‘I have never left': Yee Jenn Jong on his ‘one last' return as WP's East Coast candidate in GE2025
'I have never left': Yee Jenn Jong on his 'one last' return as WP's East Coast candidate in GE2025
Follow our live coverage here.
SINGAPORE – Former Non-Constituency MP Yee Jenn Jong has stepped into the political ring for the fourth time in a general election, for what he says is his final charge.
The 60-year-old, who is part of the WP team contesting in East Coast GRC, lost in Joo Chiat SMC by 388 votes in the watershed 2011 election, describes his 2025 bid as an 'old soldier' returning to the battleground. He had publicly announced his retirement from electoral politics in 2021.
He drew a parallel to the late American general Douglas MacArthur who had to retire twice, after being recalled to active duty in 1941 when the US was dragged into war again. Quoting a saying by the US general that goes 'Old soldiers never die. They simply fade away', Mr Yee said: 'I've never left. I stepped up when called upon.'
He was part of the WP team that contested in Marine Parade GRC in the last general election and lost, with 42.26 per cent of the vote. While the four-time candidate was not entrenched in the WP's outreach efforts there following its 2020 defeat, he said he 'remained a soldier with fire still burning'.
Two years ago, when WP chief Pritam Singh asked if he could help prepare the ground in Punggol West SMC, and possibly the whole of Punggol, for the 2025 General Election, Mr Yee said yes.
But he also made it known to the party that he need not run as a candidate.
Speaking to The Straits Times in an interview at The Marketplace@58 in Bedok, Mr Yee said Mr Singh had already suspected back then that Punggol's population growth would necessitate the creation of a new group representation constituency.
Punggol GRC came to pass with the redrawing of electoral boundaries on March 11.
Mr Yee had led a small team to walk the ground there once a week, then twice a week – many a time with potential candidates the party sent his way to mentor and observe.
Two of them are now his running mates in East Coast GRC – lawyer Sufyan Mikhail Putra, 33, a former associate director at Abdul Rahman Law Corporation, and former US Navy security administrator Paris V. Parameswari, 51.
Another is now one of the party's candidates in Tampines GRC, 48-year-old Ong Lue Ping, a senior principal child psychologist at the Institute of Mental Health (IMH). All three passed with flying colours – even putting aside their careers to fly the opposition flag, he noted.
Dr Ong, who was director of allied health at IMH, stepped down from senior leadership at the hospital in late 2024 to prepare for his candidacy.
Mr Sufyan quit his law firm due to its non-partisan policy. Ms Paris resigned from the US Navy to contest as well. Mr Yee has encouraged Mr Sufyan and Ms Paris to join him in becoming full-time MPs if they are elected.
Mr Yee said Mr Singh asked him to lead the party's East Coast GRC team, given his familiarity with the Joo Chiat ward, which was absorbed into the constituency.
Mr Yee said he could not say no. 'I have lived here all 60 years of my life – my kindergarten till junior college, extended family, friends and church are here. I am a true blue Eastie,' he said.
(From left, in blue) The WP's East Coast GRC candidates Nathaniel Koh, Jasper Kuan, Paris V. Parameswari, Yee Jenn Jong and Sufyan Mikhail Putra greeting residents during the hustings.
ST PHOTO: DESMOND WEE
Mr Yee said WP's slate in this election, with 14 new faces, is 'the best' the party has ever assembled, and that the country stands at a 'pivotal moment of Singapore politics'.
'Does Singapore progress on to a functioning multi-party system or do we regress when we struggle to persuade good men and women to step up and allow the PAP a blank cheque,' he added, noting that it would be more difficult for the WP to recruit if there is an opposition wipeout.
Asked if it was good strategy to not field former candidates such as lawyer Ang Boon Yaw, 42, and former researcher Abdul Shariff Aboo Kassim, 59, in East Coast GRC, where they continued to make weekly visits after the party's narrow loss in 2020, Mr Yee said they are 'amazing' and 'selfless' soldiers who work regardless of their candidacy.
'I don't think anyone here works expecting to be parachuted into safe seats, like someone in their 60s going into Ang Mo Kio GRC,' he added, in what was clearly a dig at the PAP's Ang Mo Kio GRC candidate Victor Lye, 63, who was part of the losing PAP team in Aljunied GRC in the last two elections.
Asked if the WP stands a chance of winning in East Coast GRC, Mr Yee would only say that he had stopped thinking about the odds after his first three electoral bids.
'Every vote counts, especially after losing by 388 votes in 2011. I tell the team to press on. Push yourselves to the max but enjoy this ride,' he said.
WP candidate for East Coast GRC Yee Jenn Jong speaking during the party's rally at Bedok Stadium on April 29.
ST PHOTO: AZMI ATHNI
As for why this would be his last electoral bid, Mr Yee said he does not want to be a first-term MP at the age of 65.
'If I do get elected, my priority is to ensure we take over operations and run the estate well, and I will actively plan for succession, either at the next or maximum one more term,' he said.
'This shall be my last attempt to help make a breakthrough.'
