Wisconsin tribal leaders, aware of concern about Trump orders, mostly avoid confrontation
Tribal leaders across Wisconsin are issuing statements in response to President Trump's flurry of executive orders last week, especially those affecting Indian Country.
The most critical reaction, so far, has come from Ho-Chunk Nation President Jon Greendeer.
'I will not bend or bow, play political games, or accept any threat to any of our tribal members or their families in this ridiculous and irresponsible demonstration of petulant leadership,' he said in a statement on the evening of Jan. 23.
'Demonizing human beings for the color of their skin, the people they love, the bodies they so choose to make decisions for, or the economic class to which they struggle to break free from represents something far from the public service embodied in any oath or promise to the people we serve.'
Several news outlets have reported that Trump's Department of Justice attorneys were questioning whether Native Americans could be considering U.S. citizens, according to a 19th century law that excludes Indigenous peoples from birthright citizenship.
One executive order being scrutinized by tribal officials is the ending of 'birthright citizenship,' which has since been blocked by a federal judge for being unconstitutional.
In Arizona, state and Navajo tribal officials responded to reports of Navajo tribal members being detained by ICE agents and urged tribal members to carry their tribal IDs or Certificate of Indian Blood.
Arizona State Sen. Theresa Hatathlie informed the Navajo Nation council about a tribal member who was detained despite showing their Certificate of Indian Blood because ICE agents failed to recognize it as valid proof of citizenship, according to a Navajo Nation press release as reported by the Arizona Republic.
More: Navajo Nation leaders address reports of ICE detaining tribal citizens
Tribal leaders are also concerned about Trump's anti-DEI efforts that rescind Biden's executive orders aimed at strengthening tribal communities.
Two programs in particular to be rescinded are, first, the White House Initiative on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Native Americans and Strengthening Tribal Colleges and Universities, and second, Advancing Equity, Justice and Opportunity for Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders.
'I hope not to believe we are the target of the president and the forces behind the MAGA front steering his decision making, but if we are we will hold our ground as we have long before this new fury against humankind came to be,' Greendeer said. 'In the meantime, I will take on a task of assembling impact statements for the variety of programs and services that could be affected in the wake of these executive orders.'
Other tribal leaders in Wisconsin made more conciliatory statements in response to Trump's executive orders.
Oneida Nation Chairman Tehassi Hill said Oneida officials are aware that many tribal members are concerned by new policies coming from the White House and they will monitor the situation and will use the tribe's leverage when necessary to protect their members and resources.
'As we embark on relations with a new U.S. administration the (Oneida) nation will continue to move forward in a conscientious and deliberate manner and will be mindful to base our actions and decisions on the facts presented to us,' Hill said in a statement on Jan. 24.
'For decades, Oneida Nation has taken a non-partisan approach in elections at every level. … The Nation has worked hard to gain political allies in both Democratic and Republican houses and we will continue to foster those relationships, as we as build new ones.'
Menominee Nation Chairwoman Gena Kakkak took a similar tone in her statement about the issue.
'We know there is a lot of confusion, uncertainty and concern within our community regarding some of the decisions and changes happening within the new U.S. administration,' she said in a Jan. 24 statement. 'These moments of change can be unsettling, but I want to reassure you that our tribe has navigated significant change before, and we always emerge strong and united.'
'Our leaders and staff are already working hard to assess any potential impacts. … Our Menominee values, resilience and collective strength will carry us forward as they always have.'
Forest County Potawatomi Chairman James Crawford said tribal officials will make decisions rooted in facts, not perceptions and misinformation.
"Tribal leadership is closely monitoring the evolving situation and assessing any possible implications for our tribal membership," he said in a statement Jan. 27. "We recognize the importance of understanding the broader political landscape and maintaining constructive relationships across all levels of government."
Tribal leaders across the country also criticized Trump for renaming Mt. Denali in Alaska from its Indigenous name to Mt. McKinley after a president who never set foot in Alaska. Republican officials from Alaska also urged Trump not to do so.
One act many are celebrating in Indian Country is Trump's statement to support federal recognition of the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina. Federal recognition would have to approved by Congress.
