logo
Trump administration ordered by federal judge to halt immigration arrests in California

Trump administration ordered by federal judge to halt immigration arrests in California

Globe and Mail5 days ago
A federal judge on Friday ordered the Trump administration to halt indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests in seven California counties, including Los Angeles.
Immigrant advocacy groups filed the lawsuit last week accusing U.S. President Donald Trump's administration of systematically targeting brown-skinned people in Southern California during its ongoing immigration crackdown. The plaintiffs include three detained immigrants and two U.S. citizens, one who was held despite showing agents his identification.
The filing in U.S. District Court asked a judge to block the administration from using what they call unconstitutional tactics in immigration raids. Immigrant advocates accuse immigration officials of detaining someone based on their race, carrying out warrantless arrests, and denying detainees access to legal counsel at a holding facility in downtown LA.
Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, said in an e-mail that 'any claims that individuals have been 'targeted' by law enforcement because of their skin colour are disgusting and categorically FALSE.'
McLaughlin said 'enforcement operations are highly targeted, and officers do their due diligence' before making arrests.
Judge Maame E. Frimpong also issued a separate order barring the federal government from restricting attorney access at a Los Angeles immigration detention facility.
U.S. detainees describe worm-filled food, inhuman treatment at 'Alligator Alcatraz' migrant centre
Protesters and federal agents clash during immigration raid at Southern California farm
Frimpong issued the orders the day after a hearing during which advocacy groups argued that the government was violating the Fourth and Fifth amendments of the constitution.
Immigrants and Latino communities across Southern California have been on edge for weeks since the Trump administration stepped up arrests at car washes, Home Depot parking lots, immigration courts and a range of businesses. Tens of thousands of people have participated in rallies in the region over the raids and the subsequent deployment of the National Guard and Marines.
The order also applies to Ventura County, where busloads of workers were detained Thursday while the court hearing was under way after federal agents descended on a cannabis farm, leading to clashes with protesters and multiple injuries.
According to the American Civil Liberties Union, the recent wave of immigration enforcement has been driven by an 'arbitrary arrest quota' and based on 'broad stereotypes based on race or ethnicity.'
When detaining the three day labourers who are plaintiffs in the lawsuit, all immigration agents knew about them is that they were Latino and were dressed in construction work clothes, the filing said. It goes on to describe raids at swap meets and Home Depots where witnesses say federal agents grabbed anyone who 'looked Hispanic.'
ACLU attorney Mohammad Tajsar said Brian Gavidia, one of the U.S. citizens who was detained, was 'physically assaulted ... for no other reason than he was Latino and working at a tow yard in a predominantly Latin American neighbourhood.'
Tajsar asked why immigration agents detained everyone at a car wash except two white workers, according to a declaration by a car wash worker, if race wasn't involved.
Representing the government, attorney Sean Skedzielewski said there was no evidence that federal immigration agents considered race in their arrests, and that they only considered appearance as part of the 'totality of the circumstances' including prior surveillance and interactions with people in the field.
In some cases, they also operated off 'targeted, individualized packages,' he said.
'The Department of Homeland Security has policy and training to ensure compliance with the Fourth Amendment,' Skedzielewski said.
Lawyers from Immigrant Defenders Law Center and other groups say they also have been denied access to a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in downtown LA known as 'B-18' on several occasions since June, according to court documents.
Lawyer Mark Rosenbaum said in one incident on June 7 attorneys 'attempted to shout out basic rights' at a bus of people detained by immigration agents in downtown LA when the government drivers honked their horns to drown them out and chemical munitions akin to tear gas were deployed.
Skedzielewski said access was only restricted to 'protect the employees and the detainees' during violent protests and it has since been restored.
Rosenbaum said lawyers were denied access even on days without any demonstrations nearby, and that the people detained are also not given sufficient access to phones or informed that lawyers were available to them.
He said the facility lacks adequate food and beds, which he called 'coercive' to getting people to sign papers to agree to leave the country before consulting an attorney.
Attorneys general for 18 Democratic states also filed briefs in support of the orders.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents were already barred from making warrantless arrests in a large swath of eastern California after a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction in April.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Epstein files' explained: Why Trump is under pressure from his base
'Epstein files' explained: Why Trump is under pressure from his base

National Post

time43 minutes ago

  • National Post

'Epstein files' explained: Why Trump is under pressure from his base

Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy American financier, died in 2019 before he faced trial for sex offenses Photo by STEPHANIE KEITH / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP/File A perceived lack of transparency over the U.S. investigations into notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has carved a rare chasm between President Donald Trump and his typically loyal Republican base. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS Enjoy the latest local, national and international news. Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events. Unlimited online access to National Post. National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES Enjoy the latest local, national and international news. Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events. Unlimited online access to National Post. National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors As Trump struggles to quell his supporters' obsessions with the case — one long surrounded by conspiracy theories — AFP outlines its history and why it has caused so much outrage. Get a dash of perspective along with the trending news of the day in a very readable format. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy American financier, was first charged with sex offenses in 2006 after the parents of a 14-year-old girl told police that he had molested their daughter at his Florida home. He avoided federal charges — which could have seen him face life in prison — due to a controversial plea deal with prosecutors that saw him jailed for just under 13 months. In July 2019, he was arrested again in New York and charged with trafficking dozens of teenage girls and engaging in sex acts with them in exchange for money. Prosecutors said he worked with employees and associates to ensure a 'steady supply of minor victims to abuse.' Epstein pleaded not guilty to the charges against him. On August 10, 2019, while in custody awaiting trial, authorities said he was found dead in his prison cell after hanging himself. A separate case against Epstein's girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, who was jailed in 2022 for helping him abuse girls, detailed Epstein's connections with high-profile figures like Britain's Prince Andrew and former US president Bill Clinton. Both have denied any wrongdoing. Some people believe that authorities are concealing details about the Epstein case to protect rich and powerful elites who associated with him, including Trump. Those ideas have gripped Trump's 'Make America Great Again' (MAGA) movement — but demands for more transparency have crossed the political aisle. One key theory centers on a rumored client list of individuals who committed sex offenses alongside Epstein. The Trump administration has insisted that no such list exists. Skeptics also allege suspicious circumstances in Epstein's death such as the security cameras around his cell apparently malfunctioning on the night he died, alongside other irregularities.

