Inside New York's Protest Against ICE Raids: 'We Should Be Putting Resources Towards Life'
Carved onto the front of the New York State Supreme Court Building are words once written by George Washington: 'The true administration of justice is the firmest pillar of good government.' The quote, which emphasizes the justice system as a stabilizing political force, loomed over thousands of protestors like a specter on Tuesday at Manhattan's Foley Square, the site of several federal immigration courts where plainclothes officers, emboldened by the Trump administration's crackdown on immigration, have arrested dozens of migrants attending routine case hearings over the past few weeks.
The protestors had mobilized within 24 hours, spurred on by a call to action amplified by several local organizations including the People's Forum, Damayan Migrant Workers Association, and the National Day Laborer Organizing Network. For days, images and videos from Los Angeles—where thousands are rallying against recent Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids and deportations—have flooded social media and news feeds. The struggle has ignited dozens of more protests across the country.
'People are seeing that ICE is invading their communities,' says David Chung, an organizer with the People's Forum. 'They're seeing that ICE is spending all of these resources that they claim that immigrants are taking and they're ready to stand up and fight back.'
After protests broke out in LA last week, Trump deployed 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to quell demonstrations. Instead, the military presence has only escalated already jittery tensions. On Monday, Governor Gavin Newsom filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for the legally questionable deployment, which the Pentagon estimates will cost $134 million.
'That's money that could be actually used to feed hungry people here, house homeless people here,' says Chung, who immigrated to the U.S. from Korea at three years old. 'All we're saying is that we should be putting resources towards life, towards the people, and that's why we're protesting.'
For Beth Levy, an attendee at Tuesday's event and the chair of the Immigration and Justice Committee of an Indivisibles chapter that covers part of the Bronx and Westchester, the deportations are a horrifying callback to the past. 'It reminds me of the Holocaust,' she says. 'Innocent people, even people without status, deserve asylum and the right to be here.'
As different speakers stepped up to the mic, the demonstration at Foley Square remained as peaceful as it was emphatic, though there was a general sense of weariness of being perceived as the right kind of protestor. Over the past week, media outlets have inevitably characterized protests in LA as 'violent,' a descriptor that gives vandalism or a tossed rock the same—or even heavier—weight than, say, the LAPD aiming their flash bangs and rubber bullets against unarmed protestors (and, in one case, an Australian journalist during a live broadcast). Indeed, later on Tuesday night in New York, a faction of the protestors returned to Foley Square, near a government building where arrested migrants have been detained. Officers in riot gear were filmed dragging individuals by their backs and slamming them to the ground as they crossed the street.
Addressing the crowd onstage that afternoon, Palestinian-American activist Linda Sarsour encouraged critics to reorient their understanding of violence. 'The root of this problem is not protestors,' Sarsour said. 'The root of this problem is masked men who are kidnapping mothers and fathers and students.'
Half a year into the second Trump administration, it's an understatement to say that trust between exhausted Americans and public officials has deteriorated beyond partisan lines. For years, advocates have called for the abolition of ICE, Sarsour added. 'Liberals and Democrats called us radical. Democrats defended ICE and, in fact, gave them more resources,' she said. 'So I'm not really feeling the clutching of pearls when it's you, the Democratic party and Democratic leadership, that gave ICE the resources and tools to attack our communities.'
As helicopters and drones whirred overhead and dozens of New York Police Department officers lined barricades along the streets, New Yorkers raised bright yellow posters that read 'ICE Out of New York' and 'Stop the Deportations Now.' They marched west, stopping traffic on Broadway, where throngs of Big Buses bearing tourists looked on and outdoor dining spectators raised their phones to record. They chanted to the beat of drums and brass instruments, reciting, 'El pueblo unido jamás será vencido!' They wore keffiyehs and pins, they offered masks and water bottles, they passed anti-fascist pamphlets and fliers, and they waved upside-down American flags. In this city, the cacophony of honking is nothing new, but as halted drivers joined the passing parade by blasting their own horns, it sounded something like a jubilant chorus.
You Might Also Like
4 Investment-Worthy Skincare Finds From Sephora
The 17 Best Retinol Creams Worth Adding to Your Skin Care Routine

