logo
Tre Johnson: I'm more of a playmaker than a shooter

Tre Johnson: I'm more of a playmaker than a shooter

Yahoo21-05-2025

Tre Johnson: I'm more of a playmaker than a shooter | The Kevin O'Connor Show
Yahoo Sports senior NBA analyst Kevin O'Connor sat down with the Texas wingman to explain how he'd describe his game and how he approaches his play on the floor. Hear the full conversation on 'The Kevin O'Connor Show' and subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube or wherever you listen.
View more
Video Transcript
How would you describe your game to somebody who's never watched you play?
Advertisement
Uh, I'd say.
A playmaker Also a scorer though.
I can make plays for others, but also score for myself.
It's kind of one way I describe it.
I mean, I feel like with you, like if I asked an NBA scout that would be like score, bucket getter, and you say playmaker first.
Why is that?
Uh, yeah, I can score, but I also use my scoring just to make plays cause somebody gotta help and somebody's gonna be open, so I also you just make plays.
And I feel like with you, like at Texas, your primary role was to score, but when you watch, you know, Trey Johnson at Link Academy, you see more passing, more creation for others.
Advertisement
Do you think that's fair to say with like the differential in your role and responsibilities?
Yeah, I just felt for that Link Academy team.
I had to take his job back from scoring.
And just, uh, and just.
Facilitate to help help make others better or help make others impact the game because my junior year coming back, I had, I was averaging like 20 something and then go to Lincoln average 15.
I wouldn't even shoot the same amount of shots, but I just was going was the best for the team for sure.
Who was on that Link academy team with you?
LeBaron Falan, Jasper Johnson, Jaylen Shelley, James Brown, Andredala Junior.
Advertisement
Andre Junior, all these players.
Yeah we had TJ, we had a lot of, we had a great guys.
Brandon Benjamin, we had a lot of great players.
I mean, could be a first round pick or, you know, we'll see if he goes back to Bama as well, but this week at the combine he he actually just announced he's not going back to going back.
Hen that.
I just saw that.
Wow, I mean you got like boogie Fla going to Florida.
Florida's news we're like and they hate each other.
We like each other at least so far.
Maybe in the NBA I might say something critical of you and you'll be like this guy.
Nah.
It might happen, who knows, but I mean, I love your game then like cause I think with you, like I said, you're clearly a bucket getter.
Advertisement
You're one of the best shooters in this whole draft class, if not the best with what you do off the dribble, the movement shooting, the way Texas ran you off of movement actions like clearly you're Undeniably an elite 3 point shooter, that goes without saying.
But I think the reason why teams have you like likely top 5 pick is because of all the other stuff.
It's because of the creation ability and your ability as a passer.
And so with you, I, I'm curious, like when you project your game forward.
Into the years to come in the NBA.
Like, how do you see your role, like, cause so many teams use multiple ball handlers.
Advertisement
Do you see yourself as one of those guys who's an engine of a team or like someone who's like sharing the rock and playing different roles because of your shooting ability.
Uh, I feel like I could either it could go either way.
I feel like also being used as a two way more as I get into my career for sure, but just like either way, whatever the team needs to win, it could also just change night to night.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Pacers' ‘wear-down effect' has drained playoff opponents: ‘We want to make it hard'
How Pacers' ‘wear-down effect' has drained playoff opponents: ‘We want to make it hard'

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

How Pacers' ‘wear-down effect' has drained playoff opponents: ‘We want to make it hard'

