logo
Norfolk election officials ask judge to remove one of its board members

Norfolk election officials ask judge to remove one of its board members

Yahoo28-04-2025

Several Norfolk election officials have asked a Circuit Court judge to remove a member of the Norfolk Electoral Board, saying she has disrupted the election process and betrayed the nonpartisan nature of the position.
Officials are asking a judge to remove Marianne McKay, the board vice chair, according to court documents.
'Her actions are a refusal to perform her required duties under state code as an appointed electoral board member,' Stephanie Iles, Norfolk general registrar, said in a Nov. 16 email to Virginia Department of Elections Commissioner Susan Beals.
The case against McKay revolves around several actions taken by her during the 2024 June primary and November general election. In November, McKay attempted to rescind her approval of the 2024 election results because she was not allowed to personally review thousands of provisional ballots.
'Despite our procedures of researching all information for each provisional ballot cast to ensure the voter is eligible and in the correct precinct to present our findings before the board for approval, she continued to delay the request to certify the provisional votes,' Iles said in a Jan. 6 letter to the Virginia State Board of Elections.
Additionally, Iles said McKay instructed election officials to deviate from normal protocols by asking chief and assistant chief officers to separately complete statements of results, according to the letter.
'Why would you change our procedures?' Iles asked. 'In a time where there are seeds of doubt sewn in our local and national elections, this action was tantamount to sabotage.'
Iles also said McKay worked with a third-party election integrity group to staff outside poll watchers at the June and November elections. Iles said the poll watchers were instructed to illegally take pictures in the polling place and that she received complaints about their behavior. Iles called the actions ethically compromising and political in nature.
'Ms. McKay has exhibited aggressive actions and a micromanaging mentality as a board member,' Iles said in the letter, adding that she continues to ignore a passed motion telling board members to only perform duties assigned to their position.
Finally, Iles said during the first election McKay served as a board member, she offended staff members with her opinions on gay people and offended Electoral Board Chair Atoy Carrington, who is Black, with racial insults.
Carrington also sent an email to Beals and other state election officials in August, saying during the June primary McKay would not answer questions about an incident that occurred on another board member's assigned route. Carrington said McKay removed a poll chief at that precinct and replaced that person with one of her choosing.
'A team player she is not,' Carrington said. 'We have all attempted to work with Ms. McKay, but she refuses to work with us.'
John Sitka, chair of the Norfolk Republican Party, even asked McKay to step down from her position after she included him in her email chains. In a Nov. 16 email, Sitka asked McKay to resign, saying doing so would prevent future embarrassment for her and Norfolk Republicans.
'If you do not voluntarily step down, I will have to consider asking a judge to remove you,' Sitka said in another email after McKay did not resign.
In a written response to the state board, McKay sidestepped a question about whether she would withdraw her certification of the election if she had the chance to do it again. McKay claimed she and other poll watchers witnessed irregularities at the Chesterfield precinct, particularly involving groups of Norfolk State University students voting. She admitted to training the poll watchers but denied that it was ethically compromising because she said she was not acting as a board member at that time.
She also countered claims of micromanaging by saying she was conducting oversight over Iles and blamed what she said was an overly broad motion delegating many tasks to the general registrar. She also denied insulting gay people or using racial insults.
Virginia's bipartisan electoral boards are selected for three-year staggered terms by Circuit Court judges based on local party recommendations, according to the Virginia elections website. Iles said McKay was sworn in Dec. 15, 2022, and her term ends Dec. 31. McKay was one of three candidates recommended by former Norfolk GOP Chair Craig Shepherd, Iles said.
Since Donald Trump falsely claimed the 2020 election was stolen and sought to overturn the results, the Republican Party and its allies recruited poll watchers in 2024 to attempt to collect evidence of fraud at elections, according to New York Times reporting.
The Virginia Board of Elections voted 4-1 on March 4 to petition the court for McKay's removal. McKay's next hearing is scheduled for 9:30 a.m. Tuesday in Norfolk Circuit Court.
McKay, Iles and Carrington declined to comment.
In a handwritten letter sent to Iles' home following the June primary, McKay quoted a Bible verse from Proverbs: 'Better is open rebuke than hidden love. Wounds from a friend can be trusted, but an enemy multiplies kisses. As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpers another.'
Trevor Metcalfe, 757-222-5345, trevor.metcalfe@pilotonline.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mayor Adams offers a surprising compliment to Democratic primary challenger Zohran Mamdani
Mayor Adams offers a surprising compliment to Democratic primary challenger Zohran Mamdani