Remember Cambridge Analytica? What to know about the $8B US lawsuit against Meta's board
Remember Cambridge Analytica? What to know about the $8B US lawsuit against Meta's board

CBC

time44 minutes ago

  • CBC

Remember Cambridge Analytica? What to know about the $8B US lawsuit against Meta's board

More than seven years after a privacy scandal involving Facebook and the Cambridge Analytica consulting firm emerged, an $8-billion US class action investors' lawsuit against Mark Zuckerberg and other Meta board members will begin. The plaintiffs, led by Amalgamated Bank Inc., will argue in court in Wilmington, Del., that the harvesting of data of Facebook users in the Cambridge case was in violation of a 2012 agreement with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). It's an investors' lawsuit that Meta battled all the way to the Supreme Court. The nine justices even heard arguments last November, before doing an about-turn just a couple weeks later, unanimously allowing the case to go forward. Here's a look at how the case proceeded, and what to expect: Cambridge Analytica, revisited In 2018, revelations that data from tens of millions of Facebook users was accessed by Cambridge Analytica emerged, in part due to a Canadian whistleblower. The now-defunct political consulting firm did work for Republican candidate Ted Cruz, who nonetheless lost to Donald Trump, and then the firm worked for Trump during his successful 2016 presidential campaign. Cambridge Analytica's investors included Trump ally Steve Bannon and Robert Mercer, a reclusive billionaire who agreed to support Trump's campaign after first backing Cruz. Cambridge Analytica harvested data on users who answered a Facebook quiz app, This Is Your Digital Life, as well as friends of those users. Zuckerberg admitted it was a "major breach of trust" on Facebook's part. "We have a responsibility to protect your data, and if we can't then we don't deserve to serve you," he said in an early 2018 statement. Scandal has been costly for Facebook The FTC fined Facebook $5 billion in the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, saying the company had violated a 2012 agreement with the FTC to protect user data. That same year, Facebook reached a $100 million settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for misleading investors. In 2022, Facebook settled a class-action lawsuit with users for $725 million, without admitting wrongdoing. On its website, the company has said it has invested billions of dollars into protecting user privacy since 2019. Who's going to testify? The trial will feature testimony from Zuckerberg and other billionaire defendants including former chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg, venture capitalist and board member Marc Andreessen, and former board members Peter Thiel, the Palantir Technologies co-founder, and Reed Hastings, co-founder of Netflix. Jeffrey Zients, White House chief of staff under President Joe Biden and a Meta director for two years starting in May 2018, is expected to be one of the first witnesses to take the stand in the non-jury trial before Kathaleen McCormick, chief judge of the Delaware Chancery Court. A lawyer for the defendants, who have denied the allegations, declined to comment. What do shareholders want? Shareholders want the defendants to reimburse Meta for the FTC fine and other legal costs, which the plaintiffs estimate total more than $8 billion. In court filings, the defendants described the allegations as "extreme" and said the evidence at trial will show Facebook hired an outside consulting firm to ensure compliance with the FTC agreement and that Facebook was a victim of Cambridge Analytica's deceit. In addition to privacy claims at the heart of the Meta case, plaintiffs allege that Zuckerberg anticipated that the Cambridge Analytica scandal would send the company's stock lower and sold his Facebook shares as a result, pocketing at least $1 billion. Defendants said evidence will show that Zuckerberg did not trade on inside information and that he used a stock-trading plan that removes his control over sales and is designed to guard against insider trading. The plaintiff attorneys also contend that Sandberg and Zients used personal email accounts to communicate about key issues relating to the suit, and didn't turn off the auto-delete function, despite being told to preserve their records. McCormick is expected to rule on liability and damages months after the trial concludes. What has happened elsewhere? Given Facebook's global reach, the scandal spawned various types of litigation around the world. Canadian class-action lawsuits stemming from the Cambridge Analytica breach were rejected in a number of provincial jurisdictions. In addition, a Federal Court judge in 2023 dismissed the federal privacy watchdog's bid for a declaration that Facebook broke the the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, known as PIPEDA. The judge agreed with Facebook's argument that once a user authorizes it to disclose information to an app, the social media company's safeguarding duties under PIPEDA come to an end. In the U.K., Facebook was fined the maximum £500,000 ($921,000 Cdn) for breaches of its data protection laws. Meta late last year settled for $50 million Australian ($44 million Cdn) on a "no admission basis," after the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner alleged the country's privacy laws were breached. What was Cambridge Analytica's political impact? While the Democrats pounced on the revelations in 2018, its political impact was downplayed by many experts. A Nature magazine investigation concluded that "evidence of Cambridge Analytica's independent impact on voter behaviour is basically nonexistent" and that "there is also no evidence that Cambridge Analytica in fact deployed psychographic models while working for the Trump campaign." An expert from Tufts University in Massachusetts, in U.S. Senate testimony, said that it was likely many Facebook users were mistargeted, likening the approach to broad-based robocalls. "No evidence has been produced publicly about the firm's profiling or targeting to suggest that its efforts were effective," said Eitan Hersh of Tufts, author of the book Hacking the Electorate: How Campaigns Perceive Voters.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store