logo
Mark Latham defends conduct towards MP Alex Greenwich at final day of tribunal hearing

Mark Latham defends conduct towards MP Alex Greenwich at final day of tribunal hearing

Independent MP Mark Latham has told a tribunal that members of parliament "have disagreements all the time", as he defended his recent use of social media during a vilification and sexual harassment case brought by Sydney MP Alex Greenwich.
Mr Greenwich is suing the former federal Labor leader in the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT), alleging four public statements by Mr Latham breach the state's Anti-Discrimination Act.
One of the statements — a tweet posted by Mr Latham in March 2023 which referenced sexual activity in explicit terms — has already been found by the Federal Court to be defamatory.
Mr Greenwich was awarded $140,000 in that case.
Mr Latham's tweet came after Mr Greenwich gave a comment to a journalist describing Mr Latham as "a disgusting human being", when was asked about violence towards LGBT protesters who had gathered outside a church where Mr Latham was expected to speak.
On the final hearing day, Mr Latham was cross-examined by barrister Prue Bindon, for Mr Greenwich, about his employment status around the time of the tweet.
Mr Latham agreed he resigned in early March 2023 and was a candidate for the One Nation party.
Ms Bindon took Mr Latham through One Nation documents which recorded payment including $2,500 to Mr Latham, which Mr Latham believed was a refund of earlier expenses.
Mr Greenwich's legal team raised recent posts from Mr Latham on Twitter, now X, and expressed concern that if there are future references to the primary tweet or evocations of similar language, the harm to their client may be exacerbated.
Mr Latham's lawyer Zali Burrows complained about the "endless affidavits" being filed in the case.
Senior member Mandy Tibbey said "it's desirable there be a cessation of hostilities between the parties", suggesting they could reach some kind of undertaking before the tribunal makes its final decision.
In one recent post, Mr Latham suggested that the NCAT case involved an "absurd proposition" that Mr Greenwich should "never be publicly criticised".
Today he told the tribunal: "Clearly members of parliament have disagreements all the time."
He said his recent online activity was responding to issues raised in parliament, claiming there had been "two-and-a-half years of misrepresentations" about him and there came a point where he was entitled to respond.
Earlier, Mr Greenwich's husband Victor Hoeld, told the tribunal he was "very concerned" about the impact of public statements on Mr Greenwich.
But he said he tried to not watch "every single media clipping" or item in the media.
"It's very distressing to watch Alex struggle or be talked about … it's been going on for two years," Mr Hoeld said.
"It's had a big impact on my life.
"I try and avoid triggering events and interviews like that and watching them because of the effect it's had on me and Alex … it's basically changed everything."
Outside court, Mr Greenwich told the media he was "really relieved the hearing process is now over".
Each side will now give written submissions to the tribunal in late October.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Uluru truck mass murderer Douglas Crabbe's parole bid rejected in WA
Uluru truck mass murderer Douglas Crabbe's parole bid rejected in WA

ABC News

time18 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Uluru truck mass murderer Douglas Crabbe's parole bid rejected in WA

A convicted mass murderer who killed five people when he ploughed his semi-trailer into a packed pub at Uluru has had his bid for parole rejected in Western Australia. On August 18, 1983, in a fit of rage after being kicked out for intoxication, Douglas Crabbe slammed his truck into the side of the Inland Hotel. It resulted in the deaths of David Seng, 24, Adrian Durnin, 21, Helen Fuller, 22, Patricia Slinn, 45 and Leslie McKay-Ramsay, 35. Many others were seriously wounded in the attack. Crabbe is serving five consecutive life sentences for the crime. He has been eligible for parole since 2013, but his bids for freedom have been consistently denied by the government of Western Australia, where he is now incarcerated. The WA Prisoners Review Board confirmed Crabbe's latest bid for parole was rejected in July. WA Attorney-General Tony Buti said in a statement he had "decided not to release Douglas Crabbe at this time". "I have taken into account the seriousness of the offence, a crime where five people were murdered and a further 16 were injured, some seriously," he said. "I also considered the views of the surviving victims and persons affected by Mr Crabbe's actions. "A number of those have spoken publicly and written to me personally expressing their opposition to Mr Crabbe's release which was at the forefront of my decision." Crabbe was relocated to Acacia Prison near Perth from the Northern Territory in 2005. NT Attorney-General Marie-Clare Boothby said "the decision of the Western Australian Attorney-General is respected". "This horrific crime has had a profound and lasting impact on the victims, their families, and the wider community," she said. Among the survivors of the attack is Bernadette Schiller, who said she still suffers anxiety and PTSD from the terror of Crabbe's actions that night in 1983. "I am grateful that this bid for parole has not been granted," she said in a statement. "As a survivor of this horrific event, I cannot express strongly enough my belief that he should never be released. "The trauma and pain inflicted on the victims and their families will never fade. "It is of utmost importance that justice is served and that the safety of the community remains a priority." Ms Schiller said Crabbe had "never taken any responsibility or remorse for his actions". "His victims have been left with a never-ending nightmare," she said. Despite Ms Schiller's calls, the WA Prisoners Review Board confirmed Crabbe would again be eligible for parole in late 2026. By that time he will be 79 years old.