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mayor Adams offers a surprising compliment to Democratic primary challenger Zohran Mamdani

Mayor Adams Tuesday offered a surprising compliment to challenger Zohran Mamdani as the democratic socialist makes a run at knocking off frontrunner Andrew Cuomo just two weeks before the Democratic mayoral primary. During his weekly press conference on Tuesday, Adams, while acknowledging he's 'diametrically opposed' to Mamdani's policies, said he respects him for being consistent. 'Mamdani is the same Mamdani that he was before, same person,' Adams said of the current state assemblymember. 'I disagree with him, but at least he's not this politician that puts a finger in the air and sees where the wind is blowing. The rest of these guys are not consistent, you know?' Adams has chosen to skip the June primary and instead run for reelection as an independent in the November election. Mamdani is polling second to ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who resigned in disgrace in 2021 amid allegations of sexual harassment but has now mounted a powerful comeback campaign. The results of the June 24 primary typically determine who the next mayor will be in the heavily Democratic Big Apple, but with Adams running outside party lines and both Cuomo and Mamdani possibly also running on independent or the Working Families Party lines, the November general election could be competitive, as well. The mayor has slammed Cuomo for his pledge to work to do away with Tier 6 pensions despite instating them as governor, a promise to advocate for a $20 minimum wage despite rejecting a similar proposal from Mayor de Blasio and his support for crime crackdowns despite signing off on bail reforms laws. 'I respect people who are authentic and consistent, not who talk out of both sides of their mouths,' Adams said from City Hall on Tuesday. The mayor said that, no matter how the Democratic primary shakes out, he expects to compete against Mamdani in November because he's earned the support of the Working Families Party. During the press conference, Adams also took shots at Cuomo and his so-called rose garden campaign strategy, under which he rarely takes questions from the press. Adams also claimed that Cuomo is touting endorsements from communities that don't overwhelmingly back him. 'I have a Master's in public administration, but I have a PhD in Andrew,' Adams said. 'He comes out on weekends, he'll stop at a Black church, and then they'll list him as an endorsement, and oftentimes they call me and say, we never endorse him. He'll go and identify one or two people in a community and say, I have the community.' Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi said in response: 'You can quote me shrugging — another Tuesday and another unhinged rant from the MAGA mayor going through the seven stages of grief,' he said. 'He sold out the city to Trump for his own personal benefit and New Yorkers aren't going to ever forget that.'

Mike Johnson Says 'Clear Distinction' Between Jan. 6 and Los Angeles Riots
Mike Johnson Says 'Clear Distinction' Between Jan. 6 and Los Angeles Riots

Newsweek

time40 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Mike Johnson Says 'Clear Distinction' Between Jan. 6 and Los Angeles Riots

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. House Speaker Mike Johnson said on Tuesday that there's a "clear distinction" between the January 6, 2021, siege on the U.S. Capitol and the widespread demonstrations against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Los Angeles. What To Know CNN's Manu Raju asked Johnson whether he thinks it's "hypocritical" for President Donald Trump to condemn the anti-ICE protesters in L.A. for clashing with law enforcement when Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of everyone charged in the deadly Capitol riot, many of whom were convicted of beating or impeding law enforcement. "Look, no, I think there's a clear distinction between those two," Johnson said. "We've seen what's happened in L.A. in the early '90s and other times, when these things get out of control ... you have to stay on top of that and you cannot let it get out of control." Johnson was referring to the deadly 1992 riots that broke out in L.A. after a jury acquitted four police officers accused of brutally beating Black motorist Rodney King after a high-speed chase. "But what's the difference between the violent protesters on January 6 [and anti-ICE demonstrators]?" Raju pressed the House speaker. "Everybody wants me to relitigate January 6, I'm not going to do that," Johnson said. "There's a very clear distinction between the two. People who broke the law and destroyed property [on January 6] were met with the proper consequences on that." He added that the government has to be "consistent" on that issue in L.A., before turning to walk away. The protests in Los Angeles erupted after ICE raided a number of downtown neighborhoods with high immigrant populations and labor-intensive industries. More than 50 people have been arrested as a result of the raids and five Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) officers have been injured, officials said. Senator Majority Leader John Thune was also asked about Trump's "inconsistency" on the L.A. demonstrations and January 6 siege. "Do you see any inconsistency when the president criticizes or condemns the violent Los Angeles protesters but then pardons the violent January 6 protesters?" a reporter asked the South Dakota Republican. Thune dodged the question, saying, "I think the issue that's in front of us right now is the chaos in L.A." "And clearly the local officials there, for whatever reason, didn't seem up to the task of getting the job done there," he added. California Governor Gavin Newsom, local officials and the LAPD have all rebuffed that claim, saying they had the protests under control until Trump deployed the National Guard and mobilized the Marines to crack down on the demonstrations, which led to more unrest. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Proposal to ban DEI college courses, state policy dies in Louisiana Legislature
Proposal to ban DEI college courses, state policy dies in Louisiana Legislature