In Wisconsin, the Brothertown Indian Nation has been working to achieve federal recognition for decades and tribal officials are hoping that will happen during this administration.
More: 50 years after a missed phone call, Brothertown Indian Nation still in pursuit of federal recognition
Sign up for the First Nations Wisconsin newsletter Click here to get all of our Indigenous news coverage right in your inbox
Frank Vaisvilas is a former Report for America corps member who covers Native American issues in Wisconsin based at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Contact him at fvaisvilas@gannett.com or 815-260-2262. Follow him on Twitter at @vaisvilas_frank.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Wisconsin tribal leaders avoid immediate confrontation with Trump
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

CNN
35 minutes ago
- CNN
About 700 Marines being mobilized in response to LA protests
More than 700 Marines based out of the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center in California have been mobilized to respond to the protests in Los Angeles, and the troops will join the thousands of National Guard members who were activated by President Donald Trump over the weekend without the consent of California's governor or LA's mayor. The deployment of the full Marine battalion marks a significant escalation in Trump's use of the military as a show of force against protesters, but it is still unclear what their specific task will be once in LA, sources told CNN. Like the National Guard troops, they are prohibited from conducting law enforcement activity such as making arrests unless Trump invokes the Insurrection Act, which permits the president to use the military to end an insurrection or rebellion of federal power. The Marines being activated are with 2nd battalion, 7th Marines, 1st Marine division, according to US Northern Command. The activation is 'intended to provide Task Force 51 with adequate numbers of forces to provide continuous coverage of the area in support of the lead federal agency,' NORTHCOM said in statement, referring to US Army north's contingency command post. One of the people familiar with the Marine mobilization said they will be augmenting the guard presence on the ground in LA. Over 2,000 members of the California National Guard have been activated by the president, but only about 300 have been deployed to the streets of LA so far. Those initial 300 people were on a routine National Guard drill weekend when they were mobilized, which is why they were able to arrive so quickly, the person familiar said; it can take up to 72 hours for other guardsmen to be mobilized. The Marines are expected to bolster some of the guard members who have been deployed to LA in the last two days, this person said. And while the person familiar stressed that the Marines were being deployed only to augment the forces already there, the image of US Marines mobilizing inside the United States will stand in contrast to National Guardsmen who more routinely respond to domestic issues. While some Marines have been assisting in border security at the southern border, one US official said Marines have not been mobilized within the US like they are in California now since the 1992 riots in Los Angeles. While the Marines' tasks have not been specified publicly, they could include assignments like crowd control or establishing perimeter security. Lawyers within the Defense Department are also still finalizing language around the use-of-force guidelines for the troops being mobilized, but the person familiar said it will likely mirror the military's standing rules of the use of force. California Gov. Gavin Newsom described the involvement of Marines as 'unwarranted' and 'unprecedented.' 'The level of escalation is completely unwarranted, uncalled for, and unprecedented — mobilizing the best in class branch of the U.S. military against its own citizens,' Newsom said in a statement linking to a news story about the Marines mobilizing. Newsom disputed the characterization as a 'deployment,' which the governor described as different from mobilization. US Northern Command said in their statement, however, that the Marines will 'seamlessly integrate' with National Guard forces 'protecting federal personnel and federal property in the greater Los Angeles area.' Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell called for 'open and continuous lines of communication' between all agencies responding to protests in the city ahead of the deployment of US Marines. McDonell said in a statement that his agency and other partner agencies have experience dealing with large-scale demonstrations and safety remains a top priority for them. That communication will 'prevent confusion, avoid escalation, and ensure a coordinated, lawful, and orderly response during this critical time,' McDonnell stressed. This story and headline have been updated with additional developments.


