‘No Cake, No Entry': More Than 1,000 Picnic to Celebrate the Love of Cake
There was just one rule: 'No cake, no entry.'
Attendees — including pastry chefs, home bakers and people with store-bought cakes — walked, drove and flew to bring elaborate cake creations to Cake Picnic, a touring festival where you can have your cake and eat it, too.
'It was harder to get than a Taylor Swift concert ticket,' said Elisa Sunga, Cake Picnic's organizer, noting that the $15 tickets sold out in less than a minute.
This Cake Picnic turned out to be the biggest since it started nearly a year ago. Ms. Sunga described the intense interest in the festival as both 'exciting' and 'terrifying.'
A spectacular variety of cakes adorned the tables, including: a light lemon cake with passion fruit filling, a tower made out of smaller spongecakes, Jell-O cake, pink champagne cake, a kid-baked dinosaur pyramid cake, and plenty of desserts with flowery ornaments.
In the first hour, picnickers placed their cakes on stands and crammed them onto the tables. Then, after the arranging was complete, came that fleeting and glorious moment: The crowd gawked and took photos of the 1,387 cakes, both sweet and savory, in their pristine, unsliced form.
After the photos were taken, the ensuing buffet was an act of controlled chaos.
Smaller groups went up for cakewalks. Each person was given a pastry box and instructed to collect slices at will. Once everyone had a turn, the tables were opened for ravenous seconds, thirds and fourths, until no crumbs were left behind.
In April 2024, Ms. Sunga, a 34-year-old home baker, hoped to gather about a dozen people in Potrero del Sol Park in San Francisco to sit in a circle and eat cakes that they had baked and brought.
'It started primarily because I wanted to eat a lot of cake,' Ms. Sunga said. 'I love cake.'
She posted the gathering on the invitation app Partiful, and it took off. Hundreds of people responded.
After the first event in April 2024, she took the cake show on the road, first to Los Angeles, then to New York and then back to San Francisco in November — 'places with cake communities,' she said. At the last picnic, 613 cakes were on display.
'It's not my full-time job, but I would love to travel full time for cake,' said Ms. Sunga, who works at Google. 'It's taken on a life of its own.'
Ms. Sunga, who brought two red velvet cakes of her own, said chefs from well-known bakeries, such as Tartine and SusieCakes, attended.
The Legion of Honor, the picnic venue, opened a special exhibit last week, 'Wayne Thiebaud: Art Comes from Art,' celebrating Mr. Thiebaud, who died in 2021 and is most famous for his decadent paintings of cakes and confections.
The Cake Picnic aimed to turn his dessert still lifes into a 'living tribute,' according to the museum's website.
Joyce Lim, 32, who lives in San Francisco, called herself a Cake Picnic 'groupie.' She said that she has baked for every Cake Picnic so far and will attend future picnics set for London and New York. (A two-day April picnic in Carlsbad, Calif., is sold out.)
Ms. Lim, an architect, said she has embraced cake baking for the picnics after at first being intimidated by it. On Saturday, she brought a scallion-pancake focaccia cake with chili-crisp cream cheese frosting and crème fraîche.
'I enjoy procrasti-baking, basically baking instead of handling my other life responsibilities,' Ms. Lim said.
She said she has been impressed by the creativity and diversity of cakes that people bring. Her cake might just top her previous elaborate entries: a kabocha cake layered with ginger-poached pears and miso-caramel cream cheese frosting, and a smörgåstårta, a Swedish cake with rye layers, hard-boiled eggs and caper filling.
Brenna Fallon, one of dozens of volunteers at the picnic, said that the brief period after the cakes are laid out and before the buffet begins is an ''Alice in Wonderland' moment.'
'Everybody is just gleefully going through the aisles,' said Ms. Fallon, 34, who is from Walnut Creek, Calif. 'People are plotting — which cakes do they want to make a beeline for when they get in?'
Ms. Fallon, an amateur baker who brought an Earl Grey chocolate cake with a salty buttercream, said that a feeling of celebration was in the air.