OKLAHOMA CITY — As Tyrese Haliburton's finger roll passed through the net with less than five minutes remaining in the fourth quarter of Game 1, assistant coach Jenny Boucek rose to her feet and implored the Indiana Pacers to apply more defensive pressure. Andrew Nembhard didn't need any encouragement. He was already making his way toward Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, preparing to deny the Thunder point guard and keep the MVP from touching the ball after Haliburton cut the Pacers' deficit to four points after trailing by 15 just five minutes earlier. Advertisement But that wasn't enough. The Pacers needed the rest of the team to join him, so Boucek continued to wave at players to find their assignments in the backcourt. As Nembhard ran circles around Thunder big man Chet Holmgren to keep Gilgeous-Alexander from touching the ball, Myles Turner made his way across the half-court line to apply more pressure to Holmgren as he brought the ball up the floor. Holmgren, a younger and quicker big man, eventually got past a backpedaling Turner as he tried to go coast-to-coast, but the Pacers' long-time starting center didn't give up and contested Holmgren's finger roll that fell off the rim and into the waiting hands of Pascal Siakam. By applying full-court pressure, the Pacers encouraged the Thunder to do something out of character and try to make a play they don't normally make, which led to a quick defensive stop. Their pressure, pace and tempo encouraged the Thunder to play in a chaotic manner during clutch time. It was exactly what Indiana wanted. Throughout the playoffs, the Pacers have been using what they call the 'wear-down effect,' in which they use their depth and speed to fly around in transition and the half court and apply full-court pressure defensively. The impact, over 48 minutes, is that the Pacers expect their opponents to wear down and make uncharacteristic decisions late in the game. 'We want to make it hard,' Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said during media availability on Saturday. 'Each game in the series is going to look different. A playoff series is a series of seven chapters, you know, and each one takes on a different personality.' Typically, lineup rotations shorten during the playoffs as starters play more minutes. But Pacers coach Rick Carlisle has been using an 11-man bench with T.J. McConnell, Obi Toppin, Ben Sheppard, Bennedict Mathurin, Jarace Walker and Thomas Bryant each coming off the bench. Instead of relying heavily on his starters and star players, Carlisle uses his bench to not only give his starters rest, but to create a bit of chaos for opposing teams to tire them out. By staggering substitutions and keeping at least one starter on the floor most of the time, Carlisle can maximize his personnel while maintaining pace. Advertisement 'I think it's just playing to exhaustion,' McConnell said. 'That tires other guys out, and with our depth, if all of us are able to do that, it's hard to play against us for 48 minutes. We press all year to get ready for … the playoffs. 'I think it's a testament to the guys we have here that Rick trusts them, especially in the playoffs, and it's about taking pride in just doing your job. If you're playing for two minutes, 28 minutes, 15 minutes, just do your job and do it at a high level and play for the four other guys out there with you.' In Game 1 against the Thunder, the wear-down effect was in full effect. Down by 13 early in the third quarter, the Pacers created a catch-and-shoot look for Siakam. He missed, but that didn't mean the Pacers were going to drop their heads and get down on themselves. Instead, they moved to the next possession. Nembhard was ready to pick up Gilgeous-Alexander 80 feet from the basket. When the MVP got past Nembhard, Aaron Nesmith was waiting to switch onto him as Nembhard peeled off to the man that Nesmith left, perfect execution of a two-tiered defensive approach the Pacers used on the Thunder point guard all game long. When Turner grabbed the rebound off the rim and found Haliburton to start the fastbreak, Siakam sprinted down the middle of the floor, just as he always does, and scored one of the easiest buckets the Pacers got the entire night. 'We're just mentally and physically conditioned,' Turner said. 