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
a few seconds ago
- CNBC
Trump warned by top Senate Democrats to rethink advanced AI chip sales to China
Six Senate Democrats on Friday released an open letter asking President Donald Trump to reconsider his decision to allow tech giants Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices to sell AI semiconductor chips to China in exchange for 15% of revenue from the sales. The letter — signed by Senators Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.; Mark Warner, D-Va.; Jack Reed, D-R.I.; Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H.; Christopher Coons, D-Del.; and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. — was in response to an Aug. 11 announcement by Trump that Nvidia and AMD would pay the U.S. government a 15% cut of revenue from chip sales to China in exchange for export licenses. "Our national security and military readiness relies upon American innovators inventing and producing the best technology in the world, and in maintaining that qualitative advantage in sensitive domains. The United States has historically been successful in maintaining and building that advantage because of, in part, our ability to deny adversaries access to those technologies," the letter states. "The willingness displayed in this arrangement to 'negotiate' away America's competitive edge that is key to our national security in exchange for what is, in effect, a commission on a sale of AI-enabling technology to our main global competitor, is cause for serious alarm," the letter continues. Senators also warned that selling advanced AI chips — specifically Nvidia's H20 and AMD's MI308 chips — to China could help strengthen its military systems, a claim that Nvidia denies. In a statement to CNBC, a Nvidia spokesperson said: "The H20 would not enhance anyone's military capabilities, but would have helped America attract the support of developers worldwide and win the AI race. Banning the H20 cost American taxpayers billions of dollars, without any benefit." The letter from Senate Democrats also requests a detailed response from the administration by Friday, Aug. 22, regarding the current deal involving Nvidia and AMD, as well as any similar arrangements being made with other companies. "We again urge your administration to quickly reverse course and abandon this reckless plan to trade away U.S. technology leadership," the letter states. A request for comment from the White House and AMD was not immediately returned. Despite Trump allowing chip sales to resume, it has already become clear that China isn't welcoming Nvidia back with open arms, instead urging tech companies to avoid buying U.S. companies' chips, according to a Bloomberg report. "We're hearing that this is a hard mandate, and that [authorities are actually] stopping additional orders of H20s for some companies," Qingyuan Lin, a senior analyst covering China semiconductors at Bernstein, told CNBC. In a separate report, The Information said regulators in China have ordered major tech companies, including ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent, to suspend Nvidia chip purchases until a national security review is complete. —


CNBC
a few seconds ago
- CNBC
Zelensky to meet with Trump after Putin talks end without a ceasefire
U.S. President Donald Trump said Saturday that his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin "went very well" after the pair met for hours one day prior. The two leaders did not reach a ceasefire agreement following the talks, which Trump had repeatedly emphasized in the lead-up to their meeting. Instead, Trump wrote on social media: "It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up." Trump's comments put him at odds with officials in Ukraine and European leaders who are urgently seeking a lasting ceasefire in the ongoing war. A joint statement from European leaders said that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who was not invited to the summit, should be present during any future talks, and that "it will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory," according to NBC News. Ukraine's allies in Europe also expressed concern that Trump was moving closer to Putin's position following his meeting. The lack of an immediate ceasefire allows Russia to continue its fighting in Ukraine without the threat of punishment from the United States or its allies. Zelenskyy said he plans to meet with Trump to "discuss all [of] the details regarding ending the killings and the war," according to a post on Telegram. Trump, who said he spoke with Zelenskyy and other European leaders overnight, is poised to meet with the Ukrainian leader in the Oval Office on Monday afternoon, he said in a Truth Social post. "If all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin," Trump also said. Putin said in a statement on Saturday that his meeting with Trump was "very frank, meaningful and, in my opinion, this brings us closer to the necessary decisions." Despite the lack of a resolution, Russian officials signaled victory following the talks. "A new European and international security architecture is on the agenda and everyone must accept it," Andrei Klishas, a Russian senator, said, according to the Washington Post.


CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
No Questions Were Taken …But So Many Remain - Smerconish on CNN - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
No Questions Were Taken …But So Many Remain Smerconish on CNN 42 mins Continuing coverage of Trump and Putin's summit in Alaska. What did President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin's body language tell us during their high-stakes summit? Behavioral Analyst and Body Language Expert Chris Ulrich, weighs in. Plus, Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan on why Trump doesn't talk about Detroit they way he talks about other big cities and crime.