People urged to share views on how to clean up water and rebuild trust
The water industry's problems are not the 'inevitable consequence' of privatisation, the chairman of a commission set up to examine reforms of the sector has said.
The Government-appointed Independent Water Commission is launching its call for evidence on Thursday, asking the public, environmental groups, investors and others their views on reform of the troubled sector.
They are being urged to share their views on how to secure the 'significant' prize of cleaner waters, growth, and a stable, well-funded water sector for future generations.
The launch comes amid ongoing public anger over the degraded and polluted state of the country's rivers, lakes and coasts, soaring water bills and privatised water companies' dividends, debt and executive bonuses.
The commission is looking for views on the strategic management of water, the regulatory system, including economic, environmental and drinking water regulation, water company ownership models, and improving the resilience of assets from pipes to reservoirs, as well as supply chains.
Former deputy governor of the Bank of England Sir Jon Cunliffe, who is chairing the commission, said its initial work since it was announced in October 2024 has highlighted a range of serious and often interlocking concerns.
'Ambitious changes will be needed to address these concerns and rebuild the trust in the system that has broken down on all sides – customers, environmental groups, investors and companies.
'The problems we see today have not emerged overnight. Nor, do I believe, are they the inevitable consequence of a privatise regulated company model,' he said.
'Rather, they have developed over time and due to factors including poor decisions and poor performance by companies, regulatory gaps, policy instability and a history of ad-hoc changes that have left an increasingly complex system that is no longer working well for anyone,' he added.
'Our task is to stand back from the current system and explore, with an open mind, potential changes.'
He added: 'We should not forget that the prize here is significant – cleaner waters, growth and a stable, well-funded sector that can deliver essential, world-class services for future generations.'
Environment Secretary Steve Reed said: 'Our waterways are polluted and our water system urgently needs fixing.
'Earlier this week our ground-breaking Water Act became law, with new powers to ban the payment of unfair bonuses for polluting water bosses and bring criminal charges against lawbreakers.
'Our plan for change will clean up our rivers, lakes and seas for good.
'I urge people to respond to this call for evidence on what needs to change to clean up our waterways and rebuild our broken water infrastructure.'
Commenting on the launch of the Water Commission's call for evidence, the chairman of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, Alistair Carmichael, whose committee is investigating the problems in the industry, said: 'There is huge public concern about the performance of water companies amidst repeated incidents of water outages, sewage pollution and outbreaks of contamination in domestic water supplies.
'I encourage the public to engage with the Water Commission's call for evidence and to use this opportunity to make their voices heard on the issues involved in cleaning up the unsatisfactory state of the country's water services.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Labour faces backlash after taking credit for Bank of England's interest rate cuts
The Government came under fire last night after seeking to take credit for interest rate cuts in the UK. Rachel Reeves used her spending review to claim her policies have 'helped support four cuts in interest rates ' by the Bank of England since the election. It echoed similar comments from Sir Keir Starmer at Prime Minister's Questions just minutes earlier. But they faced a backlash from economists. Simon French, chief economist at City broker Panmure Liberum, said that Labour's spending may have led to higher interest rates. Describing himself as 'uncomfortable with this line from the Chancellor that fiscal policy has supported cutting UK interest rates four times', he said: 'Basic economics would have it that looser fiscal policy necessitates tighter monetary policy, all else being equal.' The former Bank of England rate-setter Andrew Sentance said French's analysis was 'absolutely right' and suggested that the Bank 'has been over-hasty in cutting rates'. And Julian Jessop, of the Institute of Economic Affairs, noted that while Starmer 'is still trying to claim credit for four interest rate cuts', the European Central Bank 'has cut interest rates eight times in the past year'. The Bank's monetary policy committee is independent and Government ministers have no say in its interest rate decisions.