Coronial inquest into death of NT Police Constable Michael Deutrom concludes hearings
Coronial inquest into death of NT Police Constable Michael Deutrom concludes hearings

ABC News

time18 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Coronial inquest into death of NT Police Constable Michael Deutrom concludes hearings

A weeks-long coronial inquest into the death of Northern Territory Police Constable Michael Deutrom has ended, shining a light on the mental health challenges facing frontline police. Warning: This story contains references to suicide and will be distressing for some readers. Constable Deutrom took his own life in April 2022, after two decades of service in the NT police force. He was one of three NT police officers who died by suicide in the first half of that year. The inquest, which began in May, has heard he faced significant stress and had limited time off work during his final posting in the remote Central Australian community of Kintore. Constable Deutrom's clinicians and expert psychiatrists testified that he experienced several significant traumas throughout his 23-year career, and he was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) just days before his death. The inquest heard Constable Deutrom was never referred to a psychiatrist and NT Police did not investigate his death internally. Two witnesses also described a workplace culture inside the NT Police Force in which officers felt worried they would be sacked if they were unable to return to frontline duties. Concluding the inquest hearings on Thursday, NT Coroner Elisabeth Armitage said she hoped to make recommendations that could provide better care and earlier interventions to support the mental health of serving NT police officers, when she delivered her findings at a later date. "I'm sure that you've seen that all of us in this courtroom have been affected by the evidence we've heard," Judge Armitage said. "Each [suicide death] is a tragedy for the families that involved — none more so than the passing of Michael Deutrom, who was a courageous, brave, contributing member of our community. In a statement, members of Constable Deutrom's family — who watched proceedings both in court and via video link — expressed gratitude for the support they had been shown. "We are grateful to the coroner for conducting the inquest into the death of our brother, son and uncle, and the compassion she has shown", the statement said. "We sincerely appreciate the support we have received during this difficult time." The inquest heard the NT Police Force had conducted an internal review into its wellbeing unit. It also heard the force had withdrawn the police motto "service before self" and was contacting police commissioners across Australia to discuss best approaches to improving mental health among staff. In addition to the stress of his frontline duties, the inquest previously heard Constable Deutrom experienced significant anxiety when he was cross-examined at a coronial inquest. That pressure faced by police officers was laid bare during the inquest earlier on Thursday, when Assistant Commissioner Peter Kennon was cross-examined about the police force's response to Constable Deutrom's death. During cross-examination, NT Police Association counsel Ray Murphy asked if Assistant Commissioner Kennon had "bothered" to read certain documents related to the case, and whether evidence he had given about staffing levels in remote communities was "misleading". NT Police counsel Mark Roberts drew a parallel between Constable Deutrom's experience and Assistant Commissioner Kennon's cross-examination, arguing some questioning had been "over the top". "We are examining the death by suicide of a police officer — we have heard evidence in this case that that was a stress police officers had experienced, in giving evidence," he said. "Some care and attention needs to be given to the mental health of people in this courtroom who are being subjected to a cross examination and have been since yesterday, which quite frankly is over the top." Coroner Elisabeth Armitage ultimately allowed the question, but warned Mr Murphy to "contain" the manner of his examination. "I am interested in the wellbeing of all police officers," Judge Armitage said. "I try to conduct these proceedings in a way which are not going to create additional harm." Assistant Commissioner Kennon clarified his evidence in response to Mr Murphy's question, saying NT police had increased the number of police positions available in particular remote communities, but the force still struggled with recruitment.

Writers withdraw from Bendigo Writers Festival over censorship concerns
Writers withdraw from Bendigo Writers Festival over censorship concerns

ABC News

time18 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Writers withdraw from Bendigo Writers Festival over censorship concerns

A number of writers have withdrawn from the Bendigo Writers Festival in central Victoria over concerns about censorship of discussions relating the Israel-Gaza war. Indigenous writer Evelyn Araluen is among the guests of the three-day event, which begins today, who have criticised the festival's code of conduct. "I shall not be in Bendigo for the writers festival this weekend. I refuse to sign on to a code of conduct prohibiting critique of Israel and Zionism," she said. A spokesperson for Ms Araluen said the festival's code of conduct "directly infringes on Evelyn's freedom of speech, her academic speech, her cultural duty as a First Nations woman and her obligation as someone with a large platform to speak out against oppression, which includes speaking out against Israel's ongoing UN-defined genocide of the Palestinian people". Writer Randa Abdel-Fattah, whose most recent book 'Discipline' deals directly with issues surrounding Israeli-Palestinian conflict, has also withdrawn from the festival. "At a time when journalists are being permanently silenced by Israel's genocidal forces, it is incomprehensible that a writers' festival should also seek to silence Palestinian voices," she said. Author Kate Mildenhall also said she had withdrawn over concerns about the code of conduct, in solidarity with other writers. "Given that one of the threads of the conversation I was due to host at [Bendigo Writers Festival] included the topic of censorship, it is deeply regrettable that BWF has imposed a code of conduct that seeks to limit discussion," she said. "I did not receive the code of conduct and many other writers may be in this position. I have been made aware of it, and my decision to withdraw is one of solidarity." La Trobe University, which is involved in hosting some panels for the event, issued a statement saying it acknowledged the decision by some writers to withdraw. "La Trobe University supports the BWF to have measures in place to ensure respectful exchange of views as well as community safety, and notes that codes of conduct are not unusual at writers' festivals," a spokesperson said. "La Trobe University does not tolerate racism of any kind, including antisemitism and Islamophobia. "La Trobe's commitment to academic freedom and freedom of speech is consistent with our approach to creating safe environments for the free exchange of ideas." The ABC has contacted the Bendigo Writers Festival for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store