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
US proposed Nato-style joint defence guarantees for Ukraine, says Italy's premier
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has been proposing a security guarantee for Ukraine 'inspired' by Nato's Article 5. KYIV – The United States has proposed security guarantees for Ukraine similar to – but separate from – the collective defence agreement between Nato member countries, according to Italy's prime minister and a diplomatic source. The suggestion was raised during a call US President Donald Trump held with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders on Aug 16, the day after Mr Trump's summit with Russia's Vladimir Putin . 'As one of the security guarantees for Ukraine, the American side proposed a non-Nato Article 5 type guarantee, supposedly agreed with Putin,' the diplomatic source said on condition they not be identified in any way. Nato's collective security is based on its Article 5 principle: If one member is attacked, the entire alliance comes to its defence. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who was on the call with Mr Trump, confirmed the US president raised the idea of security guarantee 'inspired' by Article 5, which she has been pushing for several months. The starting point for the proposal was defining a collective security clause 'that would allow Ukraine to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the US, (which would be) ready to act in case it is attacked again', Ms Meloni said in a statement. In March, Ms Meloni told Italian senators that any such response would not necessarily involve going to war. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Over 280 vapes seized, more than 640 people checked by police, HSA in anti-vape raids at nightspots Singapore SPLRT disruption: 28km of cables to be tested during off-service hours, to be completed by Aug 23 Singapore First-half GDP boost likely temporary; Republic must stay relevant amid challenges: Chan Chun Sing Life Six-figure sales each durian season: Why S'pore durian sellers are now live selling on TikTok Singapore Airport-bound public bus to be fitted with luggage rack in 3-month trial: LTA Singapore 3 truck drivers injured after chain collision on ECP, including one rescued with hydraulic tools Life Meet the tutors who take O-level exams every year to create a 'war mate' bond with their students Life Pivot or perish: How Singapore restaurants are giving diners what they want She noted that, while Nato's Article 5 has the use of force as an option, 'it is not the only possible option'. Kyiv has long aspired to join Nato, but Russia has given that as one of its reasons for its war in Ukraine, and some Western circles have expressed resistance to the idea. Mr Trump has repeatedly ruled out Ukraine joining the Western military alliance. Before his joint call with Mr Zelensky and European leaders, Mr Trump spoke just with the Ukrainian president about the Alaska summit on Aug 15. 'The American side voiced this (joint security proposal) during a conversation with the president (Zelensky) and then repeated it during a joint conversation with the Europeans,' the diplomatic source said. Another source with knowledge of the matter confirmed the Nato-like guarantees was discussed. But that source added: 'No-one knows how this could work and why Putin would agree to it if he is categorically against Nato and obviously against really effective guarantees of Ukraine's sovereignty.' Ms Meloni's statement made no mention of whether the idea was discussed with Mr Putin. Mr Zelensky is due in Washington on Aug 18 for talks with Mr Trump. The second source said Mr Zelensky is to discuss what form a possible Trump-Putin-Zelensky summit would have, the role of Kyiv's European allies in peace talks, territories and security guarantees. AFP

Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Ukrainians see ‘nothing' good from Trump-Putin meeting, call it ‘useless'
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Ukrainians at a rally in New York on Aug 15 ahead of US President Donald Trump's meeting with his Russian counterpart, Mr Vladimir Putin. KYIV – Mr Pavlo Nebroev stayed up until the middle of the night in Ukraine's north-eastern city of Kharkiv to wait for a news conference between Mr Donald Trump and Mr Vladimir Putin thousands of kilometres away. The US and Russian leaders met in Alaska on Aug 15 to discuss Russia's more than three-year invasion of his country. But they made no breakthrough and, seen from Kharkiv – heavily attacked by Russia throughout the war – the red-carpet meeting looked like a clear win for Mr Putin. 'I saw the results I expected. I think this is a great diplomatic victory for Putin,' Mr Nebroev, a 38-year-old theatre manager, said. 'He has completely legitimised himself.' Mr Trump inviting Mr Putin to the US ended the West's shunning of the Russian leader since the 2022 invasion. Ukraine's leader, Mr Volodymyr Zelensky, who was not invited, described the trip as Mr Putin's 'personal victory'. Mr Nebroev, like many Ukrainians, was gobsmacked the meeting could take place without representatives of his country. 'Useless' 'This was a useless meeting,' he said, adding: 'Issues concerning Ukraine should be resolved with Ukraine, with the participation of Ukrainians, the president.' Mr Trump later briefed European leaders and Mr Zelensky, who announced he would meet the US leader in Washington on Aug 18. The Trump-Putin meeting ended without a deal, and Mr Trump took no questions from reporters, highly unusual for the media-savvy US president. Ms Olya Donik, 36, said she was not surprised by the turn of events as she walked through a sunny park in Kharkiv with Mr Nebroev. 'It ended with nothing. All right, let's continue living our lives here in Ukraine,' she said. Hours after the talks, Kyiv said Russia attacked with 85 drones and a ballistic missile at night. 'Whether there are talks or not, Kharkiv is being shelled almost every day. Kharkiv definitely doesn't feel any change,' said Ms Iryna Derkach, a 50-year-old photographer. She stopped for the daily minute of silence held across the country to honour the victims of the Russian invasion. 