Axios
37 minutes ago
- Axios
Freshman wishlist: Adam Schiff vs. Trump 2.0
Sen. Adam Schiff has some advice for President Trump when attempting to demean him: Pick one nickname. Why it matters: Schiff rose to cable TV stardom as an anti-Trump foil while leading the first impeachment. "Shifty Schiff" or "Watermelon Head" learned to give as good as he got. Trump called Schiff names. Schiff ensured he was impeached — twice. "[T]he cardinal rule of nicknames is: Just stick with one," Schiff told Axios in an interview. Schiff translated his MAGA notoriety into a safe Senate seat, first battling through a tough, expensive primary. Now he's ready for round two with Trump. "I've been thrust back into a lot of that responsibility again because what he's trying to do in the second term is even worse than what he tried to do in the first term," Schiff said. Zoom out: Before Trump dominated the national conversation, Schiff considered himself a fairly nonpartisan national security expert. He endorsed Jim Mattis for Secretary of Defense in 2016 when other Democrats didn't. Schiff had hoped for another rebrand in the Senate. "I was expecting a Biden or a Harris presidency, and the ability to just focus exclusively on what positive things I could get done," he told Axios. What to watch: He is enjoying visiting redder areas of the state after spending years representing just a slice of heavily Democratic Los Angeles. He shared about one such visit in the state's northeast. "I knew I had made progress when one of the farmers looked at me and said, 'I don't know why he calls you watermelon head. You have a perfectly normal-sized head.'" But it's doubtful he'll revert back to a less partisan posture, given the direction of Trump's second term. Driving the news: Two days after our interview, Trump deployed National Guard troops to tamp down on ICE protests in Los Angeles in opposition to Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.). "This action is designed to inflame tensions, sow chaos, and escalate the situation," Schiff posted on X on Saturday. He also repeatedly called for violence to stop at protests. "Assaulting law enforcement is never ok," he posted Sunday. Zoom in: Schiff tried to pass a resolution shortly before our interview to stop the administration from stripping civil rights leader Harvey Milk's name from a Navy ship. He has demanded financial disclosures from the White House, written letters to stop DOGE from shutting down USDA offices and tried to block the repeal of EV rules. "Most of my days are spent trying to walk this line between stopping the administration from violating the law and ignoring the Constitution on the one hand," Schiff said, "and continuing to deliver for Californians..." Schiff recognizes that his clashes altered his career trajectory. "I have my brand pre-Trump and my brand post-Trump," Schiff told Axios. Between the lines: Schiff's leadership in the House's first Trump impeachment made him a mortal enemy to Trump and his allies, leading to a "weirdly personal" dynamic, Schiff said.


Axios
37 minutes ago
- Axios
"No Kings!" anti-Trump protests planned around Utah
Protestors are taking to Utah's streets on Saturday in what organizers expect will be the largest single-day anti-Trump rally since the start of the administration. Why it matters: The widespread movement will run counter to President Trump's multimillion dollar military parade in D.C. "No Kings is a nationwide day of defiance," organizers wrote. "From city blocks to small towns, from courthouse steps to community parks, we're taking action to reject authoritarianism." The intrigue: Although no anti-Trump rally in Utah has matched the size of the "Hands Off!" protest on April 5, the movement is growing to smaller cities in more conservative parts of the state. Zoom in: At least 11 marches and rallies were scheduled throughout Utah as of Monday. Salt Lake City: 10am at the U's Marriott Library Plaza and 6pm at Pioneer Park. Ogden: 1pm at Union Station. Heber City: 11am at City Hall. Provo: 9am at 445 W. Center Price: Noon at 350 E. Main Ephraim: 11am at the former Kent's Market parking lot Moab: 9:15am at Swanny City Park Boulder: 11am at the town park Kanab: 10am at Jacob Hamblin Park St. George: 2pm at Vernon Worthen Park What they're saying:"Donald Trump wants tanks in the street and a made-for-TV display of dominance for his birthday," the No Kings website said. "Real power isn't staged in Washington. It rises up everywhere else." By the numbers: Millions of people are estimated to protest in more than 1,500 cities across all 50 states, organizers said. Context: Trump's military parade coincides with his 79th birthday and the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary. The Army expects to spend $25 million to $45 million, an estimate that doesn't include Secret Service or law enforcement. Trump has been pushing for a military parade since his first term. Yes, but: There is no protest planned in Washington, D.C. That is "a deliberate choice to keep the focus on contrast, and not give the Trump administration an opportunity to stoke and then put the focus on conflict," said Leah Greenberg, co-executive director of Indivisible, one of the groups coordinating the demonstration.