'We spend a lot of time, especially (in) offseason training camp, preparing ourselves … and it's tough on them mentally. You never know when your number's gonna be called. But what it is you expect to go out there and pick up full court, do your job defensively, and be in the right spots offensively. I think we just have elite role clarity.' Advertisement 'Shot making is important in this league, but especially in the playoffs, they are not as important as coming in there possession by possession, grinding down and doing what you're supposed to do.' Facing their largest deficit of the game early in the fourth quarter, the wear-down effect was once again in effect. Rather than throwing in the towel, the Pacers kept fighting. Going against one of the NBA's most physical defenders, Nembhard didn't back down and ran through Alex Caruso wrapping him up for a foul like a running back trying to get into the endzone and finished the tough layup through contact to keep the Pacers in the game. Indiana's use of intensity, pace, physicality and high pressure has become a strategy it's known for. In this year's playoffs, the Pacers have frustrated teams, forcing opponents into their play style and getting them out of rhythm. 'We wear it on them for 48 minutes at the end of it,' Haliburton said during Indiana's second-round series against Cleveland. 'They came out, pressed us full court and they played more our style, and by the end of the game, they were tired and I feel like that's part of the wear-down effect of 48 minutes. 'I think that our roster is just constructed for everybody to play the same way. We don't change the way we play when a guy is out. We play the same exact way. We got two fives who can space the floor, make shots, and then everybody likes to run. We got a lot of guys who play well in transition, so I think kudos to our front office and our coaching staff for the roster construction in the first place.' Both the mental and physical fatigue of the wear-down effect magnify errors at critical points in the fourth quarter, which aid Indiana's ability to capitalize or, in some cases like in Game 1 against the Thunder, make a comeback. Advertisement 'They're a very fast team,' Gilgeous-Alexander said at media day on Wednesday. 'I think, like, above all, they understand how they're playing and they're very, like, stubborn in their approach. They kind of like grind you with the way they play. They wear you down.' After the Pacers forced the Thunder into chaos with their full-court press and Holmgren missed his full-court attempt at the rim, Thunder coach Mark Daigneault decided to go to a smaller lineup that could handle the ball better and still apply pressure on the perimeter. But that tactical decision meant Siakam was the biggest player on the floor and the same effort he showed at the start of the second half would end up coming up clutch as the Thunder tried to close the game. While Siakam didn't touch the ball on the possession above, he knew if he continued to work and do his job, he could outwork the smaller Thunder players around him and put himself in position for a rebound. Two minutes later, the Pacers let Nembhard try to work in isolation and make another stepback 3, like the amazing 10-dribble triple he hit a few possessions earlier, but his shot came up short. While it could have spelled disaster for the Pacers, Siakam once again worked his way into the right position and grabbed another offensive rebound: After cutting the deficit to one, the Pacers went to work on the defensive end. They forced a miss, but couldn't play through the contact from Oklahoma City to finish the possession. That just meant one more defensive possession where they forced Gilgeous-Alexander to work through Nembhard's tough-nosed on-ball defense. With less than 14 seconds to play Thursday, Gilgeous-Alexander missed a shot that would have given the Thunder a three-point lead. After a Nesmith rebound, the ball found its way to Haliburton, who hit his fourth game-winning/tying shot of the playoffs. 'I don't know. It happened so fast,' Gilgeous-Alexander told reporters after the game. 'I feel like we got matched. He got down going right. Pulled up from middie. Knocked down the shot. 'I don't know, it didn't feel like anything crazy. He just made a play with the time winding down. Made a good play.' Advertisement That's exactly how Indiana wants it. 'It's part of a formula. I think that when you get to this time of year, you don't switch up what you do,' Turner said of the impact of the wear-down effect. 'We know this is a younger team. It's a team that kind of has the same philosophy as us. In the fourth quarter, when you get picked up full court or you get worn down a bit, the shots are a lot harder to hit. Those 3s that you've been hitting all game are a little bit different in the last three minutes when you're a little more tired. 'I think that it's an overall philosophy thing, but at the end of the day, you gotta continue to keep running it up.' (Photo of Aaron Nesmith, Andrew Nembhard and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander: Alonzo Adams / Imagn Images)

