 32-team tournament includes six first-round games at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, beginning with Sunday's match between Champions League winner Paris Saint-Germain and Spain's Atlético Madrid. CPB agents, who operate under the umbrella of the Department of Homeland Security, do not primarily provide security at stadiums the same way local police or private security firms do, but they are often involved in security operations in the lead-up to major events, monitoring airspace or assisting with rapid response to emergencies. ICE officers, which also operate under the DHS umbrella, are primarily tasked with identifying and arresting individuals who violate U.S. immigration law. So the possibility that federal immigration officials will be on site at a major international soccer match less than a year before the World Cup returns to the U.S. figures to inflame an already tense situation. FIFA said it is collaborating with the Rose Bowl on security issues and the presence of CPB and ICE agents, while not anticipated, could not be ruled out. 'FIFA is working in collaboration with the stadium authorities and relevant government government agencies — be it local, federal and state — to implement a detailed safety and security plan for the stadiums involved in the Club World Cup,' said a FIFA source familiar with the situation who was not authorized to discuss it publicly. Three other international matches will also be played in Southern California during the next five days in Inglewood and Carson, but officials at both those stadiums said federal agents will not be present. The CONCACAF Gold Cup will also kick off Saturday with Mexico playing the Dominican Republic at SoFi Stadium, but officials there said they have not changed their normal security procedures. A Gold Cup doubleheader involving Panama, Guadeloupe, Jamaica and Guatemala will follow at Dignity Health Sports Park in Carson on June 16 and a stadium spokesperson said they will also be using their regular protocols, in addition to providing a public protest area on the stadium grounds. The civil unrest in Southern California was sparked by masked ICE officers executing immigration raids across the region. The ensuing protests led the Trump administration to send thousands of national guard troops and hundreds of U.S. Marines into city streets over the objections of L.A. mayor Karen Bass, California Gov. Gavin Newsom and other local elected officials. No one at SoFi Stadium would speak on the record about security preparations for Saturday's CONCACAF Gold Cup opener featuring Mexico, which is expected to draw a crowd of more than 50,000. But one official with knowledge of the situation said the stadium is following 'normal procedures' and 'ICE is not part of those protocols.' SoFi Stadium's security and crowd management duties have traditionally been handled by local law enforcement authorities and Contemporary Services Corporation, a private security company whose yellow- and blue-clad workers have become ubiquitous at sports and entertainments across the country. The Mexican team was originally slated to stay in a downtown hotel ahead of the match in Inglewood, but it moved to Long Beach because of security concerns. Asked about the presence of ICE agents at Saturday's Club World Cup match at Hard Rock Stadium, where last year's Copa América final was delayed more than an hour by fans rushing the entrances, FIFA president Gianni Infantino said he did not see a problem with it despite the fact it figures to depress attendance for a game that was already struggling to sell tickets. 'We are very attentive on any security question,' Infantino said. 'Of course, the most important [thing] for us is to guarantee security for all the fans who come to the games. This is our priority. This is the priority of all the authorities who are here. 'And we want everyone who comes to the games to pass a good moment.'