'It's a slice of life,' she said. 'It feels like a big picnic with a bunch of friends you just don't know yet.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
Brad Pitt's Mom Jane Etta Pitt Dead at 84
Brad Pitt's mother, Jane Etta Pitt, has died at 84, with family confirming her passing in recent days and remembering her as the heart of the Pitt clan. Denise Richards was spotted with a black eye and chin cut after a visit to her estranged husband's home, though sources close to her insist the marks were from a cosmetic procedure and not abuse. A 2016 clip of Travis Kelce detailing explicit dating dealbreakers has resurfaced, stirring buzz as his relationship with Taylor Swift remains in the spotlight. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
Gizmodo
3 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Grok's ‘Spicy' Mode Makes NSFW Celebrity Deepfakes of Women (But Not Men)
This week, Elon Musk officially launched Grok Imagine, xAI's image and video generator for iOS, for people who subscribe to SuperGrok and Premium+ X. The app allows users to create NSFW content with its 'Spicy' mode, and The Verge reported on Tuesday that users are able to create topless videos of Taylor Swift easily—without even asking for it. But it's not just Swift who should be concerned about Musk's new AI-generated softcore porn tool. Gizmodo created about two dozen videos of politicians, celebrities, and tech figures using the Grok Spicy mode, though some were blurred out or came back with a message reading 'video moderated.' When Grok did make scandalous images, it would only make the ones depicting women truly not-safe-for-work. Videos of men were the kind of thing that wouldn't really raise many eyebrows. X has been swamped over the past two days with AI-generated images of naked women and tips on how to achieve the most nudity. But users, who've created tens of millions of Grok Imagine images according to Musk, don't even need to go to some great effort to get deepfakes of naked celebrities. Gizmodo didn't explicitly ask for nudity in the examples we cite in this article, but we still got plenty of it. All we did was click on the Spicy button, which is one of four options, along with Custom, Fun, and Normal. Gizmodo tested Grok Imagine by generating videos of not just Taylor Swift, but other prominent women like Melania Trump and historical figures like Martha Washington. Melania Trump has been a vocal supporter of the Take It Down Act, which makes it illegal to publish non-consensual 'intimate imagery,' including deepfakes. Grok also created a not-safe-for-work video of the late feminist writer Valerie Solanas, author of 1967's S.C.U.M Manifesto. Almost all of the videos depicted the women that we tested as shedding clothes to make them naked from the waist up, though the video of Solanas was unique in that it did show her completely naked. What happens when you try to generate Spicy videos of men? The AI will have the male figure take off his shirt, but there's nothing more scandalous than that. When Gizmodo figured out that it would only remove a man's shirt, we prompted the AI to create a shirtless image of Elon Musk and see what it might do with that. The result was the extremely ridiculous (and safe-for-work) video you see below. Attempts to make videos of Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Joaquin Phoenix, and Charlie Chaplin, as well as Presidents Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, and George Washington, ran into the same limitation. The AI-generated videos will have the men take their shirts off most of the time, but there's nothing beyond that. And if there is anything more, it's usually so cringe that we'd worry about users dying from secondhand embarrassment. Making a Spicy video of Errol Musk, Elon's father, produced the same thing. He just took off his shirt. When we made a generic man to see if Spicy mode would be more loose with its sexual content since it wasn't a known public figure, it still just made a bizarre, awkward video of a man tugging at his pants. The pants, it should be noted, seem to be a combination of shorts for one leg and long jeans for the other before transforming into just shorts. The audio for each video was also auto-generated without any further instruction. Trying the same thing with a generic woman rendered much more revealing images of a woman in a swimsuit who pulls down the top to reveal her naked breasts. Most mainstream AI video generators, like OpenAI's Sora and Google's Veo, have guardrails to protect against the creation of things like revenge porn and images of celebrities. And it seems like xAI does in some ways, at least for men. But most people would probably object to their image being used to create an AI avatar in various states of undress. Gizmodo reached out to Musk through xAI to ask about safeguards and whether it's acceptable for users to create topless videos of celebrities. We haven't heard back. One of the most striking things about Grok's AI image generator is that it's often terrible at making convincing celebrity fakes. For example, the images below were generated when asking for Vice