Chet Holmgren can't pull disappearing act in NBA Finals again. OKC needs his offense.
Chet Holmgren can't pull disappearing act in NBA Finals again. OKC needs his offense.

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Chet Holmgren can't pull disappearing act in NBA Finals again. OKC needs his offense.

Chet Holmgren can't pull disappearing act in NBA Finals again. OKC needs his offense. As Oklahoma City's third-leading scorer behind NBA MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and All-Star Jalen Williams, Chet Holmgren needs to be more involved and productive offensively in Game 2. Show Caption Hide Caption Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Thunder trying 'to get better through' losses in NBA Playoffs For Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and the Thunder, "the losses are louder" than the wins in the NBA Playoffs, but nothing really changes for OKC after a loss. OKLAHOMA CITY — At 7-foot-1, it's difficult to go unnoticed. But for the majority of his 23 minutes, 31 seconds in Game 1, Oklahoma City Thunder center Chet Holmgren was invisible, a non-factor in the Indiana Pacers' stunning 111-110 victory Thursday, June 5. Holmgren scored a playoffs-low six points on 2-for-9 shooting, including a miss on his only 3-point attempt. It was also his third-fewest minutes on the court in the playoffs. He also had just 28 touches offensively compared to 40 touches in the series clinching Game 5 of the Western Conference finals against Minnesota. He had 47 touches in Game 4 against the Timberwolves. As Oklahoma City's third-leading scorer behind NBA MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and All-Star Jalen Williams, Holmgren needs to be more involved and productive offensively in Game 2 against the Pacers on Sunday, June 8 (8 p.m. ET, ABC). 'I feel like I could have slowed down, kind of finished some of those plays at the rim,' Holmgren said. 'Obviously it hurts in a one-point loss. One single difference on one single play could have decided the whole game. Puts a magnifying glass on every single instance in the game.' OPINION: How Pacers coach Rick Carlisle helped Thunder GM Sam Presti break into NBA C-suite OPINION: Thunder regret fumbling NBA Finals Game 1 Of Holmgren's seven missed shots, six were in the paint, including four that were considered layups in the shot chart. 'Above everything else, just worrying more about impacting the game in all of the facets and just try to let that take care of itself. If you just focus on that, you're going to start putting a lot more pressure on that and you're not going to be focused on everything else that's important, too.' The Thunder used a different starting lineup in Game 1, inserting guard Cason Wallace in place of center Isaiah Hartenstein. It went away from Oklahoma City's two-big lineup featuring Holmgren and Hartenstein. Through the first three rounds of the playoffs, the pair averaged 12.6 minutes on the court together. They did not log one minute together in Game 1. '… our responsibility is to be ready to execute no matter what the coaches ask us to do out there,' Holmgren said. 'In Game 1, that was to play more single-big. Whether the coaches ask us to do that or ask the team to go small or ask the team to go double-big, we have to be ready to do that and execute it, and that's what we have to focus on.' Thunder coach Mark Daigneault declined to say what he planned for his starting lineup in Game 2. 'I know we started the same lineup in the playoffs, but our rotation night to night in these series has been incredibly variant,' Daigneault said. 'We think that's a strength of our team. I liked how we started the game, and I liked, really, everything we did to build a 15-point lead, and then we didn't deliver down the stretch collectively. 'But we are always trying to learn from it. … We understand the tradeoffs with every lineup we put on the court. We'll continue to try to make every decision we can to give ourselves the best chance to win. That's what we did in Game 1. Didn't turn out in our favor, but that's what we'll do in Game 2 and moving forward.' Holmgren averaged 15.0 points on 49% shooting during the regular season and averaged 16.4 points on 48.9% shooting in the first three rounds of the playoffs. To a lesser extent but still important to the Thunder's success, they also require a more efficient game from Williams, who had 17 points on 19 shots. Daigneault did not want to address their performances specifically. 'I don't think anybody played their best game,' he said. 'Certainly, he didn't play his best game, but I don't think any of us did. That wasn't our best game, flat-out, with anybody.' MORE: How Shaq 'flipped the script,' expanding fortune after retirement ANALYSIS: Unsung heroes? Underrated players who could make a difference in NBA Finals But Daigneault also reminded NBA media that both players were drafted in 2022 – Holmgren No. 2 and Williams No. 12. They are 23 and 24 years old, respectively, starring on the youngest team to make the NBA Finals since 1954-55. Holmgren, who missed the 2022-23 season, has played in 114 regular-season games and just 27 playoffs games the past two seasons. Despite his role, he has limited experience and is in his first Finals. 'What I will say is like he and Dub, specifically, obviously they have carved out huge roles on our team,' Daigneault said. 'They are a huge reason why we're here. They are in an uncommon position for third-year players. … Usually delivering in the Finals is not on the curriculum for third-year players.' But, that's how the Thunder are built, and Holmgren and Williams have earned their roles as the two main scorers after Gilgeous-Alexander. You win – or lose – with what got a team to this point. 'They have thrust themselves into that situation, which is a credit to them,' Daigneault. 'And now that they are here, they have to continue to do what they have done all the way through the playoffs, which is go out there, fully compete, learn the lessons, and apply it forward. 'And they have done a great job of that. You've seen that over the course of the playoffs. They haven't always played their best game, but they always get themselves ready to play the next one. The last guy I'm worried about that is Chet.' Pacers coach Rick Carlisle shared his concern: 'Chet is going to be more aggressive.' That's definitely part of the Thunder's plan to even the series. Holmgren needs to make his presence known.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store