Telegraph
17 hours ago
- Telegraph
Reform plans risk destabilising markets, warns Bank of England
Reform's plan to overhaul the Bank of England will leave markets more exposed to financial shocks, a senior official at the central bank has suggested. Victoria Saporta, a director at the Bank, signalled that the party's scheme to stop the Bank paying interest on money held there by commercial banks could return Britain to a world of 'significant' volatility in financial markets. It comes amid increasing scrutiny of Reform's economic plans as the party surges in popularity. Panmure Liberum recently warned of an 'immediate and violent' sterling crisis if Nigel Farage came to power and followed through on his plans to slash taxes. Reform has refuted this claim, saying it would focus on cutting spending first to ensure any tax cuts were affordable. The party has vowed to save taxpayers up to £35bn a year by scrapping interest payments on central bank reserves, which were created as part of the Bank's £895bn quantitative easing (QE) programme to boost the economy during the financial crisis and Covid lockdowns. Richard Tice, the party's deputy leader, sent a letter last week to Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England, accusing Threadneedle Street of prioritising corporate profits over the interests of working people. He claimed the Bank was engaging in a 'systemic misuse of taxpayers' money' by paying interest and selling its existing stockpile of government bonds at substantial Street did not start paying interest on reserves until 2006. While Ms Saporta did not reference Reform's plan directly in her comments, she warned that the pre-2006 system 'actively disincentivised banks from holding any more reserves than was strictly necessary' because they were not remunerated. She added: 'This complex, scarce-reserves framework came at the cost of significant overnight rate volatility.' Ms Saporta added that paying interest on money parked at the Bank underpinned its ability to influence the economy by controlling borrowing costs. Mr Bailey has previously said that stopping interest payments on reserves would undermine this power. The Governor has repeatedly spoken out against changing the way commercial lenders are compensated for parking their cash at the Bank, warning that it could undermine financial and monetary stability if lenders no longer wished to hold extra buffers. Ms Saporta said: 'By remunerating reserves at Bank Rate, we anchored short-term market rates to the Monetary Policy Committee's chosen policy rate – a core feature of the framework that remains in place today. 'Put simply, we implement monetary policy through the interest we pay on reserves, and this has delivered a significant improvement in our ability to steer market rates.' Responding to Ms Saporta's comments, Mr Tice said: 'This speech is designed to confuse people with technical detail. It avoids the basic principle that the system worked fine [pre-crisis], before QE, and ignores the fact that some other central banks are neither paying interest on QE reserves nor doing quantitative tightening.' Quantitative tightening is the term for winding down the significant holdings of bonds built up by the bank throughout successive crises. Critics, including Mr Tice, believe offloading bonds is detrimental to the UK as it is crystallising losses for the taxpayer and pushes up borrowing costs. The Bank is selling down its stockpile of bonds at heavy losses to the taxpayer. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the Government's tax and spending watchdog, expects the cumulative lifetime loss to total £133.7bn, which is bigger than the annual education budget and more than twice what the UK spends on defence. Ms Saporta signalled that it will keep running down its stockpile of government bonds. She said the Bank will continue to move to a more normalised system of providing cash on demand through what's known as repurchase or 'repo' operations.
The Guardian
18 hours ago
- The Guardian
Tell us: have your saving habits changed due to economic uncertainty?
UK households are increasingly setting aside physical cash amid extreme economic uncertainty and to provide a safety net for possible banking system outages such as the recent one in Spain, according to the Bank of England's chief cashier. Victoria Cleland said on Tuesday that the Bank had tracked a significant increase in the number of banknotes in circulation in recent months, continuing a rising trend since 2022. We would like to hear from people who are setting aside more cash. Have you started a contingency pot? How have your habits changed over time? You can tell us about your cash habits using this form. Please share your story if you are 18 or over, anonymously if you wish. For more information, please see our terms of service and privacy policy. Your responses, which can be anonymous, are secure as the form is encrypted and only the Guardian has access to your contributions. We will only use the data you provide us for the purpose of the feature and we will delete any personal data when we no longer require it for this purpose. For true anonymity please use our SecureDrop service instead. If you're having trouble using the form, click here. Read terms of service here and privacy policy here.