President JD Vance and actress Sydney Sweeney. And unless we completely forgot how those two people look, it's not even close. That could turn out to be Musk's saving grace, given the fact that a tool like this is bound to attract lawsuits. There were other glitches, like when we created an AI-generated image of President Harry Truman that looked very little like him, and the man's nipples appeared to be on the outside of his dress shirt. Truman, in Spicy mode, did take off his shirt to reveal his bare chest, which had identical nipples. When Gizmodo created images using the prompt 'Gizmodo writer Matt Novak,' the result was similar to what we saw with videos for Elon Musk and generic men. The figure (who, we should note, is in much better shape than the real Matt Novak) took off his shirt with a simple click of the Spicy button. As The Verge notes, there is an age verification window when a user first tries to create a video with Grok Imagine, but there doesn't appear to be any kind of check by the company to confirm the year a given user was actually born. Thankfully, Gizmodo's generation of a cartoon Mickey Mouse in Spicy mode didn't render anything scandalous, just the animated character jumping harmlessly. An AI image of Batman yielded a 'Spicy' result not unlike other male figures, where he only stripped his top off. Gizmodo did not attempt to create any images of children, though The Verge did try that in Spicy mode and reports nothing inappropriate was rendered. The 'Spicy' mode was still an option that was listed, however. 'You can still select it, but in all my tests, it just added generic movement,' The Verge notes. Elon Musk very infamously reinstated an account on X that posted child sexual abuse material in 2023, according to the Washington Post. It's perhaps not surprising that Elon Musk's new NSFW video creator has different standards for men and women. The billionaire recently retweeted a far-right figure who claimed that women are 'anti-white' because they're 'weak.' The Tesla CEO, who suggested in 2024 that he wanted to impregnate Taylor Swift, isn't exactly known for being a champion of women's rights. Gizmodo signed up for the $30 per month SuperGrok subscription and only got to test it for about 1.5 hours before we were told we'd reached our image creation limit. Strangely enough, users can still create a single still image for a prompt after getting the warning and generate NSFW videos using that lone image, but it's much more limited than what was previously available. We were told to upgrade to SuperGrok Heavy for $300 per month if we wanted to continue using the tool with all its features. But given the fact that we didn't need any more shitty images of naked celebrities to write this article, we declined. We got the answers we were looking for, unfortunately.
San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Elon Musk's AI made fake Taylor Swift nudes — no prompt needed, report says
Elon Musk 's artificial intelligence company, xAI, is under renewed scrutiny after its chatbot, Grok, was allegedly found creating AI-generated nude images of pop star Taylor Swift — without users explicitly requesting such content. Jess Weatherbed, a journalist for the tech publication the Verge, detailed her first encounter with Grok Imagine — the company's new video generation tool that converts text prompts into animated clips — in a report published Tuesday, Aug. 5. She asked the system to depict 'Taylor Swift celebrating Coachella with the boy,' and selected the tool's 'spicy' setting, a built-in tool meant to add provocative elements to the video. The result, according to Weatherbed, was a video in which Swift 'tears off her clothes' and 'dances in a thong' before a 'disinterested digital crowd.' The incident immediately sparked public backlash, particularly given that X, the Musk-owned social media platform where Grok is integrated, faced a similar controversy last year when sexually explicit deepfakes of Swift spread widely. At the time, the company said it had a 'zero-tolerance policy' for non-consensual nudity and pledged to remove such content and penalize offending accounts. But enforcement appears inconsistent. Despite the company's acceptable use policy prohibiting depictions of people 'in a pornographic manner,' Grok Imagine's 'spicy' mode was found to repeatedly default to stripping celebrity figures — notably Swift — even without explicit prompts. Though nudity requests often failed to generate results, the preset mode bypassed safeguards with ease, Weatherbed observed. She also noted that Grok refuses to depict children inappropriately, but the system's ability to differentiate between suggestive and illegal content when applied to adults remains unclear. Musk has not publicly addressed the controversy. Instead, he spent the day promoting Grok Imagine on X, encouraging users to share their AI-generated creations — a move critics argue could further incentivize abuse. With the federal Take It Down Act set to take effect next year, requiring platforms to remove non-consensual sexual imagery, xAI could face legal challenges if safeguards are not strengthened.