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Proposal to ban DEI college courses, state policy dies in Louisiana Legislature

A brick wall sign marks the entrance to the University of Louisiana at Lafayette campus on May 15, 2025. (Greg LaRose/Louisiana Illuminator) The Louisiana Senate has refused to refer a bill targeting diversity, equity and inclusion to a committee where it could be debated, an unusual move that essentially means the proposal will die on the vine. House Bill 685 by Rep. Emily Chenevert, R-Baton Rouge, would have banned DEI practices across state government and prohibit state universities and colleges from requiring certain race and gender-based curricula for undergraduate students. It narrowly passed the House last month after a hours-long debate in which Black lawmakers called the bill 'racially oppressive.' 'We couldn't figure out which committee to refer it to,' Senate President Cameron Henry, R-Metairie, said Monday in an interview. Chenevert said she was disappointed her bill didn't get a Senate committee hearing, adding she would consider sponsoring the legislation again in the future. 'Sometimes it's not about getting all the way through,' Chenevert said. 'Maybe it's just bringing up the topic and having some … open conversations about it.' The legislation was originally debated in the House and Governmental Affairs Committee, because its original version only prohibited DEI practices in state agencies. During that hearing, it was amended to restrict college curricula but it was not sent to the House Committe on Education, which handles proposals on curricula and higher education. 'To the extent the bill intended to prohibit the inclusion of certain concepts which are unrelated to specific courses or programs it would be unnecessary as professional best practices already set that standard,' LSU Faculty Senate President Dan Tirone said in a statement to the Illuminator. House Bill 685 was introduced in the Senate on May 20, with more than three weeks left in the legislative session during which it could have been debated in committee, a necessary step before it can get a Senate floor vote. But as the final week of committee meetings passed, Chenevert's proposal remained unreferred. 'I think it's unnecessary,' Henry said, adding it was the Senate's decision, not just his, to stall the bill. 'An enormous amount of people from both parties expressed their reservations.' Chenevert's bill had the support of Gov. Jeff Landry. 'If the governor wants to institute that, he can do an executive order,' Henry said of the legislation. If it had become law, the bill would have prohibited required classes that cover any of the following subjects: Critical race theory White fragility or white guilt Systemic racism, institutional racism or anti-racism Systemic bias or implicit bias Intersectionality Gender identity Allyship Race-based reparations Race-based privilege The legislation would have allowed any of the subjects to be taught if it was 'included at the discretion of the faculty member, is not prescribed by the institution as a program requirement, and is part of a broader pedagogical objective.' Opponents of the bill said even with this language, the legislation could have had a chilling effect on faculty's academic freedom and freedom of speech. The Louisiana chapter of the American Association of University Professors sent a letter to lawmakers asking them to oppose the bill. 'This legislation would stifle the 'marketplace of ideas' and infantilize our students, forcing faculty to avoid concepts the legislature dislikes and presenting only those that have gained their favor,' the letter reads. 'This is antithetical to freedom in a democratic society and hurts our students as they transition into fully enfranchised citizens.' The Southern University Foundation, which is affiliated with Louisiana's largest historically Black university, also opposed the bill. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store