'We believe in victory, we know it will come, but God only knows who exactly will bring it about,' she said. 'Pouring water' Ms Derkach, like many Ukrainians, was suspicious of Mr Trump. 'We do our job and don't pay too much attention to what Trump is doing,' she added. In Kyiv, 30-year-old cosplayer Kateryna Fuchenko, also worried that the American president was not a real ally of Ukraine. 'I don't think he is for Ukraine,' she said, criticising Mr Trump for acting as if he was 'buddies' with Mr Putin. 'They just poured water from empty to empty, back and forth, as always,' she said, characterising the talks as meaningless, doubting they achieved 'anything'. Kyiv pensioner Volodymyr Yanukovych said he expected Russia to 'fire as they fired' on Ukraine's capital, which has seen a number of deadly attacks this summer. Pharmacist Larysa Melnyk did not think her country was any closer to seeing peace. 'I don't think there will be a truce,' she said, adding that even if the guns fall silent, it will only be temporarily. Russia has historically 'unleashed such major conflicts', the 25-year-old said, pointing to the 2008 war in Georgia. She asked: 'Why does nobody react to this?' AFP


International Business Times
6 hours ago
- International Business Times
Trump and Putin's Historic Meeting in Alaska Results in 'No Deal' on Ending Ukraine War but US President Says 'Great Progress' Was Made
President Donald Trump kept everyone in suspense as he shared no specifics and avoided questions about his "very productive meeting" with Russian President Vladimir Putin regarding Ukraine's future. What was evident, however, is that the Friday meeting at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, did not result in an immediate ceasefire or peace agreement to end the war in Ukraine. "We've made some headway. There's no deal until there's a deal," Trump said, standing in front of a backdrop that read, "Pursuing Peace." The discussions appeared to yield no meaningful progress toward a ceasefire in Europe's deadliest conflict in eight decades, a goal Trump had set ahead of the summit. No Peace, No End of War Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump met at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, in a bid to end Ukraine war X In a highly unusual gesture, Trump allowed Putin take the floor first at what was presented as a joint press conference — and then left without responding to any questions, choosing instead to shake Putin's hand again before strolling offstage. The entire press event lasted only 12 minutes, despite the two having spent over three hours in private talks beforehand. "I'm going to start making a few phone calls and tell them what happened. But we had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to, and there are just a very few that are left," Trump said. "Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant," Trump added. In an interview with Sean Hannity, recorded in the same room where the summit took place, the Fox News host asked the president if he would reveal to him what that single issue was. "No, I'd rather not," Trump replied. "I guess somebody is going to go public with it, they'll figure it out, but no, I don't want to do that. I want to see if we can get it done." Trump mentioned to Hannity that Putin appeared willing to consider a three-way summit involving Zelensky. In his remarks, Putin praised Trump, agreeing with his view of the Ukraine war and adding that the conflict would never have taken place if Trump had been in power. "Today when President Trump's saying that if he was the president back then there will be no war. I'm quite sure it would indeed be so, I can confirm that," Putin said in Russian through a translator. Putin Blames Biden for War Putin during his meeting with Trump noted that ties between the U.S. and Russia had deteriorated 'to their lowest level since the Cold War.' X Putin also pointed the finger at former President Joe Biden for the breakdown in U.S.-Russia relations, rather than taking responsibility for his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, a key American ally. "I'd like to remind you that in 2022, during the last contact with the previous administration, I tried to convince my previous American colleague that the situation should not be brought to the point of no return when it would come to hostilities," Putin said, adding it was a "big mistake." Putin noted that ties between the U.S. and Russia had deteriorated "to their lowest level since the Cold War." "I think that's not benefiting our countries and the world as a whole,' Putin said. 'It's apparent that sooner or later we had to amend the situation and move on from the confrontation to dialogue." However, much of Putin's rhetoric focused on the past, underscoring the sharp divide between the U.S. and Russia on key matters necessary for reaching a ceasefire in Ukraine. The Russian president also stood firm on his claims that the invasion of Ukraine was justified. "As I've said the situation in Ukraine has to do with frontal threats of our security," Putin said. "At the same time we're convinced, that in order to make this settlement lasting and long-term, we need to eliminate all the primary roots, the primary causes of that conflict," the Russian leader added. Putin added that the U.S. must "take into account all legitimate concerns in Russia," while also agreeing with President Trump's point during the meeting that "Ukraine's security should naturally be guaranteed." When Putin launched his so-called "special military operation" in February 2022 — now continuing for three and a half years — he justified it by alleging that Ukrainians were being "subjected to abuse and genocide" by their democratically elected government, which under President Volodymyr Zelensky had grown increasingly aligned with the West. A former KGB officer, Putin has long aimed to expand Russia's borders to more closely mirror those of the Soviet Union.